Submitted:
25 September 2023
Posted:
26 September 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Description of Problem
3. Finite Element Analysis
3.1. Numerical Modelling
3.2. Soil Parameters
3.3. Input Earthquakes
3.4. Mesh analysis
3.5. Numerical Verification of the Experiment
4. Parametric Studies
4.1. Effect of Clay Liner Thickness
4.2. Effect of Groundwater Level
4.3. Effect of Pile Stiffness
4.4. Effect of Earthquake Magnitude
5. Conclusions
- The results obtained from the centrifuge experiment by Garala et al. (2022) were confirmed with numerical analysis results obtained using the finite element program in this study.
- In the kinematic interaction analyses, with the increase in the weak soil layer thickness in layered soil conditions, although there was no significant increase in the displacement values at first, significant increases were observed in the pile cap displacement at the depth where the clay layer thickness reached approximately 75% of the total pile length. No significant increase in displacements was observed as the clay layer thickness reached larger values. This is due to the fact that the pile behaves more flexible under kinematic conditions, as the amount of sockets to the dense sand decreases.
- In the analyses where the effect of the groundwater level is investigated, considering the stratified situation, it is seen that the displacement increases with the increase in the depth of the groundwater level, and there is no significant change in displacement after the water level reaches -6 m. This situation is caused by the groundwater level approaching the underlying sand layer, and the effect of the groundwater level remaining in the sand on deformation decreases.
- In the only clay soil, it has been observed that as the groundwater level increases, the deformation first decreases, and then the deformation increases. The decrease in the groundwater level causes the upper layer to behave more rigidly and the deformation to decrease up to a certain level. As the water level decreases below the bottom elevation of the pile, the pile behaves flexible, and its deformation increases.
- In the analyses examining the effect of pile stiffness, it was observed that deformation decreased as the elasticity modulus increased in the layered case, and there was no change in deformation after the elasticity modulus reached the 70 GPa value used in the experiments. If the soil is only clay, it is seen that the deformation increases with the increase of the elasticity modulus and there is no change in deformation after reaching the value of 70 GPa. In this case, it is understood that the elasticity modulus is effective as it approaches the soil elasticity modulus, and the effect decreases after a certain stiffness.
- In the analysis examining the earthquake magnitude effect, it is seen that displacement and moments increase linearly with the increase of earthquake acceleration. The results obtained show that the earthquake magnitude is the most important parameter affecting the results.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Mizuno, H. Pile damage during earthquakes in Japan. Dynamic response of pile foundations 1987, 53–78. [Google Scholar]
- Gazetas, G. , Tazoh, T., Shimizu, K., Fan, K. Seismic response of the pile foundation of Ohba-Ohashi bridge. 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Kaynia, A.M. Dynamic stiffness and seismic response of pile groups. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of technology, 1982. [Google Scholar]
- Fan, K.; Gazetas, G.; Kaynia, A.; Kausel, E.; Ahmad, S. Kinematic seismic response of single piles and pile groups. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 1991, 117, 1860–1879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kavvads, M.; Gazetas, G. Kinematic seismic response and bending of free-head piles in layered soil. Geotechnique 1993, 43, 207–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haigh, S.K. Effects of earthquake-induced liquefaction on pile foundations in sloping ground. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Brandenberg, S.J.; Boulanger, R.W.; Kutter, B.L.; Chang, D. Behavior of pile foundations in laterally spreading ground during centrifuge tests. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 2005, 131, 1378–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castelli, F.; Maugeri, M.; Mylonakis, G. Numerical analysis of kinematic soil—pile interaction. In AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Conference Proceedings; American Institute of Physics, 2008; 1020, pp. 618–625. [Google Scholar]
- Madabhushi, G.; Haigh, S.; Knappett, J. Design of pile foundations in liquefiable soils. 2009, World Scientific.
- Haskell, J.J.M. Guidance for the design of pile groups in laterally spreading soil. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Luo, X.; Li, S.; Xu, H. Results of real-time kinematic positioning based on real GPS L5 data. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 2016, 13, 1193–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mallick, M.; Mandal, K.K.; Sahu, R.B. Effects of axial loading on dynamic response of laterally loaded single piles in liquefiable layered soil of Kolkata city considering nonlinearity of soil. SN Applied Sciences 2022, 4, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garala, T.K.; Madabhushi, G.S.; Di Laora, R. Experimental investigation of kinematic pile bending in layered soils using dynamic centrifuge modelling. Géotechnique 2022, 72, 146–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lau, B.H. Cyclic behaviour of monopile foundations for offshore wind turbines in clay 2015. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.
- ASTM D854; Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, 2014.
- ASTM D4254; Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, 2016.
- ASTM D4253; Standard test methods for maximum index density and unit weight of soils using a vibratory table. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, 2016.
- ASTM D6913; Standard test methods for particle-size distribution (gradation) of soils using sieve analysis. ASTM International: ASTM International, 2017.
- ASTM D7181; Standard method for consolidated drained triaxial compression test for soils. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, 2011.
- Hardin, B.O.; Drnevich, V.P. Shear modulus and damping in soils: design equations and curves. Journal of the Soil mechanics and Foundations Division 1972, 98, 667–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Snyder, J.L. Full scale test lateral load tests of a 3x5 pile group in soft clays and silts. M.Sc. Thesis, 2004, Brigham Young University.
















| Property | Standard | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Specific gravity, Gs | ASTM D854 (2014) | 2.65 |
| Maximum void ratio, emax | ASTM D4254 (2016) | 0.767 |
| Minimum void ratio, emin | ASTM D4253 (2016) | 0.49 |
| Effective particle size, D10 (mm) | ASTM D6913 (2017) | 0.68 |
| Average particle size, D50 (mm) | ASTM D6913 (2017) | 0.80 |
| Coefficient of uniformity, Cu | ASTM D6913 (2017) | 1.221 |
| Coefficient of curvature, Cc | ASTM D6913 (2017) | 0.97 |
| Relative density, Dr (%) | ASTM D4254 (2016) | 85 |
| Peak friction angle, ϕp (˚) | ASTM D7181 (2011) | 37.2 |
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Plastic limit, PL (%) | 30 |
| Liquid limit, LL (%) | 63 |
| Plasticity index, PI (%) | 33 |
| Specific gravity, Gs | 2.60 |
| Slope of critical state line (CSL) in q-pꞌ plane | 0.90 |
| Slope of an unload-reload line, (κ) | 0.039 |
| Intercept of CSL at pꞌ=1 kPa (Γ) | 3.31 |
| Slope of normal consolidation line (λ) | 0.22 |
| Parameter | Unit | Pile cap | Pile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Material type | - | Elastic | Elastic |
| EA1 | kN/m | 9.90E+05 | 9.30E+06 |
| EA2 | kN/m | 9.90E+05 | 9.930E+06 |
| EI | kN/m2/m | 7425 | 3.439E+05 |
| d | m | 0.3 | 0.6661 |
| w | kN/m/m | 3.5 | 2.8 |
| ν | - | 0.37 | 0.3 |
| Rayleigh α | - | 0.2827 | 0.2827 |
| Rayleigh β | - | 2.39E-03 | 2.39E-03 |
| Parameters | Unit | Speswhite Kaolin Clay | Leighton Buzzard Sand | LE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Material type | - | HS Small | HS Small | Linear Elastic |
| Drainage type | - | Undrained | Drained | Drained |
| γunsat, Unsaturated unit weight | kN/m3 | 16.2 | 18.4 | 24.00 |
| γsat, Saturated unit weight | kN/m3 | 16.4 | 20.36 | 24.00 |
| einit, initial void ratio | - | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| Rayleigh α | - | 0.09425 | 0.09425 | 0.00 |
| Rayleigh, β | - | 7.958E-04 | 7.96E-04 | 0.00 |
| ν', Poisson’s ratio (lineer elastic) | - | - | - | 0.20 |
| G’, Shear modulus | kN/m2 | - | - | 1.04E+07 |
| E’, Elasticity modulus | kN/m2 | - | - | 2.50E+07 |
| Vs, S wave velocity | m/s | - | - | 2063.00 |
| Vp, P wave velocity | m/s | - | - | 3370.00 |
| E50ref, Secant stiffness | kN/m2 | 1500 | 5.10E+04 | |
| Eoedref, Tangent stiffness | kN/m2 | 750 | 5.10E+04 | |
| Eurref, Unloading/reloading stiffness | kN/m2 | 8000 | 1.5E+05 | |
| m, Rate of stress-dependency | - | 0.8 | 0.4344 | |
| c', cohesion | kN/m2 | 1 | 0.00 | |
| Ø, Internal friction angle | ° | 21 | 37.20 | |
| Ψ, dilatation angle | ° | 0 | 8.625 | |
| γ0.7, Shear strain at 0.7G0 | - | 2.00E-04 | 1.15E-04 | |
| G0ref, small strain stiffness | kN/m2 | 1.398E+04 | 1.178E+05 | |
| ν'ur, Poisson’s ratio | - | 0.20 | 0.20 | |
| Pref, Reference stress | kN/m2 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |
| K0nc, Stress ratio | - | 0.64 | 0.3954 | |
| Rf, Failure ratio | - | 0.90 | 0.90 | |
| OCR, Overconsolidation ratio | - | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Rinter, interface factor | - | 0.50 | 0.70 |
| Mesh Type | Number of Element | Pile Cap Displacement (m) |
|---|---|---|
| Coarse | 882 | 0.021 |
| Medium | 1093 | 0.022 |
| Fine | 1687 | 0.018 |
| Very Fine | 2207 | 0.018 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).