Preprint
Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Sialic Acid Mimetic Microglial SIGLEC Agonistic Nanoparticle: Potential to Restore Retinal Homeostasis and Regain Visual Function in AMD

A peer-reviewed version of this preprint was published in:
Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16(12), 1735. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16121735

Submitted:

15 October 2023

Posted:

18 October 2023

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Age-related macular degeneration, a leading cause of visual loss and dysfunction in the devel-oped world, is a disease initiated by genetic polymorphisms that impairs negative regulation of complement. Proteomic investigation points to altered glycosylation and loss of SIGLEC medi-ated glyco-immune checkpoint parainflammatory homeostasis as a main determinant for the vi-sion impairing complications of macular degeneration. The effect of altered glycosylation on microglial maintained retinal para-inflammatory homeostasis and eventual recruitment and polarization of peripheral blood monocyte derived macrophages (PBMDM) into the retina can explain the phenotypic variability seen in this clinically heterogenous disease. Restoring gly-co-immune checkpoint control with a sialic acid mimetic nanoparticle targeting microgli-al/macrophage SIGLECs to regain retinal para inflammatory homeostasis is a promising thera-peutic that could halt the progression of and improve visual function in all stages of macular de-generation.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

3. Targeting Microglial/Macrophage SIGLECs to Treat AMD

3.1. M2c polarization a promising therapeutic strategy for AMD

As in spinal cord injury, elevating M2c results in better neuronal recovery. A potential therapeutic strategy that could not only halt all forms of macular degeneration but restore visual function and retinal homeostatic health would be to reintroduce sialic acid control of microglia and macrophages. This strategy would increase M2c and decrease M1, M2d, M2a microglia /macrophages, by repolarizing them to M2c. If this repolarization strategy were to be possible, then not only would stopping progression of the disease be possible, but potentially restoration of visual function and retinal health would also be obtainable.

3.2. Sialic acid can repolarize macrophages to M2c

Tumor’s ability to evade immune attack provides the blue print on how to repolarize microglia and macrophages to the healing M2c state. Many tumors hyper express sialic acid by upregulating Golgi resident sialyltransferases.[73] These sialyltransferases produce sialylation patterns on tumors that allow them to evade immune surveillance.[74] One well characterized tumor derived sialic acid pattern that dictates monocyte/macrophage differentiation is the sialic acid ligands that are produced by pancreatic ductal carcinoma that bind Siglec 7 and 9 and reduce inflammatory signaling, increase PD-L1 a T-cell checkpoint ligand and increases IL-10. This pancreatic cancer produced sialic acid pattern agonizes Siglec-7 and 9 which deactivates monocyte derived macrophages to their quiescent state M2c state which cloaks tumors from both the innate and adaptive immune system and permits tumors to grow unchecked.[75]
Another demonstration of the ability for sialic acid to determine inflammatory state was demonstrated in a glycoprotein called serum amyloid protein a well characterized anti-fibrotic and anti-inflammatory that targets fibrotic and inflammatory macrophages.[76] The innate immune antifibrotic properties of SAP are mediated by the α(2,6)- linked terminally sialylated glycan found on the N32 position of SAP. If the sialic acid is removed from this glycan, it no longer has the anti-fibrotic properties. [77] C-reactive protein which has similar sequence homology to SAP but is a pro-inflammatory molecule can be made to behave like sialylated SAP by mutating CRP at position 32 from an alanine to an asparagine. This mutation resulted in an N-linked glycosylation added to the surface of CRP which functionally made Sialylated CRP A32N behave like sialylated SAP. This enabled CRP A32N to inhibit fibrocyte differentiation in human peripheral blood monocytes. [77]

3.3. Protein sialic acid mimetics not feasible pharmaceutical

This promise of developing immune modulating therapeutic proteins with altered glycosylation is reduced by the difficulty and unpredictability of altering glycosylation by mutating amino acid sequences. When CRP A32N was mutated, only 40% of the recombinant CRP A32N was sialylated. [77] This absence of sialylation prevented the anti-fibrotic gain of function that sialylated CRP A32N produced. This failure can be explained by the post translational nature of cellular glycosylation.
Protein glycosylation is based on O or N-linked glycosylation. O-glycosylation is defined by a sugar attachment to the oxygen atom on amino acids serine or threonine. N-linked glycosylation is defined by a sugar attachment to the nitrogen atom of an asparagine. To create a recombinant glycoprotein with the correct glycan expression pattern the correct sialyltransferases must be upregulated to produce a particular glycan pattern. Since most recombinant proteins are produced in non-human cell lines, the cells do not express the correct glycosyltransferases. Because of these technological hurdles these protein glyco-mimetic immune modulating therapeutics are not druggable.

3.4. Naked PolySialic Acid not feasible pharmaceutical

3.4.1. PSA in Laser CNV model

The concept of just using sialic acid glycans by themselves has been investigated. In a laser induced CNV model of exudative macular degeneration, α(2,8) linked polysialic acid was able to reduce microglial/macrophage activation and recruitment indicating its ability in the eye to agonize appropriate Siglecs which in the wild type mouse is Siglec-E the mouse ortholog of Siglec 7 and 9. The intravitreal injection of this polysialic acid was also able to inhibit terminal complement complex formation and reduce the size and leakage of the neovascular lesions significantly.[78]

3.4.2. PSA in Parkinson’s model

Polysia was also shown to ameliorate inflammatory dopaminergic neurodegeneration in a lipopolysaccharide induced Siglec 11 transgenic mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Intraperitoneal injection of LPS was followed by either injection of polysia or control and brains were then examined for complement 4(C4) integrin alpha M (Itgam) a subunit of complement receptor 3 and C3. The brains were also probed for oxidative burst pathway enzymes such as nitric oxide synthase 2 (NOS2) and cytochrome b245 alpha and beta chain (Cyba/Cybb) . The polysia only reduced C4 expression but not Itgam or C3 expression in the LPS challenged mice. Polysia could not reduce Nos2 or Cyba. [79] It is unclear why PSA could not suppress these factors in vivo but none the less does not support the use of PSA not presented on a NCAM like protein as a therapeutic.

3.4.3. PSA in Multiple Sclerosis model

In a model of multiple sclerosis, polysia dp-24-30 reduced nitric oxide, and recruited arginase-1 positive microglia to enhance remyelination in organotypic cerebellar slice culture of demyelination. Interestingly polysia of dp-8-14 reduced in vitro differentiation and did not help with remyelination. This observation demonstrates the specificity of Siglec receptors to the form of sialic acid and the presentation of the Sialic acid.[80]

3.4.4. PSA in Alzheimer’s model

Polysialic acid fragments have also been delivered through the intranasal route to the brain of mice who are deficient in polysia and two mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. The diseases of Alzheimer’s and schizophrenia have been associated with a deficit of neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) which is the brains main repository of polysialic acid. While mice receiving this treatment were shown to have rescued medial prefrontal cortex tasks. Studies of intracranial pharmacokinetics demonstrated that these particles were only sparsely distributed in the mouse brain after 3 hours and declined rapidly by 24 hours.[81]

3.4.5. PSA by itself not druggable

While exogenous polysialic acid has demonstrated beneficial effect in animal models of wet AMD, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, the ability to optimize sialic acid- Siglec immune cell synapse, requires presentation, density, and persistence to mediate true immune cell deactivation. [82] If a therapy were to be developed for geographic atrophy the drug would have to be administered at least monthly so a drug would need to persist. This drug would also need to present sialic acids in a multivalent fashion.
As has been demonstrated by these early proof of concept experiments, PSA alone would not be feasible therapeutic from a biologic, pharmacokinetic and a biodistribution perspective.

3.5. PSA-Nanoparticles promising therapeutic strategy for AMD

Nanoparticles decorated with sialic acid have been used to increase blood circulation time[83] and target tumor lectins for delivery of anti-tumor prodrugs. [84] The concept of decorating a nanoparticle with sialic acid to down modulate inflammation by agonizing SIGLEC receptors was first conceptualized and demonstrated in the laboratory of Professor Chris Scott. His lab decorated a nanoparticle with disialic acid that functionally mimicked a protein covered with sialylated glycans. This disialic acid α(2,8) linked decorated nanoparticle was able to completely abrogate a model of sepsis and a model of acute respiratory distress. [85] This immune modulating demonstration paved the way for a nanoparticle to be decorated with polysialic acid targeting microglial cells and complement to abrogate microglial and macrophage M1 polarization by repolarizing macrophages to the M2c healing macrophage.

3.5.1. PSA- nanoparticle mimics Microglial release of PSA-Proteins.

This PSA-nanoparticle was designed to mimic PSA bearing proteins such as Neuropilin-2 or E-selectin ligand -1. These PSA bearing proteins are secreted by microglia as part of the negative feedback regulation of microglial inflammatory response to injury or toxic stress. [86] After LPS administration in cell culture, PSA-neuropilin-2 and PSA-E-selectin ligand 1 are released in a metalloproteinase -dependent manner into the cell culture media for at least 24 hours after LPS challenge. The release of microglial derived polysia ligand that binds Siglec-E via a trans interaction, in the setting of acute brain injury, consolidates the role of polysialic acid ligands expressed on neuropilin-2 and e selectin ligand 1 as the main agonistic activator of Siglec -E which is negative feedback regulator of microglial activation preventing unbridled inflammatory responses. [87] (Figure 5)

3.5.2. PSA- nanoparticle promising AMD therapeutic

If this nanoparticle can mimics PSA -neuropilin 2 or PSA-e-selectin ligand 1 and can repolarize activated M1 microglia/macrophages to the M2c healing state this will decrease M1 and increase M2c. This repolarization has the potential to restore homeostatic healing microglial/macrophage function. In the setting of macular degeneration, this homeostatic restoration could theoretically cease cellular loss, normalize the parainflammatory environment, clear toxic substances such as auto fluorescent lipofuscin, rescue pre-apoptotic photoreceptors/RPE cells and restore efficient visual pigment regeneration. Potentially a treatment such as this could halt geographic atrophy growth, reduce lipofuscin mediated autofluorescence at the edge of the GA lesion, and recover visual function.(Figure 5)

4. Conclusion

Currently a poly sialic acid nanoparticle has entered human clinical trials for the treatment of geographic atrophy secondary to age related macular degeneration.[88] The PLGA nanoparticle core will be resistant to degradation and should demonstrate prolonged half-life in the vitreous.[89] The individual constituents of the nanoparticle are all biodegradable and have been proven safe for intravitreal injections.
This nanoparticle therapeutic is a novel technology that targets microglia and macrophage cells to repolarize their active state to the resolution healing state in a physiologic manner. This is a paradigm shift in terms of targeting macrophages and microglia by agonizing their main sialic acid binding checkpoint receptors (SIGLECS). If this therapeutic is proven to be effective in age related macular degeneration it will open the door for the development of other sialic acid presenting nanoparticle to treat diseases of acute, chronic inflammation such as arthritis, colitis, Lupus, Alzheimer’s, multiple sclerosis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, liver fibrosis and other inflammatory pathologies.

Supplementary Materials

None

Author Contributions

Conceptualization MJT,AJT,AK,MAG; methodology, X.X.; software, X.X.; validation, X.X., Y.Y. and Z.Z.; formal analysis, X.X.; investigation, X.X.; resources, X.X.; data curation, X.X.; writing—original draft preparation, MJT; writing—review and editing MJT MJT,AJT,AK,MAG; visualization, MJT,AJT; supervision, MJT,AJT,AK,MAG; project administration, MJT,AJT,AK; funding acquisition, MAG. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Aviceda Therapeutics and Tolentino Eye Research Foundation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable

Acknowledgments

Figures created with BioRender.com

Conflicts of Interest

The authors are full time (AK, MAG) or part time (MJT, AJT) employees of Aviceda Therapeutics the funder of this paper.

References

  1. Rein, D.B.; Wittenborn, J.S.; Burke-Conte, Z.; Gulia, R.; Robalik, T.; Ehrlich, J.R.; Lundeen, E.A.; Flaxman, A.D. Prevalence of Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the US in 2019. JAMA Ophthalmol 2022, 140, 1202–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. 2021 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 2021, 17, 327–406. [CrossRef]
  3. Global Burden of Disease Cancer, C.; Kocarnik, J.M.; Compton, K.; Dean, F.E.; Fu, W.; Gaw, B.L.; Harvey, J.D.; Henrikson, H.J.; Lu, D.; Pennini, A.; et al. Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life Years for 29 Cancer Groups From 2010 to 2019: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. JAMA Oncol 2022, 8, 420–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wong, W.L.; Su, X.; Li, X.; Cheung, C.M.; Klein, R.; Cheng, C.Y.; Wong, T.Y. Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2014, 2, e106–e116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Blindness, G.B.D.; Vision Impairment, C.; Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease, S. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob Health 2021, 9, e144–e160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Keenan, T.D.L.; Cukras, C.A.; Chew, E.Y. Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Epidemiology and Clinical Aspects. Adv Exp Med Biol 2021, 1256, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Murray, I.J.; Rodrigo-Diaz, E.; Kelly, J.M.F.; Aslam, T.M.; Tahir, H.J.; Carden, D.; Patryas, L.; Parry, N.R.A. The role of dark adaptation in understanding early AMD. Prog Retin Eye Res 2022, 88, 101015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tolentino, M.J.; Miller, S.; Gaudio, A.R.; Sandberg, M.A. Visual field deficits in early age-related macular degeneration. Vision Res 1994, 34, 409–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Remulla, J.F.; Gaudio, A.R.; Miller, S.; Sandberg, M.A. Foveal electroretinograms and choroidal perfusion characteristics in fellow eyes of patients with unilateral neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol 1995, 79, 558–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sandberg, M.A.; Gaudio, A.R. Slow photostress recovery and disease severity in age-related macular degeneration. Retina 1995, 15, 407–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Owsley, C.; Huisingh, C.; Clark, M.E.; Jackson, G.R.; McGwin, G., Jr. Comparison of Visual Function in Older Eyes in the Earliest Stages of Age-related Macular Degeneration to Those in Normal Macular Health. Curr Eye Res 2016, 41, 266–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Owsley, C.; McGwin, G., Jr.; Clark, M.E.; Jackson, G.R.; Callahan, M.A.; Kline, L.B.; Witherspoon, C.D.; Curcio, C.A. Delayed Rod-Mediated Dark Adaptation Is a Functional Biomarker for Incident Early Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Ophthalmology 2016, 123, 344–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Panorgias, A.; Zawadzki, R.J.; Capps, A.G.; Hunter, A.A.; Morse, L.S.; Werner, J.S. Multimodal assessment of microscopic morphology and retinal function in patients with geographic atrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013, 54, 4372–4384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Galuszka, M.; Pojda-Wilczek, D.; Karska-Basta, I. Age-Related Macular or Retinal Degeneration? Medicina (Kaunas) 2023, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Medzhitov, R. Origin and physiological roles of inflammation. Nature 2008, 454, 428–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Goto, M. Inflammaging (inflammation + aging): A driving force for human aging based on an evolutionarily antagonistic pleiotropy theory? Biosci Trends 2008, 2, 218–230. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ho, J.; Witkin, A.J.; Liu, J.; Chen, Y.; Fujimoto, J.G.; Schuman, J.S.; Duker, J.S. Documentation of intraretinal retinal pigment epithelium migration via high-speed ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2011, 118, 687–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fritsche, L.G.; Fariss, R.N.; Stambolian, D.; Abecasis, G.R.; Curcio, C.A.; Swaroop, A. Age-related macular degeneration: genetics and biology coming together. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2014, 15, 151–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Seddon, J.M.; Rosner, B. Validated Prediction Models for Macular Degeneration Progression and Predictors of Visual Acuity Loss Identify High-Risk Individuals. Am J Ophthalmol 2019, 198, 223–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Emilsson, V.; Gudmundsson, E.F.; Jonmundsson, T.; Jonsson, B.G.; Twarog, M.; Gudmundsdottir, V.; Li, Z.; Finkel, N.; Poor, S.; Liu, X.; et al. A proteogenomic signature of age-related macular degeneration in blood. Nat Commun 2022, 13, 3401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Río Hortega, P. Noticia de un nuevo y fácil método para la coloración.
  22. de la neuroglia y el tejido conjuntivo. Trab. Lab. Invest. Biol. 1918, 15, 367–378.
  23. Ransohoff, R.M.; El Khoury, J. Microglia in Health and Disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2015, 8, a020560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hickman, S.; Izzy, S.; Sen, P.; Morsett, L.; El Khoury, J. Microglia in neurodegeneration. Nat Neurosci 2018, 21, 1359–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hickman, S.E.; Kingery, N.D.; Ohsumi, T.K.; Borowsky, M.L.; Wang, L.C.; Means, T.K.; El Khoury, J. The microglial sensome revealed by direct RNA sequencing. Nat Neurosci 2013, 16, 1896–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Vasek, M.J.; Garber, C.; Dorsey, D.; Durrant, D.M.; Bollman, B.; Soung, A.; Yu, J.; Perez-Torres, C.; Frouin, A.; Wilton, D.K.; et al. A complement-microglial axis drives synapse loss during virus-induced memory impairment. Nature 2016, 534, 538–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lui, H.; Zhang, J.; Makinson, S.R.; Cahill, M.K.; Kelley, K.W.; Huang, H.Y.; Shang, Y.; Oldham, M.C.; Martens, L.H.; Gao, F.; et al. Progranulin Deficiency Promotes Circuit-Specific Synaptic Pruning by Microglia via Complement Activation. Cell 2016, 165, 921–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhan, Y.; Paolicelli, R.C.; Sforazzini, F.; Weinhard, L.; Bolasco, G.; Pagani, F.; Vyssotski, A.L.; Bifone, A.; Gozzi, A.; Ragozzino, D.; et al. Deficient neuron-microglia signaling results in impaired functional brain connectivity and social behavior. Nat Neurosci 2014, 17, 400–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fuhrmann, M.; Bittner, T.; Jung, C.K.; Burgold, S.; Page, R.M.; Mitteregger, G.; Haass, C.; LaFerla, F.M.; Kretzschmar, H.; Herms, J. Microglial Cx3cr1 knockout prevents neuron loss in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Nat Neurosci 2010, 13, 411–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Krasemann, S.; Madore, C.; Cialic, R.; Baufeld, C.; Calcagno, N.; El Fatimy, R.; Beckers, L.; O'Loughlin, E.; Xu, Y.; Fanek, Z.; et al. The TREM2-APOE Pathway Drives the Transcriptional Phenotype of Dysfunctional Microglia in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Immunity 2017, 47, 566–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Healy, L.M.; Perron, G.; Won, S.Y.; Michell-Robinson, M.A.; Rezk, A.; Ludwin, S.K.; Moore, C.S.; Hall, J.A.; Bar-Or, A.; Antel, J.P. MerTK Is a Functional Regulator of Myelin Phagocytosis by Human Myeloid Cells. J Immunol 2016, 196, 3375–3384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liddelow, S.A.; Guttenplan, K.A.; Clarke, L.E.; Bennett, F.C.; Bohlen, C.J.; Schirmer, L.; Bennett, M.L.; Munch, A.E.; Chung, W.S.; Peterson, T.C.; et al. Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia. Nature 2017, 541, 481–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fourgeaud, L.; Traves, P.G.; Tufail, Y.; Leal-Bailey, H.; Lew, E.D.; Burrola, P.G.; Callaway, P.; Zagorska, A.; Rothlin, C.V.; Nimmerjahn, A.; et al. TAM receptors regulate multiple features of microglial physiology. Nature 2016, 532, 240–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hickman, S.E.; Allison, E.K.; El Khoury, J. Microglial dysfunction and defective beta-amyloid clearance pathways in aging Alzheimer's disease mice. J Neurosci 2008, 28, 8354–8360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. El Khoury, J.B.; Moore, K.J.; Means, T.K.; Leung, J.; Terada, K.; Toft, M.; Freeman, M.W.; Luster, A.D. CD36 mediates the innate host response to beta-amyloid. J Exp Med 2003, 197, 1657–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. El Khoury, J.; Toft, M.; Hickman, S.E.; Means, T.K.; Terada, K.; Geula, C.; Luster, A.D. Ccr2 deficiency impairs microglial accumulation and accelerates progression of Alzheimer-like disease. Nat Med 2007, 13, 432–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Langmann, T. Microglia activation in retinal degeneration. J Leukoc Biol 2007, 81, 1345–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Damani, M.R.; Zhao, L.; Fontainhas, A.M.; Amaral, J.; Fariss, R.N.; Wong, W.T. Age-related alterations in the dynamic behavior of microglia. Aging Cell 2011, 10, 263–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Nimmerjahn, A.; Kirchhoff, F.; Helmchen, F. Resting microglial cells are highly dynamic surveillants of brain parenchyma in vivo. Science 2005, 308, 1314–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Coscas, G.; De Benedetto, U.; Coscas, F.; Li Calzi, C.I.; Vismara, S.; Roudot-Thoraval, F.; Bandello, F.; Souied, E. Hyperreflective dots: a new spectral-domain optical coherence tomography entity for follow-up and prognosis in exudative age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmologica 2013, 229, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Vujosevic, S.; Bini, S.; Midena, G.; Berton, M.; Pilotto, E.; Midena, E. Hyperreflective intraretinal spots in diabetics without and with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy: an in vivo study using spectral domain OCT. J Diabetes Res 2013, 2013, 491835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Killingsworth, M.C.; Sarks, J.P.; Sarks, S.H. Macrophages related to Bruch's membrane in age-related macular degeneration. Eye (Lond) 1990, 4 ( Pt 4) Pt 4, 613–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Penfold, P.L.; Killingsworth, M.C.; Sarks, S.H. Senile macular degeneration: the involvement of immunocompetent cells. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1985, 223, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Cherepanoff, S.; McMenamin, P.; Gillies, M.C.; Kettle, E.; Sarks, S.H. Bruch's membrane and choroidal macrophages in early and advanced age-related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol 2010, 94, 918–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, M.; Xu, G.; Liu, W.; Ni, Y.; Zhou, W. Role of fractalkine/CX3CR1 interaction in light-induced photoreceptor degeneration through regulating retinal microglial activation and migration. PLoS One 2012, 7, e35446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bonilha, V.L.; Bell, B.A.; Hu, J.; Milliner, C.; Pauer, G.J.; Hagstrom, S.A.; Radu, R.A.; Hollyfield, J.G. Geographic Atrophy: Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy, Histology, and Inflammation in the Region of Expanding Lesions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2020, 61, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mettu, P.S.; Allingham, M.J.; Cousins, S.W. Incomplete response to Anti-VEGF therapy in neovascular AMD: Exploring disease mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Prog Retin Eye Res 2021, 82, 100906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Marneros, A.G. Role of inflammasome activation in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. FEBS J 2023, 290, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dieckmann, B.W.; Paguaga, M.E.; McCollum, G.W.; Penn, J.S.; Uddin, I. Role of NLRP3 inflammasomes in monocyte and microglial recruitments in choroidal neovascularization. Res Sq 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yang, Y.; Liu, F.; Tang, M.; Yuan, M.; Hu, A.; Zhan, Z.; Li, Z.; Li, J.; Ding, X.; Lu, L. Macrophage polarization in experimental and clinical choroidal neovascularization. Sci Rep 2016, 6, 30933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cruz-Pimentel, M.; Wu, L. Complement Inhibitors for Advanced Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration (Geographic Atrophy): Some Light at the End of the Tunnel? J Clin Med 2023, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Penfold, P.L.; Killingsworth, M.C.; Sarks, S.H. Senile macular degeneration. The involvement of giant cells in atrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1986, 27, 364–371. [Google Scholar]
  53. Sarks, S.H. Ageing and degeneration in the macular region: a clinico-pathological study. Br J Ophthalmol 1976, 60, 324–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sarks, S.H. Drusen patterns predisposing to geographic atrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium. Aust J Ophthalmol 1982, 10, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Karlen, S.J.; Miller, E.B.; Wang, X.; Levine, E.S.; Zawadzki, R.J.; Burns, M.E. Monocyte infiltration rather than microglia proliferation dominates the early immune response to rapid photoreceptor degeneration. J Neuroinflammation 2018, 15, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Klaus, C.; Liao, H.; Allendorf, D.H.; Brown, G.C.; Neumann, H. Sialylation acts as a checkpoint for innate immune responses in the central nervous system. Glia 2021, 69, 1619–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Miralles de Imperial-Ollero, J.A.; Gallego-Ortega, A.; Ortin-Martinez, A.; Villegas-Perez, M.P.; Valiente-Soriano, F.J.; Vidal-Sanz, M. Animal Models of LED-Induced Phototoxicity. Short- and Long-Term In Vivo and Ex Vivo Retinal Alterations. Life (Basel) 2021, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Suzuki, M.; Tsujikawa, M.; Itabe, H.; Du, Z.J.; Xie, P.; Matsumura, N.; Fu, X.; Zhang, R.; Sonoda, K.H.; Egashira, K.; et al. Chronic photo-oxidative stress and subsequent MCP-1 activation as causative factors for age-related macular degeneration. J Cell Sci 2012, 125, 2407–2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Roche, S.L.; Wyse-Jackson, A.C.; Ruiz-Lopez, A.M.; Byrne, A.M.; Cotter, T.G. Fractalkine-CX3CR1 signaling is critical for progesterone-mediated neuroprotection in the retina. Sci Rep 2017, 7, 43067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tolentino, M.J.; Tolentino, A.J. Investigational drugs in clinical trials for macular degeneration. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2022, 31, 1067–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Paolicelli, R.C.; Sierra, A.; Stevens, B.; Tremblay, M.E.; Aguzzi, A.; Ajami, B.; Amit, I.; Audinat, E.; Bechmann, I.; Bennett, M.; et al. Microglia states and nomenclature: A field at its crossroads. Neuron 2022, 110, 3458–3483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wang, Y.; Xiong, X.; Wang, K.; Bao, Y.; Zhang, T.; Ainiwaer, D.; Wang, G.; Li, H.; Sun, Z. Peripheral Klotho protects the kidney and brain by regulating M2a/M2c macrophage polarization in d-gal-treated aged mice. Tissue Cell 2023, 82, 102049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Sapudom, J.; Karaman, S.; Mohamed, W.K.E.; Garcia-Sabate, A.; Quartey, B.C.; Teo, J.C.M. 3D in vitro M2 macrophage model to mimic modulation of tissue repair. NPJ Regen Med 2021, 6, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kigerl, K.A.; Gensel, J.C.; Ankeny, D.P.; Alexander, J.K.; Donnelly, D.J.; Popovich, P.G. Identification of two distinct macrophage subsets with divergent effects causing either neurotoxicity or regeneration in the injured mouse spinal cord. J Neurosci 2009, 29, 13435–13444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Goerdt, S.; Politz, O.; Schledzewski, K.; Birk, R.; Gratchev, A.; Guillot, P.; Hakiy, N.; Klemke, C.D.; Dippel, E.; Kodelja, V.; et al. Alternative versus classical activation of macrophages. Pathobiology 1999, 67, 222–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Kisucka, A.; Bimbova, K.; Bacova, M.; Galik, J.; Lukacova, N. Activation of Neuroprotective Microglia and Astrocytes at the Lesion Site and in the Adjacent Segments Is Crucial for Spontaneous Locomotor Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury. Cells 2021, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Colonna, M.; Butovsky, O. Microglia Function in the Central Nervous System During Health and Neurodegeneration. Annu Rev Immunol 2017, 35, 441–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Cao, X.; Shen, D.; Patel, M.M.; Tuo, J.; Johnson, T.M.; Olsen, T.W.; Chan, C.C. Macrophage polarization in the maculae of age-related macular degeneration: a pilot study. Pathol Int 2011, 61, 528–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ferrante, C.J.; Pinhal-Enfield, G.; Elson, G.; Cronstein, B.N.; Hasko, G.; Outram, S.; Leibovich, S.J. The adenosine-dependent angiogenic switch of macrophages to an M2-like phenotype is independent of interleukin-4 receptor alpha (IL-4Ralpha) signaling. Inflammation 2013, 36, 921–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Alves, I.; Fernandes, A.; Santos-Pereira, B.; Azevedo, C.M.; Pinho, S.S. Glycans as a key factor in self and nonself discrimination: impact on the breach of immune tolerance. FEBS Lett 2022, 596, 1485–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bearelly, S.; Khanifar, A.A.; Lederer, D.E.; Lee, J.J.; Ghodasra, J.H.; Stinnett, S.S.; Cousins, S.W. Use of fundus autofluorescence images to predict geographic atrophy progression. Retina 2011, 31, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Su, N.; Hansen, U.; Plagemann, T.; Gaher, K.; Leclaire, M.D.; Konig, J.; Hohn, A.; Grune, T.; Uhlig, C.E.; Eter, N.; et al. Sub-Retinal Injection of Human Lipofuscin in the Mouse - A Model of "Dry" Age-Related Macular Degeneration? Aging Dis 2023, 14, 184–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Chen, M.; Xu, H. Parainflammation, chronic inflammation, and age-related macular degeneration. J Leukoc Biol 2015, 98, 713–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Bull, C.; Stoel, M.A.; den Brok, M.H.; Adema, G.J. Sialic acids sweeten a tumor's life. Cancer Res 2014, 74, 3199–3204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Pietrobono, S.; Stecca, B. Aberrant Sialylation in Cancer: Biomarker and Potential Target for Therapeutic Intervention? Cancers (Basel) 2021, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Rodriguez, E.; Boelaars, K.; Brown, K.; Eveline Li, R.J.; Kruijssen, L.; Bruijns, S.C.M.; van Ee, T.; Schetters, S.T.T.; Crommentuijn, M.H.W.; van der Horst, J.C.; et al. Sialic acids in pancreatic cancer cells drive tumour-associated macrophage differentiation via the Siglec receptors Siglec-7 and Siglec-9. Nat Commun 2021, 12, 1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Pilling, D.; Gomer, R.H. The Development of Serum Amyloid P as a Possible Therapeutic. Front Immunol 2018, 9, 2328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Cox, N.; Pilling, D.; Gomer, R.H. DC-SIGN activation mediates the differential effects of SAP and CRP on the innate immune system and inhibits fibrosis in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015, 112, 8385–8390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Karlstetter, M.; Kopatz, J.; Aslanidis, A.; Shahraz, A.; Caramoy, A.; Linnartz-Gerlach, B.; Lin, Y.; Luckoff, A.; Fauser, S.; Duker, K.; et al. Polysialic acid blocks mononuclear phagocyte reactivity, inhibits complement activation, and protects from vascular damage in the retina. EMBO Mol Med 2017, 9, 154–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Liao, H.; Winkler, J.; Wissfeld, J.; Shahraz, A.; Klaus, C.; Neumann, H. Low molecular weight polysialic acid prevents lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory dopaminergic neurodegeneration in humanized SIGLEC11 transgenic mice. Glia 2021, 69, 2845–2862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Schroder, L.J.; Thiesler, H.; Gretenkort, L.; Mollenkamp, T.M.; Stangel, M.; Gudi, V.; Hildebrandt, H. Polysialic acid promotes remyelination in cerebellar slice cultures by Siglec-E-dependent modulation of microglia polarization. Front Cell Neurosci 2023, 17, 1207540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Varbanov, H.; Jia, S.; Kochlamazashvili, G.; Bhattacharya, S.; Buabeid, M.A.; El Tabbal, M.; Hayani, H.; Stoyanov, S.; Sun, W.; Thiesler, H.; et al. Rescue of synaptic and cognitive functions in polysialic acid-deficient mice and dementia models by short polysialic acid fragments. Neurobiol Dis 2023, 180, 106079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Gonzalez-Gil, A.; Schnaar, R.L. Siglec Ligands. Cells 2021, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Immordino, M.L.; Dosio, F.; Cattel, L. Stealth liposomes: review of the basic science, rationale, and clinical applications, existing and potential. Int J Nanomedicine 2006, 1, 297–315. [Google Scholar]
  85. Jayant, S.; Khandare, J.J.; Wang, Y.; Singh, A.P.; Vorsa, N.; Minko, T. Targeted sialic acid-doxorubicin prodrugs for intracellular delivery and cancer treatment. Pharm Res 2007, 24, 2120–2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Spence, S.; Greene, M.K.; Fay, F.; Hams, E.; Saunders, S.P.; Hamid, U.; Fitzgerald, M.; Beck, J.; Bains, B.K.; Smyth, P.; et al. Targeting Siglecs with a sialic acid-decorated nanoparticle abrogates inflammation. Sci Transl Med 2015, 7, 303ra140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Werneburg, S.; Buettner, F.F.; Erben, L.; Mathews, M.; Neumann, H.; Muhlenhoff, M.; Hildebrandt, H. Polysialylation and lipopolysaccharide-induced shedding of E-selectin ligand-1 and neuropilin-2 by microglia and THP-1 macrophages. Glia 2016, 64, 1314–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Thiesler, H.; Beimdiek, J.; Hildebrandt, H. Polysialic acid and Siglec-E orchestrate negative feedback regulation of microglia activation. Cell Mol Life Sci 2021, 78, 1637–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Aviceda Therapeutics, I. A Multiple Dose Study of AVD-104 for Geographic Atrophy (GA) Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) (SIGLEC). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05839041.
  90. Giordano, G.G.; Chevez-Barrios, P.; Refojo, M.F.; Garcia, C.A. Biodegradation and tissue reaction to intravitreous biodegradable poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic)acid microspheres. Curr Eye Res 1995, 14, 761–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Early/Intermediate Stage AMD. Constant photooxidative blue light release produces oxidative byproducts (MDA, CEP) and reactive oxygen species, which activate microglial cells to secrete cytokines. These activated macrophages are hindered from becoming phagocytic due to the upregulation ST6 that produces sTN on the surface of retinal cells and agonizes Siglecs to control phagocytosis. Reactive oxygen species also causes photoreceptors to secrete CX3CL1 which promotes migration of microglia and macrophages to the retina. Oxidized phospholipids stimulate RPE cells to produce MCP—1 which recruits peripheral blood monocytes along with upregulation of FUT5 on PBMCs that localize it to areas that are secreting chemokines such as CX3CL1.
Figure 1. Early/Intermediate Stage AMD. Constant photooxidative blue light release produces oxidative byproducts (MDA, CEP) and reactive oxygen species, which activate microglial cells to secrete cytokines. These activated macrophages are hindered from becoming phagocytic due to the upregulation ST6 that produces sTN on the surface of retinal cells and agonizes Siglecs to control phagocytosis. Reactive oxygen species also causes photoreceptors to secrete CX3CL1 which promotes migration of microglia and macrophages to the retina. Oxidized phospholipids stimulate RPE cells to produce MCP—1 which recruits peripheral blood monocytes along with upregulation of FUT5 on PBMCs that localize it to areas that are secreting chemokines such as CX3CL1.
Preprints 87853 g001
Figure 2. Geographic Atrophy: Oxidative byproducts (CEP, MDA) and complement chronically activate microglia which secrete neuraminidase and desialylate photoreceptors and RPE cells. This loss of sialylation prevents restoration of homeostasis. Chronically overactivated phagocytosis and inflammation recruits peripheral blood macrophages by upregulation of the fucosyltransferase FUT5 that produces Lewis X glycosylation on monocytes to bind E-selectin and localize monocytes to sites of inflammation. These monocytes polarize to M1 macrophages when they enter the retina and are not able to clear substances like lipofuscin and other undegradeable substances. The macrophages form multinucleated giants cells because they phagocytose structures that are undegradable. Since there is reduced sialic acid and altered sialic acid on the chronically inflamed retina, the macrophages are unchecked and result in elimination first of the RPE cells than the photoreceptors. The unchecked macrophages are the main determinant of growth of geographic atrophy.
Figure 2. Geographic Atrophy: Oxidative byproducts (CEP, MDA) and complement chronically activate microglia which secrete neuraminidase and desialylate photoreceptors and RPE cells. This loss of sialylation prevents restoration of homeostasis. Chronically overactivated phagocytosis and inflammation recruits peripheral blood macrophages by upregulation of the fucosyltransferase FUT5 that produces Lewis X glycosylation on monocytes to bind E-selectin and localize monocytes to sites of inflammation. These monocytes polarize to M1 macrophages when they enter the retina and are not able to clear substances like lipofuscin and other undegradeable substances. The macrophages form multinucleated giants cells because they phagocytose structures that are undegradable. Since there is reduced sialic acid and altered sialic acid on the chronically inflamed retina, the macrophages are unchecked and result in elimination first of the RPE cells than the photoreceptors. The unchecked macrophages are the main determinant of growth of geographic atrophy.
Preprints 87853 g002
Figure 3. Microglial Regulation: Microglia remove toxic metabolites, apoptotic cells and oxidative debris while maintaining the health of photoreceptors and retinal cells in a process called para inflammation. Parainflammation is initated through activation receptors such as TLR, TREM2, CX3CR1, NLRP3 and CD36 which sense and bind these substances. Once activated they secrete proinflammatory cytokines and migrate to the areas of stressed RPE cells and photoreceptors. Upon activation, neuropilin-2-PSA and E-selectin ligand 1-PSA are secreted by these activated microglia. The PSA on these glycoproteins binds Siglec’s on activated microglial cells to polarize them to the M2C healing state which releases, growth factors to protect and regenerate the stressed photoreceptors and RPE cells. This homeostatic maintenance function of microglial para inflammation if not adequately modulated with sialic acid checkpoint regulation will result in recruitment of peripheral blood monocytes and AMD disease progression.
Figure 3. Microglial Regulation: Microglia remove toxic metabolites, apoptotic cells and oxidative debris while maintaining the health of photoreceptors and retinal cells in a process called para inflammation. Parainflammation is initated through activation receptors such as TLR, TREM2, CX3CR1, NLRP3 and CD36 which sense and bind these substances. Once activated they secrete proinflammatory cytokines and migrate to the areas of stressed RPE cells and photoreceptors. Upon activation, neuropilin-2-PSA and E-selectin ligand 1-PSA are secreted by these activated microglia. The PSA on these glycoproteins binds Siglec’s on activated microglial cells to polarize them to the M2C healing state which releases, growth factors to protect and regenerate the stressed photoreceptors and RPE cells. This homeostatic maintenance function of microglial para inflammation if not adequately modulated with sialic acid checkpoint regulation will result in recruitment of peripheral blood monocytes and AMD disease progression.
Preprints 87853 g003
Figure 4. Macrophage polarization determines AMD phenotype. The plasticity and different polarization states correlate with the clinical picture seen in late-stage macular degeneration. IN geographic atrophy RPE cells and photoreceptors are phagocytosed a function of the M1 polarized phagocytic macrophage. Exudative AMD is neovascularization produced by overexpression of VEGF the main cytokine of the M2D polarization state. The sequelae of exudative AMD untreated with anti-VEGF therapies is a disciform fibrotic scar in the control of pro-fibrotic M2 A, B state. With appropriate sialic acid signaling such as PSA, all polarization states can transform into the healing M2C state.
Figure 4. Macrophage polarization determines AMD phenotype. The plasticity and different polarization states correlate with the clinical picture seen in late-stage macular degeneration. IN geographic atrophy RPE cells and photoreceptors are phagocytosed a function of the M1 polarized phagocytic macrophage. Exudative AMD is neovascularization produced by overexpression of VEGF the main cytokine of the M2D polarization state. The sequelae of exudative AMD untreated with anti-VEGF therapies is a disciform fibrotic scar in the control of pro-fibrotic M2 A, B state. With appropriate sialic acid signaling such as PSA, all polarization states can transform into the healing M2C state.
Preprints 87853 g004
Figure 5. PSA-NP can restore retinal health PSA-NP can multivalently bind Siglecs on polarized macrophages and microglia which will transform them into the M2 C healing state. This M2 C healing macrophage/microglia will reduce activated macrophages, secrete neuroprotective and healing factors such as BDNF and GDNF. This in turn will rescue photoreceptors, RPE cells and restore the homeostatic parainflammatory function of microglia and potentially can halt GA progression and improve visual function and vision.
Figure 5. PSA-NP can restore retinal health PSA-NP can multivalently bind Siglecs on polarized macrophages and microglia which will transform them into the M2 C healing state. This M2 C healing macrophage/microglia will reduce activated macrophages, secrete neuroprotective and healing factors such as BDNF and GDNF. This in turn will rescue photoreceptors, RPE cells and restore the homeostatic parainflammatory function of microglia and potentially can halt GA progression and improve visual function and vision.
Preprints 87853 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated