Submitted:
09 January 2024
Posted:
10 January 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Aim of the study
3. Methodology
3.1. Study Area

3.2. Method of Survey and Study Approach
3.3. Sample design & data collection
3.4. Data Analysis
3.5. Analytical and conceptual framework
and the function for non-participation is given as
, where ɛ is an error term with a logistic distribution. Because the utilities are random, the ith local will select the alternative ‘adoption’ if and only if
and the methods as proposed by (Nkamleu & Manyong, 2005)4. Results
4.1. Response of Locals on Perception of multiple values of NTFPs and their potential to Alleviate Poverty

5. Discussion
6. Conclusion
References
- Achandi, E.L.; Farnworth, C.R.; Galiè, A.; Omore, A.; Jeremiah, A. How do local gender norms interact with local conceptualisations of empowerment to shape women’s engagement in local dairy value chains in Tanzania? Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 2023, 7, 1198181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahenkan, A.; Boo, E. Improving the Supply Chain of Non-Timber Forest Products in Ghana. In Supply Chain Management—New Perspectives; Renko, S., Ed.; InTech, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahenkan, A.; Boon, E. Non-timber forest products farming and empowerment of rural women in Ghana. Environment, Development and Sustainability 2011, 13, 863–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahenkan, A.; Boon, E. Commercialization of non-timber forest products in Ghana: Processing, packaging and marketing, 2010.
- Ambrose-Oji, B. The contribution of NTFPs to the livelihoods of the “forest poor”: Evidence from the tropical forest zone of south-west Cameroon. International Forestry Review 2003, 5, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asamoah, O.; Danquah, J.A.; Bamsiegwe, D.; Verter, N.; Acheampong, E.; Boateng, C.M.; Kuittinen, S.; Appiah, M.; Pappinen, A. The perception of locals on commercialisation and value addition of non-Timber Forest products in forest adjacent communities in Ghana, 2023.
- Asamoah, O.; Danquah, J.A.; Bamwesigye, D.; Verter, N.; Acheampong, E.; Macgregor, C.J.; Boateng, C.M.; Kuittinen, S.; Appiah, M.; Pappinen, A. The perception of the locals on the impact of climate variability on non-timber forest products in Ghana. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 2023. [CrossRef]
- Balama, C.; Augustino, S.; Mwaiteleke, D.; Lusambo, L.P.; Makonda, F.B. Economic valuation of nontimber forest products under the changing climate in Kilombero district, Tanzania. International Journal of Forestry Research 2016, 2016, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bandi, M.M.; Mahimba, M.B.; Mbe Mpie, P.M.; M’vubu AR, N.; Khasa, D.P. Adoption of Agroforestry Practices in and around the Luki Biosphere Reserve in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Sustainability 2022, 14, 9841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belcher, B.M. Forest product markets, forests and poverty reduction. International Forestry Review 2005, 7, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bessah, E.; Raji, A.O.; Taiwo, O.J.; Agodzo, S.K.; Ololade, O.O.; Strapasson, A.; Donkor, E. Gender-based variations in the perception of climate change impact, vulnerability and adaptation strategies in the Pra River Basin of Ghana. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management 2021, 13, 435–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boafo, Y.A.; Saito, O.; Jasaw, G.S.; Otsuki, K.; Takeuchi, K. Provisioning ecosystem services-sharing as a coping and adaptation strategy among rural communities in Ghana’s semi-arid ecosystem. Ecosystem Services 2016, 19, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bock, J. What makes a competent adult forager. In Hunter-gatherer childhoods; Routledge: Informa, UK, 2017; pp. 109–128. [Google Scholar]
- Bonginkosi Msezane, S. Perceptions of youth about the integration of natural resource economics through environmental education in schools: A realist social perspective. Environmental Economics 2017, 8, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buys, L.; Aird, R.; van Megen, K.; Miller, E.; Sommerfeld, J. Perceptions of climate change and trust in information providers in rural Australia. Public Understanding of Science 2014, 23, 170–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carr, M.; Hartl, M. Gender and non-timber forest products: Promoting food security and economic empowerment. International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), Italy, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Chakravarty, S.; Puri, A.; Subba, M.; Dey, T.; Rai, P.; Shukla, G.; Pala, N.A. Value addition of non-timber forest products: Prospects, constraints, and mitigation. Value Addition of Horticultural Crops: Recent Trends and Future Directions 2015, 213–244. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, A.S.; Danks, C.; Allred, S.R. The role of social and policy learning in changing forest governance: An examination of community-based forestry initiatives in the U.S. Forest Policy and Economics 2011, 13, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cochran, W.G. Sampling techniques; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1977. [Google Scholar]
- Combest-Friedman, C.; Christie, P.; Miles, E. Household perceptions of coastal hazards and climate change in the Central Philippines. Journal of Environmental Management 2012, 112, 137–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cosyns, H.; Degrande, A.; De Wulf, R.; Van Damme, P.; Tchoundjeu, Z. Can commercialization of NTFPs alleviate poverty?: A case study of Ricinodendron heudelotii (Baill.) Pierre ex Pax. Kernel marketing in Cameroon. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics 2011, 112, 45–56. [Google Scholar]
- Danquah, J.A. Analysis of factors influencing farmers’ voluntary participation in reforestation programme in Ghana. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods 2015, 24, 176–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Danquah, J.A.; Pappinen, A.; Berninger, F. Determinants of tree planting and retention behaviour of homeowners in built-up urban areas of Ghana. Trees, Forests and People 2023, 13, 100410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- David, O.E.; Jimoh, K.A.; Oyewole, S.O.; Ayeni, A.E. Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs) as a means of Livelihood and Safety Net among the Rurals in Nigeria: A Review. American Journal of Science and Management 2019, 6, 27–31. [Google Scholar]
- Debrot, A.O.; Veldhuizen, A.; Van Den Burg, S.W.; Klapwijk, C.J.; Islam, M.N.; Alam, M.I.; Ahsan, M.N.; Ahmed, M.U.; Hasan, S.R.; Fadilah, R. Non-timber forest product livelihood-focused interventions in support of mangrove restoration: A call to action. Forests 2020, 11, 1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Derebe, B.; Alemu, A. Non-timber forest product types and its income contribution to rural households in the Horn of Africa: A systematic review. Forest Science and Technology 2023, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhungana, N.; Silwal, N.; Upadhaya, S.; Regmi, S.K.; Adhikari, S. Local people’s perception and awareness of climate change: A case study from community forests in Lamjung District, Western Nepal. Banko Janakari 2018, 28, 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edgar, T.W.; Manz, D.O. Exploratory Study. In Research Methods for Cyber Security; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 95–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Golo, B.K.; Yaro, J.A. Religion and climate change in Ghana: Religious Actor perspectives and sustainable climate change policy. Nature and Culture 2013, 8, 282–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Golo, B.-W.K.; Awetori Yaro, J. Reclaiming Stewardship in Ghana: Religion and Climate Change. Nature and Culture 2013, 8, 282–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gurung, L.J.; Miller, K.K.; Venn, S.; Bryan, B.A. Contributions of non-timber forest products to people in mountain ecosystems and impacts of recent climate change. Ecosystems and People 2021, 17, 447–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hagen, M.V. Trade and Gender–exploring a reciprocal relationship; Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit: Pulchowk, Lalitpur, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Hailu, Z. The adoption of modern farm practices in African agriculture: Empirical evidence about the impacts of household characteristics and input supply systems in the northern region of Ghana. (Issue 7), 1990.
- Ingram, V.; Ndoye, O.; Iponga, D.M.; Tieguhong, J.C.; Nasi, R. Non-timber forest products: Contribution to national economy and strategies for sustainable management. C. de Wasseige, P. de Marcken, N. Bayol, F. Hiol Hiol, P. Mayaux, B. Desclée, R. Nasi, A. Billand, P. Defourny and R. Eba’a. The Forests of the Congo Basin: State of the Forest, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Islam, K.; Sato, N. Deforestation, land conversion and illegal logging in Bangladesh: The case of the Sal (Shorea robusta) forests. iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry 2012, 5, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ito, Y. Local honey production activities and their significance for local people: A case of mountain forest area of Southwestern Ethiopia. African Study Monographs. Supplementary Issue. 2014, 48, 77–97. [Google Scholar]
- Jalonen, R.; Ziegert, R.F.; Lamers HA, H.; Hegde, N. From Within and Without: Gender, Agency and Sustainable Management of Non-Timber Forest Products in Two Indian States. Small-Scale Forestry 2023, 22, 323–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jenkins, W.; Berry, E.; Kreider, L.B. Religion and Climate Change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 2018, 43, 85–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, D. God is watching you: How the fear of God makes us human; Oxford University Press: USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Johnston, D.; Stevano, S.; Malapit, H.J.; Hull, E.; Kadiyala, S. Time use as an explanation for the agri-nutrition disconnect: Evidence from rural areas in low and middle-income countries. Food Policy 2018, 76, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karki, M.B. Commercialization of Natural Resources for Sustainable Livelihoods: The case of forest products. Growth, Poverty Alleviation and Sustainable Resource Management in the Mountain Areas of South Asia, Feldafing, Deutsche Stiftung Fur Internationale Entwicklung 2000, 293–320. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, I.-A.; Trosper, R.L.; Mohs, G. Cultural uses of non-timber forest products among the Sts’ailes, British Columbia, Canada. Forest Policy and Economics 2012, 22, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, V. Impact of non timber forest produces (NTFPs) on food and livelihood security: An economic study of tribal economy in Dang’s District of Gujarat, India. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology 2015, 8, 387–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lawless, S.; Cohen, P.; McDougall, C.; Orirana, G.; Siota, F.; Doyle, K. Gender norms and relations: Implications for agency in coastal livelihoods. Maritime Studies 2019, 18, 347–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, M.; Yu, B.; Zheng, B.; Gao, L. Collection of Non-Timber Forest Products in Chinese Giant Panda Reserves: The Effect of Religious Beliefs. Forests 2020, 12, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Guo, H.; Feng, G.; Zhang, B. Farmers’ Attitudes and Perceptions and the Effects of the Grain for Green Project in China: A Case Study in the Loess Plateau. Land 2022, 11, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magry, M.A.; Cahill, D.; Rookes, J.; Narula, S.A. An integrated value chain analysis of non-timber forest products: A case of Jharkhand State of India. Small-Scale Forestry 2022, 21, 621–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magry, M.A.; Cahill, D.; Rookes, J.; Narula, S.A. Climate change impacts on non-timber forest products: NTFP-dependent community responses from India. Climate and Development 2022, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malkamäki, A.; D’Amato, D.; Hogarth, N.J.; Kanninen, M.; Pirard, R.; Toppinen, A.; Zhou, W. A systematic review of the socio-economic impacts of large-scale tree plantations, worldwide. Global Environmental Change 2018, 53, 90–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- María Castro, L.; Encalada, D.; Rodrigo Saa, L. Non-Timber Forest Products as an Alternative to Reduce Income Uncertainty in Rural Households. In Sustainable Rural Development Perspective and Global Challenges; Özçatalbaş, O., Ed.; IntechOpen, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masozera, M.; Bailey, M.; Kerchner, C. Distribution of impacts of natural disasters across income groups: A case study of New Orleans. Ecological Economics 2007, 63, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meinhold; Darr. The Processing of Non-Timber Forest Products through Small and Medium Enterprises—A Review of Enabling and Constraining Factors. Forests 2019, 10, 1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Msalilwa, U.; Augustino, S.; Gillah, P. Community perception on climate change and usage patterns of non-timber forest products by communities around Kilolo District, Tanzania. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management 2013, 6, 507–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mujere, N. Gendered vulnerability and adaptation to climate change. In Promoting climate change awareness through environmental education; IGI global, 2016; pp. 171–184. [Google Scholar]
- Murkherjee, S.; Chaturvedi, S.S. Utilization aspects of floral non-timber forest products: A review. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies 2017, 5, 161–166. [Google Scholar]
- Mwaura, G.G.; Kiboi, M.N.; Mugwe, J.N.; Nicolay, G.; Bett, E.K.; Muriuki, A.; Musafiri, C.M.; Ngetich, F.K. Economic evaluation and socioeconomic drivers influencing farmers’ perceptions on benefits of using organic inputs technologies in Upper Eastern Kenya. Environmental Challenges 2021, 5, 100282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ndlangamandla, M.M. Contribution of indigenous knowledge use on the livelihood of rural women in the Lowveld region of Swaziland: A case study of handicrafts. 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Negi, V.S.; Maikhuri, R.K.; Rawat, L.S. Non-timber forest products (NTFPs): A viable option for biodiversity conservation and livelihood enhancement in central Himalaya. Biodiversity and Conservation 2011, 20, 545–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, T.V.; Lv, J.H.; Vu TT, H.; Zhang, B. Determinants of Non-Timber Forest Product Planting, Development, and Trading: Case Study in Central Vietnam. Forests 2020, 11, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nkamleu, G.B.; Adesina, A.A. Determinants of chemical input use in peri-urban lowland systems: Bivariate probit analysis in Cameroon. Agricultural Systems 2000, 63, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nkamleu, G.B.; Manyong, V.M. Factors affecting the adoption of agroforestry practices by farmers in Cameroon. Small-Scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy 2005, 4, 135–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Northcott, M.S. A political theology of climate change; Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing; p. 2013.
- Ofoegbu, C. An assessment of the local sociocultural concept of climate change and its perceived effect on forestbased livelihoods: Case study of rural communities of Vhembe District South Africa, University of Pretoria, 2017.
- Ofori, B.Y.; Ameade EP, K.; Ohemeng, F.; Musah, Y.; Quartey, J.K.; Owusu, E.H. Climate change knowledge, attitude and perception of undergraduate students in Ghana. PLOS Climate 2023, 2, e0000215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ojala, M. Hope and climate change: The importance of hope for environmental engagement among young people. Environmental Education Research 2012, 18, 625–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Keefe, J.H.; Vogel, R.; Lavie, C.J.; Cordain, L. Exercise like a hunter-gatherer: A prescription for organic physical fitness. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases 2011, 53, 471–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okyere-Manu, B.; Morgan, S.N. Putting words into action. In E. Chitando, E. M. Conradie, & S. M. Kilonzo, African Perspectives on Religion and Climate Change, 1st ed.; Routledge: Informa, UK, 2022; pp. 91–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pagan, A. Gregory C. Chow. Econometric Theory 1995, 11, 597–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palinkas, L.A.; Horwitz, S.M.; Green, C.A.; Wisdom, J.P.; Duan, N.; Hoagwood, K. Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 2015, 42, 533–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Palmer, I. Rural women and the basic-needs approach to development. Int’l Lab. Rev. 1977, 115, 97. [Google Scholar]
- Tripathi, P.; Kumar, A. Non Timber Forest Products (NTFPs) for Sustained Livelihood: Challenges and Strategies, 2016.
- Parks, B.C.; Roberts, J.T. Globalization, vulnerability to climate change, and perceived injustice. Society and Natural Resources 2006, 19, 337–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parrotta, J.A.; Agnoletti, M. Traditional forest-related knowledge and climate change; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Peng, B.; Wang, Y.; Wei, G. Yau Type Gradient Estimates For $\Delta u + au(\log u)^{p}+bu=0$ On Riemannian Manifolds. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2010.0776. http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.00776. [Google Scholar]
- Peng, C.-Y.J.; Lee, K.L.; Ingersoll, G.M. An Introduction to Logistic Regression Analysis and Reporting. The Journal of Educational Research 2002, 96, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poudel, J. M. Cultural understanding of non-timber forest products among the Babuban community people of eastern Nepal. Occasional Papers in Sociology and Anthropology 2009, 11, 126–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, H.; Roy, B.; Islam, S. Contribution of non-timber forest products to the livelihoods of the forest-dependent communities around the Khadimnagar National Park in northeastern Bangladesh. Regional Sustainability 2021, 2, 280–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ray, B.; Mukherjee, P. Economics of Gender in Resource Dependent Communities. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science; 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Rist, L.; Shackleton, C.; Gadamus, L.; Chapin, F.S.; Gowda, C.M.; Setty, S.; Kannan, R.; Shaanker, R.U. Ecological knowledge among communities, managers and scientists: Bridging divergent perspectives to improve forest management outcomes. Environmental Management 2016, 57, 798–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ros-Tonen MA, F.; Van Andel, T.; Morsello, C.; Otsuki, K.; Rosendo, S.; Scholz, I. Forest-related partnerships in Brazilian Amazonia: There is more to sustainable forest management than reduced impact logging. Forest Ecology and Management 2008, 256, 1482–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sardeshpande, M.; Shackleton, C. Wild edible fruits: A systematic review of an under-researched multifunctional NTFP (non-timber forest product). Forests 2019, 10, 467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarfo-Mensah, P.; Oduro, W. Traditional natural resources management practices and biodiversity conservation in Ghana: A review of local concepts and issues on change and sustainability, 2007.
- Schaafsma, M.; Morse-Jones, S.; Posen, P.; Swetnam, R.D.; Balmford, A.; Bateman, I.J.; Burgess, N.D.; Chamshama SA, O.; Fisher, B.; Freeman, T. The importance of local forest benefits: Economic valuation of Non-Timber Forest Products in the Eastern Arc Mountains in Tanzania. Global Environmental Change 2014, 24, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schreckenberg, *!!! REPLACE !!!*; Marshall, E.; Newton, A.; Velde, D.W.T.; Rushton, J.; Edouard, F. Commercialisation of Non-Timber Forest Products: What Determines Success, 2006.
- Schulz, W.; Ainley, J.; Fraillon, J.; Kerr, D.; Losito, B. ICCS 2009 International Report: Civic Knowledge, Attitudes, and Engagement among Lower-Secondary School Students in 38 Countries; ERIC, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Selm, K.R.; Peterson, M.N.; Hess, G.R.; Beck, S.M.; McHale, M.R. Educational attainment predicts negative perceptions women have of their own climate change knowledge. PLOS ONE 2019, 14, e0210149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shackleton, S.; Delang, C.O.; Angelsen, A. From subsistence to safety nets and cash income: Exploring the diverse values of non-timber forest products for livelihoods and poverty alleviation; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Shackleton, S.; Paumgarten, F.; Kassa, H.; Husselman, M.; Zida, M. Opportunities for enhancing poor women’s socioeconomic empowerment in the value chains of three African non-timber forest products (NTFPs). International Forestry Review 2011, 13, 136–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahabuddin, G.; Prasad, S. Assessing ecological sustainability of non-timber forest produce extraction: The Indian scenario. Conservation and Society 2004, 235–250. [Google Scholar]
- Shanley, P.; Pierce, A.R.; Laird, S.A.; Binnqüist, C.L.; Guariguata, M.R. From lifelines to livelihoods: Non-timber forest products into the twenty-first century. Tropical Forestry Handbook 2015, 1–50. [Google Scholar]
- Sharma, D.; Tiwari, B.K.; Chaturvedi, S.S.; Diengdoh, E. Status, utilization and economic valuation of Non-timber Forest Products of Arunachal Pradesh, India. Journal of Forest and Environmental Science 2015, 31, 24–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, S.; Thapa, R. Socioeconomic Factors and Their Interaction with Environmental Education and Biodiversity Conservation: Effects on Mental Health and Community Empowerment. AI, IoT and the Fourth Industrial Revolution Review 2023, 13, 75–90. [Google Scholar]
- Sills, E.; Shanley, P.; Paumgarten, F.; de Beer, J.; Pierce, A. Evolving perspectives on non-timber forest products. In Non-timber forest products in the global context; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp. 23–51. [Google Scholar]
- Soe, K.T.; Yeo-Chang, Y. Livelihood Dependency on Non-Timber Forest Products: Implications for REDD+. Forests 2019, 10, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sraku-Lartey, M.; Acquah, S.B.; Samar, S.B.; Djagbletey, G.D. Digitization of indigenous knowledge on forest foods and medicines. IFLA Journal 2017, 43, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stanley, D.; Voeks, R.; Short, L. Is non-timber forest product harvest sustainable in the less developed world? A systematic review of the recent economic and ecological literature. Ethnobiology and Conservation 2012, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sutherland, I.J.; Van Vianen, J.; Rowland, D.; Palomo, I.; Pascual, U.; Mathys, A.; Narulita, S.; Sunderland, T. Use, value, and desire: Ecosystem services under agricultural intensification in a changing landscape in West Kalimantan (Indonesia). Regional Environmental Change 2023, 23, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Timko, J.A.; Waeber, P.O.; Kozak, R.A. The socio-economic contribution of non-timber forest products to rural livelihoods in Sub-Saharan Africa: Knowledge gaps and new directions. International Forestry Review 2010, 12, 284–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tugume, P.; Kakudidi, E.K.; Buyinza, M.; Namaalwa, J.; Kamatenesi, M.; Mucunguzi, P.; Kalema, J. Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plant species used by communities around Mabira Central Forest Reserve, Uganda. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2016, 12, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uprety, Y.; Poudel, R.C.; Gurung, J.; Chettri, N.; Chaudhary, R.P. Traditional use and management of NTFPs in Kangchenjunga Landscape: Implications for conservation and livelihoods. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2016, 12, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van den Boog, T.; van Andel, T.; Bulkan, J. Indigenous children’s knowledge about non-timber forest products in Suriname. Economic Botany 2017, 71, 361–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verma, S.K.; Paul, S.K. Sustaining the non-timber forest products (NTFPs) based rural livelihood of tribal’s in Jharkhand: Issues and challenges. Jharkhand Journal of Development and Management Studies 2016, 14, 6865–6883. [Google Scholar]
- Vo, H.H.; Mizunoya, T.; Nguyen, C.D. Determinants of farmers’ adaptation decisions to climate change in the central coastal region of Vietnam. Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science 2021, 5, 327–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wahlén, C.B. Opportunities for making the invisible visible: Towards an improved understanding of the economic contributions of NTFPs. Forest Policy and Economics 2017, 84, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wartenberg, A.C.; Blaser, W.J.; Janudianto, K.N.; Roshetko, J.M.; van Noordwijk, M.; Six, J. Farmer perceptions of plant–soil interactions can affect adoption of sustainable management practices in cocoa agroforests. Ecology and Society 2018, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ziblim, I.A.; Timothy, K.A.; Deo-Anyi, E.J. Exploitation and use of medicinal plants, Northern Region, Ghana. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 2013, 7, 1984–1993. [Google Scholar]


| Causes | Response(n) | Percentage |
| Human activities | 208 | 28.4 |
| Punishment from gods | 51 | 6.9 |
| Sinful act | 54 | 7.4 |
| Population increment | 102 | 13.9 |
| Industrialisation | 75 | 10.3 |
| Uncertain | 52 | 7.2 |
| Tree cutting | 190 | 25.9 |
| Total | 732 | 100 |
| Perceived change | Impact experienced on the livelihood system | Response (Observed changes) | Study Area |
| Erratic, untimely, delayed, and rainfall | The decline in NTFPs collections and gathering and agricultural productivity. Decline in NTFP production, e.g honey, snails and mushroom producers |
Changes in NTFPs collection season delayed or earlier sowing and harvesting Changes to crop varieties and types Labour migration Increased engagement in wage labour Re-sowing of crops Buying food from the market Skipping meals Sale of assets Borrowing money |
All regions and districts |
| Overall, decreased water availability and increased dry conditions. | Less flow of rivers, springs and streams. Drying up of moisture; lowering of groundwater or soil moisture and forest. |
Scarcity of water for NTFPs processing and NTFPS production Scarcity for NTFPs collection and gathering. Rampant recording of forest fire Less land area cultivated |
All regions and districts |
| Increasing temperatures | Health issues (increased incidence of heat stroke and vector-borne diseases). |
Increased in expenditure in treatment of ailments. Increased in crop failure. Increased in livestock failure. Increased in NTFPs failure in the season affecting the financial state of locals. |
All regions and districts |
| Warmer and shorter rainy seasons with less rainfall Snowfall/ Increase in pests and diseases |
Beneficial conditions for specific crops consequent loss of farm AND NTFPs income Increased incidence of pests and disease |
Failure of NTFPs season for collection and gathering Traditional pest management strategies (Burning fields; spreading cow urine, salt, and ashes; crop rotation) Increased use of pesticides |
All regions and districts |
| Variable | Estimate | Std Error | z value | Pr(>|z|) |
| Intercept | 18.25583 | 1864.33824 | 0.010 | 0.992 |
| Age | 0.02890 | 0.02546 | 1.135 | 0.256 |
| Gender | -0.11723 | 0.76231 | -0.154 | 0.878 |
| Education | 0.24554 | 0.51858 | 0.473 | 0.636 |
| Religion | -0.99760 | 0.47821 | -2.086 | 0.037 * |
| Occupation | -13.86112 | 1864.33710 | -0.007 | 0.994 |
| Response | Freq | per cent | Valid Percent | Cumulative per cent |
| Value Addition | ||||
| No | 548 | 74.9 | 74.9 | 9.8 |
| Yes | 184 | 25.1 | 25.1 | 100.0 |
| Total | 732 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |
| Increased Price | ||||
| Yes | 437 | 59.7 | 59.7 | 59.7 |
| No | 295 | 40.3 | 40.3 | 100.0 |
| Total | 732 | 100.0 | 100 | |
| Religion | ||||
| Christians | 438 | 59.8 | 59.8 | 59.8 |
| Muslims | 35 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 64.6 |
| Traditional | 259 | 35.4 | 35.4 | 100.0 |
| Total | 732 | 100 | 100 | |
| Constraints | ||||
| Financial | 175 | 23.9 | 23.9 | 23.9 |
| Skills | 292 | 39.9 | 39.9 | 39.9 |
| Time | 265 | 36.2 | 36.2 | 100.0 |
| Total | 732 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Variable | Estimate | Std. Error | Z value | Pr(>|z|) |
| (Intercept) | 1.1129138 | 0.4782433 | 2.327087 | 0.0199* |
| Gender | -0.6493546 | 0.1807774 | -3.592012 | 0.000328*** |
| Education | 0.3507588 | 0.1227342 | 2.857873 | 0.004265 ** |
| Constraints | 0.1706921 | 0.1127015 | 1.514550 | 0.1298864226 |
| Religion | -0.2244204 | 0.1468319 | -1.528418 | 0.1264088668 |
| Variable | estimate | std error | Z value | P value |
| Intercept | 22.85998 | 1078.87784 | 0.021 | 0.98310 |
| Gender | -1.42808 | 0.44464 | -3.212 | 0.00132 ** |
| Education | -0.82063 | 0.30384 | -2.701 | 0.00692 ** |
| Religion | -1.25122 | 0.31750 | -3.941 | 8.12e-05 *** |
| Household size | 0.07156 | 0.07007 | 1.021 | 0.30713 |
| Occupation | -14.09820 | 1078.87703 | -0.013 | 0.98957 |
| Multiple use of NTFPs | 0.13597 | 0.12301 | 1.105 | 0.26900 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).