Submitted:
05 February 2024
Posted:
05 February 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Relationships between digital image indices and wheat Physiological indicators at the time of jointing and flowering.
3.2. Relationships between digital image indices and wheat physiological indicators at the time of filling and mature
3.3. Changes in digital image indices during various fertile stages of wheat under fertilizer treatments.
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Omia, E.; Bae, H.; Park, E.; Kim, M.S.; Baek, I.; Kabenge, I.; Cho, B.-K. Remote Sensing in Field Crop Monitoring: A Comprehensive Review of Sensor Systems, Data Analyses and Recent Advances. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Wang, K.; Han, G.; Wang, H.; Tan, N.; Yan, Z. Integrated diagnosis and time-series sensitivity evaluation of nutrient deficiencies in medicinal plant (Ligusticum chuanxiong Hort.) based on UAV multispectral sensors. Frontiers in Plant Science 2023, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benincasa, P.; Antognelli, S.; Brunetti, L.; Fabbri, C. A.; Natale, A.; Sartoretti, V.; Modeo, G.; Guiducci, M.; Tei, F.; Vizzari, M. Reliability of ndvi derived by high resolution satellite and uav compared to in-field methods for the evaluation of early crop n status and grain yield in wheat. Experimental Agriculture. 2018, 54, 604–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corti, M.; Cavalli, D.; Cabassi, G.; Vigoni, A.; Degano, L.; Gallina, P. Application of a low-cost camera on a UAV to estimate maize nitrogen-related variables. Precision Agric. 2019, 20, 675–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mullan, Daniel & Reynolds, Matthew. Quantifying genetic effects of ground cover on soil water evaporation using digital imaging. Functional Plant Biology. 2010, 37, 703–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, R.; Kumar, M.; Alam, M.S. Image processing techniques to estimate weight and morphological parameters for selected wheat refractions. Sci Rep. 2021, 11, 20953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang Jun; Ding Feng.; Chen Chen.; Liu Tao.; Sun Chengming.; Ding Dawei.; Huo Zhongyang. Correlation of wheat biomass and yield with UAV image characteristic parameters. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 2019, 35, 104–110.
- Poley, Lucy & Mcdermid, Greg. A Systematic Review of the Factors Influencing the Estimation of Vegetation Aboveground Biomass Using Unmanned Aerial Systems. Remote Sensing 2020, 12, 1052–1098. [CrossRef]
- Xiaoqin, W.; Miaomiao, W.; Shaoqiang, W.; Yundong, W. Extraction of vegetation information from visible unmanned aerial vehicle images. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 2015, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa, L.; Kunwar, S.; Ampatzidis, Y.; Albrecht, U. Determining leaf nutrient concentrations in citrus trees using UAV imagery and machine learning. Precision Agric 2022, 23, 854–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anita Simic Milas.; Matthew Romanko.; Patrick Reil.; Tharindu Abeysinghe & Anuruddha Marambe. The importance of leaf area index in mapping chlorophyll content of corn under different agricultural treatments using UAV images. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2018, 39, 5415–5431. [CrossRef]
- Bhadra, S.; Sagan, V.; Skobalski, J.; Grignola, F.; Sarkar, S.; Vilbig, J. End-to-end 3D CNN for plot-scale soybean yield prediction using multitemporal UAV-based RGB images. Precision Agric. 2023. [CrossRef]
- Liang Wan.; Haiyan Cen.; Jiangpeng Zhu.; Jiafei Zhang.; Yueming Zhu.; Dawei Sun.; Xiaoyue Du.; Li Zhai.; Haiyong Weng.; Yijian Li.; Xiaoran Li.; Yidan Bao.; Jianyao Shou.; Yong He. Grain yield prediction of rice using multi-temporal UAV-based RGB and multispectral images and model transfer – a case study of small farmlands in the South of China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 2020, 291, 108096. [CrossRef]
- Xiuliang Jin.; Shouyang Liu.; Frédéric Baret.; Matthieu Hemerlé.; Alexis Comar. Estimates of plant density of wheat crops at emergence from very low altitude UAV imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment 2017, 198, 105–114. [CrossRef]
- Maitiniyazi Maimaitijiang.; Vasit Sagan.; Paheding Sidike.; Matthew Maimaitiyiming.; Sean Hartling.; Kyle T. Peterson.; Michael J.W. Maw.; Nadia Shakoor.; Todd Mockler.; Felix B. Fritschi. Vegetation Index Weighted Canopy Volume Model (CVMVI) for soybean biomass estimation from Unmanned Aerial System-based RGB imagery. Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2019, 151, 27–41. [CrossRef]
- Mao, W. Yiming Wang and Yue Rong Wang. Real-time Detection of Between-row Weeds Using Machine Vision; ASABE: St, Joseph, MI, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- G. Poley, L.; J. McDermid, G. A Systematic Review of the Factors Influencing the Estimation of Vegetation Aboveground Biomass Using Unmanned Aerial Systems. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1052. [CrossRef]
- Niu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, H.; Han, W.; Peng, X. Estimating Above-Ground Biomass of Maize Using Features Derived from UAV-Based RGB Imagery. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo Tao.; Yan An.; Geng Hongwei. Prediction of Wheat Plant Height and Leaf Area Index Based on UAV Image. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2020(09):1-12Index Based on UAV Image.
- Xiao, Y.B.; Jia, L.L.; Chen, X.P.; Zhang, F. N status diagnosis of winter wheat by using digital image analysis technology. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin 2008, 24, 448–453. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou Hua-jie; Liu Ya-dong.; Fu Jindong.; Sui Fang-gong.; Cui Rixian. Analysis of Maize Growth and Nitrogen Nutrition Status Based on Digital Camera Image. Journal of Qingdao Agricultural University (Natural Science) 2015, 32, 1–7.
- Jia Liang-liang; Fan Ming-sheng.; Zhang Fu-suo.; Chen Xin-ping.; Lü Shi-hua.; Sun Yanming. Nitrogen Status Diagnosis of Rice by Using a Digital Camera. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis 2009, 29, 2176–2179. [CrossRef]
- Umut Hasan. Wheat Leaf Area Index (LAI) Inversion by Using “Satellite-UAV-Ground” Multi-source Remote Sensing Data. Ph.D. Thesis, Xinjiang University, 2019.
- Li, W.; Jiang, J.; Weiss, M.; Madec, S.; Tison, F.; Philippe, B.; Comar, A.; Baret, F. Impact of the reproductive organs on crop BRDF as observed from a UAV. Remote Sensing of Environment 2021, 259, 112433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, L.; Zhou, L.; Meng, R.; Zhao, F.; Lv, Z.; Xu, B.; Zeng, L.; Yu, X.; Peng, S. An improved approach to estimate ratoon rice aboveground biomass by integrating UAV-based spectral, textural and structural features. Precision Agriculture 2022, 23, 1276–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Flores, P.; Igathinathane, C.; Igathinathane, C.; Naik, D.; Kiran, R.; Ransom, J.K. Wheat lodging detection from UAS imagery using machine learning algorithms. Remote Sensing 2020, 12, 1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi Xiao-yan. Evaluation of some physiological parameters of winter wheat leaves using digital image processing. Ph.D. Thesis, Heibei Agriculture University, 2005.
- Wang, Y.; Wang, D.; Shi, P.; et al. Estimating rice chlorophyll content and leaf nitrogen concentration with a digital still color camera under natural light. Plant Methods. 2014, 10, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]







| Treatments | Fertilizer rate (kg/hm2) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrogen | Phosphate fertilizer (P2 O5 ) |
Potash fertilizer (K2 O) |
||
| Sowing N | Top-dressing N | |||
| CK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FM | 94.5 | 207 | 241.5 | 0 |
| CF | 52.5 | 124.5 | 61.5 | 60 |
| CF-N | 0.0 | 0.0 | 61.5 | 60 |
| CF-P | 52.5 | 124.5 | 0.0 | 60 |
| CF-K | 52.5 | 124.5 | 61.5 | 0.0 |
| Digital Image Index | Calculating formula |
Source Literature Reference |
|---|---|---|
| R | R | - |
| G | G | - |
| B | B | - |
| r | R/(R+G+B) | Citation 16 |
| g | G /(R+G+B) | Citation 16 |
| b | B /(R+G+B) | Citation 16 |
| ExG | 2 x G-R-B | Citation 17 |
| GRRI | G / R | Citation 17 |
| GBRI | G / B | Citation 17 |
| RBRI | R / B | Citation 17 |
| GRVI | (G-R)/(G+R) | Citation 17 |
| INT | (R+G+B)/3 | Citation 16 |
| IKAW | (R-B)/ (R+B) | Citation 17 |
| MGRVI | (G2 - R2 )/(G2 + R2) | Citation 17 |
| RGBVI | (G2 -B×R)/(G2 +B×R) | Citation 17 |
| GLA | (2×G-R-B)/(2×G+R+B) | Citation 17 |
| CIVE | 0.441R-0.881G+0.385B+18.7875 | Citation 17 |
| Digital Image Indices | P-value p-value |
CK | FM | CF | CF-N | CF-P | CF-K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 0.058 | 172.68 | 136.87 | 135.57 | 158.85 | 117.82 | 113.33 |
| G | 0.007 | 171.64a | 153.92abc | 149.85bc | 156.93ab | 136.97c | 136.00c |
| B | 0.011 | 109.60a | 97.31ab | 92.59abc | 93.67abc | 76.49bc | 73.69c |
| EXG | 0.580 | 64.11 | 22.52 | 28.71 | 67.09 | 22.18 | 16.96 |
| INT | 0.005 | 151.30a | 129.37abc | 126.00bc | 136.48ab | 110.42c | 107.67c |
| CIVE | 0.906 | -14.08 | -18.99 | -17.80 | -13.36 | -20.49 | -22.68 |
| r | 0.791 | 0.38 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.39 | 0.35 | 0.35 |
| g | 0.414 | 0.38 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.39 | 0.41 | 0.42 |
| b | 0.674 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.23 |
| GRRI | 0.634 | 1.01 | 1.17 | 1.15 | 1.00 | 1.20 | 1.24 |
| GBRI | 0.181 | 1.59 | 1.59 | 1.63 | 1.70 | 1.80 | 1.86 |
| RBRI | 0.859 | 1.58 | 1.41 | 1.47 | 1.71 | 1.56 | 1.58 |
| GRVI | 0.656 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.10 |
| IKAW | 0.844 | 0.22 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.26 | 0.21 | 0.21 |
| MGRVI | 0.666 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.11 | -0.00 | 0.16 | 0.18 |
| RGBVI | 0.318 | 0.22 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.25 | 0.36 | 0.38 |
| GLA | 0.419 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.17 | 0.18 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).