Communication
Version 2
Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Metallic Ratios are Defined by an Argument of a Normalized Complex Number
Version 1
: Received: 5 January 2024 / Approved: 5 January 2024 / Online: 8 January 2024 (06:20:05 CET)
Version 2 : Received: 9 January 2024 / Approved: 10 January 2024 / Online: 10 January 2024 (04:28:16 CET)
Version 3 : Received: 15 January 2024 / Approved: 16 January 2024 / Online: 16 January 2024 (06:19:33 CET)
Version 4 : Received: 1 February 2024 / Approved: 1 February 2024 / Online: 2 February 2024 (04:33:46 CET)
Version 2 : Received: 9 January 2024 / Approved: 10 January 2024 / Online: 10 January 2024 (04:28:16 CET)
Version 3 : Received: 15 January 2024 / Approved: 16 January 2024 / Online: 16 January 2024 (06:19:33 CET)
Version 4 : Received: 1 February 2024 / Approved: 1 February 2024 / Online: 2 February 2024 (04:33:46 CET)
A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.
Łukaszyk, S. (2024). Metallic Ratios and Angles of a Real Argument. IPI Letters, 2(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.59973/ipil.55 Łukaszyk, S. (2024). Metallic Ratios and Angles of a Real Argument. IPI Letters, 2(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.59973/ipil.55
Abstract
We show that metallic ratios for real k are defined by an argument of a normalized complex number, while for rational k ≠ {0, ±2}, they are defined by Pythagorean triples.
Keywords
metallic ratios; Pythagorean triples; emergent dimensionality
Subject
Computer Science and Mathematics, Mathematics
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comments (1)
We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.
Leave a public commentSend a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Commenter: Szymon Łukaszyk
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
2. Proof of conjecture about the Pythagorean triple corresponding to θ(k) for rational k.
3. The title was amended to reflect the results of the study.
4. Improvements in reasoning and clarity.