Triple Silencing of HSP27, cFLIP, and CLU Genes Promotes Sensitivity of Doxazosin-Induced Apoptosis in PC-3 Prostate Cancer Cells

Jeong Man Cho; Sojung Sun; Eunji Im; Hyunwon Yang; Tag Keun Yoo

doi:10.20944/preprints202401.0637.v1

Submitted:

08 January 2024

Posted:

09 January 2024

You are already at the latest version

Abstract

Background: This study investigated how the expression of heat shock protein 27 (HSP27), cellular FLICE-like inhibitory protein (cFLIP) and clusterin (CLU) affects the progression of cancer cells and their susceptibility to doxazosin-induced apoptosis. By silencing each of these genes individually, their effect on prostate cancer cell viability after doxazosin treatment was investigated. Methods: PC-3 prostate cancer cells were cultured and then subjected to gene silencing using siRNA targeting HSP27, cFLIP, and CLU, either individually, in pairs, or all together. Cells were then treated with doxazosin at various concentrations and their viability was assessed by MTT assay. Results: The study found that silencing the CLU gene in PC-3 cells significantly reduced cell viability after treatment with 25 µM doxazosin. In addition, dual silencing of cFLIP and CLU decreased cell viability at 10 µM doxazosin. Notably, silencing all three genes of HSP27, cFLIP, CLU was most effective and reduced cell viability even at a lower doxazosin concentration of 1 µM. Conclusions: Taken together, these findings suggest that simultaneous silencing of HSP27, cFLIP, and CLU genes may be a potential strategy to promote apoptosis in prostate cancer cells, which could inform future research on treatments for malignant prostate cancer.

Keywords:

Apoptosis

;

CLU

;

cFLIP

;

Doxazosin

;

HSP27

;

Prostate cancer

Subject:

Biology and Life Sciences - Cell and Developmental Biology

1. Introduction

Prostate cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers in men worldwide and is responsible for a significant number of deaths. Early diagnosis of prostate cancer through prostate-specific antigen testing can lead to successful treatment with surgery or radiation therapy. However, when prostate cancer progresses to castration-refractory prostate cancer (CRPC), it becomes difficult to treat with conventional hormone therapy or chemotherapy [1,2,3]. In these cases, α1-receptor blockers such as doxazosin and terazosin are widely used as drugs for the treatment of CRPC [4,5]. These drugs have a chemical structure known as a quinazoline nucleus, and many studies have suggested that they can induce apoptosis in prostate cancer cells by inhibiting anoikis and prostate cancer cell invasion [6,7,8].

Many signaling proteins are known to be involved in the apoptosis of prostate cancer cells are well known. Heat shock protein 27 (HSP27) is a cell survival factor synthesized in response to stress such as UV irradiation, oxidizing agents, inflammation, hypoxia, and tumors [9,10,11]. In the absence of stress, HSP27 plays an important role in maintaining cellular homeostasis as a molecular chaperone that folds, assembles, and transports polypeptides. However, HSP27 increases cell survival by inhibiting apoptosis by interfering with cytochrome c secretion from mitochondria, caspase 3 activity, and apoptosome formation [12,13,14]. In prostate cancer, HSP27 is associated with pathologic stage, Gleason score, lymph node metastasis, shorter biochemical recurrence, and poor clinical outcome [15,16].

Another protein involved in apoptosis regulation is the cellular FLICE-like inhibitory protein (cFLIP), which is expressed in three splice variants: cFLIPL, cFLIPS, and cFLIPR [17,18]. Each variant has different structures and properties, but they inhibit apoptosis by interacting with the adaptor protein FADD in downstream of the death receptors Fas, DE4, and DR5 [19]. Overexpression of cFLIP has been detected in various cancers, and apoptosis is induced when cFLIP expression is downregulated by various cytokines and drugs [17,20].

Clusterin (CLU) is a multifunctional glycoprotein complex found in body fluids and cells that is known to have two opposing actions as an apoptosis factor or a cell survival factor [21,22]. Overexpression of CLU protects cells from apoptosis induced by cellular stresses such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or androgen/estrogen depletion [23,24]. On the other hand, CLU can also suppress survival genes in cancer cells, while increasing apoptosis [25,26]. For this reason, CLU is used as a marker of apoptosis undergoing in various benign and malignant tumor tissues [25,27].

Therefore, the aim of the study was to investigate whether the inhibition of the genes that are known to protect against cell death caused by anticancer drugs could enhance the efficacy of doxazosin-induced apoptosis in prostate cancer cells. To test this hypothesis, small interfering RNA (siRNA) technology was used to simultaneously knock out all three target genes in PC-3 prostate cancer cells. This approach was designed to determine whether silencing these genes would make the cancer cells more susceptible to apoptosis when treated with the drug doxazosin.

2. Materials and Methods

Cell culture and doxazosin treatment

The human PC-3 cell line was obtained from the American Type Tissue Culture Collection (Bethesda, MD, USA). Cells were maintained in DMEM purchased from Gibco (Grand Island, NY) and supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, USA) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco BRL, Grand Island, NY). Cells were cultured in a humidified atmosphere at 37℃ with 5% CO2. When the cells reached 70% confluence, the culture medium was replaced with fresh serum-free medium, and then treated with 1, 10, and 25 µM doxazosin. Serum-free medium containing 0.25% DMSO was used as the control.

MTT assay

The 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was used to evaluate cell viability. PC-3 cells were seeded at a density of 1.5x104 per well in 48-well plates and treated with 1, 10, and 25 μM of doxazosin. At 24, 48, and 72 h after treatment, 50 μl of MTT solution was added to each well and incubated for 30 min. The supernatant was then removed and the MTT formazan was dissolved in 500 μl of DMSO. The plates were further incubated for 1 h, and the absorbance was measured at 595 nm using a spectrophotometer (Multiskan Ex, Thermo Scientific, USA).

Annexin-V staining

To detect apoptosis, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and then incubated for 5 with an in situ apoptosis detection kit (ApopTag; Roche, BMS). Cells were treated with a reaction buffer containing 10 units of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase and 1 unit of deoxyuridine triphosphate-digoxigenin at 37℃ for 1 h. The reaction was terminated by adding stop/wash buffer, and the cells were washed twice with Tris buffer. Anti-digoxigenin-FITC was added and the cells were incubated at 37℃ for 30 min. After washing with distilled water, the nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33258 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and the cells were observed under a fluorescence microscope (TE-300, Nikon, Japan).

siRNA silencing of HSP27, cFLIP, and CLU genes

To downregulate the expression levels of HSP27, cFLIP, and CLU mRNA in PC-3 cells, siRNA duplexes were transfected into PC-3 cells using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Cells were seeded in plates in Opti-MEM medium (Gibco, Waltham, MA USA) without penicillin/streptomycin. siRNA targeting HSP27 mRNA was purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA), and cFLIP and CLU mRNA were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). The mRNA target sequences for HSP27 (Gene ID: 3315), cFLIP (Gene ID: 8837), and CLU (Gene ID: 1191) were designed using a siRNA template design tool (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). A final concentration of 5 μM siRNAs was used with Lipofectamine RNAiMAX in Opti-MEM media. After 24 h, the transfection medium was removed and the cells were replenished with complete medium. The transfected cells were allowed to grow for 24, 48, and 72 h at 37∘ C in a 5% CO2 incubator.

Total RNA extraction and qRT-PCR

Cultured cells were homogenized with Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA was then extracted by precipitation with chloroform and isopropyl alcohol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), washed with 75% ethyl alcohol, and dissolved in RNase-DNase-free water (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The concentration and purity of the extracted RNA were measured using a Nano-drop (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Next, cDNA synthesis was performed in two steps; first, using the extracted RNA and oligo dT, and second, using dNTP (Takara Bio Inc., Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan) and RTase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for double-strand synthesis in RT buffer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was then performed using the Light Cycler 480 real-time PCR system (Roche, Manheim, Germany) with a buffer solution containing template cDNA, each primer, and SYBR Green (Roche, Manheim, Germany).

Western Blot Analysis

Samples were homogenized in a lysis buffer. Equal amounts of proteins were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes (Amersham; GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, England). The membranes were incubated in a 3% casein-blocking solution (Komabiotech, Korea). The membranes were incubated with rabbit anti-cFLIP polyclonal antibody (H-202, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Paso Robles, CA), goat anti-HSP27 polyclonal antibody (C-20, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Paso Robles, CA), rabbit anti-clusterin polyclonal antibody (H-330, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Paso Robles, CA), and mouse anti-β-actin monoclonal antibody (H-2202, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Paso Robles, CA) at 4ºC for overnight. The membrane was washed three times and incubated with donkey anti-rabbit IgG-HRP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Paso Robles, CA) and donkey anti-mouse IgG-HRP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Paso Robles, CA) at room temperature for 1 h each. The membrane was then washed and detected with ECL Plus Western blot detection reagent (Amersham; GE Healthcare, Buckingham, England). Relative protein levels were determined using ScionImage (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD).

Statistical analysis

Results were presented as the mean and the standard error of the mean (SEM). Student’s t-test and one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test were used for data analysis. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Cell viability and apoptosis after doxazosin treatment

To examine the potential cytotoxic effect of doxazosin on PC-3 cells, we conducted an MTT assay to measure cell viability after treatment with 1, 10, and 25 µM doxazosin for 24, 48, and 72 h. Doxazosin treatment results in a dose- and time-dependent reduction in cell viability, with the greatest reduction observed in cells treated with 25 μM doxazosin for 72 h, which showed 29.1±6.5% reduction compared to untreated controls (Figure 1A). To further elucidate the mechanism underlying this observed cytotoxic effect, we evaluated whether doxazosin-induced cell death was due to apoptosis or necrosis using Annexin-V and PI staining. Apoptotic cells, as evidenced by green fluorescence, were rarely detected in doxazosin-untreated PC-3 cells, but increased in a dose-dependent manner after doxazosin treatment. Conversely, only a negligible number of necrotic cells, as indicated by red fluorescence, were observed (Figure 1B). Importantly, we observed a significant increase in the rate of apoptosis at the 25 µM doxazosin (Figure 1C), suggesting that doxazosin-induced cytotoxicity in PC-3 cells is predominantly mediated by apoptosis rather than necrosis.

3.2. Expression of survival-related genes after doxazosin treatment

To investigate the effect of doxazosin on the expression of HSP27, cFLIP, and CLU genes, the expression levels of each gene were measured by qRT-PCR after treatment with 25 µM doxazosin for 6, 12, and 24 h. The results showed that the expression of HSP27 mRNA gradually decreased and reached its lowest level after 24 h of treatment. On the other hand, the expression of cFLIP mRNA exhibited a transient increase after 6 h of treatment, followed by a decrease from 12 h. In contrast, the expression of CLU mRNA increased steadily from 6 h after treatment and continued to increase until 24 h (Figure 2).

3.3. siRNA efficiency of HSP27, cFLIP, and CLU genes

To assess the compatibility of siRNA targeting HSP27, cFLIP, and CLU genes in PC-3 cells, we conducted qRT-PCR and Western blot analysis to detect the expression levels of each gene and protein. The expression of HSP27, cFLIP, and CLU genes was significantly reduced after siRNA treatment for each gene (Figure 3A). In addition, the expression of all three protein types was reduced in the cells subjected to siRNA, similar to the qRT-PCR results (Figure 3B).

3.4. siRNA efficiency of HSP27, cFLIP, and CLU genes

We evaluated the effect of doxazosin on the cell viability of PC-3 cells after siRNA targeting HSP27, cFLIP, and CLU genes. In the control PC-3 cells not subjected to siRNA, cell viability was 92.4±5.3%, 89.7±4.8%, and 83.5±6.3% after treatment with 1, 10, and 25 μM doxazosin, respectively, showing that there was no significant decrease (Figure 4A). In PC-3 cells subjected to single silencing targeting HSP27, cFLIP, and CLU genes, the overall cell viability was decreased after doxazosin treatment compared to the siRNA control group. Specifically, in cells subjected to siRNA targeting the CLU gene, cell viability was significantly decreased to 72.7±5.1% after treatment with 25 μM doxazosin. However, in cells subjected to siRNA targeting HSP27 and cFLIP genes, cell viability was 80.4±5.3% and 78.7±4.8%, respectively, which did not show a significant decrease (Figure 4A). In cells subjected to dual silencing targeting HSP27 and cFLIP genes, cell viability was significantly decreased in all gene combinations compared to PC-3 cells subjected to single siRNA targeting one gene after doxazosin treatment. In cells subjected to dual silencing targeting HSP27 and CLU genes and cFLIP and CLU genes, cell viability was 62.6±5.7 and 53.7±6.9%, respectively, after 25 μM doxazosin treatment, indicating a significant decrease compared to the siRNA control group (Figure 4B). Finally, in PC-3 cells subjected to triple silencing of HSP27, cFLIP, and CLU genes, cell viability was significantly decreased at 10 and 25 μM doxazosin, with cell viability of 52.1±6.1 and 40.9±7.1%, respectively. Even at 1 μM doxazosin, cell viability was significantly reduced to 58.3±4.5% compared to PC-3 cells subjected to dual siRNA targeting two genes (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

Doxazosin is a drug of the quinazoline α1-blocker class that has been shown to be a cell death inducer in both normal and cancerous prostate cells. Doxazosin has therefore been used extensively in the treatment of prostate cancer. However, the efficacy of doxazosin as a monotherapy is limited, prompting numerous efforts to improve its anticancer activity. As one of these efforts, we investigated whether the deletion of genes associated with cell survival, such as HSP27, cFLIP, and CLU, enhances the cell death inducing effect of doxazosin.

Before deleting those genes in PC-3 cells, we first confirmed the effects of doxazosin on cell viability and apoptosis using the prostate cancer cell line, PC-3 cells. Doxazosin induced a decrease in cell viability and an increase in apoptosis in a time- and dose-dependent manner in PC-3 cells after doxazosin treatment. These findings are consistent with many previously published research results. In a study using the DU-145 and PC-3 cell lines, doxazosin and terazosin were shown to induce apoptosis in the cells independently of alpha-adrenergic receptors and hormone receptors [28]. Another study reported that apoptosis occurred when doxazosin was exposed to normal prostate cells and PC-3 cells [29]. In addition, doxazosin is known to increase apoptosis by altering mitochondrial membrane potential and increasing intracellular reactive oxygen species [30].

Next, we investigated whether HSP27, cFLIP, and CLU, as survival-related genes, were involved in the apoptosis induced by doxazosin. As a result of analyzing the expression of the three genes in PC-3 cells after doxazosin treatment, HSP27 mRNA expression decreased, while cFLIP mRNA expression temporarily increased before returning to normal levels. Conversely, CLU mRNA expression increased continuously after doxazosin treatment.

HSP27 is one of the well-known cell survival genes, and its expression decreases in cancer cells undergoing apoptosis [31]. HSP27 is a cell survival factor that is synthesized in response to cytotoxic stimuli and plays an important role in maintaining cell function in the absence of stress. Conversely, under stress, HSP27 inhibits apoptosis and increases cell survival by interfering with mitochondrial cytochrome c secretion and caspase-3 activation [32,33]. These results are not consistent with our results showing that the expression of HSP27 mRNA was reduced by doxazosin treatment. However, it is proposed that HSP27 may not be involved in doxazosin-induced apoptosis of prostate cells, and that doxazosin may induce a decrease in HSP27 mRNA expression. Meanwhile, cFLIP is known as a cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein that acts as an inhibitor of death receptor-mediated apoptosis. cFLIP inhibits apoptosis by interacting with the adapter protein FADD [34,35]. In addition, when FADD expression is downregulated by cFLIP silencing, drug-induced apoptosis is promoted [36,37]. In addition, CLU has been reported to be overexpressed to protect cells from cell death induced by cellular stress and extrinsic apoptotic signals [38]. CLU, also known as a testosterone-repressed prostate message-2 (TRPM-2), is reported to have a dual role as both an apoptosis factor and a cell survival factor [39]. Aberrant CLU expression has been associated with apoptosis in several cancers. It is also known that silencing the CLU gene in cancer cells reduces cell proliferation and increases apoptosis [40].

Considering these results, we hypothesized that suppression of these genes could accelerate the apoptosis of PC-3 cells by doxazosin, and conducted small interfering RNA (siRNA) silencing of HSP27, cFLIP, and CLU genes in PC-3 cells. First, we examined cell viability after a single knockdown of these genes. We observed a significant decrease in cell viability in cells treated with CLU siRNA, but not in those treated with HSP27 and cFLIP siRNA. Our results showed that HSP27 and cFLIP mRNA expression either decreased or remained unchanged, whereas CLU mRNA expression increased after doxazosin treatment. Considering these results, it seems that the sensitivity of doxazosin-induced apoptosis in PC-3 cells was enhanced by suppressing the expression of CLU mRNA, which is a survival factor upregulated by doxazosin treatment.

In this study, we also evaluated cell viability in PC-3 cells subjected to dual silencing of HSP27, cFLIP, and CLU genes. Cell viability was significantly decreased in cells subjected to dual silencing of cFLIP and CLU genes after doxazosin treatment compared with the control, but not in cells subjected to dual silencing of HSP27 and cFLIP genes or HSP27 and CLU genes. These results suggest that HSP27 may interact with cFLIP and CLU, implying that silencing HSP27 gene expression compensates for the cell survival function of cFLIP and CLU genes. Next, we performed triple silencing of the HSP27, cFLIP, and CLU genes to determine how the interactions of these genes affect the cell viability of PC-3 cells treated with doxazosin. As expected, sensitivity to doxazosin was increased in PC-3 cells subjected to triple silencing of HSP27, cFLIP, and CLU genes, and cell viability was significantly reduced even in cells treated with 1 μM doxazosin compared to the control group. These results suggest that triple silencing of HSP27, cFLIP, and CLU genes is likely to be more effective than single or dual silencing.

5. Conclusions

Our study shows that administration of doxazosin after a single knockdown of HSP27, cFLIP, and CLU genes in PC-3 cells, a prostate cancer cell line, leads to increased apoptosis. We observed that when we applied dual siRNA to each of these genes, thereby increasing sensitivity to doxazosin, the cell survival rate after treatment was further reduced compared to the results with single siRNA. Notably, simultaneous silencing of all three genes resulted in the lowest cell survival rate, suggesting that triple silencing may be more effective than single or dual silencing in inducing apoptosis in prostate cancer cells. This study is the first to perform triple gene silencing of survival-related genes in PC-3 cells. We expect that these findings will provide fundamental data for future research in the treatment of aggressive forms of prostate cancer.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.C, H.Y. and K.Y.; Methodology, J.C. and S.S.; Validation, J.C., H.Y. and K.Y.; Formal Analysis, J.C.; Investigation, J.C., S.S. and E.L.; Resources, K.Y.; Data Curation, J.C. and H.Y.; Writing – Original Draft Preparation, J.C.; Writing – Review & Editing, H.Y. and K.Y.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

Amaral, T.M.S.; Macedo, D.; Fernandes, I.; Costa, L. Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Treatment. Prostate Cancer 2012, 2012, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Chandrasekar, T.; Yang, J.C.; Gao, A.C.; Evans, C.P. Mechanisms of resistance in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). 2015, 4, 365–380–380. [CrossRef]
Heidegger, I.; Massoner, P.; Eder, I.E.; Pircher, A.; Pichler, R.; Aigner, F.; Bektic, J.; Horninger, W.; Klocker, H. Novel therapeutic approaches for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2013, 138, 248–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wade, C.A.; Goodwin, J.; Preston, D.; Kyprianou, N. Impact of α-adrenoceptor antagonists on prostate cancer development, progression and prevention. Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2019, 7, 46–60. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Archer, M.; Dogra, N.; Dovey, Z.; Ganta, T.; Jang, H.-S.; Khusid, J.A.; Lantz, A.; Mihalopoulos, M.; Stockert, J.A.; Zahalka, A.; et al. Role of α- and β-adrenergic signaling in phenotypic targeting: Significance in benign and malignant urologic disease. Cell Commun. Signal. 2021, 19, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Partin, J.V.; Anglin, I.E.; Kyprianou, N. Quinazoline-based alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonists induce prostate cancer cell apoptosis via TGF-beta signalling and I kappa B alpha induction. Br. J. Cancer 2003, 88, 1615–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Tahmatzopoulos, A.; Kyprianou, N. Apoptotic impact of alpha1-blockers on prostate cancer growth: A myth or an inviting reality? Prostate 2004, 59, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Anglin, I.E.; Glassman, D.T.; Kyprianou, N. Induction of prostate apoptosis by α1-adrenoceptor antagonists: Mechanistic significance of the quinazoline component. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2002, 5, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wang, Z.-Y.; Li, A.; Huang, X.; Bai, G.-L.; Jiang, Y.-X.; Li, R.-L.; Liu, C.; Wen, Z.-Y.; Wang, P.; Chen, A.-J. HSP27 Protects Skin From Ultraviolet B -Induced Photodamage by Regulating Autophagy and Reactive Oxygen Species Production. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 852244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bi, X.; Jiang, B.; Zhou, J.; Luo, L.; Yin, Z. Phosphorylated Hsp27 prevents LPS-induced excessive inflammation in THP-1 cells via suppressing ROS-mediated upregulation of CBP. Cell Biol. Int. 2019, 44, 253–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Garrido, C.; Schmitt, E.; Candé, C.; Vahsen, N.; Parcellier, A.; Kroemer, G. HSP27 and HSP70: Potentially oncogenic apoptosis inhibitors. Cell Cycle 2003, 2, 578–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bruey, J.-M.; Ducasse, C.; Bonniaud, P.; Ravagnan, L.; Susin, S.A.; Diaz-Latoud, C.; Gurbuxani, S.; Arrigo, A.-P.; Kroemer, G.; Solary, E.; et al. Hsp27 negatively regulates cell death by interacting with cytochrome c. Nat. Cell Biol. 2000, 2, 645–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wang, B.; Moon, S.P.; Cutolo, G.; Javed, A.; Ahn, B.S.; Ryu, A.H.; Pratt, M.R. HSP27 inhibitory activity against caspase-3 cleavage and activation by caspase-9 is enhanced by chaperone O-GlcNAc modification in vitro. ACS Chem Biol. 2023, 18, 1698–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Rocchi, P.; Jugpal, P.; So, A.; Sinneman, S.; Ettinger, S.; Fazli, L.; Nelson, C.; Gleave, M. Small interference RNA targeting heat-shock protein 27 inhibits the growth of prostatic cell lines and induces apoptosis via caspase-3 activation in vitro. BJU Int. 2006, 98, 1082–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Garrido, C.; Ottavi, P.; Fromentin, A.; Hammann, A.; Arrigo, A.P.; Chauffert, B.; Mehlen, P. HSP27 as a mediator of confluence-dependent resistance to cell death induced by anticancer drugs. Cancer Res. 1997, 57, 2661–2667. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Arts, H.J.; Hollema, H.; Lemstra, W.; Willemse, P.H.; De Vries, E.G.; Kampinga, H.H.; Van der Zee, A.G. Heat-shock-protein-27(HSP27) expression in ovarian carcinoma: Relation in response to chemotherapy and prognosis. Int. J. Cancer 1999, 84, 234–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Safa, A.R. c-FLIP, a master anti-apoptotic regulator. Exp. Oncol. 2012, 34, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Öztürk, S.; Schleich, K.; Lavrik, I.N. Cellular FLICE-like inhibitory proteins (c-FLIPs): Fine-tuners of life and death decisions. Exp. Cell Res. 2012, 318, 1324–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hwang, E.Y.; Jeong, M.S.; Park, S.Y.; Jang, S.B. Evidence of complex formation between FADD and c-FLIP death effector domains for the death inducing signaling complex. BMB Rep. 2014, 47, 488–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Haag, C.; Stadel, D.; Zhou, S.; Bachem, M.G.; Möller, P.; Debatin, K.M.; Fulda, S. Identification of cFLIP(L) and cFLIP(S) as critical regulators of death receptor-induced apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells. Gut 2011, 60, 225–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Shannan, B.; Seifert, M.; Boothman, D.A.; Tilgen, W.; Reichrath, J. Clusterin and DNA repair: A new function in cancer for a key player in apoptosis and cell cycle control. Histochem. J. 2006, 37, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Viard, I.; Wehrli, P.; Jornot, L.; Bullani, R.; Vechietti, J.-L.; French, L.E.; Schifferli, J.A.; Tschopp, J. Clusterin Gene Expression Mediates Resistance to Apoptotic Cell Death Induced by Heat Shock and Oxidative Stress. J. Investig. Dermatol. 1999, 112, 290–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
García-Aranda, M.; Téllez, T.; Muñoz, M.; Redondo, M. Clusterin inhibition mediates sensitivity to chemotherapy and radiotherapy in human cancer. Anti-Cancer Drugs 2017, 28, 702–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Zellweger, T.; Kiyama, S.; Chi, K.; Miyake, H.; Adomat, H.; Skov, K.; Gleave, M. Overexpression of the cytoprotective protein clusterin decreases radiosensitivity in the human LNCaP prostate tumour model. BJU Int. 2003, 92, 463–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Shannan, B.; Seifert, M.; Leskov, K.; Willis, J.; Boothman, D.; Tilgen, W.; Reichrath, J. Challenge and promise: Roles for clusterin in pathogenesis, progression and therapy of cancer. Cell Death Differ. 2005, 13, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Zhang, F.; Kumano, M.; Beraldi, E.; Fazli, L.; Du, C.; Moore, S.; Sorensen, P.; Zoubeidi, A.; Gleave, M.E. Clusterin facilitates stress-induced lipidation of LC3 and autophagosome biogenesis to enhance cancer cell survival. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scaltriti, M.; Bettuzzi, S.; Sharrard, R.M.; Caporali, A.; Caccamo, A.E.; Maitland, N.J. Clusterin overexpression in both malignant and nonmalignant prostate epithelial cells induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Br. J. Cancer 2004, 91, 1842–1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Benning, C.M.; Kyprianou, N. Quinazoline-derived alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonists induce prostate cancer cell apoptosis via an alpha1-adrenoceptor-independent action. Cancer Res. 2002, 62, 597–602. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Garrison, J.B.; Kyprianou, N. Docetaxel induces apoptosis of benign and malignant prostate cells via a death receptor-mediated pathway. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 464–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Karaca, B.; Bakır, E.; Yerer, M.B.; Cumaoğlu, A.; Hamurcu, Z.; Eken, A. Doxazosin and erlotinib have anticancer effects in the endometrial cancer cell and important roles in ERα and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2021, 35, e22905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Karademir, D.; Özgür, A. Small molecule heat shock protein 27 inhibitor J2 decreases ovarian cancer cell proliferation via induction of apoptotic pathways. Med Oncol. 2023, 40, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lampros, M.; Vlachos, N.; Voulgaris, S.; Alexiou, G.A. The Role of Hsp27 in Chemotherapy Resistance. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Singh, M.K.; Sharma, B.; Tiwari, P.K. The small heat shock protein Hsp27: Present understanding and future prospects. J. Therm. Biol. 2017, 69, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Davidovich, P.; Higgins, C.A.; Najda, Z.; Longley, D.B.; Martin, S.J. cFLIPL acts as a suppressor of TRAIL- and Fas-initiated inflammation by inhibiting assembly of caspase-8/FADD/RIPK1 NF-κB-activating complexes. Cell Rep. 2023, 42, 113476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ranjan, K.; Surolia, A.; Pathak, C. Apoptotic potential of Fas-associated death domain on regulation of cell death regulatory protein cFLIP and death receptor mediated apoptosis in HEK 293T cells. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2012, 6, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Zou, W.; Chen, S.; Liu, X.; Yue, P.; Sporn, M.B.; Khuri, F.R.; Sun, S.Y. cFLIP downregulation contributes to apoptosis induction by the novel synthetic triterpenoid methyl-2-cyano-3, 12-dioxooleana-1, 9-dien-28-oate (CDDO-Me) in human lung cancer cells. Cancer Biol Ther. 2007, 6, 1614–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Zhang, S.; Shen, H.M.; Ong, C.N. Down-regulation of cFLIP contributes to the sensitization effect of 3,3'-diindolylmethane on TRAIL-induced apoptosis in cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2005, 4, 1972–1981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cunin, P.; Beauvillain, C.; Miot, C.; Augusto, J.-F.; Preisser, L.; Blanchard, S.; Pignon, P.; Scotet, M.; Garo, E.; Fremaux, I.; et al. Clusterin facilitates apoptotic cell clearance and prevents apoptotic cell-induced autoimmune responses. Cell Death Dis. 2016, 7, e2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Rizzi, F.; Bettuzzi, S. The clusterin paradigm in prostate and breast carcinogenesis. Endocrine-Related Cancer 2010, 17, R1–R17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wang, Q.; Cao, W.; Su, Q.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, L. Clusterin silencing inhibits proliferation and reduces invasion in human laryngeal squamous carcinoma cells. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2014, 12, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Figure 1. Effect of doxazosin on cell viability and apoptosis of PC-3 cells. (A) Viability of PC-3 cells after doxazosin treatment. PC-3 cells were treated with 0, 10, or 25 µM doxazosin for 24 h. Cell viability assessed by MTT assay showed a significant decrease at 25 µM after 72 h compared to the control. (B) Detection of apoptotic cells after doxazosin treatment. Annexin-V (green fluorescence) revealed increased apoptosis correlating with doxazosin concentration. Conversely, necrotic cells identified by PI staining (red fluorescence) were rarely observed. Magnification, x200 and x1000 (inset) (C) Percentage of apoptotic cells after doxazosin treatment. Apoptosis rates were significantly increased at 25 µM doxazosin. Data represent mean ± SEM of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. Statistical significance (∗ p < 0.05) was determined by Student’s t-test for comparisons of 0 µM vs. 10 and 25 µM.

Figure 2. Gene expression of cell survival markers after doxazosin treatment in PC-3 cells. PC-3 cells were treated with 25 µM doxazosin for 6, 12, and 24 h. HSP27, cFLIP, and CLU mRNA levels were then quantified by qRT-PCR. HSP27 mRNA expression decreased progressively over 24 h, while cFLIP mRNA levels remained stable. In contrast, CLU mRNA expression showed a continuous increase. Data represent mean ± SEM of three independent experiments, each conducted in triplicate. Statistical significance (∗ p < 0.05) was determined by Student’s t-test for comparisons at 0 h vs. 6, 12, or 24 h.

Figure 3. Gene and protein expression after siRNA silencing of HSP27, cFLIP, and CLU genes in PC-3 cells. The efficiency of siRNA knockdown was verified by analyzing mRNA and protein levels by qRT-PCR and Western blotting, respectively. (A) After siRNA treatment, the mRNA expression of HSP27, cFLIP, and CLU was significantly reduced. (B) In siRNA-treated cells, shows a corresponding decrease in protein expression of these genes.

Figure 4. Effect of doxazosin on the viability in PC-3 cells subjected to single or dual siRNA silencing of HSP27, cFLIP, and CLU genes. PC-3 cells were treated with 0, 10, or 25 µM doxazosin for 24 h, and then cell viability was measured by the MTT assay. (A) Cell viability was significantly decreased at 25 µM doxazosin in cells with CLU gene silencing, while silencing of HSP27 and cFLIP genes did not show this effect. (B) Dual siRNA silencing (HSP27 and cFLIP, HSP27 and CLU, or cFLIP and CLU) resulted in a significant decrease in cell viability at both 10 and 25 µM doxazosin. Data represent mean ± SEM of three independent experiments, each conducted in triplicate. Statistical significance (∗ p < 0.05) was determined by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test followed by Student’s t-test for 0 µM vs. 1, 10, and 25 µM comparisons.

Figure 5. Effect of doxazosin on the viability in PC-3 cells subjected to triple siRNA silencing of HSP27, cFLIP, and CLU genes. Cell viability was significantly decreased at 10 and 25 μM doxazosin. In addition, even at 1 μM doxazosin, cell viability was significantly reduced compared to cells subjected to dual siRNA targeting two genes. Data represent mean ± SEM of three independent experiments, each conducted in triplicate. Statistical significance (∗ p < 0.05) was determined by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test followed by Student’s t-test for 0 µM vs. 1, 10, and 25 µM comparisons.

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.