PreprintArticleVersion 1Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
A new Proposal for the Interpretation of the Diagonal Compression Test on Masonry Wallettes: the Identification of Young’s Modulus, Poisson’s Ratio, and Modulus of Rigidity
Version 1
: Received: 16 December 2023 / Approved: 17 December 2023 / Online: 18 December 2023 (08:13:13 CET)
Version 2
: Received: 23 December 2023 / Approved: 25 December 2023 / Online: 25 December 2023 (09:40:55 CET)
Ferretti, E. A New Proposal for the Interpretation of the Diagonal Compression Test on Masonry Wallettes: The Identification of Young’s Modulus, Poisson’s Ratio, and Modulus of Rigidity. Buildings2024, 14, 104.
Ferretti, E. A New Proposal for the Interpretation of the Diagonal Compression Test on Masonry Wallettes: The Identification of Young’s Modulus, Poisson’s Ratio, and Modulus of Rigidity. Buildings 2024, 14, 104.
Ferretti, E. A New Proposal for the Interpretation of the Diagonal Compression Test on Masonry Wallettes: The Identification of Young’s Modulus, Poisson’s Ratio, and Modulus of Rigidity. Buildings2024, 14, 104.
Ferretti, E. A New Proposal for the Interpretation of the Diagonal Compression Test on Masonry Wallettes: The Identification of Young’s Modulus, Poisson’s Ratio, and Modulus of Rigidity. Buildings 2024, 14, 104.
Abstract
This paper is the continuation of a previous study, which highlighted some inconsistencies in the RILEM guidelines for the interpretation of the diagonal compression test. Despite being improvements compared to the ASTM guidelines, in fact, the RILEM guidelines underestimate the state of hydrostatic stress induced by the diagonal compression test at the center of the wallette. The new interpretation of the diagonal compression test proposed in this article shows that the RILEM guidelines actually underestimate both the hydrostatic and the deviatoric stress states at the center of the wallette. The new formulation complies with the linear elastic theory and allows us to use the the diagonal compression test to identify the three elastic coefficients of masonry. In particular, it allows the identification of the Poisson ratio, which instead takes on a conventional value in the RILEM and ASTM guidelines. The one order of magnitude difference between the conventional and proposed Poisson’s ratio is in accordance with experimental results on brittle materials, in general, and concrete solids, in particular. Finally, the new proposal fills the gap between the results provided by the two tests usually performed to identify the shear behavior of masonry: the diagonal compression test and the shear-compression test.
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
