Preprint
Article

Analyses of Conditional Knockout Mice for Pogz, a Responsible Gene for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, in Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons in the Brain

Altmetrics

Downloads

130

Views

49

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

09 February 2024

Posted:

13 February 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
POGZ (Pogo transposable element derived with ZNF domain) is known to function as a regulator of gene expression. While variations in the POGZ gene have been associated with intellectual disabilities and developmental delays in humans, the exact pathophysiological mechanisms re-main unclear. To shed light on this, we created two lines of conditional knockout mice for Pogz, one specific to excitatory neurons (Emx1-Pogz mice) and the other to inhibitory neurons (Gad2-Pogz mice) in the brain. Emx1-Pogz mice showed a decrease in body weight, similar to total Pogz knockout mice. Although the two lines did not display significant morphological ab-normalities in the telencephalon, impaired POGZ function affected the electrophysiological prop-erties of both excitatory and inhibitory neurons differently. These findings suggest that these mouse lines could be useful tools for clarifying the precise pathophysiological mechanisms of neurodevelopmental disorders associated with POGZ gene abnormalities.
Keywords: 
Subject: Biology and Life Sciences  -   Neuroscience and Neurology

1. Introduction

POGZ (Pogo transposable element derived with ZNF domain) is a heterochromatin protein 1 α (HP1α) -binding protein containing a cluster of multiple C2H2-type zinc fingers, a centromere protein (CENP) B-like DNA-binding domain, and a DDE domain that might regulate gene expression [1]. POGZ functions as a transcriptional regulator, and influences gene expression by interacting with proteins and DNAs through the zinc fingers [1,2]. Since POGZ is also involved in chromatin remodeling, a process that involves modifying the structure of DNA and histones, this molecule is likely to regulate gene expression by modulating chromatin structure. On the other hand, given the primary expression at the embryonic stages of mouse brain [3], POGZ is assumed to play a crucial role in neuronal development.
With trio-based whole exome sequencing (WES) and whole genome sequencing, POGZ has been identified as a causative gene for White-Sutton syndrome (WSS), an autosomal dominant neurodevelopmental disorder (NDD). The clinical spectrum of this syndrome is relatively wide, with known multisystem manifestations, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD), developmental delay, and intellectual disability (ID), feeding and gastrointestinal difficulties, seizures, sleep problems, hearing loss, vision problems and genitourinary abnormalities [4,5,6,7]. In addition, congenital heart disease is reported to be associated with POGZ haploinsufficiency in some cases [6,8]. Among a total of 141 cases of WSS caused by POGZ gene abnormalities [6], 80 % were null variants, suggesting that loss-of-function is the main mechanism of pathogenicity. However, not only underlying mechanism(s) of POGZ gene abnormalities but also physiological significance of POGZ during brain development remains to be elucidated at the molecular and cell biological levels.
Aiming to elucidate the etiology of POGZ disease, several lines of mouse models have been generated. A model with a heterozygous or homozygous nervous system-specific deletion of the Pogz gene mimicked several of the human symptoms, such as microcephaly, growth impairment, increased sociability, and learning and motor deficits [9]. Mice with the heterozygous Q1038R variation exhibited decreased body and brain size, and ASD-related behavioral abnormalities [10]. Significantly, complete knockout (KO) of Pogz [11] or homozygosity for the Q1038R variation in mice [10] both resulted in early embryonic lethality. Computed tomography (CT) scanning of Q1038R homozygous mouse embryos (E15.5) showed a ventricular septal defect, which was suspected to cause embryonic lethality, suggesting the relationship between congenital heart disease and POGZ mutation [6].
In the present study, we generated two lines of conditional KO (cKO) mice for Pogz in 1) excitatory neurons in cerebral cortex and 2) inhibitory neurons in the central nervous system (CNS). We then performed morphological, cell biological, and electrophysiological analyses using these two mouse lines to elucidate the physiological significance of POGZ in excitatory and inhibitory neurons. While the brains from the two lines appeared to morphologically normal, electrophysiological analyses revealed that impaired POGZ function may be associated with altered synaptic functions, which may be related to the underlying mechanism of neuronal aspects of WSS.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethics statement

We followed the fundamental guidelines for proper conduct of animal experiments and related activity in academic research institutions under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (Japan). All protocols for animal handling and treatment were reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Institute for Developmental Research, Aichi Developmental Disability Center (approval number: 2019-013).

2.2. Generation of the POGZ mutant model mice

C57BL/6J mice carrying a floxed (exon 7) Pogz allele (Pogz fl/fl) [9] were crossed with the Emx1-Cre line for dorsal telencephalon-specific KO mice [12] and Gad2-Cre [12] line to generate cKO mice specific for CNS-inhibitory neurons. Genotypes were determined by PCR as described [9]. All animals were housed at a temperature of 22–24 °C with 40–60% humidity, under a 12 h light/dark cycle (light on at 07:00, off at 19:00), with free access to food and water. Embryonic day 0.5 (E0.5) was typically defined as noon on the day when a vaginal plug was observed.

2.3. Antibodies

Polyclonal rabbit anti-POGZ and anti-Parvalbumin (PV) were generated as described previously [3,13]. Rabbit polyclonal anti-GFP (Medical & Biological Laboratories, Cat# 598, 1:1000), anti-Cux1 (Gene Tex, Cat# GTX56275, 1:300), anti-Pax6 (COVANCE, Cat# PRB-278P, 1:500), anti-phospho-Histone H3 (Ser10) (PHH3) (Cell Signaling, Cat# 9701, 1:400) were used. Rat monoclonal anti-Ctip2 was from Abcam (Cat# ab18465, 1:500). Alexa Fluor 488- and 568-labeled IgG were used as secondary antibodies (Abcam, Cat# ab150077, Cat# ab175471, 1:1000). 4’, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat# D9542, 0.2 μg/ml) was used for staining DNA.

2.4. Immunohistochemistry

For sampling the brains, mice were deeply anesthetized by inhalation of isoflurane, and then perfused with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS. After perfusion, the embryonic and adult brains were dissected out and soaked in 4% PFA for at least 16 h, and then sectioned coronally at 100 μm- or 12 μm-thickness. For immunostaining of embryonic brains, sections were placed onto MAS-coat slides (Matsunami Glass, Osaka, Japan) and treated with HistoVT One (Nacalai Tesque Inc., Kyoto, Japan, Cat# 06380-05) at 70 °C for 20 min. For adult brains, floating sections were incubated in Epitope Retrieval Solution pH 9 (Leica Biosystems, Cat# RE7119-CE) at 50 °C for 3 h. After washing with PBS containing 0.05% Tween (PBST), the sections were blocked with 1% BSA in PBST and primary antibody reaction was performed in PBST at 4℃ overnight. Secondary antibody reaction together with nuclear staining with DAPI (0.2 μg/ml) was carried out in PBST for 1 h. Stained sections were mounted with the anti-fading mounting medium (PERMAFLUOR, Cat#TA-030-FM, Thermo Scientific). Fluorescent images were captured with an LSM880 confocal laser microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Bright field images were captured with a BZ-9000 microscope (Keyence, Osaka, Japan).

2.5. Golgi-Cox staining and spine analysis

Golgi-Cox staining was performed using the FD Rapid GolgiStain kit (FD NeuroTechnologies, Columbia, MD, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions with slight modifications. After mice (one month old, male) were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane and decapitated, brains were quickly harvested, and immersed in FD Solution AB (A:B = 1:1) for 2 weeks at room temperature in the dark. After transferring to FD Solution C or tissue-protectant solution (20% Sucrose, 15% glycerol in DDW) and keeping in the dark at 4°C for 72 h, the brains were sectioned coronally at 100-μm thickness in the tissue-protectant solution. The sections were mounted and stained as described in the instructions. After being dehydrated, the slides were mounted with Permount (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). Z-stack images (20 – 30) with 1-μm intervals for Golgi-stained dendrites and 0.1-μm intervals for spines were taken using a 20x and 100x lens, respectively, on a BZ-9000 microscope. Branch number and length of basal dendrite were analyzed using NeuronJ, a plugin of Fiji. The number of spine on each apical dendrite within 50-100 μm away from the cell soma was counted using Dendritic Spine Counter, a plugin of Fiji.

2.6. In utero electroporation

In utero electroporation was performed as previously described [14]. Briefly, after mice were deeply anesthetized with the mixture of 3 drugs as mentioned earlier, indicated plasmid was injected into the lateral ventricles of embryos, followed by electroporation using a NEPA21 electroporator (NEPA Gene, Chiba, Japan) with 50 ms of V electronic pulse for 5 times with 450 ms intervals. In this method, each plasmid was introduced into the somatosensory area which is included in the parietal lobe. Brains were fixed at indicated embryonic or postnatal day, sectioned, and analyzed. All experimental procedures were carried out during daytime. Animals were neither excluded nor harmed during experiments.

2.7. Electrophysiological analyses

The analyses were performed as described previously [15]. Briefly, coronal cortical slices (300 μm-thickness) from P12 - 19 mice were prepared in ice-cold cutting Krebs solution using a microslicer (PRO7, Dosaka, Kyoto, Japan). The slices were transferred to a holding chamber containing standard Krebs solution and incubated at room tetmperature. For recording, a slice was superfused with standard Krebs solution at a rate of 3-4 ml/min. To record synaptic currents, patch pipettes made from borosilicate glass capillaries were filled with CsCl-based internal solution. For current-clamp recordings, patch pipettes were filled with K-gluconate-based internal solution. Whole-cell recordings were conducted on pyramidal neurons in the cortical layer II/III and inhibitory neurons in the cerebral cortex using a patch-clamp amplifier (Axopatch 200B, Molecular Devices, Foster City, CA, USA) and pCLAMP8 software (Molecular Devices).

2.8. Statistical analyses

No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample sizes, but our sample sizes are similar to those generally employed in the field. No randomization was used to collect all the data, but cell counting and traces for all cell imaging experiments were assessed in a blinded manner by a technical staff member who was not aware of the experimental conditions. Statistical significance was determined by Welch’s t-test using Prism software (GraphPad Prism 7, GraphPad Software Inc.). Results are expressed as means ± SD. The level of statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Data were not assessed for normality in this study. No test for outliers was conducted in this study. Because data were not assessed for normality, we did not describe and justify any normalization, which did not result in the need for non-parametric analysis. Box and whisker plots represent median value (horizontal bars), 25 to 75 percentiles (box edges), and whiskers extend to the largest and smallest observed values that are not outliers while the cross in the boxes shows the average value.

3. Results

3.1. Generation of Pogz conditional KO mice for excitatory and inhibitory neurons

We generated Pogz cKO mice for excitatory neurons in the cerebral cortex and inhibitory neurons in the CNS by crossing floxed-Pogz mice with Emx1-Cre and Gad2-Cre driver mice, respectively. These mice were termed Emx1-Pogz mice (Emx1(+/-)/Pogz(-/-)) and Gad2-Pogz mice (Gad2(+/-)/Pogz(-/-)). Control littermates without Pogz deletion were also prepared.
The gross morphology of telencephalon of Emx1-Pogz mice and Gad2-Pogz mice little differed from that of control littermates at young adult stage (Figure 1A). The most obvious phenotype associated with Pogz-cKO mice, in which homozygous mutations were restricted to the nervous system, was a significant reduction in the body weight relative to control littermates across development [9]. As to the cKO mice we generated, Emx1-Pogz mice demonstrated reduced body weight, whereas Gad2-Pogz mice showed normal body size (Fig. 1B and C), suggesting a crucial role of excitatory neurons in the mouse body size.
The efficient deletion of Pogz in excitatory and inhibitory neurons was confirmed in Emx1- and Gad2-Pogz mice, respectively, by immunostaining. POGZ was barely detected in cortical neurons of Emx1-Pogz mice at P0 when compared to those of wild-type mouse [3], whereas the protein was strongly detected in medium spiny neurons in the striatum at P30 (Figure 1D, left). As to Gad2-Pogz mice, POGZ was strongly visualized in pyramidal neurons in the upper cortical layers, whereas immunoreactivity was hardly detected in the striatum under the same conditions (Figure 1D, right).
Figure 1. Characterization of the mouse lines with conditional Pogz-deficiency in excitatory and inhibitory neurons in cerebral cortex. (A) Coronal sections of brains of Emx1- and Gad2-Pogz mice and the control littermate at P30 were stained for DAPI. (B and C) Body weight of Emx1- and Gad2-Pogz mice (male and female) was compared at P30 with that of control littermates. n = 14 and 7 for Control and Emx1-Pogz male, respectively, and n = 8 and 7 for Control and Emx1-Pogz female, respectively (B). n = 9 and 8 for Control and Gad2-Pogz male, respectively, and n = 9 and 10 for Control and Gad2-Pogz female, respectively (C). For detailed information of box plots, see “Statistical analyses” in “Materials and methods” section. (D) Coronal brain sections of the somatosensory area (P0 or P30) and striatum (P30) from Emx1-Pogz (left panels) and Gad2-Pogz (right panels) mice were stained with anti-POGZ (green) plus DAPI (blue) (left panels) or anti-POGZ (red) plus anti-Ctip2 (green) (right panels). Scale bars, 500 μm (A) and 50 μm (D).
Figure 1. Characterization of the mouse lines with conditional Pogz-deficiency in excitatory and inhibitory neurons in cerebral cortex. (A) Coronal sections of brains of Emx1- and Gad2-Pogz mice and the control littermate at P30 were stained for DAPI. (B and C) Body weight of Emx1- and Gad2-Pogz mice (male and female) was compared at P30 with that of control littermates. n = 14 and 7 for Control and Emx1-Pogz male, respectively, and n = 8 and 7 for Control and Emx1-Pogz female, respectively (B). n = 9 and 8 for Control and Gad2-Pogz male, respectively, and n = 9 and 10 for Control and Gad2-Pogz female, respectively (C). For detailed information of box plots, see “Statistical analyses” in “Materials and methods” section. (D) Coronal brain sections of the somatosensory area (P0 or P30) and striatum (P30) from Emx1-Pogz (left panels) and Gad2-Pogz (right panels) mice were stained with anti-POGZ (green) plus DAPI (blue) (left panels) or anti-POGZ (red) plus anti-Ctip2 (green) (right panels). Scale bars, 500 μm (A) and 50 μm (D).
Preprints 98666 g001aPreprints 98666 g001b

3.2. Cortical architecture of Emx1-Pogz mice in embryonic and adult stages

After birth, dendritic arborization, the cerebral cortex undergoes a series of developmental processes, including dendritic arborization, axon extension, synapse formation, and myelination, to establish mature layer structures in a region-specific manner. We conducted morphological analyses of Emx1-Pogz mice, and immunostained their brains with Cux1 (a marker for neurons in layer II to IV) and Ctip2 (a marker for neurons in layer V/VI) at P0 and P30. Since the cell size of Ctip2-positive layer V neurons was larger than that of layer VI neurons, layers II~IV, V, VI, and white matter were roughly assignable in the somatosensory area. Based on the staining patterns of Ctip2 and Cux1, the layer structure of the cerebral cortex of this line did not differ significantly from that of control littermates at these time points (Figure 2A).
During brain development, cortical excitatory neurons migrate from the ventricular zone (VZ) toward the pial surface. This process is frequently affected by blocking the expression of genes involved in the brain development [16]. Although the cortical layer structure appeared to be normal in Emx1-Pogz mice, neuronal migration might be affected during corticogenesis. To test this possibility, Emx1-Pogz mice were crossed and the resulting embryos were electroporated in utero with pCAG-EGFP (0.5μg) at E14 and fixed at P0. When the distribution of EGFP-positive cells was examined, most of them migrated to the superficial layer of the cortical plate (CP) just like the control mice (Figure 2B). Hence, the radial migration of cortical excitatory neurons is thought to be normal in Emx1-Pogz mice.
We then analyzed interhemispheric axon projections of cortical neurons in Emx1-Pogz mice in vivo. pCAG-EGFP (0.5μg) was electroporated in utero into control embryos at E14, fixed at P16, and the sections were stained for GFP. The results showed that axon bundles extended normally into the contralateral hemisphere (Figure 2C, left panels), indicating the successful development of interhemispheric connections. Similarly, axons from POGZ-deficient cortical neurons extended appropriately into the cortical layers on the contralateral side after reaching the contralateral white matter at P16 (Figure 2C, right panels). These observations strongly suggest that there is no significant defect in the cortical development in Emx1-Pogz mice.

3.3. Cortical architecture of Gad2-Pogz mice

The cortical layer structure of Gad2-Pogz mice did not show any significant differences from that of control littermates when immunostained for Cux1 and Ctip2 at P30 (Figure 3A). This finding is consistent with the observations made in Emx1-Pogz mice (Figure 2A). To investigate whether the deficiency of Pogz in inhibitory neurons affects their generation and distribution in the cerebral cortex, we examined the cortical architecture of this line. Staining for phospho-histone H3 (pHH3) in E13 cortical slices revealed that the distribution pattern and number of pHH3-positive mitotic cells in the medial ganglionic eminence (MGE) were comparable to those of control mice (Figure 3B). These findings suggest that POGZ is not essential for inhibitory neuron generation. Furthermore, we observed that the distribution and number of PV-positive inhibitory neurons were minimally affected in the cerebral cortex (Figure 3C) and hippocampus (Figure 3D) at P30. Our investigation of the density and distribution of medium spiny neurons, which are inhibitory neurons dominantly distributed in the striatum, revealed that they were normal and similar to the control littermate (Figure 3E).

3.4. Role of POGZ in the dendritic arbor development in vivo

Given that the principal neurological manifestations associated with Pogz gene abnormalities, such as ID and ASD, are likely linked to deficiencies in synapse network formation and/or maintenance, an analysis was conducted on the morphology of dendrites and synapses in Golgi-stained pyramidal neurons located in layer II/III of the somatosensory cortices of Emx1-Pogz mice at P30. The study found that there were no significant differences in the length and branch numbers of basal dendrites between Emx1-Pogz mice and their control littermates (Figure 4A – C), indicating that the genetic modification did not have a significant impact on these parameters. Additionally, the study quantified the dendritic spines of layer II/III pyramidal neurons in Emx1-Pogz mice and found no significant alterations were observed in spine density within the somatosensory area when compared to the control mice (Figure 4D and E). These results suggest that the genetic modification did not have a significant effect on dendritic spine density in this region. Overall, the study provides valuable insights into the impact of the Emx1-Pogz genetic modification on neuronal morphology and function.
We then conducted the same analyses as described above, focusing on Gad2-Pogz mice. Our findings indicate that the absence of POGZ in inhibitory neurons within the CNS had minimal effects on the total length and branch number of basal dendrites in pyramidal neurons located in cortical layer II/III of the somatosensory area when compared to control littermates (Figure 4F - H). Furthermore, it was observed that there was no significant impact on the spine densities of layer II/III pyramidal neurons in the model mice (Figure 4I and J). These findings suggest that the deficiency of Pogz in inhibitory neurons has limited influence on the morphology of excitatory neurons in the cerebral cortex. In general, it appears that functional defects in POGZ in either excitatory or inhibitory neurons are unlikely to significantly affect dendritic and synaptic morphologies.

3.5. Role of POGZ in synaptic transmission in the cortical neurons

While ID and ASD are often referred to as synaptic disorders, our analyses have revealed that there are only minimal morphological differences in the development of dendrites and spines in cortical neurons (Figure 4). Our focus therefore shifted to investigating the effects of Pogz deficiency on synaptic functions and neuronal activity, with an emphasis of neuron-type-specific effects. To achieve this, we performed electrophysiological analyses using the whole-cell patch clamp technique with P12 - 19 mice.
When the synaptic transmission was analyzed in layer II/III pyramidal neurons of Emx1-Pogz mice using voltage-clamp recording, the frequency of miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs) was significantly lower than that of the control littermates (Figure 5A and B). However, there was no significant difference in mEPSC amplitude between the control and Emx1-Pogz mice (Figure 5A and C). When recording miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs), both frequency and amplitude were similar between the control and Emx1-Pogz mice (Figure 5D - F). Subsequently, the excitability of layer II/III pyramidal neurons was analyzed by recording their firing rates through current-clamp recording. The experiment conducted using a 120 pA current pulse to evoke action potentials for 800 ms showed no significant difference between the two groups (Figure 5G and H). These results suggest that defects in Pogz in excitatory neurons reduce presynaptic glutamate release, leading to a decrease in excitatory transmission in layer II/III pyramidal neurons, while not affecting inhibitory synaptic transmission or excitability.
As a next set of experiments, we analyzed synaptic transmission in cortical neurons of Gad2-Pogz mice. We recorded synaptic currents from inhibitory neurons in the cerebral cortex (Figure 6A - F) and from layer II/III pyramidal neurons (Figure 6G - I). The frequency of mEPSCs in Gad2-Pogz mice was significantly higher than that in the control littermates (Figure 6A and B), while there was no significant difference in mEPSC amplitude between the two groups (Figure 6A and C). The Gad2-Pogz mice exhibited a significantly higher frequency of mIPSCs compared to the control mice (Figure 6D and E), whereas mIPSC amplitude was comparable to the control mice (Figure 6D and F). In layer II/III pyramidal neurons, the frequency of mIPSCs was also significantly higher in the Gad2-Pogz mice than in the control mice (Figure 6G and H). However, there was no significant difference in mIPSC amplitude between the two groups (Figure 6G and I). The findings suggest that a deficiency in Pogz within inhibitory neurons may result in an elevation of synapse formation and/or presynaptic GABA release onto cortical inhibitory neurons, thereby disturbing the excitation-inhibition (E-I) equilibrium in these neurons. Furthermore, the Pogz defect in inhibitory neurons could heighten inhibitory transmission in layer II/III pyramidal neurons by increasing presynaptic GABA release. The functional defects in POGZ may cause suppression of layer II/III pyramidal neurons and disrupt the E-I balance in cortical inhibitory neurons. It is possible that the observed cellular phenotypes may reflect the pathophysiology of ASD and other neurodevelopmental disorders associated with POGZ gene abnormalities. Further research is needed to fully understand the implications of these findings.

4. Discussion

POGZ variations that lead to loss-of-function or haploinsufficiency have been associated with WSS. These variations generally involve deletions, frameshift variations, or other alterations that disrupt the normal function of the POGZ gene. The importance of POGZ in cognitive function has also been implicated by analyses with Drosophila knockdown model of the POGZ ortholog, row, since neuron-specific knockdown of row caused deficits in habituation, a form of non-associative learning highly relevant to both ID and ASD [5].
Figure 6. Electrophysiological analyses in cortical neurons of Gad2-Pogz mice. Postsynaptic currents were recorded from cortical inhibitory neurons (A-F) and pyramidal neurons in the layer II/III (G-I) at a holding potential of -60 mV. (A - C) Consecutive traces of mEPSCs were recorded in the presence of bicuculline, strychnine and TTX from Control and Gad2-Pogz mice. For the quantification for mEPSC frequency (B) and amplitude (C), Both control and Gad2-Pogz mice were analyzed for 6 neurons in 4 slices from 3 mice. (D - F) Consecutive traces of mIPSCs were recorded in the presence of DNQX, D-AP5, strychnine and TTX. For the quantification of mIPSC frequency (E) and amplitude (F), Control mice were analyzed for 6 neurons in 4 slices from 3 mice while Gad2-Pogz mice were done for 5 neurons in 5 slices from 4 mice. (G - I) Consecutive traces of mIPSCs were recorded in the presence of DNQX, D-AP5, strychnine and TTX. For the quantification of mIPSC frequency (H) and amplitude (I), Control mice were analyzed for 7 neurons in 4 slices from 2 mice while Gad2-Pogz mice were done for 7 neurons in 5 slices from 3 mice. For detailed information of box plots, see “Statistical analyses” in “Materials and methods” section. ** p <0.01, ***p < 0.001, student t-test.
Figure 6. Electrophysiological analyses in cortical neurons of Gad2-Pogz mice. Postsynaptic currents were recorded from cortical inhibitory neurons (A-F) and pyramidal neurons in the layer II/III (G-I) at a holding potential of -60 mV. (A - C) Consecutive traces of mEPSCs were recorded in the presence of bicuculline, strychnine and TTX from Control and Gad2-Pogz mice. For the quantification for mEPSC frequency (B) and amplitude (C), Both control and Gad2-Pogz mice were analyzed for 6 neurons in 4 slices from 3 mice. (D - F) Consecutive traces of mIPSCs were recorded in the presence of DNQX, D-AP5, strychnine and TTX. For the quantification of mIPSC frequency (E) and amplitude (F), Control mice were analyzed for 6 neurons in 4 slices from 3 mice while Gad2-Pogz mice were done for 5 neurons in 5 slices from 4 mice. (G - I) Consecutive traces of mIPSCs were recorded in the presence of DNQX, D-AP5, strychnine and TTX. For the quantification of mIPSC frequency (H) and amplitude (I), Control mice were analyzed for 7 neurons in 4 slices from 2 mice while Gad2-Pogz mice were done for 7 neurons in 5 slices from 3 mice. For detailed information of box plots, see “Statistical analyses” in “Materials and methods” section. ** p <0.01, ***p < 0.001, student t-test.
Preprints 98666 g006
When POGZ was knocked out in both excitatory and inhibitory neurons within the neuronal system, the mice exhibited notable phenotypes, such as dwarfism, microcephaly, and motor deficits [9]. In stark contrast, Emx1-Pogz and Gad2-Pogz mice did not manifest morphological anomalies in the telencephalon, strongly indicating that the pathogenicity of WSS relies critically on the functional defects of POGZ in both excitatory and inhibitory neurons within the CNS.
While dendritic and synaptic morphology remained normal in Emx1-Pogz and Gad2-Pogz mice, electrophysiological analyses revealed distinct impacts on synaptic functions in these lines. Considering the shared pathophysiological mechanisms encompassing ID to ASD, we hypothesize that structural and/or functional defects in synapses may contribute to the etiology of WSS. Conversely, the regulatory role of POGZ in mitosis suggests its involvement as a transcriptional regulator in the control of neuronal proliferation, potentially explaining the frequent occurrence of microcephaly and dysmorphia, including craniofacial and limb development anomalies, in patients with POGZ variations. However, mouse lines specific to either cerebral excitatory neurons or inhibitory neurons exhibited normal brain and body sizes. We assume that concurrent haploinsufficiency effects within the POGZ gene in both excitatory and inhibitory neurons are essential for the pathogenicity of POGZ disease.
While the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathophysiological significance of POGZ gene abnormalities await further clarification, the loss of POGZ function is supposed to disrupt proper regulation of downstream signaling. Although the specific downstream pathways affected by POGZ gene abnormalities remain unknown, AURKB, encoding Aurora B kinase and an interactive partner for POGZ, emerges as a potential research target [1]. Notably, AURKB has been implicated in another autosomal dominant neurological disorder, spinocerebellar ataxia type 10 (SCA10), characterized by cerebellar dysfunction and varying degrees of signs from other components of the CNS [17]. Further studies are necessary to provide insight into the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of POGZ disorders including WSS, and to identify novel therapeutic targets to interfere with the pathogenesis of the disease.

Author Contributions

NH and KN designed the study. NH, TN, and II performed the experiments and functional data analysis. SS generated C57BL/6J mice carrying a floxed (exon 7) Pogz allele. KN, NH, and TN drafted the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. KN is the guarantors of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (Grant Number JP22H03049), Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research (JP20K21589), and Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (JP19K07059).

Institutional Review Board Statement

We followed the fundamental guidelines for proper conduct of animal experiments and related activity in academic research institutions under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (Japan). All protocols for animal handling and treatment were reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Institute for Developmental Research, Aichi Developmental Disability Center (approval number: 2019-013).

Data Availability Statement

Data supporting the findings of this study are avail- able from the corresponding author upon request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Mses. Noriko Kawamura and Hiroko Kosuge for technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Nozawa, R.-S.; Nagao, K.; Masuda, H.-T.; Iwasaki, O.; Hirota, T.; Nozaki, N.; Kimura, H.; Obuse, C. Human POGZ modulates dissociation of HP1α from mitotic chromosome arms through Aurora B activation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12, 719–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bartholomeeusen, K.; Christ, F.; Hendrix, J.; Rain, J.-C.; Emiliani, S.; Benarous, R.; Debyser, Z.; Gijsbers, R.; De Rijck, J. Lens Epithelium-derived Growth Factor/pInteracts with the Transposase-derived DDE Domain of PogZ*. J Biol Chem. 2009, 284, 11467–11477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ibaraki, K.; Hamada, N.; Iwamoto, I.; Ito, H.; Kawamura, N.; Morishita, R.; Tabata, H.; Nagata, K.-I. Expression Analyses of POGZ, A Responsible Gene for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, during Mouse Brain Development. Dev. Neurosci. 2019, 41, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Batzir, N.A.; Posey, J.E.; Song, X.; Akdemir, Z.C.; Rosenfeld, J.A.; Brown, C.W.; Chen, E.; Holtrop, S.G.; Mizerik, E.; Moreno, M.N.; et al. Phenotypic expansion of POGZ-related intellectual disability syndrome (White-Sutton syndrome). Am. J. Méd. Genet. Part A 2020, 182, 38–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Stessman, H.A.; Willemsen, M.H.; Fenckova, M.; Penn, O.; Hoischen, A.; Xiong, B.; Wang, T.; Hoekzema, K.; Vives, L.; Vogel, I.; et al. Disruption of POGZ Is Associated with Intellectual Disability and Autism Spectrum Disorders. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2016, 98, 541–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Duan, J.; Ye, Y.; Liao, J.; Chen, L.; Zhao, X.; Liu, C.; Wen, J. White-Sutton syndrome and congenital heart disease: case report and literature review. BMC Pediatr. 2023, 23, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. White, J.; Beck, C.R.; Harel, T.; Posey, J.E.; Jhangiani, S.N.; Tang, S.; Farwell, K.D.; Powis, Z.; Mendelsohn, N.J.; Baker, J.A.; et al. POGZ truncating alleles cause syndromic intellectual disability. Genome Med. 2016, 8, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Duran, S.; Gerber, C.; Bilsky, S.; Plummer, S.; Bocks, M. Use of Rivaroxaban in Children with Congenital Heart Disease: A Single-Center Case Series. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2023, 2023, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Suliman-Lavie, R.; Title, B.; Cohen, Y.; Hamada, N.; Tal, M.; Tal, N.; Monderer-Rothkoff, G.; Gudmundsdottir, B.; Gudmundsson, K.O.; Keller, J.R.; et al. Pogz deficiency leads to transcription dysregulation and impaired cerebellar activity underlying autism-like behavior in mice. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Matsumura, K.; Seiriki, K.; Okada, S.; Nagase, M.; Ayabe, S.; Yamada, I.; Furuse, T.; Shibuya, H.; Yasuda, Y.; Yamamori, H.; et al. Pathogenic POGZ mutation causes impaired cortical development and reversible autism-like phenotypes. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Gudmundsdottir, B.; Gudmundsson, K.O.; Klarmann, K.D.; Singh, S.K.; Sun, L.; Singh, S.; Du, Y.; Coppola, V.; Stockwin, L.; Nguyen, N.; et al. POGZ Is Required for Silencing Mouse Embryonic β-like Hemoglobin and Human Fetal Hemoglobin Expression. Cell Rep. 2018, 23, 3236–3248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Taniguchi, H.; He, M.; Wu, P.; Kim, S.; Paik, R.; Sugino, K.; Kvitsani, D.; Fu, Y.; Lu, J.; Lin, Y.; et al. A Resource of Cre Driver Lines for Genetic Targeting of GABAergic Neurons in Cerebral Cortex. Neuron 2011, 71, 995–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Inaguma, Y.; Kurobe, N.; Shinohara, H.; Kato, K. Sensitive immunoassay for rat parvalbumin: tissue distribution and developmental changes. Biochim. et Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Gen. Subj. 1991, 1075, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hamada, N.; Iwamoto, I.; Nagata, K. MED13L and its disease-associated variants influence the dendritic development of cerebral cortical neurons in the mammalian brain. J. Neurochem. 2023, 165, 334–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Nishijo, T.; Momiyama, T. Serotonin 5-HT1B receptor-mediated calcium influx-independent presynaptic inhibition of GABA release onto rat basal forebrain cholinergic neurons. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2016, 44, 1747–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lu, I.-L.; Chen, C.; Tung, C.-Y.; Chen, H.-H.; Pan, J.-P.; Chang, C.-H.; Cheng, J.-S.; Chen, Y.-A.; Wang, C.-H.; Huang, C.-W.; et al. Identification of genes associated with cortical malformation using a transposon-mediated somatic mutagenesis screen in mice. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tian, J.; Tian, C.; Ding, Y.; Li, Z.; Geng, Q.; Xiahou, Z.; Wang, J.; Hou, W.; Liao, J.; Dong, M.-Q.; et al. Aurora B-dependent phosphorylation of Ataxin-10 promotes the interaction between Ataxin-10 and Plk1 in cytokinesis. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 2. Architecture of cerebral cortex of Emx1-Pogz mice. (A) Layer structure of cerebral cortices at P0 (left) and P30 (right). Coronal sections at the somatosensory area were stained for Ctip2 (green) and Cux1 (red). (B) Cortical neuron migration and positioning. pCAG-EGFP (0.5 μg) was electroporated in utero into the VZ progenitor cells at E14. Coronal sections were prepared at P0 and double-stained with anti-GFP (green) and DAPI (blue). (C) Axon extension from ipsilateral to contralateral cortex during corticogenesis in vivo. pCAG-EGFP (0.5 μg) was electroporated as in (A). Coronal sections were prepared at P16, and stained with anti-GFP (green). Red boxed areas were magnified to show axon extension into the cortex. The ratio of the GFP-intensity in the area (yellow) of ipsilateral cortex to that in the area (white) of contralateral cortex was calculated as the axon intensity ratio (n = 6 for each genotype). For detailed information of box plots, see “Statistical analyses” in “Materials and methods” section. Scale bars; 100 μm (A and B), 1 mm (C, upper), and 200 μm (C, lower).
Figure 2. Architecture of cerebral cortex of Emx1-Pogz mice. (A) Layer structure of cerebral cortices at P0 (left) and P30 (right). Coronal sections at the somatosensory area were stained for Ctip2 (green) and Cux1 (red). (B) Cortical neuron migration and positioning. pCAG-EGFP (0.5 μg) was electroporated in utero into the VZ progenitor cells at E14. Coronal sections were prepared at P0 and double-stained with anti-GFP (green) and DAPI (blue). (C) Axon extension from ipsilateral to contralateral cortex during corticogenesis in vivo. pCAG-EGFP (0.5 μg) was electroporated as in (A). Coronal sections were prepared at P16, and stained with anti-GFP (green). Red boxed areas were magnified to show axon extension into the cortex. The ratio of the GFP-intensity in the area (yellow) of ipsilateral cortex to that in the area (white) of contralateral cortex was calculated as the axon intensity ratio (n = 6 for each genotype). For detailed information of box plots, see “Statistical analyses” in “Materials and methods” section. Scale bars; 100 μm (A and B), 1 mm (C, upper), and 200 μm (C, lower).
Preprints 98666 g002
Figure 3. Architecture of telencephalon of Gad2-Pogz mice. (A) Layer structure of cerebral cortices at P30. Coronal sections at the somatosensory area from Gad2-Control and Gad2-Pogz mice were stained for Ctip2 (green) and Cux1 (red). (B) Sections from Control and Gad2-Pogz mice at E13 were co-stained with anti-pHH3 (green) and DAPI (blue). Quantification analyses; box-and-whisker plots show the number of pHH3+ mitotic cells per unit area (0.06 mm2) in the MGE from the indicated genotypes. (C and D) Representative images of cerebral cortex (C) and hippocampus (D) at P30. Sections from each genotype were co-stained with anti-parvalbumin (PV, green) and DAPI (blue). Quantification analyses; box-and-whisker plots show the number of PV+ interneurons per unit area (0.75 mm2) (C) and the whole area of hippocampus (D) from the indicated genotypes. (E) Medium spiny neurons in striatum were stained with Ctip2 (green). Ctip2+ neurons were quantified. Box-and-whisker plots show the number of Ctip2+ cells per unit area (0.1 mm2) from the indicated genotypes. For all quantification; n = 5 animals per genotype used. 10 fields of views per genotype scored. For detailed information of box plots, see “Statistical analyses” in “Materials and methods” section. Scale bars; 100μm (A), 50 μm (B – D), 20 μm (E).
Figure 3. Architecture of telencephalon of Gad2-Pogz mice. (A) Layer structure of cerebral cortices at P30. Coronal sections at the somatosensory area from Gad2-Control and Gad2-Pogz mice were stained for Ctip2 (green) and Cux1 (red). (B) Sections from Control and Gad2-Pogz mice at E13 were co-stained with anti-pHH3 (green) and DAPI (blue). Quantification analyses; box-and-whisker plots show the number of pHH3+ mitotic cells per unit area (0.06 mm2) in the MGE from the indicated genotypes. (C and D) Representative images of cerebral cortex (C) and hippocampus (D) at P30. Sections from each genotype were co-stained with anti-parvalbumin (PV, green) and DAPI (blue). Quantification analyses; box-and-whisker plots show the number of PV+ interneurons per unit area (0.75 mm2) (C) and the whole area of hippocampus (D) from the indicated genotypes. (E) Medium spiny neurons in striatum were stained with Ctip2 (green). Ctip2+ neurons were quantified. Box-and-whisker plots show the number of Ctip2+ cells per unit area (0.1 mm2) from the indicated genotypes. For all quantification; n = 5 animals per genotype used. 10 fields of views per genotype scored. For detailed information of box plots, see “Statistical analyses” in “Materials and methods” section. Scale bars; 100μm (A), 50 μm (B – D), 20 μm (E).
Preprints 98666 g003aPreprints 98666 g003b
Figure 4. Morphological analyses of dendrites and spines of cortical neurons at P30. (A) Representative images of Golgi-stained pyramidal neurons in the somatosensory area of cerebral cortices of Control and Emx1-Pogz mice (upper panels). Neuron-tracing images by Image J software were also shown (lower panels). (B and C) Quantification of (A). Branch number (B) and length (C) of basal dendrites were quantified. n = 5 for each genotype. 17 and 20 neurons were scored for Control and Emx1-Pogz mice, respectively. (D) Representative images of Golgi-stained spines of apical dendrites of layer II/III pyramidal neurons of Control and Emx1-Pogz mice. (E) Quantification of spine density in (D). n = 5 for each genotype. 34 and 38 neurons were scored for Control and Emx1-Pogz genotypes, respectively. (F) Representative images for Control and Gad2-Pogz mice as in (A). (G - J) Quantification analyses were conducted as in (B - E). n = 5 for each genotype. 18 and 23 neurons (G and H) and 34 and 39 neurons (J) were scored for Control and Gad2-Pogz mice, respectively. For detailed information of box plots, see “Statistical analyses” in “Materials and methods” section. Scale bars; 50 μm (A and F), 10 μm (D and I).
Figure 4. Morphological analyses of dendrites and spines of cortical neurons at P30. (A) Representative images of Golgi-stained pyramidal neurons in the somatosensory area of cerebral cortices of Control and Emx1-Pogz mice (upper panels). Neuron-tracing images by Image J software were also shown (lower panels). (B and C) Quantification of (A). Branch number (B) and length (C) of basal dendrites were quantified. n = 5 for each genotype. 17 and 20 neurons were scored for Control and Emx1-Pogz mice, respectively. (D) Representative images of Golgi-stained spines of apical dendrites of layer II/III pyramidal neurons of Control and Emx1-Pogz mice. (E) Quantification of spine density in (D). n = 5 for each genotype. 34 and 38 neurons were scored for Control and Emx1-Pogz genotypes, respectively. (F) Representative images for Control and Gad2-Pogz mice as in (A). (G - J) Quantification analyses were conducted as in (B - E). n = 5 for each genotype. 18 and 23 neurons (G and H) and 34 and 39 neurons (J) were scored for Control and Gad2-Pogz mice, respectively. For detailed information of box plots, see “Statistical analyses” in “Materials and methods” section. Scale bars; 50 μm (A and F), 10 μm (D and I).
Preprints 98666 g004aPreprints 98666 g004b
Figure 5. Electrophysiological analyses in layer II/III pyramidal neurons of Emx1-Pogz mice. Postsynaptic currents were recorded from pyramidal neurons in the layer II/III at a holding potential of -60 mV. (A - C) Consecutive traces of mEPSCs were recorded in the presence of bicuculline (a GABAA receptor antagonist, 10 μM), strychnine (a glycine receptor antagonist, 0.5 μM) and tetrodotoxin (TTX) (a sodium channel blocker, 0.5 μM) from Control and Emx1-Pogz mice. For the quantification of mEPSC frequency (B) and amplitude (C), Control mice were analyzed for 5 neurons in 4 slices from 2 mice, while Emx1-Pogz mice were analyzed for 6 neurons in 4 slices from 2 mice. (D - F) Consecutive traces of mIPSCs were recorded in the presence of 6,7-Dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (DNQX) (a non-NMDA receptor antagonist, 5 μM), D-AP5 (an NMDA receptor antagonist, 25 μM), strychnine (0.5 μM) and TTX (0.5 μM). For the quantification of mIPSC frequency (E) and amplitude (F), Both control and Emx1-Pogz mice were analyzed for 6 neurons in 3 slices from 3 mice. (G and H) Action potentials evoked by a 120 pA current injection for 800 ms (G) and quantification of the number (H). Control mice were analyzed for 10 neurons in 4 slices from 2 mice, while Emx1-Pogz mice were analyzed for 11 neurons in 6 slices from 3 mice. For detailed information of box plots, see “Statistical analyses” in “Materials and methods” section. * p <0.05, student t-test.
Figure 5. Electrophysiological analyses in layer II/III pyramidal neurons of Emx1-Pogz mice. Postsynaptic currents were recorded from pyramidal neurons in the layer II/III at a holding potential of -60 mV. (A - C) Consecutive traces of mEPSCs were recorded in the presence of bicuculline (a GABAA receptor antagonist, 10 μM), strychnine (a glycine receptor antagonist, 0.5 μM) and tetrodotoxin (TTX) (a sodium channel blocker, 0.5 μM) from Control and Emx1-Pogz mice. For the quantification of mEPSC frequency (B) and amplitude (C), Control mice were analyzed for 5 neurons in 4 slices from 2 mice, while Emx1-Pogz mice were analyzed for 6 neurons in 4 slices from 2 mice. (D - F) Consecutive traces of mIPSCs were recorded in the presence of 6,7-Dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (DNQX) (a non-NMDA receptor antagonist, 5 μM), D-AP5 (an NMDA receptor antagonist, 25 μM), strychnine (0.5 μM) and TTX (0.5 μM). For the quantification of mIPSC frequency (E) and amplitude (F), Both control and Emx1-Pogz mice were analyzed for 6 neurons in 3 slices from 3 mice. (G and H) Action potentials evoked by a 120 pA current injection for 800 ms (G) and quantification of the number (H). Control mice were analyzed for 10 neurons in 4 slices from 2 mice, while Emx1-Pogz mice were analyzed for 11 neurons in 6 slices from 3 mice. For detailed information of box plots, see “Statistical analyses” in “Materials and methods” section. * p <0.05, student t-test.
Preprints 98666 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated