Submitted:
12 January 2024
Posted:
12 January 2024
Read the latest preprint version here
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Conceptual Framework
3. Theoretical Framework
3.1. Attitude
3.2. Perceived Behavioural Control
3.3. Management Commitment
3.4. Online Reputation Management (ORM)
4. Factors Influencing ORM Adoption
5. Methodology
6. Research Philosophy
7. Research Design
8. Target Population
9. Sampling Methods, Techniques, and Procedure
10. Sample Size Determination
11. Data Sources
12. Research Instrument
13. Data Collection Procedure
14. Validity and Reliability of Research Instruments
15. Data Analysis and Presentation
16. Findings
17. Descriptive Statistics
18. Reliability Scale
19. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA)
20. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA)
21. Internal Consistency and Reliability
22. Convergent Validity
23. Discriminant Validity
24. SEM Structural Model
25. Path Coefficients and Regression Weights

26. Goodness-of-Fit Test Results
27. Moderation Analysis
28. Hypotheses testing
29. Discussion of Findings
30. Conclusions
31. Recommendations
31.1. Management Training and Awareness Programs
31.2. Perceived Behavioural Control Interventions
31.3. Leadership Commitment Enhancement
31.4. Balancing Management Commitment Moderation
31.5. Continuous Monitoring and Adaptation
31.6. Collaboration with Marketing Teams
31.7. Feedback Mechanisms and Employee Involvement
31.8. Benchmarking and Learning from Industry Leaders
32. Suggestions for Future Research
References
- Ajzen, I., and Schmidt, P. (2020). Changing behaviour using the theory of planned behaviour. The handbook of behaviour change, 17‐31.
- Ali Qalati, S.; Li, W.; Ahmed, N.; Ali Mirani, M.; Khan, A. Examining the factors affecting SME performance: the mediating role of social media adoption. Sustainability 2020, 13, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arora, A.S.; Sanni, S.A. Ten years of ‘social media marketing in the Journal of Promotion Management: Research synthesis, emerging themes, and new directions. Journal of Promotion Management 2019, 25, 476–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benckendorff, P. J., Xiang, Z., and Sheldon, P. J. (2019). Tourism information technology. Cabi.
- Bloomfield, J.; Fisher, M.J. Quantitative research design. Journal of the Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses Association 2019, 22, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bosnjak, M.; Ajzen, I.; Schmidt, P. The theory of planned behaviour: Selected recent advances and applications. Europe’s Journal of Psychology 2020, 16, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cabiddu, F., Dessì, C., and Floris, M. (2019). Social media communication strategies in fashion industry. In Exploring Digital Ecosystems: Organizational and Human Challenges (pp. 393-405). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- Chakraborty, U. The impact of source credible online reviews on purchase intention: The mediating roles of brand equity dimensions. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing 2019, 13, 142–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, Y.C.; Ku, C.H.; Chen, C.H. Social media analytics: Extracting and visualizing Hilton hotel ratings and reviews from TripAdvisor. International Journal of Information Management 2019, 48, 263–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, J.; Yoon, J.; Chung, J.; Coh, B.Y.; Lee, J.M. Social media analytics and business intelligence research: A systematic review. Information Processing and Management 2020, 57, 102279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cillo, V.; Rialti, R.; Del Giudice, M.; Usai, A. Niche tourism destinations’ online reputation management and competitiveness in big data era: Evidence from three Italian cases. Current Issues in Tourism 2021, 24, 177–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cioppi, M.; Curina, I.; Forlani, F.; Pencarelli, T. Online presence, visibility and reputation: a systematic literature review in management studies. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing 2019, 13, 547–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Collier, J. (2020). Applied structural equation modeling using AMOS: Basic to advanced techniques. Routledge.
- Conner, M. (2020). Theory of planned behaviour. Handbook of sport psychology, 1-18. Handbook of sport psychology.
- Cooley, D.; Parks-Yancy, R. The effect of social media on perceived information credibility and decision making. Journal of Internet Commerce 2019, 18, 249–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dewnarain, S.; Ramkissoon, H.; Mavondo, F. Social customer relationship management: An integrated conceptual framework. Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management 2019, 28, 172–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhir, A.; Kaur, P.; Chen, S.; Pallesen, S. Antecedents and consequences of social media fatigue. International Journal of Information Management 2019, 48, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duffy, B.E.; Chan, N.K. “You never really know who’s looking”: Imagined surveillance across social media platforms. New Media and Society 2019, 21, 119–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dwivedi, Y.K.; Ismagilova, E.; Hughes, D.L.; Carlson, J.; Filieri, R.; Jacobson, J.; Jain, V.; Karjaluoto, H.; Kefi, H.; Krishen, A.S.; Kumar, V. Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions. International Journal of Information Management 2021, 59, 102168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ebrahim, R.S. Trust’s role in understanding social media marketing’s impact on brand equity and brand loyalty. Journal of Relationship Marketing 2020, 19, 287–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eid, R.; Abdelmoety, Z.; Agag, G. Antecedents and consequences of social media marketing use: an empirical study of the U.K. exporting B2B SMEs. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing 2020, 35, 284–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evans, D., Bratton, S., and McKee, J. (2021). Social media marketing. A.G. Printing and Publishing.
- Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., Ray, S., ... and Ray, S. (2021). An introduction to structural equation modeling. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: a workbook, 1-29.
- Hair Jr, J., Page, M., and Brunsveld, N. (2019). Essentials of business research methods. Routledge.
- Insurance and Pensions Commission. (2023). ‘Funeral assurance report for the half-year ended ’. Harare. 30 June.
- Jibril, A.B.; Kwarteng, M.A.; Chovancova, M.; Pilik, M. The impact of social media on consumer-brand loyalty: A mediating role of online based-brand community. Cogent Business and Management 2019, 6, 1673640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, A.; Moravec, P.L.; Dennis, A.R. Combating fake news on social media with source ratings: The effects of user and expert reputation ratings. Journal of Management Information Systems 2019, 36, 931–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirongo, A., and Odoyo, C. (2020). Research philosophy design and methodologies: A systematic review of research paradigms in information technology.
- La Barbera, F.; Ajzen, I. Control interactions in the theory of planned behaviour: Rethinking the role of subjective norm. Europe’s Journal of Psychology 2020, 16, 401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J. W. Organizational usage of social media for corporate reputation management. Becker, Kip 2019, 231-240.
- Leong, C.M.; Loi AM, W.; Woon, S. The influence of social media eWOM information on purchase intention. Journal of Marketing Analytics 2021, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leung, X.Y.; Sun, J.; Bai, B. Thematic framework of social media research: state of the art. Tourism Review 2019, 74, 517–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Wu, C.; Mai, F. The effect of online reviews on product sales: A joint sentiment-topic analysis. Information and Management 2019, 56, 172–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meel, P.; Vishwakarma, D.K. Fake news, rumor, information pollution in social media and web: A contemporary survey of state-of-the-arts, challenges and opportunities. Expert Systems with Applications 2020, 153, 112986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nusair, K. Developing a comprehensive life cycle framework for social media research in hospitality and tourism: a bibliometric method 2002-2018. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 2020, 32, 1041–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, Y.S.; Konge, L.; Artino, A.R., Jr. The positivism paradigm of research. Academic medicine 2020, 95, 690–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Patel, F.; Levinson-Waldman, R.; DenUyl, S.; Koreh, R. Social media monitoring. Brennan Center for Justice 2019, 22, 1–57. [Google Scholar]
- Qalati, S.A.; Yuan, L.W.; Khan MA, S.; Anwar, F. A mediated model on the adoption of social media and SMEs’ performance in developing countries. Technology in Society 2021, 64, 101513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saroj, A.; Pal, S. Use of social media in crisis management: A survey. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 2020, 48, 101584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sashi, C.M.; Brynildsen, G.; Bilgihan, A. Social media, customer engagement and advocacy: An empirical investigation using Twitter data for quick service restaurants. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 2019, 31, 1247–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sekaran, U., and Bougie, R. (2019). Research methods for business. John Wiley and Sons, Incorporated.
- Sivarajah, U.; Irani, Z.; Gupta, S.; Mahroof, K. Role of big data and social media analytics for business to business sustainability: A participatory web context. Industrial Marketing Management 2020, 86, 163–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stamolampros, P.; Korfiatis, N.; Chalvatzis, K.; Buhalis, D. Job satisfaction and employee turnover determinants in high contact services: Insights from Employees’ Online reviews. Tourism Management 2019, 75, 130–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swann, P. (2019). Cases in public relations management: The rise of social media and activism. Routledge.
- Voramontri, D.; Klieb, L. Impact of social media on consumer behaviour. International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences 2019, 11, 209–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vrontis, D.; Makrides, A.; Christofi, M.; Thrassou, A. Social media influencer marketing: A systematic review, integrative framework and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies 2021, 45, 617–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walliman, N. (2021). Research methods: The basics. Routledge.
- Zhuravskaya, E.; Petrova, M.; Enikolopov, R. Political effects of the internet and social media. Annual review of economics 2020, 12, 415–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

| Measures of validity and reliability | Sufficient conditions |
|---|---|
| Internal consistency | CR ≥ 0.60 |
| Indicator Reliability | Cronbach’s alpha ≥ 0.70 |
| Convergent validity | AVE ≥ 0.50 |
| Discriminant validity | Fornell-Larcker criterion (AVE > highest construct correlation). |
| Latent Variable | Items or constructs | Mean | Corrected Item-Total Correlation | Cronbach’s Alpha if Item Deleted | Item Deletion status | Original Cronbach’s Alpha prior to items deletion | Final Cronbach’s Alpha after items are deleted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATSM | ATSM1 | 3.08 | 0.648 | 0.768 | Retained | 0.819 | 0.819 |
| ATSM2 | 3.52 | 0.577 | 0.800 | Retained | |||
| ATSM3 | 3.15 | 0.662 | 0.762 | Retained | |||
| ATSM4 | 3.24 | 0.680 | 0.753 | Retained | |||
| PBC | PBC1 | 3.09 | 0.633 | 0.688 | Retained | 0.773 | 0.773 |
| PBC2 | 3.19 | 0.540 | 0.737 | Retained | |||
| PBC3 | 3.09 | 0.478 | 0.769 | Retained | |||
| PBC4 | 3.55 | 0.658 | 0.674 | Retained | |||
| MC | MC1 | 3.35 | 0.561 | 0.822 | Retained | 0.828 | 0.828 |
| MC2 | 3.70 | 0.749 | 0.737 | Retained | |||
| MC3 | 3.90 | 0.750 | 0.738 | Retained | |||
| MC4 | 3.64 | 0.565 | 0.822 | Retained | |||
| ORM | ORM1 | 3.03 | 0.349 | 0.398 (0.719) | Retained (Deleted) | 0.499 (0.677) | 0.719 |
| ORM2 | 3.62 | 0.486 | 0.321 (0.548) | Retained (Retained) | |||
| ORM3 | 3.23 | 0.433 | 0.354 (0.581) | Retained (Retained) | |||
| ORM4 | 3.73 | 0.403 | 0.371 (0.553) | Retained (Retained) | |||
| ORM5 | 4.10 | 0.209 | 0.478 (0.688) | Retained (Retained) | |||
| ORM6 | 3.29 | -0.202 | 0.677 (-) | Deleted (-) |
| Factor loadings | Component | Communalities | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| ATSM1 | 0.771 | 0.076 | 0.048 | 0.123 | -0.116 | -0.094 | 0.639 |
| ATSM2 | 0.702 | -0.206 | 0.053 | -0.076 | 0.048 | -0.174 | 0.576 |
| ATSM3 | 0.789 | 0.083 | 0.146 | -0.002 | 0.047 | 0.116 | 0.666 |
| ATSM4 | 0.825 | 0.133 | 0.042 | 0.130 | -0.020 | -0.075 | 0.723 |
| PBC1 | 0.126 | -0.134 | 0.015 | 0.010 | 0.806 | 0.074 | 0.690 |
| PBC2 | -0.134 | 0.100 | -0.101 | -0.004 | 0.765 | -0.070 | 0.628 |
| PBC3 | 0.254 | -0.410 | -0.063 | 0.084 | 0.604 | -0.168 | 0.636 |
| PBC4 | -0.067 | 0.021 | 0.024 | 0.063 | 0.851 | 0.025 | 0.734 |
| MC1 | 0.291 | 0.119 | 0.722 | 0.089 | -0.014 | 0.065 | 0.632 |
| MC2 | 0.148 | 0.188 | 0.819 | 0.120 | -0.021 | -0.112 | 0.754 |
| MC3 | 0.065 | 0.377 | 0.753 | 0.118 | -0.109 | -0.124 | 0.754 |
| MC4 | 0.044 | 0.486 | 0.829 | -0.013 | 0.010 | -0.091 | 0.642 |
| ORM1 | 0.834 | 0.146 | 0.023 | 0.117 | 0.017 | 0.053 | 0.295 |
| ORM2 | 0.233 | 0.770 | 0.262 | 0.158 | 0.007 | -0.104 | 0.607 |
| ORM3 | 0.111 | 0.794 | 0.125 | 0.210 | -0.042 | 0.034 | 0.557 |
| ORM4 | 0.177 | 0.723 | 0.472 | 0.105 | -0.001 | 0.140 | 0.673 |
| ORM5 | -0.116 | 0.613 | 0.059 | -0.046 | -0.081 | -0.116 | 0.504 |
| ORM6 | 0.430 | -0.296 | -0.469 | -0.067 | 0.004 | -0.086 | 0.214 |
| Latent Construct | Indicators | Loadings | Squared multiple correlations | Cronbach’s alpha |
CR | AVE | Square root of AVE | Internal consistency and reliability | Convergent Validity | Discriminant validity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attitude towards social media monitoring (ATSM) | ATSM1 | 0.848 | 0.532 | 0.819 | 0.856 | 0.598 | 0.77 | No problem | No problem | No problem |
| ATSM2 | 0.644 | 0.375 | ||||||||
| ATSM3 | 0.874 | 0.583 | ||||||||
| ATSM4 | 1.000 | 0.633 | ||||||||
| Perceived Behavioural Control (PBC) | PBC1 | 0.906 | 0.538 | 0.773 | 0.845 | 0.581 | 0.76 | No problem | No problem | No problem |
| PBC2 | 0.821 | 0.419 | ||||||||
| PBC3 | 0.707 | 0.304 | ||||||||
| PBC4 | 1.000 | 0.631 | ||||||||
| Management Commitment (MC) | MC1 | 0.656 | 0.368 | 0.828 | 0.863 | 0.612 | 0.78 | No problem | No problem | No problem |
| MC2 | 0.913 | 0.635 | ||||||||
| MC3 | 1.000 | 0.764 | ||||||||
| MC4 | 0.810 | 0.498 | ||||||||
| Online Reputation Management (ORM) | ORM2 | 0.921 | 0.494 | 0.719 | 0.817 | 0.530 | 0.73 | No problem | No problem | No problem |
| ORM3 | 0.801 | 0.374 | ||||||||
| ORM4 | 1.000 | 0.591 | ||||||||
| ORM5 | 0.315 | 0.128 |
| Variable Correlations | Estimate | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ATSM | <--> | MC | 0.074 |
| MC | <--> | PBC | -0.120 |
| ATSM | <--> | PBC | -0.037 |
| ATSM | <--> | ATSM_MC | -0.021 |
| MC | <--> | ATSM_MC | -0.574 |
| PBC | <--> | ATSM_MC | 0.112 |
| e19 | <--> | ATSM | 0.748 |
| e7 | <--> | e17 | 0.642 |
| e11 | <--> | e19 | 0.173 |
| Dependent variable | Path | Independent variable | Unstandardized Estimates | Standard Error | Critical Ratio | P-value | Standardized Estimates | R-square |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ORM | ← | PBC | -0.030 | 0.038 | -0.801 | 0.423 | -0.033 | 0.78 |
| ORM | ← | MC | 0.485 | 0.049 | 10.001 | 0.000 | 0.568** | 0.78 |
| ORM | ← | ATSM | 0.118 | 0.033 | 3.562 | 0.000 | 0.144** | 0.78 |
| ORM | ← | ATSM*MC | -0.274 | 0.037 | -7.459 | 0.000 | -0.359** | 0.78 |
| ATSM1 | ← | ATSM | 0.848 | 0.053 | 15.866 | 0.000 | 0.730** | 0.53 |
| ATSM2 | ← | ATSM | 0.644 | 0.049 | 13.021 | 0.000 | 0.612** | 0.39 |
| ATSM3 | ← | ATSM | 0.874 | 0.052 | 16.686 | 0.000 | 0.763** | 0.57 |
| ATSM4 | ← | ATSM | 1.000 | - | - | - | 0.795 | 0.64 |
| MC1 | ← | MC | 0.656 | 0.047 | 14.025 | 0.000 | 0.607** | 0.39 |
| MC2 | ← | MC | 0.913 | 0.045 | 20.355 | 0.000 | 0.797** | 0.65 |
| MC3 | ← | MC | 1.000 | - | - | - | 0.874 | 0.74 |
| MC4 | ← | MC | 0.810 | 0.047 | 17.163 | 0.000 | 0.706** | 0.48 |
| PBC1 | ← | PBC | 0.906 | 0.068 | 13.275 | 0.000 | 0.733** | 0.55 |
| PBC2 | ← | PBC | 0.821 | 0.067 | 12.205 | 0.000 | 0.647** | 0.41 |
| PBC3 | ← | PBC | 0.707 | 0.066 | 10.653 | 0.000 | 0.551** | 0.32 |
| PBC4 | ← | PBC | 1.000 | - | - | - | 0.794 | 0.62 |
| ORM2 | ← | ORM | 0.921 | 0.064 | 14.491 | 0.000 | 0.703** | 0.51 |
| ORM3 | ← | ORM | 0.801 | 0.064 | 12.529 | 0.000 | 0.612** | 0.39 |
| ORM4 | ← | ORM | 1.000 | - | - | - | 0.769 | 0.59 |
| ORM5 | ← | ORM | 0.315 | 0.044 | 7.182 | 0.000 | 0.357** | 0.14 |
| Note:The superscript ** Indicates that the path coefficient is statistically significant at a 5% level of significance | ||||||||
| Test statistic | Acceptable threshold | Initial model | Re-specified or modified model |
|---|---|---|---|
| AGFI | ≥ 0.95 | 0.739 | 0.979 |
| CFI | ≥ 0.95 | 0.765 | 0.984 |
| CMIN/df | ≤ 3 | 5.908 | 2.350 |
| GFI | ≥ 0.95 | 0.800 | 0.984 |
| RMSEA | ≤0.08 | 0.103 | 0.080 |
| TLI | ≥ 0.95 | 0.717 | 0.980 |
| Moderation Relationship | Independent variable | Moderation variable | Interaction variable | Moderation effect | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ATSM | Path | ATSM→ORM | MC | Path | MC→ORM | ATSM*MC | Path | ATSM*MC→ORM | Significant negative effect |
| Coefficient | 0.118** | Coefficient | 0.485** | Coefficient | -0.274** | |||||
| p-value | 0.000 | p-value | 0.000 | p-value | 0.000 | |||||
| Note: The superscript ** Indicates that the path coefficient is statistically significant at a 5% level of significance | ||||||||||
| Independent | Path | Dependent | Hypothesis | Standardised estimates | Critical Ratio (C.R.) | R-squared | p-value | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATSM | ← | ORM | H1 | 0.144** | 3.562 | 0.78 | 0.000 | Supported |
| PBC | ← | ORM | H3 | -0.033 | -0.801 | 0.78 | 0.423 | Not supported |
| ATSM*MC | ← | ORM | H4 | -0.359** | -7.459 | 0.78 | 0.000 | Not supported |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).