Preprint Review Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Soft Tissue Substitutes in Periodontal and Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Augmentation. A Systematic Review.

Version 1 : Received: 31 January 2024 / Approved: 31 January 2024 / Online: 31 January 2024 (16:10:20 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Rotundo, R.; Pancrazi, G.L.; Grassi, A.; Ceresoli, L.; Di Domenico, G.L.; Bonafede, V. Soft Tissue Substitutes in Periodontal and Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Augmentation: A Systematic Review. Materials 2024, 17, 1221. Rotundo, R.; Pancrazi, G.L.; Grassi, A.; Ceresoli, L.; Di Domenico, G.L.; Bonafede, V. Soft Tissue Substitutes in Periodontal and Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Augmentation: A Systematic Review. Materials 2024, 17, 1221.

Abstract

The present review compared the efficacy of soft tissue substitutes (STS) and autogenous free gingival graft (FGG) or connective tissue graft (CTG) in mucogingival procedures to increase keratinized tissue (KT) width around teeth and implants. Two independent examiners performed the electronic search on Medline and Cochrane Library based on the following PICO’s format: (P) adult patients; (I) soft tissue substitutes and FGG/CTG; (C) STS vs CTG; STS vs FGG; STS vs CTR; (O) KT width gain; (S) Systematic Reviews, Randomized Controlled Trials. Results showed that around teeth, all biomaterials showed superior performance compared to CAF alone for treating gingival recessions. However, when compared to CTG, ADM yields the most similar outcomes to the gold standard (CTG), even though in multiple recessions CTG still continue to be considered the most favorable approach. Use of STSs (acellular matrix or tissue engineered) in combination with an apically positioned flap resulted in a significantly less gain of KTW compared to what achieved with FGG and APF. Around dental implants, free gingival grafts were deemed more effective than soft tissue substitutes in enhancing keratinized mucosa width.

Keywords

gingiva; dental implants; gingival recessions; soft tissue substitute; surgery; review; keratinized tissue

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Dentistry and Oral Surgery

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.