2.2.1. The Pedagogical Contract
Hatzidemou[
8] reported that the role of the teacher has many dimensions such as coordinating, encouraging, and supporting. However, the teacher must have sufficient communication skills in an appropriate manner that gains the interest of the students. For this reason, teacher’s development of skills and the personal characteristics are very important. In a classroom, the teacher, in addition to his teaching work, must be able to offer help to individuals or groups in order to improve their personality, develop the ability solving problems, make decisions about their personal and educational/professional life, change attitudes and behaviors, supporting students to discover their positive characteristics.
However, there are many times when the education environment in a class is not the ideal for someone to learn. Based onBrousseau[
26] bothparties (the teacher and the student), has the responsibility of managing how to learn. This system of mutual obligations is like a contract.
FurthermoreMamoulidou [
26] presented that the pedagogical contract is the result of a voluntary transaction between those involved in the learning process (teacher and the students). The purpose of any type of pedagogical contract is to achieve a specific goal, undertaking the commitment to observe the mutual obligations agreed upon by them.In order to achieve results, the two sides need to negotiate, to discuss and contrast their views, to express their expectations and desires, to assess their capabilities, to adapt to each other's needs and the requirements of the other, and finally to co-decide on the process, the content, the means, the evaluation, and the final object of the pedagogical contract.
The pedagogical contract reflects the mutual intention between teacher and student to solve a problem, settle a backlog, implement a collective or personal project, acquire a specific skill, etc. Among them is inserted knowledge, the acquisition of which is the purpose of the contract. Therefore, the pedagogical contract regulates everything related to the provision of knowledge to students, but also the environment that is established between the members of the group-class, the rules of life, the roles and positions of each party in the educational process. Because the pedagogical contract is depended knowledge gained from students, and also of the relationship with the teacher, it proposes specific practices for its acquisition, adapted to student’s particularities, without, neglecting the imperatives of the pedagogical program [
28].
Regarding duration of the pedagogical contract can vary and it can last from ten minutes, two hours" or "a week or three months" depending on the age of the student and the nature of the promise [
29]. For this reason, the implementation of the pedagogical contract cannot be a requirement of the teacher, but presupposes its common acceptance by the students, given the need to overcome the difficulties encountered by some or the regulation of the rules of life for others.
To ensure the successful implementation of the pedagogical contract, certain conditions must be met. The teacher must adopt the contract in the classroom, which means that all agreed-upon actions will guarantee the student's access to knowledge or the intended skill. With this condition, the teacher can determine how to help the student, defining a favorable work context. In addition, the teacher believes in the student's abilities for autonomous acquisition of knowledge by supporting actions. The implementation of the pedagogical contract also implies a relationship of reciprocity. However, from the various roles within the class, an asymmetry emerges [
30].The terms of the pedagogical contracts are under constant negotiation between teachers and students. In order to be effective, any change in the pedagogical contract should be recognized at least by the teachers, in order to allow new arrangements and reorganization of the teaching procedures. The negotiation of the terms of pedagogical contracts is also limited by external factors such as the curricula, educational circumstances, the school reality and its components, social expectations etc. These restrictions exert different types of influences on teachers and students.
In the traditional pedagogical contract, teachers present the issues, identify the solution process, which is usually either individual or led by the teacher, and validate the solutions. Often teachers simply ask for collaboration from the students. Students try to solve the problems by making individual efforts and/or being guided by the teachers. They activate only a small part of their abilities, relate information to what they already know and recognize its usefulness to the issue.
However, instead of the application of the 'traditional pedagogical contract' the application of a new more 'open', pedagogical contract in which the position of the learner is indeed that of someone who learns by taking initiatives, satisfying personal interests, interacting, adapting information to his/her needs and questioning the knowledge of the teacher. However, Meirieu[
31] in his study reported that in a pedagogical contract "partners are never truly equal".
Another study also highlighted that for the preparation of schoolwork, the most characteristic form of individualization of schoolwork is that of the Dalton system or plan, which took the form of individual pedagogical contracts between the teacher and the student[
27]. The students are responsible for the contract and have the freedom to work as they likes (under certain conditions)[
32]. With this agreement, the teacher, "is no longer forced to teach face-to-face teaching children of all ages, but can devote much more time to each child individually or to groups of children" [
33]. According to Tsiandis[
34] Helen Parkhourst, sought to make the student autonomous and active. In this way he “developed the activity corners in the schoolroom-laboratory, introduced the method of written instructions and work contracts and made learning possible, according to the student's individual needs. However, this specific method has been recognized by various researchers who have focused on the fact that this particular way of working in the classroom is of interest to only some students and whether these assignments really have a meaning for them. For critics of the particular Dalton method, the "acceptance contract" is not "motivational, except for the already trained students who want the school" [
35]. This means that pedagogical contract excludes students who do not maintain such good relations with the educational institution (school) and that the proposed individualization is not a sufficient condition for their successful studies. It has been said by Dewey[
36] that the position of the teacher as the "leader of group activities", allows him to work with the logic of the plan, which is understood in terms of reciprocity and exchange. The process of acquiring knowledge is collective, but his/her suggestions can be a starting point for the implementation of a work plan.
Regarding the application of the pedagogical contract in Freinet pedagogy, according to Burguière [
37] the pedagogical contract is a series of tools that allow the regulation of the production of work at school, seeking the autonomy of the student, since the form of work proposed by him it is personalized, meets his learning needs and takes into account the conditions under which the work takes place.The plans of work which he established in the various classes are in reality contracts between teacher and students, entered into in cooperation, in order that the latter may become ‘free’ within certain limits, which he has previously appreciated and accepted. Within these limits of the framework, he/she can proceed at his/her own learning rhythm and measure the progress of his/her work [
38]. Additionally, Filloux, [
39] reported that the pedagogical contract regulates the relations between two contracting parties who hold different positions in the learning process.
Application of the pedagogical contract concerning teacher and student respectively, is presented as follows: "I am here to teach you something" and "we are here to learn something", clarifying at the same time that "the presence of one it is validated by the presence of the other'.