Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Review

Estrus Cycle, Pyometra, and Insulin-Resistant Diabetes in the Bitch: What is Known and Why it is Relevant?

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Submitted:

16 February 2024

Posted:

19 February 2024

You are already at the latest version

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Abstract
Correlations among estrus cycle, pyometra, and canine diabetes mellitus (CDM) have been described since the late 1950s, and substantial progress in understanding mechanisms beyond was achieved nowadays. Progesterone-related diabetes mellitus (PRDM) in dogs is known for its particular potential for diabetes remission. Thus, a deep understanding of the physiopathological aspects involved is crucial to postulate treatment guidelines to improve the PRDM remission rate, as well as to inform preventive measures. This narrative review aims to provide relevant detailed information on 1) canine estrus cycle and its impact on CDM etiology and management, 2) the role of pyometra as a further cause of insulin resistance, and 3) useful individual therapeutic and preventive strategies. Pharmacological annulment of progesterone effects, as well as inflammatory and progesterone-related conditions resolution in association with adequate exogenous insulin therapy, and residual beta cell function, are key aspects to achieve remission, or at least to improve diabetic clinical control. In this way, spaying should be considered mandatory in most PRDM cases. Preventive measures against CDM can include spaying recommendations; however, individual-based recommendations should be considered since castration may be associated with some long-term health issues.
Keywords: 
diestrus
;  
progesterone
;  
growth hormone
;  
insulin resistance
;  
insulin receptor
;  
spaying
;  
aglepristone
;  
dog
Subject: 
Medicine and Pharmacology  -   Veterinary Medicine

1. Introduction

Diestrus is often associated with canine diabetes mellitus (CDM) [1,2], and this relationship has been recognized since the late 1950s [3,4]. Entire females and diestrus occurrence were identified as potential risk factors for CDM [5,6] and in regions where neutering is not a routine for the majority of the bitches, progesterone-related diabetes mellitus (PRDM) is probably the main form of CDM [6,7,8,9]. Less often, pregnancy may also trigger CDM [10,11]. Pyometra, another typical diestrus-associated disease [12] has also been related to CDM [4,11,13,14] and insulin resistance [15,16], not just because of the diestrus hormonal environment, but also due to the inflammatory and septic characteristics of this condition. These particular insulin-resistant CDM subtypes deserve attention since they are potentially reversible after removing the insulin-resistance cause [10,11,14]. Notwithstanding, molecular mechanisms involved in the insulin-resistant state of bitches in diestrus or with pyometra have been explored in the last years bringing new insights about insulin resistance in dogs [16,17,18]. This narrative review´s purpose is to summarize recent advances in the field of diestrus and pyometra-related insulin resistance and help clinicians understand why straightforward management is mandatory with intact diabetic bitches to improve their glycemic control and eventually achieve remission, as well as to inform potential preventive measures.

2. Canine Estrus Cycle: The Progesterone Perspective

The bitch is considered monoestrus, typically non-seasonal species with polytocous spontaneous ovulation [19]. The cycle is divided into four distinct phases: proestrus, estrus, diestrus, and anestrus. Inter-estrus intervals last around six months but can range from 5-12 months according to the breed, age, and environmental factors and correspond to the period between the end of estrus and the beginning of a new proestrus [20,21]. The proestrus and estrus phases share similarities with the proliferative (follicular) phase of the menstrual cycle and are marked by estrogenic influence, while diestrus is characterized by progesterone dominance similar to the secretory (luteal) phase of the menstrual cycle [19,20,21,22]. However, in the bitch, progesterone starts rising during the proestrus and estrus before corpus luteum (CL) formation [19,20,21,22,23].
During proestrus, the bitch shows estrogen-related heat signs (swallowed vulva, vaginal serosanguinous discharge, male attraction) but refuses male mount [19,22]. Estrogens’ effects promote serial anatomical modifications in the reproductive tract, including fimbria proliferation, oviduct thickening, uterine horns’ elongation, and cervix enlargement [19,21,22]. Estrogens also cause vaginal epithelium and endometrial proliferation [24,25] and are associated with a progesterone-sensitizing effect by progesterone-receptors upregulation [26]. Estrogen also positively influences theca cells steroidogenesis to avoid progesterone secretion, at this point – is just a hormonal precursor. Under luteinizing hormone (LH) influence, the theca cells produce androgens that will be further aromatized by the granulosa cells. The follicular stimulating hormone (FSH) not only promotes ovarian follicular recruitment and development but also upregulates aromatase activity within granulosa cells [20,27]. Progesterone levels can vary from < 0.5 ng/mL at the beginning of the proestrus to > 1 ng/mL at the proestrus’ end [22,23]. Progesterone rising concentration, associated with decreased estrogen production by follicular cells, determines estrus (heat) beginning and its characteristic behavior [19,21,28].
Progesterone levels keep rising during estrus and are around 2-3 ng/mL by the time of the LH peak and can range between 4-10 ng/mL by the time of ovulation [23,28]. Interestingly, progesterone secretion during these phases derives from follicular cells (theca cells) before “luteinization” and may be seen as a kind of steroidogenic precursor leakage due to increased production of precursors that will be further aromatized within follicular granulosa cells to synthesize estrogen under follicular stimulating hormone (FSH) influence [19,21,27]. In contrast, during diestrus, progesterone is the main steroidogenic product released from the CL due to diverse functional and morphologic modifications promoted by the LH on the follicular cells after ovulation [19,20,21,22].
Diestrus starts with the moment when the bitch starts to refuse the male mount [21]. After the CL formation progesterone concentration keeps rising during the first 2-3 weeks of the diestrus reaching plateau values ranging from 15-90 ng/mL [21,23,28]. During this phase, the bitch is considered physiologically pregnant since there is no pregnancy recognition system in the dog. In this way, in non-pregnant bitches, CL remains functional for 10 to 30 days longer than observed in pregnant bitches, where CL suffers abrupt lysis by prostaglandins action around 65 days after fertilization as part of parturition onset [21]. Pituitary prolactin, as well as LH, are important luteotropic factors during diestrus, helping to sustain relatively high progesterone levels [19,20,29]. Progesterone promotes and keeps endometrial growth as well as endometrial glandular activity and suppresses myometrial activity and intra-uterine leukocyte function while keeping the cervix closed [25,27]. These actions are fundamental for gestation maintenance but happen independently of fetal presence. The diestrus longs around 56-58 days in the pregnant bitch and can vary from 60 to 100 days in the non-pregnant ones. The end of diestrus is marked by progesterone levels < 1 ng/mL and basal estrogen levels [19,20,21,22,23].
The next phase, anestrus, is marked by the downregulation of ovarian activity and resultant basal levels of estrogens and progesterone [19,23,28]. Uterine involution occurs, and also ovaries, vaginal epithelium, and mammary glands return to a basal state [21,25].

Estrus’ cycle effects on mammary glands

The mammary glands also exhibit responses to the gonadal hormone fluctuations during the estrus cycle. While estrogens promote ductal and tubular growth, progesterone initiates and promotes glandular development [21]. By the end of diestrus, prolactin increase associated with a progressive reduction in progesterone concentration can cause overt lactation and galactorrhea [20,27,29]. Some bitches would also show maternal behavior by adopting and protecting inanimate objects or other animals, a clinical scenario called pseudocyesis [30]. Noteworthy, progesterone also induces growth hormone (GH) production by ductal cells in the mammary glands [31]. This progesterone-induced GH should exert local autocrine and paracrine effects to promote mammary gland physiological proliferation and differentiation during diestrus. However, some mammary GH can be secreted into the blood and exert endocrine effects [32]. Endometrial hyperplastic changes [33], insulin resistance [34], and eventually overt acromegaly are some of the progesterone-induced GH effects [32,35]. Pituitary and gonadal hormone fluctuations during the canine estrus cycle are represented in Figure 1, as well as described GH variation during diestrus.

3. Diabetes Mellitus and the Estrus cycle effects on Insulin Sensitivity

The ALIVE project of the European Society of Veterinary Endocrinology defines diabetes mellitus as a heterogeneous group of diseases with multiple etiologies characterized by hyperglycemia resulting from inadequate insulin secretion, inadequate insulin action, or both [36]. The global prevalence of CDM from published literature ranges from 0.15 to 1.33% while sex and gonadal status (entire or desexed) predisposition to CDM varies according to the population studied [6,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44]. However, is generally accepted that entire females are at increased risk for CDM development due to the influence of diestrus [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,11,43]. Female dogs have a two-fold higher CDM incidence compared to males, and nearly 75% of the diagnosed dogs with DM are females [5,6,7,8,43,44]; however, this distribution can show a vast range. The reduction in synthetic progestin use as a contraceptive and systematic neutering of non-breeding dogs can make CDM incidence similar between males and females [45]. A study from Canarias found that 79.3% of CDM cases were in females, and 87% of them were entire [8]. A 95% female prevalence (19 out of 20 dogs) was documented in a case series in Southern Brazil in the early 2000s, and 68.4% of those were in diestrus at the time of CDM diagnosis [7]. In contrast, an American case series with 65 diabetic bitches found that only 8% were in diestrus at the time of CDM diagnosis [46], and in some studies [37,40], desexed males appear at CDM risk.
The dog’s breed, and of course, its genetic background also play a role in the impact of the estrus cycle on insulin sensitivity and CDM predisposition. To note, in the Australian Terrier Dog, no significant difference in the effect of males and females on CDM outcome was identified [47]. Nordic breeds like the Swedish and the Norwegian Eukhounds are at increased risk for progesterone-related diabetes mellitus (PRDM) [11]. However, in the American Eskimo Dog, an increased risk for CDM was documented in neutered females [48]. Genetic analyses have been characterizing dog breeds at risk of CDM, as well as breeds somehow protected [46,49,50], and despite certain haplotypes being overrepresented among susceptible breeds, to carry a genotype associated with CDM phenotype does not warrant overt diabetes at certain life stage, and complex environmental interactions are probably involved with disease development in genetically predisposed animals [2,49]. Heritability studies have suggested that the mode of inheritance of DM in certain breeds is polygenic, with no evidence for a single gene of large effect causing CDM, and genetic uniformity for diabetes-susceptible genes would better explain individual susceptibility [47,48]. Notwithstanding, breed-related phenotypes and monogenic CDM forms could be better characterized soon [2].
Given the heterogeneous pathogenesis of CDM, common risk factors associated with insulin-resistant diabetes (IRD) such as obesity, diestrus, hypercortisolism, hypersomatotropism, progestins, and glucocorticoids exposure can act as triggers in previously susceptible dogs [2,5,6,9,11,45]. Environmental factors triggering types 1 and 2 DM in humans are well understood, and potentially other environmental factors such as diet, exercise, infections, and diseases (pancreatitis, pyometra) also have a role in these complex interactions regarding CDM pathogenesis [2].
The most important feature of PRDM cases is its potential reversibility after the removal of the progesterone source, confirming the insulin-resistant nature of this condition [10,11,14]. When no remission is achieved after the end of diestrus, pregnancy termination, or after ovariectomy and no other insulin resistance cause is identifiable, bitches are often reclassified as insulin-deficient diabetes (IDD) [45]. Despite some cases still having some positive staining cells for insulin in pancreatic islands and showing no evidence of immune-mediated insulitis, beta cell mass, and serum insulin are marked reduced [8]. The resultant need for exogenous insulin therapy to control clinical signs and to avoid diabetic complications and death [46] after resolution of insulin-resistance causes is often attributable to glucotoxicity [1,11,14], a phenomenon associated with beta cell death after chronic exposure to hyperglycemia [51,52]. In contrast, ovariectomy in bitches was associated with increased insulin secretion capacity due to pancreatic islets’ hypertrophy [53].

3.1. Progesterone: The evil one?

The last proestrus days are characterized by discrete estrogen concentration reduction, while progesterone starts to rise at the beginning of the estrus [19,20,21,22]. In this way, the estrogen: progesterone ratio is marked reduced during the late estrus period, and especially during diestrus. The PRDM is often observed during physiological diestrus but also may be secondary to pregnancy, ovarian remnant syndrome, and possible other ovarian diseases, or even iatrogenic due to the use of synthetic progestins [11,14,32,46,54]. Curiously, CDM secondary to progesterone-secreting corticoadrenal tumors is yet to be demonstrated in dogs [55]. Despite the similarities between the dynamics of insulin resistance in pregnant bitches and women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) [56], as well as several common clinical characteristics such as increased severity near full-term pregnancy, this concept is not well applied to bitches since the mechanisms behind GDM and PRDM are different [1].
Human GDM is characterized as carbohydrate intolerance (fasting glucose > 92 mg/dL or serum glucose > 180 mg/dL one hour, or > 153 mg/dL two hours after an oral 50g glucose tolerance test) first identified during pregnancy, and these diagnostic criteria have been often lapidated over years [56,57]. The ALIVE project has proposed new cutoffs for CDM, and briefly, diabetes can be assumed in a dog showing diabetes classic clinical signs (Pu/Pd, polyphagia, and weight loss) associated with a random glycemia > 200 mg/dL, or eventually, in a dog showing persistent fasting glycemia > 126 mg/dL, but < 200 mg/dL, associated with elevated glycated proteins such as fructosamine, independently of clinical signs presence [36]. Several comments and alerts accompany those criteria. This new view on diabetes diagnosis has created the figure of subclinical diabetes to describe patients that meet CDM diagnostic criteria; however, do not have overt classical clinical signs. Most women with GDM do not develop clinical signs as well [56,57,58]. To date, no published research has applied these new concepts to investigate actual PRDM incidence in bitches during diestrus, pregnancy, or other progesterone-related conditions. However, a recent study found that only 3.5% of the dogs identified with random hyperglycemia between 126 and 200 mg/dL needed insulin treatment somewhere in the future [60], and none of those cases were in diestrus or pregnant at the time hyperglycemia was first documented. In women, GDM prevalence varies from 1-14% according to the studied population [59], and genetics [61], ethnicity [62], and overweight status [63] are known risk factors. The same relationships were also documented in the bitch, since certain breeds are at a clear increased risk for PRDM [11], and previous overweight was identified as an additional risk factor for PRDM in Elkhounds [64].
Insulin resistance is considered worse by the second half of gestation for both women [65] and bitches [56], and pregnant bitches are more insulin-resistant than bitches in diestrus [11,21,66,67]. After parturition, glucose tolerance is restored in about 90% of the GDM cases [68]; however, there is an increased risk for women who develop GDM to overt type-2 DM in the future. Also, after the first GDM episode, the condition is highly expected in subsequent gestations [59]. In the bitch, better outcomes, including diabetes remission, were obtained after spaying surgery or medical pregnancy interruption [10,11], and in cases with spontaneous diabetes remission after the end of diestrus, relapse is expected in the next estrus cycle [3,4,10,14,21]. Nevertheless, is not clear if bitches that achieve PRDM remission are at risk for future CDM by other causes [1]. Fetal macrosomia, maternal or newborn mortality, dystocia, and neonatal hypoglycemia are the main GDM complications [10,11,65]. Despite would be natural to expect the same complications in diabetic pregnant bitches, there is very poor evidence in veterinary literature that diabetes during pregnancy causes the same risks for the bitch or the litter [1,10,66,67]; however, the pregnancy termination decision was common in pregnant diabetic bitches [10,14]. A small case series of gestational diabetes in dogs [10] found that dystocia occurred in 80% of the bitches reaching full-term pregnancy, and 50% were diagnosed as diabetic when seeking medical attention for dystocia. The study also reported a 27% neonatal mortality which was considered higher than mortality rates described for puppies delivered naturally (10-15%) or by cesarean section (20%) [10]. Clinicians should be aware of these potential outcomes and the difficulties in regulating glucose levels during gestation [66,67].
The influence of diestrus on insulin sensitivity in bitches is often associated with progesterone-controlled GH overproduction; however, progesterone itself seems to be guilty by its direct mechanisms. Progesterone was associated with reduced insulin binding to the insulin receptor (IR) [70] and suppressed intracellular insulin signaling pathways by multiple mechanisms [71] in adipocyte cultures. A more recent study in a mouse model [72] showed that progesterone can cause increased hepatic glucose production via gluconeogenesis under limited or impaired action of insulin which may exacerbate hyperglycemia in diabetes where insulin action is limited. These effects cause insulin resistance and may predispose to glucose intolerance due to reduced glucose transport in target tissues in the bitch [73].
Glucose homeostasis biomarkers and their relationship with progesterone, GH, and Insulin-like growth factor type-1 (IGF-1) were compared in PRDM-susceptible healthy Elkhounds during anestrus and diestrus and other breeds in anestrus and diestrus [74]. Elkhounds showed increased serum insulin, C-peptide concentration, and HOMA (homeostatic model assessment) for beta-cell function during diestrus compared with anestrus, while the HOMA for insulin sensitivity was lower, suggesting increased beta-cell function due to insulin resistance, while non-Elkhounds dogs showed similar insulin secretion and sensitivity markers during anestrus and diestrus. GH and IGF-1 concentrations did not differ during diestrus in Elkhounds and non-Elkhounds dogs when compared with anestrus results, but progesterone [74]. This finding suggests progesterone-direct mechanisms can be primarily involved in insulin resistance in Elkhound dogs. However, each 1 ng/mL increase in GH serum concentration was associated with a 12.7% increase in the HOMA for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and IGF-1 concentration was positively correlated with C-peptide concentration in Swedish Elkhounds, showing that GH also exerts a strong insulin resistance effect during diestrus [75]. A study about natural estrous cycle effects in normal and diabetic bitches concerning glucose and insulin tests showed that intact naturally diabetic bitches in diestrus have severely suppressed insulin secretion compared with estrus or anestrus [76]. Another study [77] showed that progesterone treatment caused mild insulin resistance together with depletion of pancreatic insulin stores in the long run.
In human GDM, not only progesterone is involved, and multifaceted mechanisms probably involve both hormonal, placental, genetic, and epigenetic contributions, as well as activity level, diet/microbiome, and overweight/obesity [65]. Probably, most of these complex variables may also be involved in PRDM in dogs [2]. Regarding hormonal factors, cortisol, prolactin, and placental lactogen worsen progesterone-induced insulin resistance during pregnancy [70]. Hyperprolactinemia is a known cause of insulin resistance in humans, and despite prolactin's rise during diestrus in dogs as a luteotropic factor [19,20,29], the role of prolactin corroborating insulin resistance induction in dogs is unknown. In contrast, mammary GH endocrine secretion in response to progesterone does not occur in women [1].

3.2. How Growth Hormone Causes Insulin Resistance?

The diabetogenic role of progesterone-controlled GH overproduction in dogs is well documented since the early 1980s after the recognition of the first acromegaly case in a bitch exposed to synthetic progestogens [78]. GH is a classic insulin counterregulatory hormone [79] and can reduce IR density in cell membranes and secondary glucose uptake in insulin target tissues [80]. Other authors argue that IR downregulation is secondary to the hyperinsulinemia provoked by the GH [34]. The GH lipolytic effects also counteract insulin effects [79,80,81]. Accumulated evidence suggests that GH modulates insulin sensitivity by multiple mechanisms since GH and IGF-1 intracellular signaling pathways converge with insulin signaling pathways [34]. Chronic GH exposure is associated with muscle tissue reduced phosphorylation of the IR and the IR substrates IRS-1 and IRS-2, reduced association p85/IRS-1, and reduced PI3K activity. On the other hand, in the liver, GH excess is associated with chronic activation of the pathway IR/IRS-1/PI3K blocking activation by insulin. This aspect suggests the liver is the main insulin-resistance site in response to GH. Moreover, insulin modulation action by GH also seems to involve mechanisms of signaling attenuation such as increased expression of SOCS (suppressor of cytokine signaling) proteins and increased IRS-1 phosphorylation in serine residues [34,79]. Adiponectin and visfatin modulation by GH may also corroborate GH-induced insulin resistance [34].
Diestrus and medroxyprogesterone treatment were associated with absent GH suppression due to hyperglycemia in bitches [32,82] suggesting autonomous GH production, later shown arising from the mammary glands [31]. During diestrus, pulsatile pituitary GH secretion is perturbed by the mammary GH production, with a resultant increase in GH serum concentration and reduction in GH pulsatile secretion from by pituitary. During diestrus, progesterone fluctuations positively correlate with GH serum concentration. In contrast, medroxyprogesterone-treated bitches exhibit a chronic non-pulsatile increased serum mammary GH [32,82].

3.3. Do estrogens play a role in insulin sensitivity?

Estrogens are poorly studied in veterinary medicine concerning insulin sensitivity impact. However, some entire diabetic bitches under insulin treatment may experience diabetes poorly controlled during proestrus. In this phase, there is a predominant estrogen effect. Anestrus’ estrogen basal levels (5-15 pg/mL) are progressively increased during proestrus due to follicular activity and can reach plateau levels above 60-70 pg/mL days before estrus [19,20,21,22]. Despite in humans some insulin-resistant states like the end of pregnancy or polycystic ovarian syndrome being associated with higher estrogen concentration [83], estrogens have been claimed to have serial protective effects in insulin-target tissues and other organs in post-menopause women [84]. These effects were documented in the pancreas (improved fasting insulinemia and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion), liver (modulatory effect on gluconeogenesis, improved insulin response, reduced hepatic insulin degradation), adipose tissue (improved insulin sensitivity, reduced oxidative stress), skeletal muscle (improved insulin-stimulated glucose absorption), heart (mitigation of insulin-induced cardiomyopathy and improved cardiac function), and in the vascular endothelium (increased nitric oxide production and vasodilation response) [84].
Sequential estrogen and progesterone administration in healthy bitches in anestrus showed that the hypoglycemic effect of insulin was enhanced by estrogenization, together with insulin accumulation in Langerhans islets [77] despite some degree of glucose intolerance and higher free fatty acids were also documented in bitches treated with estrogens [85].
An inhibitory estrogen effect on insulin-dependent glucose transporters (GLUT-4) was demonstrated in a mice model. Neutering reversibly increased GLUT-4 expression after estrogen repositioning in muscle and adipose tissue. The GLUT-4 upregulation after spaying leads to adipose hypertrophy and eventual adipose differentiation [86]; however, estradiol supplementation can restore weight, reduce appetite, and increase physical activity [87]. Notwithstanding, GLUT-4 cellular distribution in intraabdominal white adipose tissue was documented to be smaller in obese bitches compared with lean ones during anestrus [88]. Also, estrogen can negatively interact with an estrogen-responsive nuclear factor regulating lipoprotein lipase (LPL) expression [87], resulting in increased fatty acids influx to adipocytes after gonadectomy [89]. These findings may help to explain the weight gain after neutering in bitches [90]. Mechanisms behind the inhibitory effect of estrogen on GLUT-4 are not completely understood; however, estrogen-receptor (ER) subtypes are probably involved. ER-alfa stimulation activates GLUT-4 expression, and the ER-beta stimulation, which is upregulated during the estrogenic phase of the estrus cycle suppresses it [86]. Curiously, estrus was associated to worsen insulin receptor (IR) binding affinity in a study on insulin binding properties in bitches in different estrus cycle phases, but increased IR concentration seemed to compensate for it [18].

3.4. Estrus cycle effects on markers of insulin sensitivity.

The heterogeneous nature of PRDM in bitches can be realized through the different impacts of diestrus on markers of insulin sensitivity [74,75] and PRDM-susceptibility among different breeds [43,46,48] as previously exposed. In this way, studies performed in more heterogeneous populations such as convenience hospital-population cases seen in clinical routines are less prone to identify a clear impact of the estrus cycle on insulin sensitivity markers [74]. Fasting glucose, serum fructosamine, fructosamine to albumin ratio, insulinemia, HOMA-B, HOMA-IR, insulinogenic index, and amended insulin to glucose ratio (AI:GR) were compared in a small heterogeneous breed (most mongrel) group of “lean” (body condition scores 4-6/9) bitches in anestrus, estrus, or diestrus [15]. Age, weight, and BCS were similar among groups, and despite no statistically significant difference detected in the studied variables, the mean insulinogenic index [II = fasting insulin (μU/mL) / fasting glucose (mg/dL)] of bitches in diestrus was higher than the suggested cut-off for insulin resistance (> 0.235) and 33% higher than II documented in bitches in anestrus or estrus [15].
Fasting insulin concentration, and its correlation with fasting glycemia explored by complex formulas such as HOMA-B and HOMA-IR, is not adequately validated for use in veterinary medicine since HOMA models were developed to be applied in humans [91], and HOMA models can fail to demonstrate insulin resistance in dogs [92]. The AI:GR corrected insulin: glucose ratio can be applied in hypoglycemic patients’ investigation, even though its use for insulinoma diagnosis is questionable [93]. In these ways, fasting insulinemia and basal II are probably the simplest methods to assess insulin resistance in the dog in contrast with gold-standard clamp methods [94]. Nevertheless, a 40% reduction in insulin sensitivity in bitches in diestrus shown by the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic glucose clamp technique was not associated with differences in baseline insulin or baseline glucose plasma concentrations [95].
Insulin resistance may induce hyperlipidemia [96]. No significative differences were found in total lipids, serum triglycerides, or total cholesterol in bitches during anestrus, estrus, or diestrus; however, intact diabetic bitches showed increased serum lipids results compared to non-diabetic ones, and results were higher during estrogenic and luteal phases compared with anestrus. Also, the triglycerides response to an insulin tolerance test (ITT) was greater in bitches in anestrus compared to bitches in seasons [97]
Intravenous-glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) was applied to assess insulin resistance in bitches in anestrus, estrus, or diestrus, but no differences in basal glycemia or insulinemia, neither glucose nor insulin responses in the times studied could be identified [18]. The same bitches were submitted to ovariohysterectomy after IVGTT´s end and rectus abdominis muscle samples were collected for further studies. Muscle tissue membranes were extracted and submitted to tyrosine-kinase [17] and insulin binding experiments [18]. Those studies' results brought evidence that the estrus cycle impacts insulin action at the IR and post-receptor steps.
The IR belongs to a subfamily of tyrosine kinase (TK) receptors, and so do the type-I insulin-like growth factor (IGF-IR) and the orphan insulin receptor-related receptor (IRR) [98]. Insulin and IGF-1 may cross-bind their receptors with different affinities [34,79]. Rectus abdominis muscle membranes’ TK activity (cpm/µg of protein) was significantly (P<0.001) smaller in estrus (57%) and diestrus (51%) in comparison with bitches in anestrus [17] suggesting a modulatory effect of estrus cycle’s seasons in the TK-family receptor's ability to phosphorylate intracellular substrates. Post-binding steps in insulin signaling, such as reduced TK activity, decreased expression of insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1), and increased levels of the p85α subunit of PI 3-kinase are mainly involved as causes of insulin resistance in women with gestational diabetes mellitus, [99].
IRs are a transmembrane tetrameric protein that consists of two α- and two β-subunits. Insulin binding to the extracellular monomeric α-subunits leads to the intracellular activation of the intrinsic kinase activity of the β-subunits [81]. Two ligand binding sites are often recognized in each α-subunit monomer due to their curvilinear Scatchard plots, and negative cooperativity: the low-affinity/high-capacity (S1) and the high-affinity/low-capacity (S2) binding sites [18,100,101]. The insulin-IR interaction is reversible, and at equilibrium, for each insulin-IR complex formed, another insulin-IR complex dissociates at the same rate. The dissociation constant (Kd) is then considered to be the inverse association constant (Ka) and depicts the insulin-free concentration needed to saturate half of the IR in the system [102], or in competitive binding experiments, the cold insulin concentration needed to reduce maximal 125I-insulin binding by 50% [99]. Therefore, Kd is assumed as a measure of tissue insulin resistance, and the higher the Kd, the smaller the insulin sensitivity.
Insulin binding studies in the rectus abdominis muscle of bitches showed Kd values 4.3-fold and 2.8-fold increase in estrus and diestrus, respectively, in comparison with Kd values of bitches in anestrus (P< 0.001) [18]. However, this receptor-level resistance was accompanied by a 2.4-fold and 3.5-fold increase in the maximum binding capacity (BMax) of the muscle tissue’s membrane of bitches in estrus and diestrus, respectively, compared with anestrus. These results highlighted that muscle tissue became more insulin-resistant during estrus and diestrus due to elevated Kd values. However, the maximum insulin binding capacity during these estrous cycle phases has increased and seems to compensate for the lower binding affinity, resulting in absent differences in basal fasting glycemia and insulinemia, as well as insulin and glucose responses during an IVGTT [16,18]. Curiously, different physiological conditions seem to modulate insulin binding characteristics only at the high-affinity/low-capacity binding sites in dogs [18,101] suggesting that the low-affinity/high-capacity binding sites could have a more constitutive role, less susceptible to modulation. Chronic exposure of bitches to estradiol and progesterone caused insulin resistance in the whole body, but primarily in the skeletal muscle [103] and the estrogenic phase of the canine estrus cycle was associated with reduced peripheral (mainly muscle) insulin sensitivity [104]. Therefore, reduced muscle TK activity, as well as, altered modulation of insulin binding affinity and maximum capacity may play a role in insulin-resistance induction and IRD predisposition in dogs [17,18].

4. Pyometra and its impact on insulin sensitivity

Pyometra is a common illness in middle-aged to older intact female dogs and is characterized by an acute or chronic suppurative bacterial infection of the uterus postestrus with the accumulation of inflammatory exudate in the uterine lumen leading to several local and systemic clinical signs [12,105,106]. The condition is considered progesterone-dependent since progesterone effects within the uterus help the infection development which can be life-threatening. Most cases develop during diestrus, and clinical manifestation often occurs within four months of estrus [106,107]. Pyometra commonly is associated with previous cystic endometrial hyperplasia (CEH), despite the condition can occur independently [12,109]. Mammary GH overproduction due to progesterone seems to also have a role in the pathogeny since IGF-1 is potentially involved in endometrial hyperplasia during diestrus predisposing to CEH- pyometra complex (CEH-P) [33]
Since CDM and pyometra were first correlated back in the ’60s [13], very few published research explored pyometra as a cause of insulin resistance [11,14]. Pyometra represents an additional insulin resistance factor over diestrus due to its inflammatory and septic nature [14,105,109]. Similar to diestrus and pregnancy, CEH-P can overt DM in some bitches [11] and ovariohysterectomy may cause DM remission [14]. The former study that proposed a link between CDM and pyometra suggested that both conditions were preceded by obesity suggesting the existence of a diabetes mellitus-obesity-pyometra syndrome [13]. At that time, most CDM case presentations were considered closed cervix pyometra cases due to obesity, polyuria/polydipsia, and a recent estrus history [4,13]. Pyometra is considered more prevalent among certain breeds such as Bernese Mountain Dog, Great Dane, Leonberger, Rottweiler, Irish Wolfhound, Staffordshire Bull Terrier, Keeshond, Bull Terrier, Bouvier de Flandres, and Newfoundland [12], and some (Terriers, Keeshond, Rottweiler) were also overrepresented among dogs with CDM [13,21,49,50]. Swedish Elkhounds have a relatively lower risk of pyometra compared with other breeds but are highly susceptible to PRDM. Pyometra was documented in 17% of a population of female Elkhounds with PRDM [11].
Insulin resistance secondary to pyometra was associated with higher basal serum insulin and higher area under the curve after an intravenous glucose load, as well as glucose intolerance during the IVGTT. These features normalized after pyometra surgical resolution and antibiotic treatment [16]. Reversal of the diestrus hormonal environment by ovariohysterectomy, as well as the removal of the infection focus, were considered the main mechanisms driving insulin resistance control. However, an eventual role of the antibiotic treatment modulating microbiome and further impacting insulin sensitivity could be also involved [6]. Furthermore, altered insulin binding characteristics and reduced basal membrane TK activity were characterized in the muscle tissue of bitches with pyometra, suggesting that the mechanisms of pyometra-induced insulin resistance involve insulin signaling at receptor and post-receptor levels [16].
The mean Kd values for the high-affinity/low-capacity insulin binding sites of bitches with pyometra was 6.27-fold higher than observed in bitches in anestrus, and 2.63-fold higher than in bitches in diestrus. Despite higher Kd values were compensated by increased Bmax capacity during diestrus, there were no differences in this parameter in bitches with pyometra compared with diestrus. Failure to further increase the binding capacity due to the reduced IR binding affinity was associated with the insulin resistance and glucose intolerance documented in the IVGTT. Also, muscle membrane TK activity was reduced (65%, P<0.001) in bitches with pyometra compared to anestrus but did not differ from TK activity documented in bitches in diestrus [16].
Increased concentration of inflammatory cytokines (TNF-a, IL-1, IL-6) under sepsis, or chronic inflammation conditions, inhibits insulin signaling through different mechanisms, including reduced TK activity and reduced insulin binding affinity [109,110,111,112,113]. In this scenario, the role played by the inflammatory environment in inducing additional insulin resistance seemed to explain worsened insulin sensitivity due to pyometra compared with the isolated diestrus influences [16]. Chronic inflammation due to obesity [114,115,116,117] or periodontitis [118,119] leading to insulin resistance represents other examples of the negative effect of inflammation on insulin sensibility in dogs. These findings allowed the assumption that conditions such as diestrus and pyometra can exert insulin resistance at the IR and post-IR levels, and mechanisms such IR upregulation represent a potential peripheral compensatory modulation [34,79,81]. Failure to counter-regulate muscle insulin sensitivity by increasing Bmax capacity was associated with glucose intolerance and higher basal insulinemia [16].
Hyperlipidemia could be caused by chronic inflammatory status independent of inflammation-induced insulin resistance [112]. Pyometra-induced insulin resistance was not associated with increased serum concentration of triglycerides and total cholesterol probably because of the brief period of insulin resistance before diagnosis [18]. However, hypercholesterolemia was reported in 74% of the bitches with pyometra [12]. Serum glycemia abnormalities were reported in a very low percentual of bitches with pyometra, being hypoglycemia due to sepsis in 6%, and hyperglycemia in only 4% [12]. Despite the absence of fasting glycemia differences among bitches with pyometra or other estrus cycle phases [15], the severe increase in fasting insulinemia during pyometra allowed a clear demonstration of the insulin resistance status employing insulin sensitivity indexes such as the II and AI:GR (both ~2-fold higher compared to diestrus), as well as HOMA-B and HOMA-R (both ~3-fold higher compared to diestrus). The same study showed a moderate Pearson’s correlation between leukogram and II (r = 0.649, P = 0.012) and between leukogram and HOMA-R (r = 0.709, P < 0.01) [15]. Fructosamine fails to evidence insulin resistance in bitches with pyometra; and showed reduced levels compared with bitches in diestrus [15,16] a finding considered to be the result of the lower albumin serum concentration levels [120] observed in the bitches with pyometra. Assessment of the fructosamine-to-albumin ratio to correct fructosamine misrepresentation was not shown to be helpful [16]. Serum fructosamine was previously considered a poor indicator of insulin resistance during diestrus [74] and reduced serum albumin due to inflammatory-mediated catabolism [110,111,112] was documented in nearly a third of the bitches with pyometra [12] turns it even worse.
Also, it is important to highlight pyometra is more common in large-breed older bitches [12,13,105,106,108], as well as it is the mammary progesterone-controlled GH overproduction and the GH-related insulin resistance [78,79,80,81,82]. These pyometra epidemiological characteristics were associated with significantly higher age and higher size of bitches in the studies that have compared insulin sensitivity among bitches with pyometra and other estrus cycle phases [15,16]. Since neither progesterone nor GH were measured in these studies, the real cause of insulin resistance (older age, progesterone, GH, and/or inflammation) cannot be accurately assumed. However, the magnitude of GH response to progesterone as well as the tissue response to GH, and the glycemic/insulinemic responses to this phenomenon is quite variable from dog to dog [31,32,74] and it seems reasonable pyometra-related septic and inflammatory environment playing an additional role in inducing insulin resistance in bitches during diestrus. Figure 2 shows a hypothetical causal diagram correlating factors potentially involved with PRDM in dogs.

5. How to Best Manage Progesterone-Related CDM?

5.1. Initial patient evaluation

An often-made question by the owners of diabetic pets is “Why did my pet become diabetic?”, and due to the heterogeneity of the CDM, the answer is usually “we don´t know” [121]. Notwithstanding, the main characteristic of IRD cases is the potential for remission after identification and resolution of the target-tissue disorder causing insulin resistance [1,36]. In this way, properly identifying a possible diestrus role in the diabetes pathogeny of a bitch recently diagnosed diabetic is central to better managing the patient.
Ideally, practitioners should run a checklist looking for all possible factors influencing the diabetes origin, and that will potentially also impact treatment success [36,122]. Regarding PRDM, throughout reproductive history anamnesis should be performed, including confidence regarding the status neutered/entire (is the bitch confirmedly spayed?), time of spaying, and eventual heat signs despite spayed (ovarian remnant syndrome?), regularity of estrus cycle (ovarian diseases or another chronic systemic disease such as hypothyroidism or hypercortisolism?) heat signs in the preceding two months (diestrus influence?), contraceptive methods (synthetic progestins exposure?), mating history (can the bitch be pregnant?), and finally clinical signs of systemic disease (hyporexia/anorexia, lethargy/depression, vomiting) that should alert towards possible diabetic ketoacidosis; however, can be due to pyometra or other systemic illness (pancreatitis, renal failure).
Clinical evaluation can eventually reveal acromegalic features such as increased skin folding and increased interdental space, macroglossia, and respiratory stridor, as well as mammary masses (Figure 3 and Figure 4) [35]. GH overproduction was demonstrated also in neoplastic mammary glands, and after malignant transformation, GH production by altered mammary tissue can turn progesterone-independent [75,123,124]. Identification of mammary masses should also raise suspicion about insulin-resistant status.
Ideally, a minimum database including a complete blood count, a complete serum biochemistry profile including ketones and electrolytes, blood gas analysis, urine analysis, and abdominal ultrasound should be recommended to every newly diabetic dog [21,122]. In the bitch, these complementary exams will be helpful to assess eventual diabetic complications (i.e., dyslipidemia, increased liver enzymes, pre-renal azotemia, electrolytes abnormalities, ketoacidosis, urinary tract infection) as well as pieces of evidence of potential causes for the diabetic state (i.e., Cushing´s syndrome, pancreatitis, pyometra, others). Abdominal ultrasound can help identify uterine (wall hyperplasia, cystic hyperplasia, fluid collection) and ovarian (cysts, corpus luteum, neoplasia) abnormalities, as well as eventual ovarian remnant tissue or uterine stump abnormalities.
Insulin and progesterone serum concentration are also useful in the initial screening of the entire diabetic bitch. Despite most diabetic dogs showing basal insulin levels at diagnosis, this finding is not pathognomonic of IDD; and can be secondary to initial glucotoxicity in IRD cases [8,46]. On the other hand, finding insulin levels within the reference range or above in a diabetic patient indicates insulin resistance and an exciting potential for diabetic remission after removing the factor(s) causing insulin resistance. Serum progesterone concentration can easily support diestrus diagnosis, as well as vaginal cytology, and both are useful tools for estrus cycle phase monitoring [19,23,24,125,126]. Spayed bitches should have typical anestrus cytology with few basal cells. Diestrus cytology is marked by increased cellular content including parabasal and intermediary cells, neutrophils, and the eventual presence of the “metestrus cells” shortly after the end of estrus [21,22,23,24]. Canine GH assays are not commercially available worldwide, while there are assays to measure IGF-1 as a marker of the GH influence. However, to date, there is no cutoff for IGF-1 measurement in dogs to assume a negative influence of GH on insulin sensitivity and IGF-1 concentration can overlap among insulin-resistant or insulin-sensitive bitches during diestrus [74]. In contrast, IGF-1 levels may be used to indirectly monitor diestrus influence in GH [127].

5.2. Treatment goals and recommendations

The ALIVE project has proposed treatment goals and physiological mechanisms through which these aims are achieved [36]. To date, PRDM cases should be treated the same way, and the resolution of the progesterone and/or inflammatory-related conditions is crucial. Despite spaying or pregnancy termination as a sole treatment without chronic insulin treatment was previously shown to induce remission [10,11], undergoing general anesthesia in a dehydrated uncompensated diabetic dog represents additional risks to a generally uncomplicated procedure [128]. Moreover, insulin treatment was associated with better outcomes in PRDM bitches treated through spaying and was considered crucial to protect beta cells from undergoing glucotoxicity while the procedure is programmed and while the insulin resistance decreases after progesterone and inflammatory-related conditions resolution [10,11,14,125,126]. Insulin treatment is also important to avoid cataracts and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) development [46,122].
In this sense, the initial long-term insulin regimen adopted can follow the same standards regardless of a PRDM diagnosis. Low twice-daily doses of intermediated or long-acting insulin suspensions or insulin analog solutions can be applied to try to cover the patient’s basal and post-prandial insulin requirements taking into account local regulatory rules, costs, patient´s size, and owner‘s issues for example [46,122,129]. Alternatively, a basal-bolus insulin treatment system can be proposed for particular cases trying to better cover basal and post-prandial insulin requirements [129]. The insulin dose to stabilize a diabetic patient is assumed as the difference between the patient´s needs and the patient’s insulin production [9]. In this way, is difficult to assume a general standardized suggestion regarding initial insulin dose in IRD cases since the patient´s insulin-resistance degree (i.e., presence of interferences of insulin action on target cells) and residual beta cell secretory capacity are unknown. Starting doses of insulins recommended in actual guidelines can be used according to the veterinarian’s description [46,122,129,130]. Dietary management of diabetic patients is also highly advisable and has serial benefits for the patient (46,122]. Not only the diet content of macronutrients such as protein, fats, fiber, and simple carbohydrates are important [131] but also starch source was associated with better glycemic [132]and lipemic outcomes [133].
Serial insulin dose adjustments can be suggested following monitoring guidelines considering control of the clinical signs, preferably using standardized scoring systems such as the Diabetes Clinical Score and glycemic variability evaluated in the blood, interstitium, and/or urine [36,46,122]. Despite good clinical control being reached in dogs maintaining daily mean glycemic values between 80-250 mg/dL [46], there is no prospective high-level evidence that setting a specific glycemic range could be correlated with a specific treatment outcome, including remission [36]. Fructosamine values in diabetic monitoring have more value when compared within the same patient over time, using the same laboratory, and in the light of the clinical picture. To date, there are no validated fructosamine intervals to ensure poor or good glycemic control, and is also important to note fructosamine levels are affected by factors such as lipemia, plasmatic protein concentration, and turnover rate. The veterinary endocrine societies from the USA (Society for Comparative Endocrinology – SCE), Europe (European Society of Veterinary Endocrinology – ESVE), and Brazil (Brazilian Association of Veterinary Endocrinology – ABEV) endorsed the comments above and others on fructosamine serum measurement and are available online [134].

5.3. When surgery is indicated?

It is important to emphasize that achieving diabetic clinical or glycemic control in an intact bitch under progesterone and/or GH influence due to diestrus, pregnancy, progestin administration, or an eventual pyometra can be very frustrating and unsuccessful [10,11,46]. By the way, waiting for “perfect” diabetic clinical control achievement before proposing surgery can delay and reduce the chances of diabetic remission [14,125]. In cats, diabetes mellitus secondary to acromegaly has incredibly high remission rates after successful hypophysectomy due to quick removal of the GH source [135,136] and the same results are not achieved with medical therapy [137,138]. Despite distinct species, the removal of the stimuli for the mammary GH overproduction in bitches with PRDM (spaying), as well as the removal of mammary masses eventually producing GH is important to improve diabetic remission rates in dogs.
Diabetes mellitus diagnosis exerts heavy concerns in many owners, eventually leading to a decision of euthanasia [3,4,7,139,140,141]. In this way, the possibility of achieving remission is very welcome by the owners, and nearly 10% of the bitches spayed after DM diagnosis achieved remission [14]. Another study achieved 58% of remission after pregnancy termination in gestational diabetes in bitches [10]. As proposed for the surgical treatment of pyometra [12], the author’s opinion and experiences regarding PRDM are that spaying surgery should be done as soon as the patient is hemodynamic stable to increase remission rates. Detailed considerations for diabetic patient anesthesia are available elsewhere [128]. Even patients presented with DKA can undergo surgery after being stable [128,142]. In a study reporting diabetic remission in bitches after resolution of progesterone and inflammatory-related conditions resolution, one case presented with possible DKA (hyporexia, nausea, severe hyperglycemia, and marked ketonuria) due to ovarian remnant syndrome was submitted to remnant tissue removal surgery shortly after intensive care under fluid, electrolytes, and short-acting regular insulin therapy, and achieve remission four days later [14]. Many other cases achieved successful remission after this more aggressive approach regarding PRDM since then in our experience.
Preprints 99075 g005
Figure 5. Five-year-old American Stratford Shire bitch presented with diabetes diagnosed weeks after the last heat. Acromegalic features such as (a) increased skin thick folds, (b) widened interdental space, (c) discrete macroglossia and prognathism were observed. Panting and snoring were also reported by the owners. The bitch was submitted to ovariohysterectomy and (d) an enlarged uterus filled with a serosanguinous content diagnosed as hematometra and (e) bilateral polycystic ovaries were found. (f) Weight gain and muscle mass were restored after adequate diabetic control, as well as skin folds, regressed; however, despite diabetic remission was not achieved, glycemic was consistently improved after surgery with a ~40% smaller insulin dose.
Figure 5. Five-year-old American Stratford Shire bitch presented with diabetes diagnosed weeks after the last heat. Acromegalic features such as (a) increased skin thick folds, (b) widened interdental space, (c) discrete macroglossia and prognathism were observed. Panting and snoring were also reported by the owners. The bitch was submitted to ovariohysterectomy and (d) an enlarged uterus filled with a serosanguinous content diagnosed as hematometra and (e) bilateral polycystic ovaries were found. (f) Weight gain and muscle mass were restored after adequate diabetic control, as well as skin folds, regressed; however, despite diabetic remission was not achieved, glycemic was consistently improved after surgery with a ~40% smaller insulin dose.
Preprints 99075 g005
Spaying should not be viewed as an elective procedure in these cases but as an urgency. Ovariectomy of bitches in the mid-luteal phase stops progesterone-induced GH release from the mammary gland, resulting in lower plasma GH levels, recurrence of GH pulsatility, and lower circulating IGF-I levels [127]. Theoretically, the sooner the surgery, the greater the remission chance [14,46]. However, diabetic remission in a bitch was already reported even after being spayed almost 12 weeks after diabetes diagnosis [14]. Spaying induced diabetic remission for four months in a case report of poorly responsive to insulin treatment Schnauzer dog with concomitant hypercortisolism and multiple mammary masses [126]. Ovariohysterectomy was first recommended as a drastic therapeutic measure to avoid rapid clinical deterioration in the 1960s [4]. Advances in veterinary anesthesiology can make this procedure quite safer nowadays, rather not free of complications [128]. In this way, bitches diagnosed with PRDM could benefit from intensive treatment under hospitalization to quickly restore fluid and electrolyte abnormalities identified while the glycemic control is provided by short or intermediate-acting insulin therapy to stabilize the patient for spaying surgery in a shorter time after diagnosis (e.g., 1-2 days).

5.4. What are the next steps after surgery?

Even when spaying surgery is performed soon after diabetes diagnosis, it is important to properly manage the owner’s expectancy and clearly state the surgery does not warrant diabetic remission, but surely will improve diabetic control, and luckily will be associated with remission [14,46]. Long-term insulin treatment would be still needed for a few days to weeks in cases achieving remission, and client education regarding diabetes management and glycemic home monitoring is mandatory [10,14,125]. An arbitrary recommendation for an insulin dose reduction (e.g., 20-30%) after surgery can be applied assuming that an important source of insulin action antagonism was removed. The growing use of continuous glucose monitoring systems (CGMS) and generated data delivery to the owner and the veterinarian (e.g., FreeStyle Libre and LibreLinkUp application) make it easy for hypoglycemic tendencies recognition and prompt insulin dose adjustments [143,144]. Glycemic parameters within the reference interval of non-diabetic dogs (i.e., glycemia between 70-120 mg/dL, absent glycosuria) can be assumed as a trend to diabetic remission or insulin overdosing and therefore implies the possibility of episodes of hypoglycemia [36]. Eventually, a dog undergoing diabetic remission after spaying can be presented due to hypoglycemic crise [14]. When diabetic remission is suspected due to the above-mentioned factors, progressive insulin dose reduction can be tested (e.g., 25-50% reduction each 3-5 days) while glycemic values and clinical score are being monitored [44,46,122]. In this scenario, maintenance of a long-acting “peakless” basal insulin analog once daily (e.g., glargine 300U) before complete insulin withdrawal would be safer to reduce hypoglycemic risk while insulin resistance is reducing, and endogenous insulin secretion is recovering [145]. Alternatively, prompt insulin interruption and checking for overt hyperglycemia or relapse in clinical signs in the following days would be also indicated [46]. The author prefers the second strategy when there´s normal or increased endogenous insulin secretion by the time of diagnosis.
Diabetic remission can be assumed when a dog previously diagnosed with DM using ALIVE criteria ceases to receive exogenous insulin therapy and shows no evidence of DM according to ALIVE criteria after 4 weeks [36]. The time to stop insulin treatment in a case series of gestational diabetes that achieved diabetic remission after pregnancy termination ranged from 7 to 21 days (median 9) [10]. A case series of diabetic remission among Elkhounds reported a median time to insulin interruption of 11 days (range 1 to 51 days). Another case series of diabetic remission after the resolution of inflammatory and progesterone-related conditions showed a range from 4 to 39 days (median 10) to stop insulin after ovariohysterectomy [14]. Based on the findings of those studies and single-case reports [125,126], the estimated median time to stop insulin after surgery and progressively reduce insulin dose when remission is achieved is around 10 days.

5.5. What to do when spaying is not an option?

Spaying can be a sensible topic for some owners, and different points of view regarding this issue can arise during a consultation influencing the decision to not undergo surgery. For example, a pregnant breeder dog diagnosed with diabetes near the end of gestation would be a potential case leading an owner to refuse pregnancy termination. Trying to help the diabetic patient deliver her puppies can be very challenging [10] despite gratifying, and progressive insulin resistance and increased risk for DKA are expected closer to the full-term pregnancy with resultant increased risk for the mother and puppies, especially in older bitches [10,66,67]. Insulin doses and regimens can be reviewed according to the patient’s needs [44,46,122,129]. Perfect glucose control was quite unlikely in a study with gestational diabetes in dogs [10]; however, the patients were treated with insulin suspensions (NPH or intermediate porcine insulin), in a median dose of 0.65 U/kg q12h (range 0.4 – 1.5 U/kg, q12h) and eventually, more aggressive doses could have performed better. In contrast, hypoglycemia concern and time for judgment of the insulin-dose adjustments [45,122] could have delayed the achievement of effective insulin doses within this cohort before full-term pregnancy. Also, most bitches were diagnosed at the pregnancy final third. Modern technologies in glucose monitoring and new insulin treatment protocols allow quicker and more aggressive insulin adjustments nowadays [122]. The insulin analog detemir could be a helpful option for patients poorly regulated with other insulins according to a recent study [146]; however, no entire female under diestrus was studied in this small case series. On the other hand, detemir insulin was useful in improving the management of a diabetic dog with concurrent Cushing´s syndrome and also prevented insulin-dependent treatment in canine patients with Cushing syndrome presented with hyperglycemia [147]. Despite being quite different conditions, the insulin resistance pattern induced by the diestrus and glucocorticoid excess due to hypercortisolism was shown to be similar [95]. Regarding basal-bolus protocols, despite long-acting insulin analogs (e.g., glargine 300U, degludec) the best options to employ as basal insulins and intermediate-acting insulin such as NPH considered best options to employ as bolus insulin due to physiological insulin secretion patterns in the dog [129,148], a basal-bolus protocol using NPH as basal and the short-acting analog lispro as bolus showed helpful to improve glycemic control in a group of poorly regulated diabetic dogs [149].
Despite the open cervix pyometra can be medically treated [12], concurrent diabetes mellitus should be assumed as a contraindication for medical treatment. Other times, general patient condition or comorbidities (e.g., end-stage chronic kidney disease or heart failure), or owner´s financial issues can be impeditive to a surgical approach. In this scenario, increasing insulin doses, frequency, and eventual different insulin combinations can be applied to achieve ALIVE's proposed treatment goals [36]. However, the owner’s and pet’s quality of life can be negatively impacted [139,140,150], and the risk of hypoglycemia increases in parallel with more aggressive insulin treatments [46,122]. So, trying to reduce progesterone-related insulin resistance can be attempted in other ways while waiting for the end of natural diestrus.
To date, pharmacological treatments applicable to PRDM cases are generally less effective compared with spaying. Aglepristone, a progesterone receptor (PR) blocker approved for veterinary use, is typically used for parturition induction [151], pregnancy interruption [152], and pyometra medical treatment in bitches [12,106,108]. Two aglepristone doses (10 mg/kg, SC) 24h apart were 100% effective in medically terminating mid-term pregnancy in bitches [153]. Its effects on the uterus allow cervix opening and uterine contraction inhibited by progesterone. The PR blockage can also revert progesterone effects in the mammary glands despite having a very small effect on estrus cycle length and a negligible effect on progesterone concentration [154]. The aglepristone effect on mammary glands is effective in controlling local GH effects and reverts fibroadenomatous mammary hyperplasia in queens [155] and also reverts progestin-induced GH overproduction in dogs [156]. Aglepristone serial administration (10 mg/kg, SC) on days 1, 2, 9, and 17 after diabetes diagnosis in entire bitches in diestrus induced reduction in GH concentration and better glycemic control allowing insulin dose reduction after two weeks of the beginning of the treatment [155].
Trilostane, a 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase inhibitor commonly used in hypercortisolism treatment in dogs [157,158] also has the potential to decrease progesterone secretion [153,159] and can eventually be applied in diabetic bitches during diestrus if aglepristone treatment is not available. Trilostane doses ranging from 2.2–6.7 mg/kg once daily for seven days cause a significant reduction in progesterone concentration in pregnant bitches but were ineffective in inducing pregnancy termination [153]. Another study showed that trilostane given at a dose range of 3.3-5.3 mg/kg twice daily was able to significantly decrease progesterone concentration during both the pituitary-dependent and the pituitary-independent parts of the luteal phase of healthy Beagles bitches [159]. However, neither study assessed trilostane impacts on GH or IGF-1 concentration, as well as an eventual impact on insulin sensitivity. Moreover, progesterone levels in both studies remained compatible with diestrus levels, despite the progesterone-lowering effect of trilostane [153,159].
Dopaminergic drugs acting on the pituitary level could be considered with some potential to reduce progesterone-mediated insulin resistance by suppressing prolactin levels, such as cabergoline. Cabergoline administration at 5 mcg/kg daily was effective in reducing progesterone levels below 1 ng/dL in 15 to 20 days; however, this treatment is associated with proestrus/estrus induction, and the effect on insulin sensitivity was not evaluated [160]. On the other hand, gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists such as deslorelin 4.7 mg subcutaneous implant applied during diestrus successfully suppressed the estrus cycle in bitches since applied every 4 months; however, a transient increase in serum progesterone was documented before anestrus induction [161].
Sodium-glucose transporters type-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors are being successfully applied in eligible feline IRD cases [162]. There is very limited information on SGLT-2 inhibitors in dogs [163]. Their possible role and benefits in the treatment of PRDM in dogs are to be shown and eventually can represent an alternative treatment to avoid IRD negative impacts on beta cell function due to glucotoxicity in dogs. Also, its use can be shown in the future as a potential treatment modality for dogs diagnosed as having subclinical diabetes.

5.6. Appliable Preventive Measures

Given all evidence towards the negative impact of diestrus and the progesterone-controlled GH overproduction on insulin sensitivity, and the generally increased risk for CDM among entire females, spaying can be claimed as the main way to prevent PRDM in the bitch. However, PRDM is more common among certain breeds [11], while others seemed protected from DM when kept intact [48]. Spaying can be a protective measure not only against PRDM but also against mammary neoplasia development [162,165] and pyometra [166]. Spaying is also important as a population control tool [167] and a helpful strategy for some behavior problems [168]. In contrast, it was also associated with several chronic complications including obesity [90,169], cognitive impairment [168], orthopedic diseases and certain types of cancer [170], immune-mediated diseases [166], including eventually IDD due to immune-mediate mechanisms leading to beta cell loss [48], urinary incontinence [171], and even a suggested LH-dependent hypercortisolism variant [172]. Breed-specific recommendations regarding undergoing spaying surgery or not, as well as when to perform have been generated based on some of these aspects [170]. Due to these complex interactions between the impacts of sex hormones and the pituitary-gonadal axis imbalance after spaying [173], is difficult to define the overall benefits and risks of spaying for a particular dog. Recognition of acromegalic features [78] in intact bitches should represent a stronger recommendation for spaying since the acromegalic phenotype can be considered a biomarker of the GH influence [174] (Figure 6). However, is important to note acromegaly phenotype in dogs may rarely occur due to pituitary somatotrophs [175,176] or due to primary hypothyroidism [177,178,179]. Despite progesterone-controlled GH's negative influence on insulin sensitivity being documented only during diestrus, continued intermittent GH exposure over the next estrus cycles can predict increased cumulative risk for DM, especially due to aging effects on beta cell function [10]. Also, since mammary neoplasms can secrete GH [75,124], prompt surgical removal of identifiable mammary neoplasms is not only helpful for potentially reducing the odds of DM among entire bitches, but also may reduce potential negative impacts on bitch’s lifespan and quality of life [180].
Many owners do not agree with spaying their dogs, and in these ways, other ways to try to prevent PRDM are welcome. Environmental risk factors for CDM have been explored in the literature and raised the “Nature or Nurture” dilemma in canine diabetology [73]. Several pieces of evidence obtained from retrospective studies point to factors such as obesity [5,6,40,41], diet [6,64,181], and glucocorticoid exposure [6,41] as relevant risk factors for CDM despite the eventual underlying mechanisms are unknown. Within a diabetic Elkhounds population composed exclusively of females with PRDM (10.4% pregnant), previous obesity was shown as a relevant risk factor, as well as age [64]. In these ways, the knowledge regarding PRDM risk factors allows simple recommendations that can potentially reduce the risk of DM development in an entire female [121]. These may include rational use of glucocorticoids especially in older, breed-predisposed, and overweighted entire bitches [6], feeding a balanced commercial dog food as the main (>90%) daily source of energy and nutrients [5,7,64,90], and preventing overweight development by promoting owner´s education, adequate feeding recommendations, and regular physical activity [64,181,182]. Avoid mating and the risk of pregnancy should also be a matter of concern since insulin resistance due to pregnancy can be more dangerous [10,11]. Eventually, the use of aglepristone to block progesterone effects by the end of estrus [151], could also be considered as a preventive measure in highly susceptible bitches. Notwithstanding, the recent characterization of diabetes remission in a male dog suggested that much of the beta-cell biology is still to be unraveled in canine diabetology [1,2,183]

6. Conclusions

Far away to provide definitive recommendations and understanding of the features related to PRDM in the bitch, this review brings up relevant insights and reviews the main aspects involved in this CDM subtype of particular interest. The complex effects of progesterone and progesterone-controlled growth hormone overexpression during diestrus or pregnancy represent a strong risk factor for DM development especially in older bitches. Genetics, preexisting obesity, and nutritional aspects are potentially also involved; however, spaying may represent a preventive measure against CDM development for many bitches. Also, the risk for pyometra development is dramatically reduced in spayed bitches. The septic and inflammatory characteristics of pyometra additionally decrease insulin sensitivity during diestrus. Quickly spaying after CDM diagnosis in a bitch in diestrus, as well as prompt pyometra surgical resolution and pregnancy termination are associated with better outcomes and increased probability of diabetic remission. In this way, more aggressive and straightforward initial patient hydroelectrolytic stabilization and insulin treatment may allow quicker surgical management and potentially increase remission rates in bitches presented with PRDM. Hypoglycemia monitoring should be carefully discussed with owners of recently spayed diabetic bitches to help with insulin adjustments and remission identification. Despite diabetic remission being a goal with a brilliant potential for improving the patient and owner’s quality of life, spaying may not be enough to promote remission, and the eventual negative impacts of gonadectomy should be discussed with the owners on an individual basis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft preparation, A.G.P.; writing—review and editing, J.L.X.L, T.B.N., D.I.S., and B.M.S.; visualization, and formal analysis, J.L.X.L and T.B.N.; funding acquisition, A.G.P., D.I.S., and B.M.S.

Funding

Not applicable.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the “Programa de Ações em Endocrinologia Veterinária (PetEndocrine)” from the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul for the support with this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Gilor, C.; Niessen, S.J.M.; Furrow, E.; DiBartola, S.P. What’s in a name? Classification of diabetes mellitus in veterinary medicine and why it matters. J Vet Intern Med 2016, 30, 927–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. O´Kell, A.L.; Davison, L.J. Etiology and pathophysiology of diabetes mellitus in dogs. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2023, 53, 493–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Campbell, E.A. The treatment and control of diabetes in the dog. Aust Vet J 1958, 34, 222–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wilkinson, J.S. Spontaneous diabetes mellitus. Vet Rec 1960, 72, 548–554. [Google Scholar]
  5. Pöppl, A.G.; de Carvalho, G.L.C.; Vivian, I.F.; Corbellini, L.G.; González, F.H.D. Canine diabetes mellitus risk factors: A matched case-control study. Res Vet Sci 2017, 114, 469–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Heeley, A.M.; Brodbelt, D.C.; O'Neill, D.G.; Church, D.B.; Davison, L.J. Assessment of glucocorticoid and antibiotic exposure as risk factors for diabetes mellitus in selected dog breeds attending UK primary-care clinics. Vet Rec 2023, 192, e2785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Pöppl, A.G.; González, F.H.D. Epidemiologic and clinical-pathological features of canine diabetes mellitus. Acta Scien Veterin 2005, 33, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Brito-Casillas, Y.; Melián, C.; Holder, A.; Wiebe, J.C.; Navarro, A.; Quesada-Canales, O.; Expósito-Montesdeoca, A.B.; Catchpole, B.; Wägner, A.M. Studying the heterogeneous pathogenesis of canine diabetes: Observational characterization of an island population. Vet Med Sci 2021, 7, 1071–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Fleeman, L.; Barrett, R. Cushing’s syndrome and other causes of insulin resistance in dogs. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2023, 53, 711–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Fall, T.; Kreuger, S.J.; Juberget, A.; Bergström, A.; Hedhammar, A. Gestational diabetes mellitus in 13 dogs. J Vet Intern Med. 2008, 22, 1296–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Fall, T.; Hedhammar, A.; Wallberg, A.; Fall, N.; Ahlgren, K.M.; Hamlin, H.H.; Lindblad-Toh, K.; Andersson, G.; Kämpe, O. Diabetes mellitus in elkhounds is associated with diestrus and pregnancy. J Vet Intern Med 2010, 24, 1322–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hagman, R. Pyometra in Small Animals 3.0. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2023, 53, 1223–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Krook, L.; Larsson, S.; Rooney, J.R. The interrelationship of diabetes mellitus, obesity, and pyometra in the dog. Am J Vet Res 1960, 21, 120–124. [Google Scholar]
  14. Pöppl, A.G.; Mottin, T.S.; González, F.H.D. Diabetes mellitus remission after resolution of inflammatory and progesterone-related conditions in bitches. Res Vet Sci 2013, 94, 471–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pöppl, A.G.; Lasta, C.S.; González, F.H.D.; Kucharski, L.C.; Da Silva, R.S.M. Insulin sensitivity indexes in female dogs: Effect of estrus cycle and pyometra. Acta Scien Veterin. 2009, 37, 341–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pöppl, A.G.; Valle, S.C.; Mottin, T.S.; Leal, J.S.; González, F.H.D.; Kucharski, L.C.; Da Silva, R.S.M. Pyometra-associated insulin resistance assessment by insulin binding assay and tyrosine kinase activity evaluation in canine muscle tissue. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2021, 76, 106626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pöppl, A.G.; Valle, S.C.; González, F.H.D.; Beck, C.A.C.; Kucharski, L.C.; Da Silva, R.S.M. Estrus cycle effect on muscle tyrosine kinase activity in bitches. Vet Res Comm 2012, 36, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pöppl, A.G.; Valle, S.C.; González, F.H.D.; Kucharski, L.C.; Da Silva, R.S.M. Insulin binding characteristics in canine muscle tissue: Effects of the estrous cycle phases. Pesq Vet Bras 2016, 36, 761–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Concannon, P.W. Reproductive cycles of the domestic bitch. Anim Reprod Sci 2011, 124, 200–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Concannon, P.W. Endocrinologic control of normal canine ovarian function. Reprod Dom Anim 2009, 44, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Feldman, E.C.; Nelson, R.W. Canine and Feline Endocrinology and Reproduction, 3rd ed.; Saunders, Missouri, USA, 2004; pp. 752-774.
  22. Hoffmann, B.; Riesenbeck, A.; Klein, R. Reproductive endocrinology of bitches. Anim Reprod Sci 1996, 42, 275–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hollinshead, F.K.; Hanlon, D.W. Normal progesterone profiles during estrus in the bitch: A prospective analysis of 1420 estrous cycles. Theriogenology 2019, 125, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Post, K. Canine vaginal cytology during the estrous cycle. Can Vet J 1985, 26, 101–104. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Van Cruchten, S.; Van den Broeck, W.; D’haeseleer, M.; Simoens, P. Proliferation patterns in the canine endometrium during the estrous cycle. Theriogenology 2004, 62, 631–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bouchard, P. Progesterone and the progesterone receptor. J Reprod Med 1999, 44, 153–157. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Thompson, F.N. Reprodução em mamíferos do sexo feminino. In Dukes: Fisiologia dos Animais Domésticos, 2nd ed.; Reece, W.O. Ed, Guanabara Koogan; Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 2006; volume 1, pp. 644-669.
  28. Concannon, P.W.; Hansel, W.; Visek, W.J. The ovarian cycle of the bitch: Plasma estrogen, LH and progesterone. Biol Reprod 1975, 13, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kooistra, H.S.; Okkens, A.C. Secretion of growth hormone and prolactin during progression of the luteal phase in healthy dogs: a review. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2002, 197, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Gobello, C. Revisiting canine pseudocyesis. Theriogenology 2021, 167, 94–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Selman, P.J.; Mol, J.A.; Rutterman, G.R.; Rijnberk, A. Progestin-induced growth hormone excess in the dog originates in the mammary gland. Endocrinology 1994, 134, 287–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Eingenmann, J.E.; Eingenmann, R.Y.; Rijinberk, A.; Van der Gaag, I.; Zapf, J.; Froesch, E.R. Progesterone-controlled growth hormone overproduction and naturally occurring canine diabetes and acromegaly. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1983, 104, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. De Cock, H.; Ducatelle, R.; Tilmant, K.; De Schepper, J. Possible role for insulin-like growth factor-I in the pathogenesis of cystic endometrial hyperplasia pyometra complex in the bitch. Theriogenology 2002, 57, 2271–2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dominici, F.P.; Argentino, D.P.; Muñoz, M.C.; Miquet, J.G.; Sotelo, A.I.; Turyn, D. Influence of the crosstalk between growth hormone and insulin signaling on the modulation of insulin sensitivity. Growth Horm IGF Res 2005, 15, 324–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gouvêa, F.N.; Pennacchi, C.S.; Assaf, N.D.; Branco, L.O.; Costa, P.B.; Reis, P.A.; Borin-Crivellenti, S. Acromegaly in dogs and cats. Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 2021, 82, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Niessen, S.J.M.; Bjornvad, C.; Church, D.B.; Davison, L.; Esteban-Saltiveri, D.; Fleeman, L.M.; Forcada, Y.; Fracassi, F.; Gilor, C.; Hanson, J.; Herrtage, M.; Lathan, P.; Leal, R.O.; Loste, A.; Reusch, C.; Schermerhorn, T.; Stengel, C.; Thoresen, S.; Thuroczy, J. Agreeing Language in Veterinary Endocrinology (ALIVE): diabetes mellitus – a modified Delphi-method-based system to create consensus disease definitions. Vet J 2022, 105910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yoon, S.; Fleeman, L.M.; Wilson, B.J.; Mansfield, C.S.; McGreevy, P. Epidemiological study of dogs with diabetes mellitus attending primary care veterinary clinics in Australia. Vet Rec 2020, 187, e22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Davison, L.J.; Herrtage, M.E.; Catchpole, B. Study of 253 dogs in the United Kingdom with diabetes mellitus. Vet Rec 2005, 156, 467–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fracassi, F.; Pietra, M.; Boari, A.; Aste, G.; Giunti, M.; Famigli-Bergamini, P. Breed distribution of canine diabetes mellitus in Italy. Vet Res Commun 2004, 28, 339–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Guptill, L.; Glickman, L.; Glickman, N. Time trends and risk factors for diabetes mellitus in dogs: analysis of veterinary medical database records (1970-1999). Vet J 2003, 165, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Mattin, M.; O'Neill, D.; Church, D.; McGreevy, P.D.; Thomson, P.C.; Brodbelt, D. An epidemiological study of diabetes mellitus in dogs attending first opinion practice in the UK. Vet Rec 2014, 174, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wiles, B.M.; Llewellyn-Zaidi, A.M.; Evans, K.M.; O’Neill, D.G.; Lewis, T.W. Large-Scale survey to estimate the prevalence of disorders for 192 Kennel Club registered breeds. Canine Genet Epidemiol 2017, 4, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Fall, T.; Hamlin, H.H.; Hedhammar, A.; Kampe, O.; Egenvall, A. Diabetes mellitus in a population of 180,000 insured dogs: incidence, survival, and breed distribution. J Vet Intern Med 2007, 21, 1209–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fleeman, L.M.; Rand, J.S. Management of canine diabetes. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2001, 31(5), 855–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Catchpole, B.; Ristic, J.M.; Fleeman, L.M.; Davison, L.J. Canine diabetes mellitus: can old dogs teach - us new tricks? Diabetologia 2005, 48, 1948–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nelson, R.W. Canine diabetes mellitus. In: Canine and Feline Endocrinology, 4th ed.; Feldman, E.C.; Nelson, R.W.; Reusch, C.E.; Scott-Moncrieff, J.C.R.; Behrend, E.N. Eds.; Saunders, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, 2015. 213-257.
  47. Mui, M.L.; Famula, T.R.; Henthorn, P.S.; Hess, R.S. Heritability and complex segregation analysis of naturally-occurring diabetes in Australian Terrier Dogs. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0239542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cai, S.V.; Famula, T.R.; Oberbauer, A.M.; Hess, R.S. Heritability and complex segregation analysis of diabetes mellitus in American Eskimo Dogs. J Vet Intern Med 2019, 33, 1926–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Denyer, A.L.; Massey, J.P.; Davison, L.J.; Ollier, W.E.R.; Catchpole, B.; Kennedy, L.J. Dog leucocyte antigen (DLA) class II haplotypes and risk of canine diabetes mellitus in specific dog breeds. Canine Med Genet 2020, 7, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ringstad, N.K.; Lingaas, F.; Thoresen, S.I. Breed distributions for diabetes mellitus and hypothyroidism in Norwegian dogs. Canine Med Genet 2022, 9, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Imamura, T.; Koffler, M.; Helderman, J.H.; Prince, D.; Thirlby, R.; Inman, L.; Unger, R.H. Severe diabetes induced in subtotally depancreatized dogs by sustained hyperglycemia. Diabetes 1988, 37, 600–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Nelson, R.W.; Reusch, C.E. Animal model of disease Classification and etiology of diabetes in dogs and cats. J Endocrinology 2014, 222, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Renauld, A.; Sverdlik, R.C.; Von Lawzewitsch, I.; Agüero, A.; Pérez, R.L.; Rodríguez, R.R.; Foglia, V.G. Metabolic and histological pancreatic changes induced by ovariectomy in the female dog. Acta Physiol Pharmacol Latinoam 1987, 37, 289–304. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Sasidharan, J.K.; Patra, M.K.; Singh, L.K.; Saxena, A.C.; De, U.K.; Singh, V.; Mathesh, K.; Kumar, H.; Krishnaswamy, N. Ovarian Cysts in the Bitch: An Update. Top Companion Anim Med 2021, 43, 100511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Farges, A.; Crawford, D.; Silva, C.A.; Ramsey, I. Hyperprogesteronism associated with adrenocortical tumours in two dogs. Vet Rec Case Rep 2024, e794, 1–9, (online ahead of print). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Connolly, C.C.; Aglione, L.N.; Smith, M.S.; Lacy, D.B.; Moore, M.C. Insulin action during late pregnancy in the conscious dog. Am J Physiol, Endocrinol Metab 2004, 286, E909–9015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Russell, M.A.; Carpenter, M.W.; Coustan, D.R. Screening and diagnosis of gestacional diabetes mellitus. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2007, 50(4), 949–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. ElSayed, N.A.; Aleppo. G.; Aroda, V.R.; Bannuru, R.R.; Brown, F.M.; Bruemmer, D.; Collins, B.S.; Gaglia, J.S.; Hilliard, M.E.; Isaacs, D.; Johnson, E.L.; Kahan, S.; Khunti, K.; Leon, J.; Lyons, S.K.; Perry, M.L.; Prahalad, P.; Pratley, R.E.; Seley, J.J.; Stanton, R.C.; Gabbay, R.A. American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023. Diabetes Care 2023, 46(Suppl. 1):S19–S40. [CrossRef]
  59. Nilsson, C.; Ursing, D.; Törn, C.; Aberg, A.; Landin-Olsson, M. Presence of GAD antibodies during gestational diabetes mellitus predicts type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007, 30(8), 1968–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. DiNinni, A.; Hess, R.S. Development of a requirement for exogenous insulin treatment in dogs with hyperglycemia. J Vet Intern Med 2024, 1-7 (online ahead of print). [CrossRef]
  61. Watanake, R.M.; Black, M.H.; Xiang, A.H.; Allayee, H.; Lawrence, J.M.; Buchanan, T.A. Genetics of gestational diabetes mellitus and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007, 30(2suppl), S134–S140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Beischer, N.A.; Oats, J.N.; Henry, O.A.; Sheedy, M.T.; Walstab, J.E. Incidence and severity of gestational diabetes mellitus according to country of birth in woman living in Australia. Diabetes 1991, 40(2suppl), 35–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chu, S.Y.; Callagan, W.M.; Kim, S.Y.; Schmid, C.H.; Lau, J.; England, L.J.; Dietz, P.M. Maternal obesity and risk of gestacional diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2007, 30(8), 2070–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wejdmark, A.K.; Bonnet, B.; Hedhammar, A.; Fall, T. Lifestyle risk factors for progesterone-related diabetes mellitus in Elkhounds – a case-control study. J Small Anim Pract 2011, 52, 240–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kampman, U.; Knorr, S.; Fuglsang, J.; Ovesen, P. Determinants of Maternal Insulin Resistance during Pregnancy: An Updated Overview. J Diabetes Res 2019, 5320156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Johnson, C.A. High-risk pregnancy and hypoluteoidism in the bitch. Theriogenology 2008, 70(9), 1424–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Johnson, C.A. Glucose homeostasis during canine pregnancy: insulin resistance, ketosis, and hypoglycemia. Theriogenology 2008, 70(9), 1418–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kim, C.; Berger, D.K.; Chamany, S. Recurrence of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2007, 30(5), 1314–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Philips, P.J. Gestational diabetes: Worth finding and actively treating. Aust Fam Physician 2006, 35(9), 701–3. [Google Scholar]
  70. Ryan, E.A.; Enns, L. Role of gestational hormones in the induction of insulin resistance. J Clin Endocrionol Metab 1988, 67(2), 341–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Wada, T.; Hori, S.; Sugiyama, M.; Fujisawa, E.; Nakano, T.; Tsuneki, H.; Nagira, K.; Saito, S.; Sasaoka, T. Progesterone inhibits glucose uptake by affecting diverse steps of insulin signaling in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2010, 298(4), E881–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Lee, S.R.; Choi, W.; Heo, J.H.; Huh, J.; Kim, G.; Lee, K.; Kwun, H.; Shin, H.; Baek, I.; Hong, E. Progesterone increases blood glucose via hepatic progesterone receptor membrane component 1 under limited or impaired action of insulin. Sci Rep 2020, 10(1), 16316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Rand, J.S.; Fleeman, L.M.; Farrow, H.A.; Appleton, D.J.; Lederer, R. Canine and feline diabetes mellitus: nature or nurture? J Nutr 2004, 134(8), 2072S–2080S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Mared, M.; Catchpole, B.; Kämpe, O.; Fall, T. Evaluation of circulating concentrations of glucose homeostasis biomarkers, progesterone, and growth hormone in healthy Elkhounds during anestrus and diestrus. Am J Vet Res 2012, 73(2), 242–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Strage, E.M.; Lewitt, M.S.; Hanson, J.M.; Olsson, U.; Norrvik, F.; Lilliehöök, I.; Holst, B.S.; Fall, T. Relationship among Insulin Resistance, Growth Hormone, and Insulin-Like Growth Factor I Concentrations in Diestrous Swedish Elkhounds. J Vet Intern Med 2014, 28, 419–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Scaramal, J.D.; Renauld, A.; Gómez, N.V.; Garrido, D.; Wanke, M.M.; Marquez, A.G. Natural estrous cycle in normal and diabetic bitches in relation to glucose and insulin tests. Medicina (B Aires) 1997, 57, 169–180. [Google Scholar]
  77. Renauld, A.; Sverdlik, R.C.; Agüero, A.; Pérez, R.L. Influence of estrogen-progesterone sequential administration on pancreas cytology. Serum insulin and metabolic adjustments in female dogs. Acta Diabetol Lat 1990, 27(4), 315–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Rijnberk, A.D.; Kooistra, H.S.; Mol, J.A. Endocrine diseases in dogs and cats: similarities and differences with endocrine diseases in humans. Growth Horm IGF Res 2003, 13, S158–S164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Sharma, R.; Kopchick, J.J.; Puri, V.; Sharma, V.M. Effect of growth hormone on insulin signaling. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2020, 1, 518:111038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Moller, D.; Flier, J.S. Insulin resistance. Mechanisms, syndromes, and implications. N Engl J Med 1991, 325(13), 938–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Saltiel, A.R.; Kahn, C.R. Insulin signaling and the regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism. Nature 2001, 414(6865), 799–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kooistra, H.S.; Den Hertog, E.; Okkens, A.C.; Mol, J.A.; Rijnberk, A. Pulsatile secretion pattern of growth hormone during the luteal phase and mild-anoestrus in beagle bitches. J Reprod Fertil 2000, 119(2), 217–222. [Google Scholar]
  83. Godsland, I.F. Oestrogens and insulin secretion. Diabetologia 2005, 48(11), 2213–2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. De Paoli, M.; Zakharia, A.; Werstuck, G.H. The role of estrogen in insulin resistance: A review of clinical and preclinical data. Am J Pathol 2021, 191(9), 1490–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Renauld, A.; Von Lawzewitsch, I.; Pérez, R.L.; Sverdlik, R.; Agüero, A.; Foglia, V.G.; Rodríguez, RR. Effect of estrogens on blood sugar, serum insulin and serum free fatty acids, and pancreas cytology in female dogs. Acta Diabetol Lat 1983, 20(1), 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Barros, R.P.A.; Machado, U.F.; Warmer, M.; Gostafsson, J. Muscle GLUT4 regulation by estrogen receptors ERβ and ERα. PNAS 2006, 103(5), 1605–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Homma, H.; Kurachi, H.; Nishio, Y.; Takeda, T.; Yamamoto, T.; Adachi, K.; Morishige, K.; Ohmichi, M.; Matsuzawa, Y.; Murata, Y. Estrogen suppresses transcription of lipoprotein lipase gene. Existence of a unique estrogen response element on the lipoprotein lipase promoter. J Biol Chem 2000, 275(15), 11404–11411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Vargas, A.M.; Barros, R.P.A.; Zampieri, R.A.; Okamoto, M.M.; Carvalho Papa, P.; Machado, U.F. Abnormal subcellular distribution of GLUT4 protein in obese and insulin-treated diabetic female dogs. Braz J Med Biol Res 2004, 37(7), 1095–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Le Roux, P.H.; Van Der Walt, L.A. Ovarian autograft as an alternative to ovariectomy in bitches. J S Afr Vet Assoc 1977, 48(2), 117–123. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  90. Vendramini, T.H.A.; Amaral, A.R.; Pedrinelli, V.; Zafalon, R.V.A.; Rodrigues, R.B.A.; Brunetto, M.A. Neutering in dogs and cats: current scientific evidence and importance of adequate nutritional management. Nutr Res Rev 2020, 33(1), 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Wallace, T.M.; Levy, J.C.; Matthews, D.R. Use and abuse of HOMA modeling. Diabetes Care 2004, 27(6), 1487–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Ader, M.; Stefanovski, D.; Richey, J.M.; Kim, S.P.; Kolka, C.M.; Ionut, V.; Kabir, M.; Bergman, R.N. Failure of homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance to detect marked diet-induced insulin resistance in dogs. Diabetes 2014, 63(6), 1914–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Koenig, A. Endocrine emergencies in dogs and cats. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2013, 43(4), 869–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Verkest, K.R.; Fleeman, L.M.; Rand, J.S.; Morton, J.M. Basal measures of insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion and simplified glucose tolerance tests in dogs. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2010, 39(3), 194–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Fukuta, H.; Mori, A.; Urumuhan, N.; Lee, P.; Oda, H.; Saeki, K.; Kurishima, M.; Nozawa, S.; Mizutani, H.; Mishina, S.; Arai, T.; Sako, T. Characterization and comparison of insulin resistance induced by Cushing syndrome or diestrus against healthy control dogs as determined by euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic glucose clamp profile glucose in- fusion rate using an artificial pancreas apparatus. J Vet Med Sci 2012, 74(11), 1527–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Bailhache, E.; Nguyen, P.; Krempf, M.; Siliart, B.; Magot, T.; Ougueram, K. Lipoproteins abnormalities in obese insulin-resistant dogs. Metabolism 2003, 52(5), 559–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Renauld, A.; Gomez, N.V.; Scaramal, J.D.; Garrido, D.; Wanke, M.M. Natural estrous cycle in normal and diabetic bitches. Basal serum total lipids and cholesterol. Serum tryglicerides profiles during glucose and insulin tests. Acta Physiol Pharmacol Ther Latinoam 1998, 48, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Lawrence, M.C.; McKern, N.M.; Ward, C.W. Insulin receptor structure and its implications for the IGF-1 receptor. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2007, 17(6), 699–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Barbour, L.A.; McCurdy, C.E.; Hernandez, T.L.; Kirwan, J.P.; Catalano, P.M.; Friedman, J.E. Cellular mechanisms for insulin resistance in normal pregnancy and gestational diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007, 30, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Schäffer, L. A model for insulin binding to the insulin receptor. Eur J Biochem 1994, 221(3), 1127–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Johnston, V.; Frazzini, V.; Davidheiser, S.; Przybylski, R.J.; Kliegman, R.M. Insulin binding receptor number and binding affinity in newborn dogs. Pediatr Res 1991, 29, 611–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Sanvitto, G.L.; Marques, M.; Dellacha, J.M.; Turyn, D. Masked insulin receptors in rat hypothalamus microsomes. Horm Metab Res 1994, I, 160–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Batista, M.R.; Smith, M.S.; Snead, W.L.; Connolly, C.C.; Lacy, D.B.; Moore, M.C. Chronic estradiol and progesterone treatment in conscious dogs: ef- fects on insulin sensitivity and response to hypoglycemia. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2005, 289(4), R1064–R1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Yu, E.N.; Winnick, J.J.; Edgerton, D.S.; Scott, M.F.; Smith, M.S.; Farmer, B.; Williams, P.E.; Cherrington, A.D.; Moore, M.C. Hepatic and whole-body insulin metabolism during proestrus and estrus in mongrel dogs. Comp Med 2016, 66, 235–40. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  105. Hagman, R. Canine pyometra: What is new? Reprod Domest Anim 2017, 52, 288–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Smith, F.O. Canine pyometra. Theriogenology 2006, 66(3), 610–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. De Bosschere, H.; Ducatelle, R.; Vermeirsch, H.; Simoens, P.; Coryn, M. Estrogen-αand progesterone receptor expression in cystic endometrial hyperplasia and pyometra in the bitch. Anim Reprod Sci 2002, 70, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Hagman, R. Pyometra in Small Animals. Vet Clin North Small Anim Pract 2018, 48(4), 639–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Chen, L.; Chen, R.; Wang, H.; Liang, F. Mechanisms linking inflammation to insulin resistance. Int J Endocrinol. 2015, 2015, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Das, U.N. Current advances in sepsis and septic shock with particular emphasis on the role of insulin. Med Sci Monit 2003, 9, RA181–RA192. [Google Scholar]
  111. Das, U.N. Insulin in sepsis and septic shock. JAPI 2003, 51, 695–700. [Google Scholar]
  112. Grimble, R.F. Inflammatory status and insulin resistance. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2002, 5, 551–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Tilg, H.; Moschen, A.R. Inflammatory mechanisms in the regulation of insulin resistance. Mol Med 2008, 14, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. German, A.J.; Hervera, M.; Hunter, L.; Holden, S.L.; Morris, P.J.; Biourge, V.; Trayhurn, P. Improvement in insulin resistance and reduction in plasma inflammatory adipokines after weight loss in obese dogs. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2009, 37, 214–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Wakshlag, J.J.; Struble, A.M.; Levine, C.B.; Bushey, J.J.; Laflamme, D.P.; Long, G.M. The effects of weight loss on adipokines and markers of inflammation in Dogs. Br J Nutr 2011, 106, S11–S14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Jeremias, J.T.; Takeara, P.; Vendramini, T.H.A.; Rodrigues, R.B.A.; Perini, M.P.; Pedrinelli, V.; Teixeira, F.A.; Brunetto, M.A.; Pontieri, C.F.F. Markers of inflammation and insulin resistance in dogs before and after weight loss versus lean healthy dogs. Pesq Vet Bras 2020, 40, 300–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Marchi, P.H.; Vendramini, T.H.A.; Perini, M.P.; Zafalon, R.V.A.; Amaral, A.R.; Ochamotto, V.A.; Da Silveira, J.C.; Dagli, M.L.Z.; Brunetto, M.A. Obesity, inflammation, and cancer in dogs: Review and perspectives. Front Vet Sci 2022, 9, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Pöppl, A.G.; Müller, F.; Queiroga, L.; González, F.H.D. Insulin resistance due to periodontal disease in an old diabetic female poodle. Diab Res Treat 2015, 2, 1–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Nivy, R.; Bar-Am, Y.; Retzkin, H.; Bruchim, Y.; Mazaki-Tovi, M. Preliminary evaluation of the impact of periodontal treatment on markers of glycaemic control in dogs with diabetes mellitus: A prospective, clinical case series. Vet Rec 2023, 194, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Loste, A.; Marca, M.C. Study of the effect of total serum protein and albumin concentrations on canine fructosamine concentration. Can J Vet Res 1999, 63, 138–41. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  121. Pöppl, A.G. Canine diabetes mellitus: assessing risk factors to inform preventive measures. Vet Rec 2023, 192, 406–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Behrend, E.; Holford, A.; Lathan, P.; Rucinsky, R.; Schulman, R. 2018 AAHA Diabetes Management Guidelines for Dogs and Cats. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2018, 54, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Mol, J.A.; Garderen, E.V.; Selman, P.J.; Wolfswinkel, J.; Rijinberk, A.; Rutteman, G.R. Growth hormone mRNA in mammary gland tumors of dogs and cats. J Clin Invest 1995, 95, 2028–2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Murai, A.; Nishii, N.; Morita, T.; Yuki, M. GH-producing mammary tumors in two dogs with acromegaly. J Vet Med Sci 2012, 74, 771–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Staroňová, R.; Kožár, M.; Horňáková, L.; Fialkovičová, M. Diestrous diabetes mellitus remission in a Yorkshire terrier bitch. Vet Rec Case Rep 2021, 9, e205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Jeon, Y.; Bae, H.; Yu, D. A case of transient diabetes mellitus in a dog managed by ovariohysterectomy. J Biomed Transl Res. 2023, 24, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Lee, W.M.; Kooistra, H.S.; Mol, J.A.; Dieleman, S.J.; Schaefers-Okkens, A.C. Ovariectomy during the luteal phase influences secretion of prolactin, growth hormone, and insulin-like growth factor-I in the bitch. Theriogenology 2006, 66, 484–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Costa, R.S.; Jones, T. Anesthetic considerations in dogs and cats with diabetes mellitus. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2023, 53, 581–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Gilor, C.; Fleeman, L.M. One hundred years of insulin: Is it time for smart? J Small Anim Pract. 2022, 63, 645–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Shiel, R.E.; Mooney, C.T. Insulins for the long-term management of diabetes mellitus in dogs: a review. Canine Med Genet 2022, 9, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Teixeira, F.A.; Brunetto, M.A. Nutritional factors related to glucose and lipid modulation in diabetic dogs: literature review. Braz J Vet Res Anim Sci 2017, 54, 330–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Teixeira, F.A.; Machado, D.P.; Jeremias, J.T.; Queiroz, M.R.; Pontieri, C.F.F.; Brunetto, M.A. Effects of pea with barley and less-processed maize on glycaemic control in diabetic dogs. Br J Nutr 2018, 120, 777–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Teixeira, F.A.; Machado, D.P.; Jeremias, J.T.; Queiroz, M.R.; Pontieri, C.F.F.; Brunetto, M.A. Starch sources influence lipidaemia of diabetic dogs. BMC Vet Res 2020, 16, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Society for Comparative Endocrinology. Available online: https://www.veterinaryendocrinology.org/ (accessed on 12 January 2024).
  135. van Bokhorst, K.L.; Galac, S.; Kooistra, H.S.; Valtolina, C.; Fracassi, F.; Rosenberg, D.; Meij, B.P. Evaluation of hypophysectomy for treatment of hypersomatotropism in 25 cats. J Vet Intern Med 2021, 35(2), 834–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Fenn, J.; Kenny, P.J.; Scudder, C.J.; Hazuchova, K.; Gostelow, R.; Fowkes, R.C; Forcada, Y.; Church, D.B.; Niessen, S.J.M. Efficacy of hypophysectomy for the treatment of hypersomatotropism-induced diabetes mellitus in 68 cats. J Vet Intern Med 2021, 35(2), 823–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Gostelow, R.; Scudder, C.J.; Keyte, S.; Forcada, Y.; Fowkes, R.C; Schmid, D.B.; Church, D.B.; Niessen, S.J.M. Pasireotide long-acting release treatment for diabetic cats with underlying hypersomatotropism. J Vet Inter Med 2017, 31(2), 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Miceli, D.D.; García, J.D.; Pompili, G.A.; Amunategui, J.P.R.; Ferraris, S.; Pignataro, O.M.; Guitelman, M. Cabergoline treatment in cats with diabetes mellitus and hypersomatotropism. J Feline Med Surg 2022, 24(12), 1238–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Aptekmann, K.P.; Schwartz, D.S. A survey of owner attitudes and experiences in managing diabetic dogs. Vet J 2011, 190, e122–e124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Aptekmann, K.P.; Armstrong, J.; Coradini, M.; Rand, J. Owner experiences in treating dogs and cats diagnosed with diabetes mellitus in the United States. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2014, 50, 247–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Tardo, A.M.; Baldo, D.F.; Dondi, F.; Pietra, M.; Chiocchetti, R.; Fracassi, F. Survival estimates and outcome predictors in dogs with newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus treated in a veterinary teaching hospital. Vet Rec 2019, 185, 692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Gal, A.; Odunayo, A. Diabetes Ketoacidosis and Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemic Syndrome in Companion Animals. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2023, 53, 531–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Corradini, S.; Pilosio, B.; Dondi, F.; Linari, G.; Testa, S.; Brugnoli, F.; Gianella, P.; Pietra, M.; Fracassi, F. Accuracy of a flash glucose monitoring system in diabetic dogs. J Vet Intern Med 2016, 30, 983–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Baldo, D.F.; Fracassi, F. Continuous glucose monitoring in dogs and cats. Application of new technology to an old problem. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2023, 53, 591–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Fink, H.; Herbert, C.; Gilor, C. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of insulin detemir and insulin glargine 300 U/mL in healthy dogs. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2018, 64, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Harris-Samson, A.R.; Rand, J.; Ford, S.L. Detemir improves diabetic regulation in poorly controlled diabetic dogs with concurrent diseases. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2023, 261, 237–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Miceli, D.D.; Pignataro, O.P.; Castillo, V.A. Concurrent hyperadrenocorticism and diabetes mellitus in dogs. Res Vet Sci 2017, 115, 425–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Fleeman, L.; Gilor, C. Insulin Therapy in Small Animals, Part 3: Dogs. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2023, 53(3), 645–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Kuzi, S.; Mazaki-Tovi, M.; Hershkovitz, S.; Yas, E.; Hess, R.S. Long-term field study of lispro and neutral protamine Hagedorn insulins treatment in dogs with diabetes mellitus. Vet Med Sci 2023, 9(2), 704–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Niessen, S.J.M.; Powney, S.; Guitian, J.; Niessen, A.P.M.; Pion, P.D.; Shaw, J.A.M; Church, D.B. Evaluation of a Quality-of-Life Tool for Dogs with Diabetes Mellitus. J Vet Intern Med. 2012, 26, 953–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Baan, M.; Taverne, M.A.M.; Kooistra, H.S.; Gier, J.D.; Dieleman, S.J.; Okkens, A.C. Induction of parturition in the bitch with the progesterone-receptor blocker aglépristone. Theriogenology 2005, 63, 1958–1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Galac, S.; Kooistra, H.S.; Butinar, J.; Bevers, M.M.; Dieleman, S.J.; Voorhout, G.; Okkens, A.C. Termination of mid-gestation pregnancy in bitches with aglepristone, a progesterone receptor antagonist. Theriogenology 2000, 53, 941–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Binli, F.; Inan, I.; Büyükbudak, F.; Gram, A.; Kaya, D.; Liman, N.; Aslan, S.; Fındık, M.; Ay, S.S. The Efficacy of a 3-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Inhibitor for the Termination of Mid-Term Pregnancies in Dogs. Animals 2022, 12, 2475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Galac, S.; Kooistra, H.S.; Dieleman, S.J.; Cestnik, V.; Okkens, A.C. Effects of aglépristone, a progesterone receptor antagonist, administered during the early luteal phase in non-pregnant bitches. Theriogenology 2004, 62, 494–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Bigliardi, E.; Bresciani, C.; Callegari, D.; Ianni, F.D.; Morini, G.; Parmigiani, E.; Bianchi, E. Use of aglepristone for the treatment of P4 induced insulin resistance in dogs. J Vet Sci 2014, 15, 267–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Bhatti, S.F.M.; Duchateau, L.; Okkens, A.C.; Vanham, L.M.L.; Mol, J.A.; Kooistra, H.S. Treatment of growth hormone excess in dogs with the progesterone receptor antagonist aglépristone. Theriogenology 2006, 66, 797–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Lemetayer, J.; Blois, S. Update on the use of trilostane in dogs. Can Vet J 2018, 59, 397–407. [Google Scholar]
  158. Sanders, K.; Kooistra, H.S.; Galac, S. Treating canine Cushing’s syndrome: Current options and future prospects. Vet J 2018, 241, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Gier, J.D; Wolthers, C.H.J.; Galac, S.; Okkens, A.C.; Kooistra, H.S. Effects of the 3-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase inhibitor trilostane on luteal progesterone production in the dog. Theriogenology 2011, 75, 1271–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Jeukenne, P.; Verstegen, J. Termination of dioestrus and induction of oestrus in dioestrous nonpregnant bitches by the prolactin antagonist cabergoline. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1997, 51, 59–66. [Google Scholar]
  161. Romagnoli, S.; Stelletta, C.; Milani, C.; Gelli, D.; Falomo, M.E.; Mollo, A. Clinical use of deslorelin for the control of reproduction in the bitch. Reprod Dom Anim 2009, 44 (Suppl. 2), 36–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Hadd, M.J.; Bienhoff, S.E.; Little, S.E.; Geller, S.; Ogne-Stevenson, J.; Dupree, T.J.; Scott-Moncrieff, J.C. Safety and effectiveness of the sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitor bexagliflozin in cats newly diagnosed with diabetes mellitus. J Vet Intern Med 2023, 37, 915–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Reinhart, M.R.; Graves, T.K. The Future of Diabetes Therapies New Insulins and Insulin Delivery Systems, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Analogs, Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter Type 2 Inhibitors, and Beta Cell Replacement Therapy. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2023, 53, 675–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Beauvais, W.; Cardwell, J. M.; Brodbelt, D. C. The effect of neutering on the risk of mammary tumours in dogs – a systematic review. J Small Anim Pract 2012, 53, 314–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Edmunds, G.; Beck, S.; Kale, U.K.; Spasic, I.; O’Neill, D.; Brodbelt, B.; Smalley, M.J. Associations between dog breed and clinical features of mammary epithelial neoplasia in bitches: an Epidemiological Study of Submissions to a Single Diagnostic Pathology Centre Between 2008–2021. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2023, 28, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Sundburg, C.R.; Belanger, J.M.; Bannasch, D.L.; Famula, T.R.; Oberbauer, A.M. Gonadectomy effects on the risk of immune disorders in the dog: a retrospective study. BMC Vet Res 2016, 12, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Urfer, S.R.; Kaeberlein, M. Desexing dogs: A review of the current literature. Animals 2019, 9, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Palestrini, C.; Mazzola, S.; Caione, B.; Groppetti, D.; Pecile, A.; Minero, M.; Cannas, S. Influence of Gonadectomy on Canine Behavior. Animals 2021, 11, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Pegram, C.; Raffan, E.; White, E.; Ashworth, A.H.; Brodbelt, D.C.; Church, D.B.; O'Neill, D.G. Frequency, breed predisposition and demographic risk factors for overweight status in dogs in the UK. J Small Anim Pract 2021, 62, 521–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Hart, B.L.; Hart, L.A.; Thigpen, A.P.; Willits, N.H. Assisting decision-making on age of neutering for 35 breeds of dogs: associated joint disorders, cancers, and urinary incontinence. Front Vet Sci 2020, 7, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Pegram, C.; O’Neill, D.G.; Church†, D. B.; Hall, J.; Owen, L.; Brodbelt, D. C. Spaying and urinary incontinence in bitches under UK primary veterinary care: A case–control study. J Small Anim Pract 2019, 60, 395–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Espiñeira, I.M.; Vidal, P.N.; Ghersevich, M.C.; Arias, E.A.S.; Bosetti, F.; Blatter, M.F.C.; Miceli, D.D.; Castillo, V.A. Adrenal cortex stimulation with hCG in spayed female dogs with Cushing’s syndrome: Is the LH-dependent variant possible? Open Vet J 2021, 11, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Kutzler, M.A. Possible relationship between long-term adverse health effects of gonad-removing surgical sterilization and luteinizing hormone in dogs. Animals 2020, 10, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Meij, B.P.; Kooistra, H.S.; Rijnberk, A. Hypothalamus-Pituitary System. In Clinical Endocrinology of Dogs and Cats an Illustrated Text, 2nd ed.; Rijnberk, A.; Kooistra, H.S., Eds.; Schlütersche, Hannover, Germany, 2010; Volume 1, pp. 25-34.
  175. Fracassi, F.; Gandini, G.; Diana, A.; Preziosi, R.; van den Ingh, T.S.G.A.M.; Famigli-Bergamini, P.; Kooistra, H.S. Acromegaly due to a somatroph adenoma in a dog. Domest Anim Endocrinol, 2007, 32(1), 43-54. [CrossRef]
  176. Steele, M.M.E.; Lawson, J.S.; Scudder, C.; Watson, A.H.; Ho, N.T.Z.; Yaffy, D.; Batchelor, D.; Fenn, J. Transsphenoidal hypophysectomy for the treatment of hypersomatotropism secondary to a pituitary somatotroph adenoma in a dog. J Vet Intern Med 2024, 38(1), 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Lee, W.M.; Diaz-Espineira, M.; Mol, J.A.; Rijnberk, A.; Kooistra, H.S. Primary hypothyroidism in dogs is associated with elevated GH release. J Endocrinol 2001, 168(1), 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Diaz-Espiñeira, M.M.; Galac, S.; Mol, J.A.; Rijnberk, A.; Kooistra, H.S. Thyrotropin-releasing hormone-induced growth hormone secretion in dogs with primary hypothyroidism. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2008, 34(2), 176–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Johnstone, T.; Mooney, C.T. Hypothyroidism associated with acromegaly and insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus in a Samoyed. Aust Vet J 2004, 92(11), 437–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Rasotto, R.; Berlato, D.; Goldschmidt, M.H.; Zappulli, V. Prognostic Significance of Canine Mammary Tumor Histologic Subtypes: An Observational Cohort Study of 229 Cases. Vet Pathol 2017, 54(4), 571–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Klinkenberg, H.; Sallander, M.H.; Hedhammar, A. Feeding, exercise and weight identified as risk factors in canine diabetes mellitus. J Nutr 2006, 136, 1985–1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Kipperman, B.S.; German, A.J. The responsibility of veterinarians to address companion animal obesity. Animals, 2018, 8, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Rak, M.B.; Gilor, C.; Niessen, S.J.M.; Furrow, E. Spontaneous remission and relapse of diabetes mellitus in a male dog. J Vet Intern Med 2024 (Online ahead of print). [CrossRef]
Preprints 99075 g001
Figure 1. Hormonal fluctuations during the canine estrus cycle. The scheme represents pituitary gonadotrophins (FSH, LH, and prolactin) patterns, as well as resultant ovarian estradiol and progesterone responses. The progesterone influence on basal GH concentration and pulsatility pattern are also represented. The FSH line (blue) represents fluctuations between 15-40 to 200-400 ng/mL during the estrus cycle, while the LH line (yellow) represents variations from 0.4-1.5 to 5-40 ng/mL, and the prolactin line (green) shows fluctuations ranging from 0.5-2 to 5-30 ng/mL. Estradiol (pink) and progesterone (red) lines range from 5-10 pg/mL and 0.2-0.5 ng/mL when in basal levels, to 45-120 pg/mL and 15-90 ng/mL, respectively [19]. Basal GH concentration during anestrus varies around 1.4 ± 0.2 µg-1 and can reach values around 2.3 ± 0.2 µg-1 18-20 days after ovulation. During this early diestrus, the GH pulsatile secretion pattern is marked reduced from ~5 to ~2 peaks/12h as well as the pulse duration from~41 to ~11 minutes compared with anestrus. All these GH pulse and concentration abnormalities were slowly mitigated during the subsequent weeks following progesterone throwback to basal levels [29].
Figure 1. Hormonal fluctuations during the canine estrus cycle. The scheme represents pituitary gonadotrophins (FSH, LH, and prolactin) patterns, as well as resultant ovarian estradiol and progesterone responses. The progesterone influence on basal GH concentration and pulsatility pattern are also represented. The FSH line (blue) represents fluctuations between 15-40 to 200-400 ng/mL during the estrus cycle, while the LH line (yellow) represents variations from 0.4-1.5 to 5-40 ng/mL, and the prolactin line (green) shows fluctuations ranging from 0.5-2 to 5-30 ng/mL. Estradiol (pink) and progesterone (red) lines range from 5-10 pg/mL and 0.2-0.5 ng/mL when in basal levels, to 45-120 pg/mL and 15-90 ng/mL, respectively [19]. Basal GH concentration during anestrus varies around 1.4 ± 0.2 µg-1 and can reach values around 2.3 ± 0.2 µg-1 18-20 days after ovulation. During this early diestrus, the GH pulsatile secretion pattern is marked reduced from ~5 to ~2 peaks/12h as well as the pulse duration from~41 to ~11 minutes compared with anestrus. All these GH pulse and concentration abnormalities were slowly mitigated during the subsequent weeks following progesterone throwback to basal levels [29].
Preprints 99075 g001
Preprints 99075 g002
Figure 2. Hypothetical causal diagram for progesterone-related diabetes mellitus in dogs [2,5,64,121]. The arrows represent evidence obtained from studies with dogs, but also from studies with humans, animal models, and cell cultures. The main determinants of glycemia (purple) are beta-cell function and peripheric insulin sensitivity (red), both influenced by intrinsic factors such as age and genetics (blue). Factors shown in yellow can potentially be modified by proper patient management. Glycemia can also affect beta-cell function by glucotoxicity (heavy double arrow). Serial unknown factors may exert positive or negative effects on beta-cell function (“black box”) and influence the patient's ability to increase insulin secretion to avoid hyperglycemia in an insulin-resistant environment. Those factors potentially are also determinants of diabetic remission after resolution of progesterone-related conditions.
Figure 2. Hypothetical causal diagram for progesterone-related diabetes mellitus in dogs [2,5,64,121]. The arrows represent evidence obtained from studies with dogs, but also from studies with humans, animal models, and cell cultures. The main determinants of glycemia (purple) are beta-cell function and peripheric insulin sensitivity (red), both influenced by intrinsic factors such as age and genetics (blue). Factors shown in yellow can potentially be modified by proper patient management. Glycemia can also affect beta-cell function by glucotoxicity (heavy double arrow). Serial unknown factors may exert positive or negative effects on beta-cell function (“black box”) and influence the patient's ability to increase insulin secretion to avoid hyperglycemia in an insulin-resistant environment. Those factors potentially are also determinants of diabetic remission after resolution of progesterone-related conditions.
Preprints 99075 g002
Preprints 99075 g003
Figure 3. Ten-year-old mixed breed dog recently diagnosed with diabetes three weeks after estrus. (a) The general patient´s appearance shows weight loss and increased thick folding of the skin over the withers (b) and neck (d). (c) Discrete widening of the interdental space and gingival hyperplasia. (e) A mammary mass was identified during the physical exam (red arrows). Insulin therapy was started (NPH, 0.4 U/kg, q12h) associated with a diabetic commercial food (Royal Canin Diabetic). On day 5, the insulin dose was adjusted to 0.55 U/kg, q12h, due to initial poor clinical and glycemic responses, and a hypoglycemic crisis was documented on day 8. Insulin was reduced back to the initial dose, but new hypoglycemic episodes were documented in the following days. Insulin was interrupted on day 11 and diabetic remission was associated with natural progesterone reduction on the second diestrus half. The owner refuses to proceed with spaying surgery, and the dog relapses into diabetes five months later after the subsequent estrus. At this time the bitch was spayed and underwent a mastectomy without achieving diabetic remission a second time. Her insulin need was dramatically reduced after surgery (0.2 U/kg, q12h). The dog was followed until death four years later and never achieved remission again despite maintaining a relatively “low” insulin requirement over time.
Figure 3. Ten-year-old mixed breed dog recently diagnosed with diabetes three weeks after estrus. (a) The general patient´s appearance shows weight loss and increased thick folding of the skin over the withers (b) and neck (d). (c) Discrete widening of the interdental space and gingival hyperplasia. (e) A mammary mass was identified during the physical exam (red arrows). Insulin therapy was started (NPH, 0.4 U/kg, q12h) associated with a diabetic commercial food (Royal Canin Diabetic). On day 5, the insulin dose was adjusted to 0.55 U/kg, q12h, due to initial poor clinical and glycemic responses, and a hypoglycemic crisis was documented on day 8. Insulin was reduced back to the initial dose, but new hypoglycemic episodes were documented in the following days. Insulin was interrupted on day 11 and diabetic remission was associated with natural progesterone reduction on the second diestrus half. The owner refuses to proceed with spaying surgery, and the dog relapses into diabetes five months later after the subsequent estrus. At this time the bitch was spayed and underwent a mastectomy without achieving diabetic remission a second time. Her insulin need was dramatically reduced after surgery (0.2 U/kg, q12h). The dog was followed until death four years later and never achieved remission again despite maintaining a relatively “low” insulin requirement over time.
Preprints 99075 g003
Preprints 99075 g004
Figure 4. Nine-year-old Frech Bulldog presented with poorly controlled diabetes diagnosed after the last estrus five weeks before. (a) Skin thick folds in the neck and (b) marked widened interdental space with gingival hyperplasia and discrete enlarged tongue. The bitch had also a mammary mass and was submitted to ovariohysterectomy and mastectomy. Diabetic remission was achieved four weeks later. At fourteen years the dog relapsed due to chronic kidney disease. (c) Note the clear reduction in soft tissue overgrowth and skin folding; (d) however, bony changes documented in the mouth persists.
Figure 4. Nine-year-old Frech Bulldog presented with poorly controlled diabetes diagnosed after the last estrus five weeks before. (a) Skin thick folds in the neck and (b) marked widened interdental space with gingival hyperplasia and discrete enlarged tongue. The bitch had also a mammary mass and was submitted to ovariohysterectomy and mastectomy. Diabetic remission was achieved four weeks later. At fourteen years the dog relapsed due to chronic kidney disease. (c) Note the clear reduction in soft tissue overgrowth and skin folding; (d) however, bony changes documented in the mouth persists.
Preprints 99075 g004
Preprints 99075 g006
Figure 6. Evolution of acromegalic features over time in a mixed breed intact dog. (a) Facial and neck skin aspect by the age of five years. By the age of eight years, (b,c) skin folding in the ventral neck and over the wither, and (d) increased interdental space were starting to become evident. (e) Mammary glands were well demarked despite being in anestrus and never have mated. Ovariohysterectomy was performed as a preventive measure against PRDM when it was nine years old. (f) Increased skin folding in the ventral neck by the time surgery was performed. The bitch never developed diabetes and died two years later due to a liver tumor.
Figure 6. Evolution of acromegalic features over time in a mixed breed intact dog. (a) Facial and neck skin aspect by the age of five years. By the age of eight years, (b,c) skin folding in the ventral neck and over the wither, and (d) increased interdental space were starting to become evident. (e) Mammary glands were well demarked despite being in anestrus and never have mated. Ovariohysterectomy was performed as a preventive measure against PRDM when it was nine years old. (f) Increased skin folding in the ventral neck by the time surgery was performed. The bitch never developed diabetes and died two years later due to a liver tumor.
Preprints 99075 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.

Downloads

328

Views

201

Comments

0

Subscription

Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.

Email

Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated