Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Light and Shadows in Newborn Screening for Lysosomal Storage Disorders: Eight Years of Experience in Northeast Italy

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

10 November 2023

Posted:

10 November 2023

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
In the last two decades, the development of high-throughput diagnostic methods and availabil-ity of effective treatments has increased interest in newborn screening for lysosomal storage disorders. However, long-term follow-up experience is needed to clearly identify risks, benefits and challenges. We report our 8-year experience of screening and follow up on about 250,000 neonates screened for four lysosomal storage diseases (Pompe disease, mucopolysaccharidosis type I, Fabry dis-ease, Gaucher disease), using enzyme activity assay by tandem mass spectrometry, and bi-omarker quantification as second tier test. Among the 126 positive newborns (0.051%), 51 infants were confirmed as affected (positive pre-dictive value 40%), with an overall incidence of 1:4,874. Of these, 3 infantile-onset Pompe dis-ease, 2 neonatal-onset Gaucher disease and 4 mucopolysaccharidosis type I patients were imme-diately treated. Furthermore, another four Gaucher disease patients needed treatment in the first years of life. Our study demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of newborn screening for lysosomal storage diseases. Early diagnosis and treatment allow the achievement of better patient out-comes. Challenges such as false positive rates, the diagnosis of variants of uncertain significance or late-onset forms, and the lack of treatment for neuronopathic forms, should be addressed.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs) are inborn errors of metabolism that include about 60 different inherited diseases [1]. They are caused by the deficiency or absence of specific lysosomal enzyme or transporter activities, resulting in the accumulation of uncatabolized macromolecular substrates within lysosomes [2,3,4]. LSDs can present at any age with multisystemic involvement and progressive courses. Enzyme analysis in leukocytes/lymphocytes, biochemical assays demonstrating accumulation, and gene analysis can confirm the diagnosis [5,6]. The treatment (enzyme replacement therapy ERT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation HSCT, chaperones, and gene therapy) can significantly improve outcomes, but the progressive nature of these diseases makes early diagnosis essential [7].
Unfortunately, diagnosis is often delayed because of non-specific symptoms that frequently arise when organ damage is already irreversibly severe [8,9,10,11,12,13]. This has motivated the development of newborn screening (NBS) programs in the last two decades that use multiplex analytical techniques [5,14,15], such as fluorometry coupled with digital microfluidics (DMF) and electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), for the simultaneous quantification of several lysosomal enzyme activities [16].
In Europe, the first pilot NBS project for LSD was performed in the Piemonte Region in Northwest Italy. Between 2003 and 2005, 37,104 male newborns were screened for Fabry disease (FD) using a fluorometric assay. Twelve positive neonates were identified and confirmed with a specific GLA variant (1:3,092 males). Only one patient carried a variant associated with the classic phenotype, demonstrating a high incidence of later-onset forms [17]. A similar study, using a fluorometric assay for FD, was performed in 2008 in Galicia (Spain) on 14,600 newborns. Of these, 106 resulted positive and 37 carried a GLA variant, indicating a very high overall incidence (1:395). However, only one male patient carried a variant associated with the classic phenotype, 11 (including a female neonate) carried variants of uncertain significance (VUS) and 25 carried polymorphisms [18].
After the development of multiplex high-throughput assays (DMF and MS/MS), these methods were used to screen for multiple LSDs simultaneously on deidentified neonatal dried blood spot (DBS). Pilot studies using MS/MS to assay 4 LSDs (Pompe disease PD, Fabry disease FD, Gaucher disease GD and Niemann Pick A/B disease NPD) were performed in Austria and Hungary on 34,736 and 40,024 anonymous neonatal DBS, respectively. Both found an overall incidence of about 1:2,300 [19,20]. Subsequently, a similar study performed in Belgium analyzed around 20,000 newborn samples for PD, FD and MPSI using an MS/MS assay to establish reference ranges. Reference intervals were found to depend on sex and gestational age (higher enzyme activities in female and premature newborns) [21]. A limitation of these studies is the lack of follow-up data.
A retrospective study conducted in Italy had identified a high incidence of LSDs, which constituted the most frequent class of inborn errors of metabolism (overall incidence 1:8,275) [22]. In 2012, a small pilot program conducted in Umbria region of Italy assessed four lysosomal disorders (PD, GD, FD and MPSI) using a fluorometric assay. One patient with GD was found among 3,403 newborns screened [23].
In 2015, the Regional Health Administration of Northeast Italy expanded its NBS program to include four LSDs: GD, PD, FD, MPSI, using a multiplex high-throughput MS/MS assay. A second-tier test (2TT) of positive DBS (GD, FD, MPSI) was used to reduce the recall rate. Here, we report our 8-year experience with about 250,000 neonates screened, discuss the role of 2TT and briefly describe the patients’ outcomes summarizing the “lights and shadows” of our experience.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

DBS from 248,616 newborns were consecutively collected from September 2015 to August 2023 at the Regional Center for Expanded Newborn Screening, Padua University Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from parents.

2.2. Determination of Enzyme Activities

The DBSs were assayed for the enzyme activities deficient in PD, GD, FD and MPSI (α-galactosidase A [α-GalA] for FD, acid α-glucosidase [GAA] for PD, acid β-glucocerebrosidase [GCase] for GD and acid α-L-iduronidase [IDUA] for MPS I) using a flow-injection-MS/MS analysis, as previously reported [24]. The cut-offs (0.2 MoM) were recalculated monthly to avoid an increase in false-positives in winter and false-negatives in summer, due to seasonal changes in temperature and humidity during transport.

2.3. Second Tier Tests

Second tier tests were introduced in 2016 for GD and FD and in 2019 for MPSI. Newborns who had initial screening results below the cutoff for GCase, α-GalA or IDUA activity, were tested for LysoGb1, LysoGb3 and glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), respectively.
DBS lysosphingolipids (LysoGb1, LysoGb3) were measured by LC-MS/MS as previously described [25,26]. GAGs levels were measured by methanolysis followed by LC-MS/MS with a method optimized for DBSs based on that developed by Zhang et al [27].

2.4. Confirmatory Testing

Screen-positive newborns were referred to our Clinical Unit for confirmatory testing, including clinical evaluation, enzyme activities in leukocytes/lymphocytes, substrate quantification (plasma LysoGb1 for GD, LysoGb3 for FD, urinary GAGs for MPSI and urinary Glc4 for PD) and mutation analysis.
For PD and MPSI, which can require immediate intervention, results were obtained within 24 hours for urinary Glc4 and GAGs, respectively. Treatment was started immediately in patients with infantile-onset PD (ERT) and Hurler disease (ERT+HSCT). In patients with the neonatal form of GD, treatment was started after ethics discussion. The other patients were followed and treated only when symptoms appeared. Family members were counseled and offered testing and medical evaluations.

3. Results

3.1. Screening Outcomes

Of the 248,616 screened newborns (119,512 males, 129,104 females), 126 positive cases were referred to our Clinical Unit for confirmatory testing (0.05%). Screening results and patients with a confirmed diagnoses are reported in Table 2.

3.1.1. Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I

For MPSI, 29/248,616 newborns (0.012%) had low IDUA activity in DBS (range 0.1 to 2.2 µmol/L/h). Of these, 4/29 were confirmed as affected due to low IDUA activity in lymphocytes, elevated GAGs in urine, as well as two pathogenic alleles at genetic analysis. The overall MPSI incidence was 1:62,154 births.
During the first 3 years of screening (2015-2018, 112,446 newborns), when we only tested IDUA activity in DBS, the recall rate was 0.024% (27 newborns). 25/27 newborns were false positive on confirmatory testing, presenting normal urinary GAGs and genetic variants known to be pseudodeficency alleles (21 newborns, 18 of African origin), variants of unknown significance VUS (n = 2) or were carriers (n = 2) (false positive rate 0.022%, PPV 7.4%). The residual enzyme activities in these newborns (0.10-2.21 nmol/L/h) overlapped that of two true positive MPSI patients (0.12-0.22 µmol/l/h).
Since 2019 (136,170 newborns), GAG analysis in DBS was developed as a 2TT. The recall rate during this period was 0.015% (2 patients) and no false positives were referred to the clinic (predictive value 100%).
The four affected newborns were immediately investigated and treated (Table 3).
The first patient, a female of African origin (Morocco), had the intermediate Hurler/Scheie phenotype. She began ERT with laronidase (100 U/kg/weekly) one month after birth with good clinical and biochemical responses.
The other 3 patients (of which pt.2 and pt.4 were siblings), were of Italian origin, and affected by Hurler syndrome. ERT with laronidase (100 U/kg/weekly) was started early. GAGs normalized, although patients developed mild features of MPSI, such as coarse facial features (n = 3), conductive and sensorineural hearing loss (n = 2), corneal clouding (n = 3), mild dilatation of the periventricular spaces on brain MRI (n = 3). Due to severe phenotype, at 6 months of age, they received an allogenic HSCT. All patients achieved high donor chimerism and normal IDUA levels. GAGs remained normal after discontinuation of ERT, 6 months after HSCT. Currently, they have no neurologic involvement.

3.1.2. Pompe Disease

For PD, 48/248,616 newborns (0.019%) needed to be clinically evaluated. Two pathogenic variants of the GAA gene were found in 16/48 newborns, of which 3 were infantile-onset (IOPD) and 13 late-onset (LOPD) patients. Findings in 28 other newborns included a VUS (n = 7), a known pseudodeficiency allele or predicted non-pathogenic variant (n = 17), or to be carriers (n = 4). Four newborns were lost to follow-up prior to confirmatory testing due to relocation out of the region. The incidence of PD was 1:15,539 (IOPD 1:82,872, LOPD 1:19,124) and the PPV was 52%.
DBS GAA values in affected and pseudodeficiency/carrier newborns overlapped (0.45-1.94 µmol/l/h and 1.14-3.22 µmol/l/h, respectively). Only the urinary assay of Glc4 and cardiologic assessment allowed rapid identification of IOPD patients. Molecular analysis helped to confirm IOPD and distinguish LOPD patients from pseudodeficiency and carrier newborns.
The 3 IOPD patients were referred between day 3 and day 14 of life. All had increased levels of muscle necrosis markers (CPK 653-1063U/L) and uGlc4 (26.5-71.2 mmol/mol crea, nv < 7.4), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (LVMI 128-232 g/m2). In our laboratory, we assayed the CRIM status on PBMC, then confirmed by molecular analysis (Pt.1 CRIM pos c.1933G>A, c.2237G>A – p.Asp645Asn, p.Trp746*; Pt.2 CRIM neg c.2560C>T, del exons 4-8 – p.Arg854*, del exon 4-8; Pt.3 CRIM neg homozygous c.236_246del – p.Pro79Argfs*13). They started ERT (alglucosidase alfa, Genzyme Corp.) between day 5 and day 19 of life, with good responses. To date, all are alive (mean age 4.5 years). Two patients (Pt.1, 5.5 years old, and pt.3, 3.0 years old) have age-appropriate motor development with no signs of cardiomyopathy and normal biochemical test results, including CPK and uGlc4. Pt.2, CRIM negative, developed anti-rhGAA antibodies after 6 months of ERT (max titre 1:102,400), associated with delayed psychomotor development and persistence of cardiomyopathy [28].
Among patients with LOPD, the typically Caucasian IVS1 variant was the most common pathogenic variant, present in 12/13 LOPD cases, 6 of which were homozygous. Over 8 years (mean follow-up 3.6 yrs, range 0.5-7), none of the patients carrying a LOPD or VUS variant developed symptoms and none was receiving ERT.
Among patients with pseudodeficiency alleles, we found a high incidence of the Asiatic variant c.2065 G>A (p.Glu689Lys), alone (n = 1) or in the complex allele c.(1726G>A, 2065G>A) p.(Gly576Ser; Glu689Lys) (n = 10). Moreover, 5 European newborns carried the predicted non-pathogenic variant p.Val222Met. Patients carrying a single variant or pseudodeficiency alleles were dismissed after communication of molecular assay result.

3.1.3. Fabry Disease

For FD, of the 248,616 newborns screened (119,512 males), 31 newborns (29 males) were referred for confirmatory testing due to low enzyme activity. The α-GalA enzyme activities in DBS of positive patients ranged from 0.45 to 3.45 µmol/L/h (n = 29, mean 1.45 µmol/L/h, SD 0.82). LysoGb3 testing was conducted on 24 DBS with low α-GalA activity. LysoGb3 values ranged from 0.22 to 8.06 nmol/L (mean 1.38 nmol/L, SD 1.74, nv <1.45 nmol/l). Values were abnormal in 7 newborns.
All 29 males were confirmed to have low α-GalA activity in lymphocytes and a genetic variant in the GLA gene, with an incidence of 1:4,121 males. The two female newborns with low DBS α-GalA activity were negative at molecular testing.
Molecular analysis identified 18 newborns carrying known pathogenic variants, associated with the later-onset form of FD, 6 carrying previously unclassified GLA variants, 4 the debated p.Ala143Thr variant and 1 carrying a haplotype considered benign (-10C>T, IVS2-77_81del15, IVS4-16A>G, IVS6-22C>T). The most common variant was p.Asn215Ser (n = 5). Other variants were associated with ethnic origin. Three unrelated newborns of Asiatic origin carried the splicing variant IVS4+919G>A [12], 3 unrelated patients of African descent carried the pathogenic variant p.Arg363His, 3 African patients had arginine substitutions at position 356 (p.Arg356Gln, n = 2; and p.Arg356Gly, n = 1). Ten patients carried a VUS. One patient carrying an unclassified variant (p.Ile91Thr) had abnormal DBS lysoGb3 at birth (8.06 nmol/L), that increased during follow-up (13.62 nmol/L at 1 yr), suggesting that this variant may be pathogenic. All mothers were positive for the same mutation as their children.
All patients participated in regular follow-up, except 4 whose parents refused additional medical examinations. Because all our patients carried variants associated with the later-onset form or unclassified variants, we decided to follow them every 12 months to avoid overmedicalization. After 8 years of NBS and follow-up, none of our patients (mean age at last visit 4.5 years, range 0.7-7.8 years) have symptoms or signs of disease and none is treated. All presented a progressive increase of LysoGb3, which was abnormal at last follow-up in 21/25 patients (mean 1.88 nmol/l, SD 2.2, range 0.35-13.62).

3.1.4. Gaucher Disease

For GD, positive NBS results were found in 18 neonatal DBS; 16 were referred to our Clinic for confirmatory testing, while 2 infants were lost due to relocation. GD was confirmed in all newborns, with an overall incidence of 1:15,539 births. Two newborns affected by neonatal form of GD were already symptomatic at recall. The other newborns were predicted to have GD1.
Gcase activity on DBS in confirmed patients ranged from 0.38 to 2.3 uM/h and the value did not correlate with disease subtype or severity. Conversely, LysoGb1 in DBS from patients with neonatal onset GD were 7,262 nmol/L and 1,698 nmol/l (nv < 33.31), respectively, while the mean in GD1 patients was 130.81 nmol/L (n = 14, range 45.55-323). Thus, DBS LysoGb1 at birth can clearly discriminate the disease phenotype. Molecular analysis was available for all 16 patients. Of the two patients with neonatal onset GD, both of Balkan origin, one was homozygous for p.(His294Gln+Asp448His) and the other compound heterozygous p.Asp448His, p.(His294Gln+Asp448His). Of 11 genotypes associated with GD1, p.Asn409Ser (n = 17) was the most common allele in our cohort, as expected in the Italian population. Three patients carried at least one VUS (p.Thr408Met or p.Glu365Lys).
Except for the 2 patients who relocated after diagnosis of GD, most patients (n = 14) received follow-up evaluations (mean age at last visit 3.8 years, range 0.2-7.0 years). Thus far, 6/16 patients exhibited clinical manifestations and required therapeutical intervention. The neonatal onset GD patients presented at birth with anemia and low platelet counts, petechiae, hepatosplenomegaly, and cholestatic hepatitis. They were treated with ERT beginning at 13 and 4 days of life and obtained hematological and visceral improvement, Unfortunately, ERT does not cross the blood-brain barrier, and the first patient presented gradual neurological involvement with delayed psychomotor development [29], while the second patient showed neurological involvement in the first month of life with hypertonus, strabismus, dysphagia, stridor and central apnea. Four GD1 patients developed signs of disease at a mean age of 3 yrs (range 2-4 years). Three patients developed hepatosplenomegaly, one patient developed bilateral femur osteonecrosis [30]. All started ERT, with good clinical and biochemical outcomes.

4. Discussion

We report our experience after 8 years of LSDs newborn screening on about 250,000 newborns, which is the largest study to date reported in Europe.
Among the 126 newborns who underwent confirmatory tests, we found 51 affected patients (16 with PD, 13 with GD, 18 males with FD, 4 with MPSI). Of them, 45/51 are currently in follow-up (15 with PD, 11 with GD, 15 males with FD, 4 with MPSI).
For MPSI, we found an incidence of 1:62,154, which is higher that clinically reported (1:100,000) [31,32,33,34]. In Europe, there are only a few other experiences with NBS for MPSI, such as the small experience in the Umbria Region of Italy (3,403 newborns) [23], and a pilot project on 64,907 newborns conducted in the Italian Regions of Tuscany and Umbria [35]. No true positives were identified in either project, while a total of 15 recalled newborns were false positives at confirmatory testing. In the USA, NBS for MPSI is included in the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP). The incidence ranged between 1:35,509 (Washington State) to 1:219,793 (Illinois) [36] and a high number of pseudodeficiencies is found in programs that do not use 2TT (GAGs quantification or DNA sequencing). Conversely, in Taiwan, where the incidence was about 1:73,000, the rate of false positives was very low without 2TT (0.0013% on 294,196 newborns) [37,38]. This was attributed to population homogeneity in Taiwan and a very low frequency of pseudodeficiency.
Our experience confirmed a high false positive rate due to pseudodeficiency, more prevalent in African and African-American populations [35,39]. Since February 2019, when we added GAGs quantification on DBS as a 2TT [27], our two-test algorithm has reduced false-positives and recall rates, with a PPV of 100% [40]. The outcome of our patients confirms that early HSCT can change the natural history of the severe disease form, preventing neurological involvement and allowing a normal psychomotor development.
During the study period, one patient was clinically diagnosed at the age of 10 months with Hurler syndrome. The patient was born in a neighboring country and did not undergo neonatal screening for lysosomal diseases. At diagnosis he presented with severe organ involvement (coarse facies, lumbar hump, joint stiffness, heart valve disease, visceromegaly, umbilical hernia, corneal opacity and severe deafness). This confirms the importance of neonatal screening for MPSI in avoiding diagnostic delay. No screen-negative patients were clinically diagnosed, with a negative predictive value of 100%.
The incidence of PD from our NBS data was 1:15,539 (IOPD 1:82,872; LOPD 1:19,124). The reported clinical prevalence of PD worldwide is 1:40,000 [41], whilst a previous Italian study estimated an incidence of 1:120,743 [22]. The difference with our results could be explained by recent immigration from Africa, where there is a higher incidence of consanguinity, but also by the identification of a high number of LOPD patients, as reported from other screening programs. Among 48 newborns with a positive NBS result, 3 patients had IOPD, 13 were predicted with LOPD and 7 carried a VUS (PPV 52%).
In IOPD, treatment should be started as soon as possible; delay of a few days can influence outcomes [42,43]. Our IOPD patients (n = 3) started ERT very early, between 5 and 19 days of life. Two had good outcomes, one patient, CRIM negative, developed a non-compactum myocardium and psychomotor delay [28], due to the formation of anti-ERT antibodies [44].
In patients with LOPD, ERT is associated with better outcomes when started before irreversible muscle damage occurs [45,46]. The outcome of LOPD is difficult to predict. Most of our patients carried the c.-32-12T>G variant (i.e., IVS1), which is the most frequent variant in the Caucasian population (90% of patients) [47], with phenotypic variation in the age of symptom onset from early childhood to late adulthood [48,49]. Until now, our LOPD patients (mean age 3.4 years, range 0.3-6.9 years) have no clinical signs or symptoms, all have age-appropriate development, and none is receiving ERT.
Our data demonstrate a high incidence of pseudodeficiencies, especially of the Asiatic variant p.Glu689Lys, alone (n = 1) or in the complex allele p.(Gly576Ser; Glu689Lys) (n = 7). Moreover, 5 European newborns carried the predicted non-pathogenic variant p.Val222Met.
Despite these reservations, NBS for PD is widespread worldwide. In the USA, it was the first LSD to be included in the RUSP, added in 2015. All reported programs confirmed a higher-than-expected incidence of disease and in particular a high number of LOPD. In Taiwan, the first NBS pilot study for PD was conducted in 2005. The Taiwanese cohort is unique, because almost all the IOPD patients are CRIM positive (due to high frequency of the p.Asp645Glu mutation), LOPD cases lack the IVS1 variant, common in Caucasian population, and there is a high frequency of the pseudodeficiency allele p.(Gly576Ser; Glu689Lys).
For GD, among 18 newborns with positive NBS, we diagnosed 13 patients with GD1, 2 patients with neonatal onset GD, while 3 patients carried a VUS (PPV 100%). The overall incidence was 1:16,574, three times higher than clinically estimated (1:40,000-1:60,000) [50]. The most frequent allele was p.Asn409Ser (n = 17, associated with phenotype GD1), interestingly followed by the p.(His294Gln+Asp448His) allele (n = 4), of Balkan origin, associated with a GD2/3 phenotype [51]. This is probably due to recent immigration from the Balkans.
NBS for GD is still controversial, and in the USA it is not included in the RUSP. Only a few States have reported their experience, such as Missouri and Illinois (43,701 and 219,973 newborns, respectively), which found an incidence of about 1:43,000 [52,53]. In New York State (65,605 newborns), a very high incidence was found (1:4374), and this likely reflects New York City’s large Jewish population, in which the p.Asn409Ser allele is frequent [54]. Several NBS programs for GD have been conducted in East Asia where, due to different ethnic backgrounds, a lower incidence of disease was reported (1:73,743 to 1:103,134), and most patients suffered from neuronopathic forms (GD2/3), for which few therapeutic options are available [37,55,56,57,58].
There are few data on the measurement of LysoGb1 in the neonatal period. Its use as a 2TT appears promising. In our population, all the neonates with increase LysoGb1 were confirmed as true positive, with a PPV of 100%. LysoGb1 at birth correlated with disease burden, in agreement with genotype, as patients harboring neuropathic alleles returned significantly higher plasma concentrations than GD patients with non-neuropathic disease. Interestingly, 6/16 patients, including 4 GD1 patients, started ERT in the first years of life due to clinical manifestations (hepatosplenomegaly, osteonecrosis). This underlines the importance of NBS for GD to prevent irreversible complications and avoid diagnostic delays.
In our study, FD was identified and confirmed in 28 males, while one newborn carried a benign variant. The 2 female newborns were found to be false positives (overall PPV 90%). The overall incidence of α-GalA deficiency was 1:8,573 (1:4,121 males), which is similar to previous reports from NBS programs [59], but higher than the clinically estimated incidence (1:40,000) [60], likely due to the recognition of previously undiagnosed later-onset forms of FD. Ten patients carried unclassified variants. It is difficult to predict their pathogenicity because FD may occur later in life. Clinically, our patients presented no symptoms or signs at the last visit (0.7-7.8 years old), although they show a progressive increase of LysoGb3. All mothers carried the same mutation as their children.
In the USA, FD is not included in the RUSP, but local laws promoted by NBS advocates and parents allowed its implementation in NBS in several States. These programs confirmed the high incidence of the disease (1:1,790 to 1:15,558), but also the high number of false positives [59]. Conversely, in Taiwan, NBS for FD was started in 2006. The disease prevalence was very high, due the diffusion of the IV4+919G>A variant (82%, 1:1,600 males), associated with cardiac involvement [61].
We tested the utility of lysoGb3 as a 2TT. Only 7/29 patients had abnormal DBS LysoGb3 at birth, indicating that a normal result cannot exclude FD. A recent report of two brothers with classic FD (genotype c. 370–2 A > G) showed that LysoGb3 was elevated in the first days of life and that it increased significantly during infancy in these patients [62]; therefore, LysoGb3 values may contribute to the complete identification of the phenotype.
We did not detect any heterozygotes among 129,104 females screened, which confirms that the current enzyme based NBS approach misses most female carriers due to X-chromosome inactivation [63]. Some authors suggest first-tier screening with GLA gene sequencing in female newborns. This method has been applied in Taiwan, where 21 variants account for approximately 98% of variants [64]. In Italy and throughout Europe, mutational heterogeneity hampers the use of molecular analysis for high-throughput screening, which could also increase the number of VUS.

5. Shadows

NBS for LSDs (MPSI, PD, GD and FD) has several limitations:
- A high number of false positives and pseudodeficiencies, which impact families and health care systems. Our results demonstrate that biochemical 2TTs are effective to reduce the recall rate for MPSI (GAGs quantification) and GD (LysoGb1). In FD the use of LysoGb3 in the neonatal period is debated [59]. The development of a 2TT is important for all the screened diseases. Proposal to reduce false positive rate for PD includes both biochemical (creatine/creatinine over GAA ratio by MS/MS) [65], and/or molecular 2TTs [66,67,68] and postanalytical tools, e.g., CLIR [69,70].
- Identification of an increasing number of VUS, especially for PD and FD. Some of these patients may never develop symptoms; however, they require ongoing monitoring, which causes anxiety to families and costs for healthcare systems. Future improvement in the management of these patients is likely to come from a better understanding of the genotype/phenotype correlation and natural history of the disease.
- NBS detects newborns across the full phenotypic spectrum of severity, although not all subtypes benefit equally from early detection. Central nervous system damage for neuropathic LSDs such as GD2 cannot be treated currently [71]. Although having the benefit of informing genetic counseling for parents, an untreatable disease may not fit the criteria for NBS. Potential new therapies for the central nervous system are under development.
- Ethical issues due to the high incidence of late-onset forms. For these disorders, onset is often unpredictable and some “patients in waiting” may never develop symptoms [72], resulting in unnecessary anxiety and medical intervention, but also the potential that they will be treated as “vulnerable children” [73]. Challenges remain in identifying better biomarkers for phenotype prediction and the best tailored strategy for the follow-up, management and treatment of these patients.
In conclusion, our experience showed that NBS for these four LSDs is feasible and extendable to larger populations. The incidence of screened LSDs appears to be higher than clinically estimated in our country, but compatible with other screening studies. The possibility of including 2TTs for three of these diseases has changed the false positive rate.
Our experience also outlines the importance of early diagnosis in improving disease outcomes when treatments are available.
Remaining challenges include determining the best management of infants with late-onset phenotypes and those carrying VUS. Long-term follow-up of these patients is an emerging problem. Sharing data in international databases will provide valuable information on genotype-phenotype correlations, natural history, the role of biomarkers, and the impact of early treatment, all of which will pave the way to optimized management of these patients.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, VG, APB, ABB; methodology, EP, MS, PM, LS; validation, EP, MS, PM, ABB; formal analysis, VG, EP, MS, PM, ABB; investigation, VG, CC, DG, AP, CL, EP, MS, PM, LS, APB, ABB; resources, ABB; data curation, VG, APB, ABB; writing—original draft preparation, VG; writing—review and editing, ABB; visualization, VG, CC, DG, AP, CL, EP, MS, PM, LS, APB, ABB; supervision, ABB; project administration, ABB. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from parents of all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request due to privacy/ethical restrictions.

Acknowledgments

We thank Richard Vernell, an independent medical writer, who provided medical writing support funded by Cometa A.S.M.M.E.–Associazione Studio Malattie Metaboliche Ereditarie—ONLUS.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fuller M, Meikle PJ, Hopwood JJ. Epidemiology of Lysosomal Storage Diseases: An Overview. In: Mehta A, Beck M, Sunder-Plassmann G, Editors. Fabry Disease: Perspectives from 5 Years of FOS. Oxford: Oxford PharmaGenesis; 2006.
  2. Wraith, J.E. Lysosomal Disorders. Seminars in Neonatology 2002, 7, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Schultz, M.L.; Tecedor, L.; Chang, M.; Davidson, B.L. Clarifying Lysosomal Storage Diseases. Trends in Neurosciences 2011, 34, 401–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Klein AD, Futerman AH. Lysosomal Storage Disorders: Old Diseases, Present and Future Challenges. Pediatric Endocrinology Reviews : PER. 2013 Nov;11 Suppl 1:59-63.
  5. Gelb, M.H.; Scott, C.R.; Turecek, F. Newborn Screening for Lysosomal Storage Diseases. Clinical Chemistry 2015, 61, 335–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gelb, M.; Lukacs, Z.; Ranieri, E.; Schielen, P. Newborn Screening for Lysosomal Storage Disorders: Methodologies for Measurement of Enzymatic Activities in Dried Blood Spots. IJNS 2018, 5, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chien, Y.-H.; Lee, N.-C.; Thurberg, B.L.; Chiang, S.-C.; Zhang, X.K.; Keutzer, J.; Huang, A.-C.; Wu, M.-H.; Huang, P.-H.; Tsai, F.-J.; Chen, Y.-T.; Hwu, W.-L. Pompe Disease in Infants: Improving the Prognosis by Newborn Screening and Early Treatment. Pediatrics 2009, 124, e1116–e1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bruni, S.; Lavery, C.; Broomfield, A. The Diagnostic Journey of Patients with Mucopolysaccharidosis I: A Real-World Survey of Patient and Physician Experiences. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism Reports 2016, 8, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kuiper, G.-A.; Meijer, O.L.M.; Langereis, E.J.; Wijburg, F.A. Failure to Shorten the Diagnostic Delay in Two Ultra-Orphan Diseases (Mucopolysaccharidosis Types I and III): Potential Causes and Implications. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2018, 13, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Giugliani, R.; Muschol, N.; Keenan, H.A.; Dant, M.; Muenzer, J. Improvement in Time to Treatment, but Not Time to Diagnosis, in Patients with Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I. Arch Dis Child 2021, 106, 674–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Oqvist, B.; Brenner, B.M.; Oliveira, J.P.; Ortiz, A.; Schaefer, R.; Svarstad, E.; Wanner, C.; Zhang, K.; Warnock, D.G. Nephropathy in Fabry Disease: The Importance of Early Diagnosis and Testing in High-Risk Populations. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2009, 24, 1736–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hsu, T.-R.; Hung, S.-C.; Chang, F.-P.; Yu, W.-C.; Sung, S.-H.; Hsu, C.-L.; Dzhagalov, I.; Yang, C.-F.; Chu, T.-H.; Lee, H.-J.; Lu, Y.-H.; Chang, S.-K.; Liao, H.-C.; Lin, H.-Y.; Liao, T.-C.; Lee, P.-C.; Li, H.-Y.; Yang, A.-H.; Ho, H.-C.; Chiang, C.-C.; Lin, C.-Y.; Desnick, R.J.; Niu, D.-M. Later Onset Fabry Disease, Cardiac Damage Progress in Silence. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2016, 68, 2554–2563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Germain, D.P.; Altarescu, G.; Barriales-Villa, R.; Mignani, R.; Pawlaczyk, K.; Pieruzzi, F.; Terryn, W.; Vujkovac, B.; Ortiz, A. An Expert Consensus on Practical Clinical Recommendations and Guidance for Patients with Classic Fabry Disease. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism 2022, 137, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Marsden, D.; Levy, H. Newborn Screening of Lysosomal Storage Disorders. Clinical Chemistry 2010, 56, 1071–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, Y.; Scott, C.R.; Chamoles, N.A.; Ghavami, A.; Pinto, B.M.; Turecek, F.; Gelb, M.H. Direct Multiplex Assay of Lysosomal Enzymes in Dried Blood Spots for Newborn Screening. Clinical Chemistry 2004, 50, 1785–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Millington, D.; Bali, D. Current State of the Art of Newborn Screening for Lysosomal Storage Disorders. IJNS 2018, 4, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Spada, M.; Pagliardini, S.; Yasuda, M.; Tukel, T.; Thiagarajan, G.; Sakuraba, H.; Ponzone, A.; Desnick, R.J. High Incidence of Later-Onset Fabry Disease Revealed by Newborn Screening*. The American Journal of Human Genetics 2006, 79, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Colon, C.; Ortolano, S.; Melcon-Crespo, C.; Alvarez, J.V.; Lopez-Suarez, O.E.; Couce, M.L.; Fernández-Lorenzo, J.R. Newborn Screening for Fabry Disease in the North-West of Spain. Eur J Pediatr 2017, 176, 1075–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Wittmann, J.; Karg, E.; Turi, S.; Legnini, E.; Wittmann, G.; Giese, A.-K.; Lukas, J.; Gölnitz, U.; Klingenhäger, M.; Bodamer, O.; Mühl, A.; Rolfs, A. Newborn Screening for Lysosomal Storage Disorders in Hungary. In JIMD Reports - Case and Research Reports, 2012/3; SSIEM, Ed.; JIMD Reports; Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012; Vol. 6, pp. 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mechtler, T.P.; Stary, S.; Metz, T.F.; De Jesús, V.R.; Greber-Platzer, S.; Pollak, A.; Herkner, K.R.; Streubel, B.; Kasper, D.C. Neonatal Screening for Lysosomal Storage Disorders: Feasibility and Incidence from a Nationwide Study in Austria. The Lancet 2012, 379, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Eyskens, F.; Devos, S. Newborn Screening for Lysosomal Storage Disorders in Belgium: The Importance of Sex- and Age-Dependent Reference Ranges. Journal of Inborn Errors of Metabolism and Screening 2017, 5, 232640981774423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dionisi-Vici, C.; Rizzo, C.; Burlina, A.B.; Caruso, U.; Sabetta, G.; Uziel, G.; Abeni, D. Inborn Errors of Metabolism in the Italian Pediatric Population: A National Retrospective Survey. The Journal of Pediatrics 2002, 140, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Paciotti, S.; Persichetti, E.; Pagliardini, S.; Deganuto, M.; Rosano, C.; Balducci, C.; Codini, M.; Filocamo, M.; Menghini, A.R.; Pagliardini, V.; Pasqui, S.; Bembi, B.; Dardis, A.; Beccari, T. First Pilot Newborn Screening for Four Lysosomal Storage Diseases in an Italian Region: Identification and Analysis of a Putative Causative Mutation in the GBA Gene. Clinica Chimica Acta 2012, 413, 1827–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Burlina, A.B.; Polo, G.; Salviati, L.; Duro, G.; Zizzo, C.; Dardis, A.; Bembi, B.; Cazzorla, C.; Rubert, L.; Zordan, R.; Desnick, R.J.; Burlina, A.P. Newborn Screening for Lysosomal Storage Disorders by Tandem Mass Spectrometry in North East Italy. J of Inher Metab Disea 2018, 41, 209–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Polo, G.; Burlina, A.P.; Ranieri, E.; Colucci, F.; Rubert, L.; Pascarella, A.; Duro, G.; Tummolo, A.; Padoan, A.; Plebani, M.; Burlina, A.B. Plasma and Dried Blood Spot Lysosphingolipids for the Diagnosis of Different Sphingolipidoses: A Comparative Study. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) 2019, 57, 1863–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Turgeon, C.T.; Orsini, J.J.; Sanders, K.A.; Magera, M.J.; Langan, T.J.; Escolar, M.L.; Duffner, P.; Oglesbee, D.; Gavrilov, D.; Tortorelli, S.; Rinaldo, P.; Raymond, K.; Matern, D. Measurement of Psychosine in Dried Blood Spots — a Possible Improvement to Newborn Screening Programs for Krabbe Disease. J of Inher Metab Disea 2015, 38, 923–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Polo, G.; Gueraldi, D.; Giuliani, A.; Rubert, L.; Cazzorla, C.; Salviati, L.; Marzollo, A.; Biffi, A.; Burlina, A.P.; Burlina, A.B. The Combined Use of Enzyme Activity and Metabolite Assays as a Strategy for Newborn Screening of Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) 2020, 58, 2063–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Gragnaniello, V.; Rizzardi, C.; Commone, A.; Gueraldi, D.; Maines, E.; Salviati, L.; Di Salvo, G.; Burlina, A.B. Unusual Evolution of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in Non-Compaction Myocardium in a Pompe Disease Patient. JCM 2023, 12, 2365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Gragnaniello, V.; Cazzorla, C.; Gueraldi, D.; Loro, C.; Massa, P.; Puma, A.; Cananzi, M.; Salviati, L.; Burlina, A.P.; Burlina, A.B. Long-term Follow-up of a Patient with Neonatal Form of Gaucher Disease. American J of Med Genetics Pt A 2023, 191, 1917–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Gragnaniello, V.; Burlina, A.P.; Manara, R.; Cazzorla, C.; Rubert, L.; Gueraldi, D.; Toniolli, E.; Quaia, E.; Burlina, A.B. Bone Disease in Early Detected Gaucher Type I Disease: A Case Report. JIMD Reports 2022, 63, 414–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Lukacs, Z. Mucopolysaccharides. In: Blau N, Duran M, Gibson K, Editors. Laboratory Guide to the Methods in Biochemical Genetics. Berlin/Heidelberg (Germany): Springer; 2008. p. 287–324.
  32. Kemper, AR. Newborn Screening for MPS I: Final Report from the Condition Review Workgroup. North Carolina: Duke Clinical Research Institute; 2015. Available from: Https://Www.Hrsa.Gov/Sites/Default/Files/Hrsa/Advisory-Committees/Heritable-Disorders/ Meetings/Heritable%20Disorders%202004-2015/2015/February%2012-3,%202015/Kemper-Mps1.Pdf.
  33. Moore, D.; Connock, M.J.; Wraith, E.; Lavery, C. The Prevalence of and Survival in Mucopolysaccharidosis I: Hurler, Hurler-Scheie and Scheie Syndromes in the UK. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2008, 3, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Taylor, J.L.; Clinard, K.; Powell, C.M.; Rehder, C.; Young, S.P.; Bali, D.; Beckloff, S.E.; Gehtland, L.M.; Kemper, A.R.; Lee, S.; Millington, D.; Patel, H.S.; Shone, S.M.; Woodell, C.; Zimmerman, S.J.; Bailey, D.B.; Muenzer, J. The North Carolina Experience with Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I Newborn Screening. The Journal of Pediatrics 2019, 211, 193–200.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Donati, M.A.; Pasquini, E.; Spada, M.; Polo, G.; Burlina, A. Newborn Screening in Mucopolysaccharidoses. Ital J Pediatr 2018, 44, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Burlina, A.B.; Gragnaniello, V. Newborn Screening of Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I. Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences 2022, 59, 257–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chien, Y.-H.; Lee, N.-C.; Chen, P.-W.; Yeh, H.-Y.; Gelb, M.H.; Chiu, P.-C.; Chu, S.-Y.; Lee, C.-H.; Lee, A.-R.; Hwu, W.-L. Newborn Screening for Morquio Disease and Other Lysosomal Storage Diseases: Results from the 8-Plex Assay for 70,000 Newborns. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2020, 15, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chuang, C.-K.; Lin, H.-Y.; Wang, T.-J.; Huang, Y.-H.; Chan, M.-J.; Liao, H.-C.; Lo, Y.-T.; Wang, L.-Y.; Tu, R.-Y.; Fang, Y.-Y.; Chen, T.-L.; Ho, H.-C.; Chiang, C.-C.; Lin, S.-P. Status of Newborn Screening and Follow up Investigations for Mucopolysaccharidoses I and II in Taiwan. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2018, 13, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Clarke, L.A.; Atherton, A.M.; Burton, B.K.; Day-Salvatore, D.L.; Kaplan, P.; Leslie, N.D.; Scott, C.R.; Stockton, D.W.; Thomas, J.A.; Muenzer, J. Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I Newborn Screening: Best Practices for Diagnosis and Management. The Journal of Pediatrics 2017, 182, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gragnaniello, V.; Gueraldi, D.; Rubert, L.; Manzoni, F.; Cazzorla, C.; Giuliani, A.; Polo, G.; Salviati, L.; Burlina, A. Report of Five Years of Experience in Neonatal Screening for Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I and Review of the Literature. IJNS 2020, 6, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. A.J.J. Reuser, R. Hirschhorn, M.A. Kroos, Pompe Disease: Glycogen Storage Disease Type II: Acid α- Glucosidase (Acid Maltase) Deficiency, in: D. Valle, S. Antonarakis, A. Ballabio, A.L. Beaudet, G.A. Mitchell (Eds.), The Online Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease, McGraw-Hill, 2019. Accessed. 13 September 2022.
  42. Yang, C.-F.; Yang, C.C.; Liao, H.-C.; Huang, L.-Y.; Chiang, C.-C.; Ho, H.-C.; Lai, C.-J.; Chu, T.-H.; Yang, T.-F.; Hsu, T.-R.; Soong, W.-J.; Niu, D.-M. Very Early Treatment for Infantile-Onset Pompe Disease Contributes to Better Outcomes. The Journal of Pediatrics 2016, 169, 174–180.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Li, C.; Desai, A.K.; Gupta, P.; Dempsey, K.; Bhambhani, V.; Hopkin, R.J.; Ficicioglu, C.; Tanpaiboon, P.; Craigen, W.J.; Rosenberg, A.S.; Kishnani, P.S. Transforming the Clinical Outcome in CRIM-Negative Infantile Pompe Disease Identified via Newborn Screening: The Benefits of Early Treatment with Enzyme Replacement Therapy and Immune Tolerance Induction. Genetics in Medicine 2021, 23, 845–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gragnaniello, V.; Deodato, F.; Gasperini, S.; Donati, M.A.; Canessa, C.; Fecarotta, S.; Pascarella, A.; Spadaro, G.; Concolino, D.; Burlina, A.; Parenti, G.; Strisciuglio, P.; Fiumara, A.; Casa, R.D. Immune Responses to Alglucosidase in Infantile Pompe Disease: Recommendations from an Italian Pediatric Expert Panel. Ital J Pediatr 2022, 48, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Huggins, E.; Holland, M.; Case, L.E.; Blount, J.; Landstrom, A.P.; Jones, H.N.; Kishnani, P.S. Early Clinical Phenotype of Late Onset Pompe Disease: Lessons Learned from Newborn Screening. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism 2022, 135, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lee, N.-C.; Chang, K.-L.; in ’t Groen, S.L.M.; de Faria, D.O.S.; Huang, H.-J.; Pijnappel, W.W.M. Pim.; Hwu, W.-L.; Chien, Y.-H. Outcome of Later-Onset Pompe Disease Identified Through Newborn Screening. The Journal of Pediatrics 2022, 244, 139–147.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bergsma, A.J.; in ’t Groen, S.L.M.; van den Dorpel, J.J.A.; van den Hout, H.J.M.P.; van der Beek, N.A.M.E.; Schoser, B.; Toscano, A.; Musumeci, O.; Bembi, B.; Dardis, A.; Morrone, A.; Tummolo, A.; Pasquini, E.; van der Ploeg, A.T.; Pijnappel, W.W.M.P. A Genetic Modifier of Symptom Onset in Pompe Disease. EBioMedicine 2019, 43, 553–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. van der Wal, E.; Bergsma, A.J.; van Gestel, T.J.M.; in ‘t Groen, S.L.M.; Zaehres, H.; Araúzo-Bravo, M.J.; Schöler, H.R.; van der Ploeg, A.T.; Pijnappel, W.W.M.P. GAA Deficiency in Pompe Disease Is Alleviated by Exon Inclusion in iPSC-Derived Skeletal Muscle Cells. Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids 2017, 7, 101–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wens, S.C.A.; van Gelder, C.M.; Kruijshaar, M.E.; de Vries, J.M.; van der Beek, N.A.M.E.; Reuser, A.J.J.; van Doorn, P.A.; van der Ploeg, A.T.; Brusse, E. Phenotypical Variation within 22 Families with Pompe Disease. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2013, 8, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Wang, R.Y.; Bodamer, O.A.; Watson, M.S.; Wilcox, W.R. Lysosomal Storage Diseases: Diagnostic Confirmation and Management of Presymptomatic Individuals. Genetics in Medicine 2011, 13, 457–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Filocamo, M.; Grossi, S.; Stroppiano, M.; Tortori-Donati, P.; Regis, S.; Allegri, A.; Di Rocco, M. Homozygosity for a Non-Pseudogene Complex Glucocerebrosidase Allele as Cause of an Atypical Neuronopathic Form of Gaucher Disease. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2005, 134A, 95–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hopkins, P.V.; Campbell, C.; Klug, T.; Rogers, S.; Raburn-Miller, J.; Kiesling, J. Lysosomal Storage Disorder Screening Implementation: Findings from the First Six Months of Full Population Pilot Testing in Missouri. The Journal of Pediatrics 2015, 166, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Burton, B.K.; Charrow, J.; Hoganson, G.E.; Waggoner, D.; Tinkle, B.; Braddock, S.R.; Schneider, M.; Grange, D.K.; Nash, C.; Shryock, H.; Barnett, R.; Shao, R.; Basheeruddin, K.; Dizikes, G. Newborn Screening for Lysosomal Storage Disorders in Illinois: The Initial 15-Month Experience. The Journal of Pediatrics 2017, 190, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wasserstein, M.P.; Caggana, M.; Bailey, S.M.; Desnick, R.J.; Edelmann, L.; Estrella, L.; Holzman, I.; Kelly, N.R.; Kornreich, R.; Kupchik, S.G.; Martin, M.; Nafday, S.M.; Wasserman, R.; Yang, A.; Yu, C.; Orsini, J.J. The New York Pilot Newborn Screening Program for Lysosomal Storage Diseases: Report of the First 65,000 Infants. Genetics in Medicine 2019, 21, 631–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liao, H.-C.; Chiang, C.-C.; Niu, D.-M.; Wang, C.-H.; Kao, S.-M.; Tsai, F.-J.; Huang, Y.-H.; Liu, H.-C.; Huang, C.-K.; Gao, H.-J.; Yang, C.-F.; Chan, M.-J.; Lin, W.-D.; Chen, Y.-J. Detecting Multiple Lysosomal Storage Diseases by Tandem Mass Spectrometry — A National Newborn Screening Program in Taiwan. Clinica Chimica Acta 2014, 431, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kang, L.; Zhan, X.; Gu, X.; Zhang, H. Successful Newborn Screening for Gaucher Disease Using Fluorometric Assay in China. J Hum Genet 2017, 62, 763–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chiang, S.-C.; Chen, P.-W.; Hwu, W.-L.; Lee, A.-J.; Chen, L.-C.; Lee, N.-C.; Chiou, L.-Y.; Chien, Y.-H. Performance of the Four-Plex Tandem Mass Spectrometry Lysosomal Storage Disease Newborn Screening Test: The Necessity of Adding a 2nd Tier Test for Pompe Disease. IJNS 2018, 4, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sawada, T.; Kido, J.; Sugawara, K.; Yoshida, S.; Matsumoto, S.; Shimazu, T.; Matsushita, Y.; Inoue, T.; Hirose, S.; Endo, F.; Nakamura, K. Newborn Screening for Gaucher Disease in Japan. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism Reports 2022, 31, 100850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Gragnaniello, V.; Burlina, A.P.; Commone, A.; Gueraldi, D.; Puma, A.; Porcù, E.; Stornaiuolo, M.; Cazzorla, C.; Burlina, A.B. Newborn Screening for Fabry Disease: Current Status of Knowledge. IJNS 2023, 9, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Desnick, R.J.; Ioannou, Y.A.; Eng, C.M. A-Galactosidase A Deficiency: Fabry Disease; McGraw Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  61. Hwu, W.-L.; Chien, Y.-H.; Lee, N.-C.; Chiang, S.-C.; Dobrovolny, R.; Huang, A.-C.; Yeh, H.-Y.; Chao, M.-C.; Lin, S.-J.; Kitagawa, T.; Desnick, R.J.; Hsu, L.-W. Newborn Screening for Fabry Disease in Taiwan Reveals a High Incidence of the Later-Onset GLA Mutation c.936+919G>A (IVS4+919G>A). Hum. Mutat. 2009, 30, 1397–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Spada, M.; Kasper, D.; Pagliardini, V.; Biamino, E.; Giachero, S.; Porta, F. Metabolic Progression to Clinical Phenotype in Classic Fabry Disease. Ital J Pediatr 2017, 43, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hsu, T.-R.; Niu, D.-M. Fabry Disease: Review and Experience during Newborn Screening. Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine 2018, 28, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lu, Y.-H.; Huang, P.-H.; Wang, L.-Y.; Hsu, T.-R.; Li, H.-Y.; Lee, P.-C.; Hsieh, Y.-P.; Hung, S.-C.; Wang, Y.-C.; Chang, S.-K.; Lee, Y.-T.; Ho, P.-H.; Ho, H.-C.; Niu, D.-M. Improvement in the Sensitivity of Newborn Screening for Fabry Disease among Females through the Use of a High-Throughput and Cost-Effective Method, DNA Mass Spectrometry. J Hum Genet 2018, 63, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Tortorelli, S.; Eckerman, J.S.; Orsini, J.J.; Stevens, C.; Hart, J.; Hall, P.L.; Alexander, J.J.; Gavrilov, D.; Oglesbee, D.; Raymond, K.; Matern, D.; Rinaldo, P. Moonlighting Newborn Screening Markers: The Incidental Discovery of a Second-Tier Test for Pompe Disease. Genetics in Medicine 2018, 20, 840–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ficicioglu, C.; Ahrens-Nicklas, R.C.; Barch, J.; Cuddapah, S.R.; DiBoscio, B.S.; DiPerna, J.C.; Gordon, P.L.; Henderson, N.; Menello, C.; Luongo, N.; Ortiz, D.; Xiao, R. Newborn Screening for Pompe Disease: Pennsylvania Experience. IJNS 2020, 6, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Martin, M.M.; Wilson, R.; Caggana, M.; Orsini, J.J. The Impact of Post-Analytical Tools on New York Screening for Krabbe Disease and Pompe Disease. IJNS 2020, 6, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Tang, H.; Feuchtbaum, L.; Sciortino, S.; Matteson, J.; Mathur, D.; Bishop, T.; Olney, R.S. The First Year Experience of Newborn Screening for Pompe Disease in California. IJNS 2020, 6, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Hall, P.L.; Sanchez, R.; Hagar, A.F.; Jerris, S.C.; Wittenauer, A.; Wilcox, W.R. Two-Tiered Newborn Screening with Post-Analytical Tools for Pompe Disease and Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I Results in Performance Improvement and Future Direction. IJNS 2020, 6, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Minter Baerg, M.M.; Stoway, S.D.; Hart, J.; Mott, L.; Peck, D.S.; Nett, S.L.; Eckerman, J.S.; Lacey, J.M.; Turgeon, C.T.; Gavrilov, D.; Oglesbee, D.; Raymond, K.; Tortorelli, S.; Matern, D.; Mørkrid, L.; Rinaldo, P. Precision Newborn Screening for Lysosomal Disorders. Genetics in Medicine 2018, 20, 847–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Hwu, W.; Chien, Y.; Lee, N. Newborn Screening for Neuropathic Lysosomal Storage Disorders. J of Inher Metab Disea 2010, 33, 381–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Timmermans, S.; Buchbinder, M. Patients-in-Waiting: Living between Sickness and Health in the Genomics Era. J Health Soc Behav 2010, 51, 408–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kokotos, F. The Vulnerable Child Syndrome. Pediatrics In Review 2009, 30, 193–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 2. Newborn screening results and confirmed diagnosis.
Table 2. Newborn screening results and confirmed diagnosis.
LSD Total screened Positive NBS Patients with confirmed disorder Pseudodeficit VUS Carrier Status Benign variant No variant Lost before confirmatory testing
GD 248,616 18 13 0 3 0 0 0 2
PD 48 16 17 7 4 0 0 4
FD 31 18 0 10 / 1 2* 0
MPSI 29 4 21 2 2 0 0 0
TOT 126 51 38 22 6 1 2 6
* Both were females.
Table 3. Clinical and biochemical characteristic of MPSI patients.
Table 3. Clinical and biochemical characteristic of MPSI patients.
Pt.1 (female) Pt.2 (female) Pt.3 (male) Pt.4 (female)
Diagnosis
IDUA activity on DBS 0.22 µmol/l/h 0.17 µmol/l/h 0.17 µmol/l/h 0.12 µmol/l/h
GAGs on DBS
HS nv <3.2 µg/ml; DS nv <2.7 µg/ml
NA NA HS 6.3 µg/ml, DS 33 µg/ml HS 7.8 µg/ml, DS 41 µg/ml
uGAGs
HS nv <4.6 mg/mmol crea; DS nv <38.1 mg/mmol crea
HS 148.9 mg/mmol crea, DS 172 mg/mmol crea HS 121.9 mg/mmol crea and DS 80 mg/mmol crea HS 60.9 mg/mmol crea and DS 58 mg/mmol crea HS 274 mg/mmol crea and DS 287.7 mg/mmol crea
Molecular analysis (DNA) homozygous c.1598C>G homozygous p.Tyr201* c.603C>G + c.-14_10del homozygous c.46_57del12
Protein homozygous p.Pro533Arg homozygous p.Tyr201* pTyr201* + intronic variant homozygous p.Tyr201*
Phenotype Hurler/Scheie Hurler Hurler Hurler
Treatment
ERT (laronidase 100 U/kg) 30 days 45 days 19 days 9 days
HSCT no 6 months 6 months 6 months
Follow-up
Age at last follow up 6.5 years old 6 years old 1.5 years 1 year
Clinical features diffuse corneal clouding mild coarse facial features, deformity of lumbar vertebral bodies, diffuse corneal clouding. Mild deformity of vertebral bodies, diffuse corneal clouding. deformity of thoracic and lumbar vertebral bodies, diffuse corneal clouding.
Cognitive function WPPSI III: 93 WPPSI III: 121 Bayley 3: 75 Bayley 3: 100
Chimerism / 94% donor 86% donor 100% donor
IDUA nv 1.9-15 µmol/l/h / 6.49 µmol/l/h 3.49 µmol/l/h 12.60 µmol/l/h
uGAGs HS 9.2 mg/mmol crea, DS 15.4 mg/mmol crea HS 2.6 mg/mmol crea, DS 5.5 mg/mmol crea HS 3.9 mg/mol crea, DS 12 mg/mmol crea HS 8.4 mg/mmol crea, DS 13.2 mg/mmol crea
NA: not available, HS: heparan sulfate, DS: dermatan sulfate, crea: creatinine.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated