Preprint Review Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

COVID-19 Vaccines for Optimizing Immunity in the Upper Respiratory Tract

Version 1 : Received: 10 October 2023 / Approved: 11 October 2023 / Online: 11 October 2023 (10:52:38 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Ramasamy, R. COVID-19 Vaccines for Optimizing Immunity in the Upper Respiratory Tract. Viruses 2023, 15, 2203. Ramasamy, R. COVID-19 Vaccines for Optimizing Immunity in the Upper Respiratory Tract. Viruses 2023, 15, 2203.

Abstract

Rapid development and deployment of vaccines greatly reduced mortality and morbidity during the COVID-19 pandemic. The most widely used COVID-19 vaccines approved by national regulatory authorities require intramuscular administration. SARS-CoV-2 initially infects the upper respiratory tract where the infection can be eliminated with little or no symptoms by an effective immune response. Failure to eliminate SARS-CoV-2 in the upper respiratory tract results in lower respiratory tract infections that can lead to severe disease and death. Presently used intramuscularly administered COVID-19 vaccines are effective in reducing severe disease and mortality but are not entirely able to prevent asymptomatic and mild infections as well as person to person transmission of the virus. Individual and population differences also influence susceptibility to infection and the propensity to develop severe disease. This article provides a perspective on the nature and the mode of delivery COVID-19 vaccines that can optimize protective immunity in the upper respiratory tract to reduce infections and virus transmission as well as severe disease.

Keywords

adaptive immunity to COVID-19; clinical vaccine trials; COVID-19; COVID-19 vaccines; innate immunity to COVID-19; mucosal vaccines; nasal vaccines; SARS-CoV-2; upper respiratory tract immunity; vaccine safety

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Immunology and Microbiology

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 13 October 2023
Commenter:
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Comment: Nice article – well-structured and informative. The author did not touch unresolved topics to avoid long review process and get the article published sooner than later. But this turns the article into a cake without the icing. I would encourage author to add at least one of the following scientific challenges to the article:
- mucosal immunity in the URT is primarily mechanistic/physical barrier – nasal hairs, mucus produced by goblet cells, ciliary beating of motile cilia, etc. and only a secondary – immunologic barrier, for maintenance of bodily integrity. This makes any inoculation strategies irrelevant because role of immunological barrier plays a non-essential role in maintaining of bodily integrity against external pathogens, when anti-septic nasal or oral sprays (hypertonic saline, hydrogen peroxide, povidone iodine, nitric oxide, etc.) are more potent agents than any vaccine no matter what vaccination strategy is used (prime and spike, prime and pull, for instance) or what adjuvants are added;
- olfactory mucosa is distinct immunological department from systemic immunity separated by blood-endothelial barrier, which restricts monomeric Abs reaching mucosa of the URT. Even those Abs from the circulation that reach the mucosa of the URT have short half-live and poor neutralising capacity in comparison to polymeric secretory IgA produced by tissue resident B cells there;
- best mucosal immunity is in those having an innate immunity in good shape. It is not adaptive immunity that constitutes effective immunity in the URT. Therefore, vaccines that induce high titter of poly-specific Abs, non-antigen specific effector cells and otherwise trains innate immunity are more potent for inducing effective immune response in the URT (e.g. BCG, BPZE1 vaccines). Why would anyone then spend efforts in vain for development and administering parenteral antigen-specific vaccine against airborne respiratory pathogen?
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.