Figure 1.
Photography of some oblong tablets on a table. Inset: Schematic shape silhouettes, top, long side, short side.
Figure 1.
Photography of some oblong tablets on a table. Inset: Schematic shape silhouettes, top, long side, short side.
Figure 2.
Top: Vizualisation of simulated oblong tablets resting on a plane. Bottom: View from underneath; The corresponding footprint of the tablets. Squares belongs to upright standing tablets, thin stripes belongs to tablets landed on their round cap (green colored tablet for easy mapping of both views).
Figure 2.
Top: Vizualisation of simulated oblong tablets resting on a plane. Bottom: View from underneath; The corresponding footprint of the tablets. Squares belongs to upright standing tablets, thin stripes belongs to tablets landed on their round cap (green colored tablet for easy mapping of both views).
Figure 3.
Left: Song et al.: Representation of a bi-convex tablet using three convex surfaces. Right: Representation of an oblong tablet and its geometrical properties. is a single parameter which allows for total scaling of the shape.
Figure 3.
Left: Song et al.: Representation of a bi-convex tablet using three convex surfaces. Right: Representation of an oblong tablet and its geometrical properties. is a single parameter which allows for total scaling of the shape.
Figure 4.
a: The spherocylinder which forms a capsule is created by a sphere (green) moving along the axis. b: The resulting capsule shape. c: Schematic draw of contour shape creation. A bi-convex tablet is shifted along the axis of a sperocylinder (outer objet defined by the bounding sphere of the bi-convex tablet). The oblong tablet shape (transparent green) finally results by the contour of the moving bi-convex tablet and the terminal positions (arrows) at the lower end and upper end of the bodys axis. d: The resulting oblong tablet (score is a visual effect).
Figure 4.
a: The spherocylinder which forms a capsule is created by a sphere (green) moving along the axis. b: The resulting capsule shape. c: Schematic draw of contour shape creation. A bi-convex tablet is shifted along the axis of a sperocylinder (outer objet defined by the bounding sphere of the bi-convex tablet). The oblong tablet shape (transparent green) finally results by the contour of the moving bi-convex tablet and the terminal positions (arrows) at the lower end and upper end of the bodys axis. d: The resulting oblong tablet (score is a visual effect).
Figure 5.
True shape modeling properties of an oblong tablet. Left: Circumferending flat band (green), round caps on front side and back side and the sharp edge, called rim. Right: Band-band contact, two oblong tablets on top of each other and band-plane contact, tablets can rest on an STL surface.
Figure 5.
True shape modeling properties of an oblong tablet. Left: Circumferending flat band (green), round caps on front side and back side and the sharp edge, called rim. Right: Band-band contact, two oblong tablets on top of each other and band-plane contact, tablets can rest on an STL surface.
Figure 6.
View into a rotating drum. Only a few tablets are simulated for better visibility of the tablet climbing effect which occurs on rotating walls before tablets falling back onto the bed.
Figure 6.
View into a rotating drum. Only a few tablets are simulated for better visibility of the tablet climbing effect which occurs on rotating walls before tablets falling back onto the bed.
Figure 7.
Initial simulation setup. Talets filled at 40% fill level, drum resting, 0 rpm.
Figure 7.
Initial simulation setup. Talets filled at 40% fill level, drum resting, 0 rpm.
Figure 8.
Four different rpm cases, a=6 rpm, b=9 rpm, c=12 rpm, d=18 rpm. Side view, after 10 seconds mixing, using a smooth start from 0rpm to case target value within a period of one second.
Figure 8.
Four different rpm cases, a=6 rpm, b=9 rpm, c=12 rpm, d=18 rpm. Side view, after 10 seconds mixing, using a smooth start from 0rpm to case target value within a period of one second.
Figure 9.
Stacked bar chart histograms for 10s tablet mixing at 9 rpm (left) and 6 rpm (right).
Figure 9.
Stacked bar chart histograms for 10s tablet mixing at 9 rpm (left) and 6 rpm (right).
Figure 10.
Stacked bar chart histograms for 10s tablet mixing at 12 rpm (left) and 18 rpm (right).
Figure 10.
Stacked bar chart histograms for 10s tablet mixing at 12 rpm (left) and 18 rpm (right).
Figure 11.
Comparison after 10s operation time for all of the four cases a, b, c and d. With increasing rpm, a shift towards decreasing band-cap pairs take place. Whereas band-band pairs increase a bit. Other contact pairs ramain rather constant.
Figure 11.
Comparison after 10s operation time for all of the four cases a, b, c and d. With increasing rpm, a shift towards decreasing band-cap pairs take place. Whereas band-band pairs increase a bit. Other contact pairs ramain rather constant.
Figure 12.
Coating drum for simulation, look inside. Cylindrical main part with conical end for filling and discharging purposes (left). Smoothed baffles are placed in equal distance circumferending the interior wall.
Figure 12.
Coating drum for simulation, look inside. Cylindrical main part with conical end for filling and discharging purposes (left). Smoothed baffles are placed in equal distance circumferending the interior wall.
Figure 13.
View into the cutted drum: 370 kg batch. 2.54 million individual oblong tablets, ech of 114 mg mass. Drum speed is set to 6rpm.
Figure 13.
View into the cutted drum: 370 kg batch. 2.54 million individual oblong tablets, ech of 114 mg mass. Drum speed is set to 6rpm.
Figure 14.
370 kg batch contact pair statistics. After about 6s a steady state distribution of frequency of contact pairs has been reached.
Figure 14.
370 kg batch contact pair statistics. After about 6s a steady state distribution of frequency of contact pairs has been reached.
Figure 15.
2.54 million individual tablets result in over 20 million individual inter-tablet contacts. The diagram shows the evolution of number of contacts per tablet the so called coordination number. Black curve indicates the occuring contacts. Red curve shows the total contacts in the contact list which is build based on the number of the potential bounding sphere contacts.
Figure 15.
2.54 million individual tablets result in over 20 million individual inter-tablet contacts. The diagram shows the evolution of number of contacts per tablet the so called coordination number. Black curve indicates the occuring contacts. Red curve shows the total contacts in the contact list which is build based on the number of the potential bounding sphere contacts.
Figure 16.
At 15s simulation time: Empirical probability density function of contact normal force magnitudes between classified contact pairs. Higher forces acting on pairs with band-contribution (black, red, blue).
Figure 16.
At 15s simulation time: Empirical probability density function of contact normal force magnitudes between classified contact pairs. Higher forces acting on pairs with band-contribution (black, red, blue).
Table 1.
DEM simulation parameters 4x case studie.
Table 1.
DEM simulation parameters 4x case studie.
| Parameter |
Symbol |
Value |
Unit |
| Density |
|
1800 |
|
| Normal stiffness |
|
|
|
| Tangential stiffness |
|
|
|
| Restitution coefficent (normal) |
e |
0.18 |
|
| static friction (PP) |
|
0.6 |
|
| static friction (PW) |
|
0.6 |
|
Table 2.
Observations of histogram data after 10s mixingtime.
Table 2.
Observations of histogram data after 10s mixingtime.
| band-band: |
frequency increase slightly |
| band-cap: |
frequency decrease |
| cap-cap: |
frequency increase slightly |
| rim-band: |
frequency remain rather constant |
| rim-cap: |
frequency remain rather constant |
| rim-rim: |
frequency remain constant |
Table 3.
DEM simulation parameters large batch.
Table 3.
DEM simulation parameters large batch.
| Parameter |
Symbol |
Value |
Unit |
| Density |
|
1800 |
|
| Normal stiffness |
|
|
|
| Tangential stiffness |
|
|
|
| Restitution coefficent (normal) |
e |
0.18 |
- |
| static friction (PP) |
|
0.6 |
- |
| static friction (PW) |
|
0.85 |
- |
| time step |
|
* |
s |
Table 4.
Maximum observed inter-tablet normal forces at different times mixingtime.
Table 4.
Maximum observed inter-tablet normal forces at different times mixingtime.
| contact type |
force [mN] |
|
|
|
| |
10s |
15s |
20s |
30s |
| band-band: |
267.543 |
170.411 |
170.368 |
95.108 |
| band-cap: |
73.702 |
170.508 |
77.714 |
81.777 |
| cap-cap: |
121.394 |
127.872 |
125.214 |
130.2866 |
| rim-band: |
215.950 |
106.107 |
166.392 |
100.958 |
| rim-cap: |
67.680 |
75.741 |
60.780 |
75.500 |
| rim-rim: |
54.253 |
52.563 |
52.027 |
48.638 |