3. Empirical Study
[
32] used the data on continuous aluminum production of the various profiles for the six months of production which were provided by the company. The stepwise method was used to estimate the linear scrap model, considering the extrusion variables. This method considered all significant variables for a significance level of 5%. This model has an adjusted R square of approximately 46%, therefore this is the expected percentage of total variability in scrap production explained by the independent variables included in the linear regression model.
For the accomplishment of the present empirical study, it was used the same database used in the previous work ([
32]), however, all phases of the aluminum extrusion process are now addressed (i.e. pre-extrusion, extrusion and post-extrusion).
Data for comparative analysis was standardized. The database includes 42 821 observations, corresponding each observation to an extruded billet. The database contains 65 variables, of which 62 are quantitative (some discrete and other continuous) and three qualitative (nominal). Depending on the phase of the process, the variables considered in this study can be divided into three categories/phases: Pre-extrusion (
), Extrusion (
E) and Post-extrusion (
) (see
Table 3).
Similar to [
32], the variables
, Weight Billet (kg), and
, Bars Weight (kg), are used to define the variable
, the scrap (kg), i.e:
Optimizing the overall extrusion process, as well as predicting the behaviour of aluminum at all stages (before, during and after extrusion), allows to anticipate some key variable control issues and consequently improve the extrusion process, being possible to make decisions adjusted to the reality of the company.
The aim is to determine the most appropriate extrusion variables values in order to minimize scrap production, and consequently avoid excessive costs and promote environmental sustainability. If a linear model to approximate
S is considered, Problem (
3) is classified as simple bounds linear minimization problem.
From the large database on the company’s six-month production, it was possible to extract the limits for the variables which are presented in
Table 4.
However, if any of the the functions involved in Problem (
3) is not a linear function, this is a nonlinear problem and thus other methods, appropriate to the type of problem, are required.
To estimate the model of S using the stepwise method, the software R was used. The results showed that, for a 5% significance level, all variables are significant. The obtained model has an adjusted R square of approximately 53%. Therefore, 53% of total variability in scrap production is explained by the independent variables included in the linear regression model.
The model can be written as:
The analysis of the coefficients of the model (
5), which are depicted in
Table 5, allowed to conclude that all variables are significant to explain the scrap production of each billet. However, although all variables are significant, some are more important to the model than others.
The analysis of the standard regression coefficients shows that variables : Number of Holes, : Extrusion Speed (mm/s), : Specific Weight, : Sealing Pressure (bar), : Puller Speed (m/min), : Dead Time (s), : DX Puller Traction and : Post Container Temp (°C), are those that have the greatest relative contribution to explain the dependent variable.
In fact, the variables with positive coefficients, and therefore the ones that most influence scrap production, are , , and . The results indicate lower scrap production in the process to lower values.
On the other hand, the variables , , and are those that negatively influence scrap production, because the higher values show lower scrap production.
The model expressed in equation
5 is in agreement with the results previously found by the authors presented in
Table 1, since the variables that tend to contribute more to the scrap production during the aluminum extrusion process are the same.
The linear regression approach also assumes that the residuals are independent and identical distributed, with a zero mean, normal distribution and constant variance. These assumptions are generally verified.
For large samples, the Kolmorogov-Smirnov (K-S) or Shapiro-Wilk (SW) normality tests implies the rejection of the normal distribution. In this case, the sample size is large, so therefore, the central limit theorem can be used ([
52]). The large the sample, the closer to a normal distribution the distribution of the means will be. Consequently the residuals of the model can be considered approximately normally distributed.
For the assumption of the independence of residuals, the Durbin-Watson (DW) Statistics can be considered. Since this test yield the value 0.91 (approximate to 1), it is expectable that the residuals are correlated. This is a limitation of the model and it can be explained by the existence of a sequence of billets being extruded in the process, which are easily welded together at the extrusion temperature and pressure ([
49]).
The values of tolerance are closer to 0 and Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) are smaller than 15, for each independent variable (see
Table 5), therefore that there is statistical evidence to support the inexistence of multicollinearity.
In this way, it is possible to obtain an optimal linear model. Using the descriptive analysis of the variables
Table 4 and by identifying the maximum and minimum values of each variable, the amount of scrap generated is minimized. The maximum value of the variables with positive coefficients and the minimum value of the variables with negative coefficients should considered, so that aluminum production achieves the lowest scrap production, which in turns will avoid aluminum recycling.
For further analysis, recognizing the company’s interest in sustainable production, the data was standardized and linear regressions were used to model the nine most frequent profiles observed in in total production dataset and also for the nine profiles with an average of more than 20 kg of scrap and frequencies exceeding 100 (see
Table 6 and
Table 7).
These linear regressions indicate that, as expected, the most frequently produced profiles lead to the lowest amount of billet-generated scrap and the less frequently produced profiles have more billet-generated scrap. This is an indicator of the stability throughout the production process.
The results presented in
Table 6 and in
Table 7 show the scrap quantity models (
: Scrap (kg), dependent variable) of the 18 selected profiles (9 most frequent profiles and 9 profiles with more than 20 kg of scrap). From these tables results, the die and the number of holes in the die (Number of Holes:
) are similar, i.e., these are variables without relevant variability. However, it is well known from literature that die geometry, as well as the components used, are causes of the amount of scrap generated in a profile ([
13,
17,
23,
28]). [
23] concluded that geometry is a parameter that should be well adjusted for each alloy type. [
28] points out that die geometry is the main cause of defects in profiles. In this sense, the work developed by [
17] presents rules for the development of matrices, considering matrices design extremely important in the production of the quality profile. The work developed by [
13] considers that defects in dies and tools are the main source of profile defects and, consequently, scrap generation. The company has developed several quality control systems ([
53,
54]). In this area in particular, three-dimensional analysis of aluminum profiles.
The coefficients of the linear models, presented in
Table 6 and in
Table 7, are able to identify the variables that most contribute to scrap production. The missing coefficients correspond to non-significant variables for the model.
The analysis of the most frequently produced profiles, whose results are presented in
Table 6, linear models were obtained for which the geometric variables present significant coefficients, regardless of the matrices. These results reinforce the effect of geometric factors on the amount of scrap generated. It may be concluded that in addition to the die geometry and tools mentioned ([
13,
17,
23,
28]), there are other geometric factors that can contribute significantly to scrap production.
In particular, it can be seen that Length Bars () negatively contribute to scrap production, for all most frequent dies. Therefore whenever this length is reduced, scrap production increases. Similar behavior can be observed for the Number of Bars () and the Number of Billets (). The opposite behavior is observed for the Billet Length variable (). Billet Length contributes for scrap positively, meaning that its increase implies an increase in scrap amount.
In some profiles, the geometric variables Butt Length () and Specific Weight (), contribute positively to the increase in scrap (since which has a corresponding positive coefficient), while in others have the opposite contribution.
The lack of studies in literature on billet length do not allow a critical analysis. However, further analysis is required. This unexpected result may come from alloy type ([
23]) or from previous billet size calculations due to customer specifications.
Regarding temperature, for the four variables considered: Post Container Temp (°C) (
), Max End Temperature (°C) (
), Set Temperature Z1 (
) and Billet Conical Temperature (
), almost no effect on scrap production was observed. Similar behavior was obtained for the variables time, speed and pressure. Despite these results, it cannot be concluded that temperature, speed and pressure do not influence the amount of scrap generated. Although data show no evidence that these parameters influenced scrap production for the studied profiles. These effects are well documented in literature, as presented in
Table 1. In general, increasing temperature and pressure increases the amount of scrap, while time and speed are directly related to previous variables. On the other hand, all dependent variables depend on the alloy type used to produce a specific profile ([
23]). The company’s empirical knowledge of the influence of temperature, pressure, time and speed on the amount of scrap generated by the experience led to the company’s growing concern and greater employee control over these parameters during the production process.
In the
Table 7, are presented models for profiles with the largest amount of scrap generated in the company. For each significant linear models were obtained. The geometric variables Butt Length (
) and Specific Weight (
) again show a significant contribution to the scrap, which reinforce the results presented in
Table 6. For example, the Length Bars (
)) contribute negatively to scrap production. Generically, similar behavior can be observed for Specific Weight (
) and Number of Bars (
). As mentioned in the previous analysis, the variables related to the geometric factors have significant coefficients for all matrices, which means a great influence on scrap production.
Regarding the other variables, it is also verified that the main variables associated with the extrusion process do not influence the amount of scrap generated, during the extrusion process for the analyzed profiles, namely extrusion time, velocity and pressure.
In summary, according to this study, to improve production by minimizing scrap production in the company, better control of geometry variables is necessary. However, these variables are not easy to control because they are very dependent on customer orders. Perhaps the company can exercise greater control in the production, inspection and correction of the matrices.
Thus, the identified gaps can serve as an important basis for improving the company’s aluminum extrusion process, as the geometric factors identified have been little explored in literature.