Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Relation between Adaptive Eating and Coping Strategies with Energy Intake in a Model of Refeed Proposed for Bodybuilders

Version 1 : Received: 1 December 2023 / Approved: 4 December 2023 / Online: 4 December 2023 (15:13:26 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

de Moraes, W.M.A.M.; Moura, R.F.; Alves, R.; Vilar Neto, J.O.; de Castro, B.M.; Leão, D.; Prestes, J. Relation between Adaptive Eating and Energy Intake Coping Strategies in a Refeed Model for Bodybuilders. Dietetics 2024, 3, 52-62. de Moraes, W.M.A.M.; Moura, R.F.; Alves, R.; Vilar Neto, J.O.; de Castro, B.M.; Leão, D.; Prestes, J. Relation between Adaptive Eating and Energy Intake Coping Strategies in a Refeed Model for Bodybuilders. Dietetics 2024, 3, 52-62.

Abstract

Background: Extremametly lean athletes could have difficulty for adaptive eating (intuitively or consciously) during ad libitum refeed. Aims: we verificate if there is a relation between adaptive eating and coping strategies with energy intake in a model of refeed proposed for bodybuilders. Methods: Fourteen male bodybuilders (29.6±3.1yrs; 85.6±6.8kg, ≥6 competitions) completed the 4-week each consisting of a 5 days of energy restriction following 2 days of refeed. Dietary assessment, body composition (ultrasound), Recovery stress questionnaire (REST-Q) and BRUMS (Brunel mood scale) were accessed pre and post; Coping Function Questionnaire (CFQ), Mindful Eating Scale version 2 (MES 2) and the Intuitive Eating Scale-2 (IES-2) was used at 4th week. Results: The refeed day resulted in a daily caloric increment of ~44% compared to the average energy intake on the energy restriction days, culminating in a weekly calorie deficit of ~27% and a drop in body mass of 3.1±1.4% with relation to initial values. The most reduced body fat and preserved or gained lean mass. The energy consumption during refeed maintained an inverse relationship with the perception of satiety (r=-0.9; p<0.01), total scores of IES 2 (r=-0.82; p<0.01), as well as with the confidence in hunger and satiety cues (r=-0.62; p=0.02) and congruence in food-body choice (r=-0.56; p=0.04) dimensions. Coping based in emotions maintained a relationship with the total scores of IES 2 (r=0.54; p<0.05) and an inverse relationship with energy intake during refeed (r=-0.42; p<0.05). Conclusion: Our results suggest that a higher perception of internal hunger and satiety signals and higher scores in intuitive eating may contribute to energy intake adequate, even when high scores of coping based in emotions are present.

Keywords

Physique athletes; refeed; intermittent energy restriction; intuitive eating; coping

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Life Sciences

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.