1. Introduction
Nowadays, the significance of electric traction is widely acknowledged as fundamental for the advancement of society. Projections indicate substantial growth in the global electric vehicle (EV) market in the upcoming years, largely due to policy objectives aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions in transportation across numerous countries worldwide [
1,
2,
3].
Currently, light-duty electric vehicles typically feature powertrains with rated power varying between 60kW and 200kW. These powertrains are mostly powered by lithium-ion battery packs with capacities ranging from 30kWh to 110kWh, resulting in estimated ranges mostly below 400km. This limited range stands as a significant barrier hindering the widespread adoption of EVs. Another substantial limitation is the lengthy recharging duration compared to equivalent internal combustion vehicles. Despite significant developments in recharging infrastructure, most charging points still operate at a peak power of 100kW [
4]. Consequently, charging times for reaching 80% battery capacity using 100kW - 480V DC fast charging typically range from 30 minutes to 1 hour. Reducing charging times would alleviate the inconvenience posed by limited driving range. Therefore, higher charging power can considerably diminish battery refueling duration. For instance, increasing fast-charging power levels from 100 kW to 350 kW results in a significant reduction in charging time. However, maintaining the charging voltage at the typical value of 400V would necessitate increased current ratings for charging cables, leading to amplified system power losses. Some automotive manufacturers are exploring solutions involving an 800V DC bus to achieve faster battery charge times, [
5,
6,
7,
8,
9]. However, this approach presents technical challenges related to current electric powertrain technologies, especially semiconductor technologies utilized in electric traction inverters.
Additionally, considering alternative power converter topologies could potentially enhance efficiency, reliability, and power density, while simultaneously reducing the cost and weight of power conversion processes.
Because of their notable efficiency and cost-effectiveness, the prevailing choice for most production EVs involves the utilization of Two-Level (2L) three-phase volage source inverters (VSIs). These inverters typically rely on insulated gate bipolar transistors (IGBTs), with only a few cases incorporating silicon-carbide based (SiC) power modules. IGBTs power devices still remain the primary choice for realizing common traction inverters over other available power device technologies. This preference stems from the technology's maturity, widespread availability, cost-effectiveness, and sufficient power-handling capabilities. IGBTs with blocking voltages ranging from 650V to 1200V are well-suited to manage the variable DC-link voltages of today's battery packs, which typically range from 300V to 450V. The VSI topology can be realized by compact power modules, each comprising multiple dies arranged in parallel to evenly distribute the high current load across the switches, to reach the appropriate power level. In commercial vehicle applications, most IGBT-based traction inverters demonstrate efficiencies below 94%. These systems operate at switching frequencies intentionally kept below 30kHz to limit power losses. Additionally, due to technological limitations inherent in power switches, the dead-time between complementary switches is generally set to at least 1μs. This practice is adopted to mitigate output current distortion and voltage error, which become more pronounced at higher rotational speeds, consequently impacting on the control performance [
10,
11,
12,
13]. A DC-link capacitor, denoted as
Cdc, is commonly employed in the standard 2L topology to mitigate current and voltage fluctuations generated by Pulse Width Modulated (PWM) power devices. This capacitor serves to smoothen these fluctuations, curbing the adverse effects associated with high-frequency current harmonics.
Figure 1 shows an example of a traditional IGBT-based traction inverter.
In the last ten years, Wide Band Gap (WBG) semiconductors like SiC and GaN have gained prominence in various power conversion applications, replacing silicon (Si) devices due to their superior physical attributes, as detailed in
Table 1 [
14]. Leveraging these superior properties allows for the creation of smaller-sized switching devices that possess higher breakdown voltages, lower on-resistance, and increased switching frequency capabilities [
15]. The reduced dimensions of these devices facilitate the design of inverters significantly smaller in size, yet with equivalent ratings compared to traditional Si-based inverters. Furthermore, it aids in the integration of motor drives within the inverter design, particularly advantageous for GaN-based inverters, fostering the development of integrated modular motor drives, [
16,
17]. SiC-based power modules offer advantages like reduced switching and conduction losses, increased power density, and the ability to operate at higher temperatures. Some SiC inverters have demonstrated efficiency gains of up to +2% compared to their Si counterparts. However, the cost implications still constrain their widespread adoption in automotive traction.
Presently, 2L SiC-based inverters in traction systems operate at frequencies below 30kHz, with dv/dt values comparable to those of silicon IGBTs. This is to mitigate the adverse effects of PWM on the cable-motor system. Noteworthy issues encompass over-voltages at motor terminals, common mode currents, additional losses, and subsequent reduction in motor efficiency.
Although currently not extensively utilized in motor drives, GaN power switches hold promising potential for enhancing electric drives in traction systems, especially when paired with high-speed electrical machines and operating within GaN-based inverter topologies at elevated switching frequencies. In fact, GaN devices exhibit advantages such as reduced switching and conduction losses, heightened power density, and the capability for operation at higher temperatures, surpassing the performance of Si power switches. Furthermore, GaN devices claim fewer parasitic components, making them more suitable, particularly in hard-switched applications. Consequently, this technology presents an opportunity to develop traction electric drives characterized by compactness, high efficiency, robustness, and reduced weight—factors contributing to expanding a vehicle's range. The primary limitation of this technology lies in the rated blocking voltage, typically limited to 650V for most of the available products. Consequently, to harness the full potential of this technology in the upcoming generation of electric traction drives for electric vehicles, the implementation of a multilevel inverter configuration becomes imperative. This setup allows the GaN-based power inverter to effectively operate with DC bus voltages ranging between 800V and 1kV.
Multilevel inverters offer several advantages over the conventional two-level topologies commonly employed in today's vehicles [
18]. These benefits encompass improved efficiency, superior thermal characteristics, optimized distribution of switching and conduction power losses, and reduced size of passive components. In low-voltage applications (<1.5kV), multilevel inverters leverage the advantageous traits of lower-voltage semiconductor switches, leading to decreased conduction and switching power losses. This results in the more efficient distribution of overall losses among multiple switches, effectively reducing junction temperatures compared to the conventional two-switch arrangement in each phase of a three-phase two-level power inverter.
Additional advantages associated with multilevel topologies include:
- -
Reduced dv/dt stress on the electric load;
- -
Reduced common mode voltages;
- -
Enhanced freedom to control the output waveform;
- -
Mitigation of Total Harmonic Distortions;
- -
Lower stress on the power switches;
- -
Improved fault tolerance capability.
Hence, GaN-based multilevel inverters emerge as an appealing solution for designing compact and highly efficient traction inverters, circumventing the breakdown voltage limits (650V) inherent in existing GaN technologies. Additionally, due to reduced output voltage steps, the utilization of multilevel converters proves effective in curbing voltage stress and subsequently reducing electrical aging in traction machines.
In literature several methods have been presented to compute the power losses of motor drive fed by inverter, including both the main electric motor (copper, iron and friction) and the power converter losses (conduction and switching) [
19,
20,
21,
22,
23,
24,
25]. In [
19,
20,
21] an IGBT-based 2L-VSI power converter is considered, and the related power losses are analytically evaluated, where the conduction ones are determined by computing the load RMS current, duty ratio and power factor. These models can be improved by taking into consideration the manufacturer’s curve fitting coefficients [
20]; the switching losses are computed starting from the curve fitting of the energy curves provided in the datasheet in [
19,
20], whereas in [
21] the energy switching losses are analytically evaluated taking into account physical aspects of the IGBT, such as transconductance, breakdown voltage and permittivity of the semiconductor. Furthermore, in [
19,
20] an analytical dynamic model of the induction motor (IM) drive is considered realized through an equivalent circuit model [
19] and state space vector equivalent circuit [
20], whereas in [
21] per phase steady-state IM equivalent circuit model is used. In [
22,
23] the electric motor and relative power losses are developed by finite element analysis (FEA), IM and PMSM are both analyzed in [
22] and in [
23] only IM is considered. Despite similar approach in electric motor modelling, in [
22] IGBT power losses are computed as in [
19,
21], while in [
23] a look-up table-based approach is implemented. Differently from [
19,
21], in [
24,
25] the IGBT power losses are computed including the junction temperature function; about the electric motor model, [
24] uses a similar qd-axis equivalent circuit model of [
19], whereas in [
25] a inductor load replaces the electric motor.
This paper introduces a systematic procedure for estimating power loss distributions in three distinct three-phase three-level voltage source GaN-based inverters employed within a PMSM-based traction drive. The power loss analysis spans a broad operational range of the drive, incorporating energy-saving control techniques like maximum torque per ampere (MTPA) and flux weakening (FW). The suggested approach combines analytical power loss modeling of the considered 3LIs with a simplified equivalent representation of the electrical machine. This integration offers a viable solution, enabling the creation of a simulation platform that saves time, reduces computational load, and yields accurate results.
The remaining part of the paper is organized as follows. Section II illustrates the traction drive unit under test, the inverter topologies that have been considered in this study and their corresponding modulation strategies. Section III details the static and dynamic characterizations of the GaN HEMT intended for use in the power inverters. Section IV describes the realization of the entire traction drive in PSIM (speed and current controls have been implemented in MATLAB/Simulink environment) including accurate loss modelling of power devices. Section V details the step-by-step procedure utilized to develop the analytical power loss models for the three level inverters (3LIs) examined in this study. Additionally, it necessitates determining an equivalent model of the PMSM across various operating conditions. In Section VI, the power loss distributions of the three examined 3LIs will be carried out by using both the proposed analytical approach and a detailed “inverter + electrical machine”-based circuit simulation modelling. Differences between these methodologies will be discussed. Finally, Section VII will provide concluding remarks.