Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Mental Workload Modeling by Using Machine Learning Techniques Based on EEG and Eye Tracking Data

Version 1 : Received: 7 February 2024 / Approved: 7 February 2024 / Online: 8 February 2024 (00:02:27 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Aksu, Ş.H.; Çakıt, E.; Dağdeviren, M. Mental Workload Assessment Using Machine Learning Techniques Based on EEG and Eye Tracking Data. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 2282. Aksu, Ş.H.; Çakıt, E.; Dağdeviren, M. Mental Workload Assessment Using Machine Learning Techniques Based on EEG and Eye Tracking Data. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 2282.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyze the mental workload using EEG and eye tracking data and classify it using machine learning algorithms. The machine learning model was developed based on the simultaneous recording of eye tracking and EEG measurements during the experimental process. The experiments involved 15 university students, consisting of 7 women and 8 men. Throughout the experiments, the researchers utilized the n-back memory task and the NASA-Task Load Index (TLX) subjective rating scale to assess various levels of mental workload. The findings revealed that as the task difficulty increased, there was an increase in the diameter of both the right and left pupils, the number of fixations, the number and duration of saccades, and the number and duration of blinks. Conversely, variables related to fixation duration decreased. The EEG results indicated that theta power in the prefrontal, frontal, and front central regions increased with task difficulty. Additionally, alpha power increased in the frontal regions but decreased in the temporal, parietal, and occipital regions as the task became more challenging. Furthermore, low beta power significantly decreased in almost all brain regions as the task difficulty increased. In terms of the four-class classification problem, the mental workload level can be predicted with an accuracy rate of 76.59% using 34 selected features. This study has made a significant contribution to the literature by presenting a four-class mental workload estimation model that utilizes different machine learning algorithms.

Keywords

EEG; eye tracking; mental workload; machine learning; neuroergonomics; prediction; NASA-TLX; N-back

Subject

Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.