Submitted:
18 September 2023
Posted:
20 September 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Test program
3. Test results
3.1. Effects of conditioning period on LCF performance
3.2. Effects of CSH diameter on LCF behaviour
3.3. Effects of the location of CSH on LCF behaviour
3.4. Effects of on LCF behaviour
4. Finite element modelling(FEM)
4.1. Parametric study
5. Conclusions and recommendations
5.1. Future work
Acknowledgements
Declaration of competing interest
References
- Vatandoost, F. (2010). Fatigue behaviour of steel girders strengthened with prestressed CFRP strips (Master’s thesis, University of Waterloo).
- Božić, Ž. , Mlikota, M., & Schmauder, S. (2011). Application of the ΔK, ΔJ and ΔCTOD parameters in fatigue crack growth modelling. Tehnički vjesnik, 18(3), 459-466.
- Committee on Fatigue and Fracture Reliability of the Committee on Structural Safety and Reliability of the Structural Division, American Society of Civil Engineers. (1982). Fatigue reliability: Development of criteria for design. Journal of the Structural Division, 108(1), 71-88.
- Arcovio, S. D. (2013). Fatigue performance of a hybrid CFRP/steel splice detail for modular bridge expansion joints. Queen’s University (Canada).
- Fish, P. , Schroeder, C., Connor, R. J., & Sauser, P. (2015). Fatigue and Fracture Library for the Inspection, Evaluation, and Repair of Vehicular Steel Bridges.
- Ishikawa, T., Matsumoto, R., Hattori, A., KAWANO, H., & YAMADA, K. (2013). Reduction of stress concentration at edge of stop hole by closing crack surface. Journal of the Society of Materials Science, Japan, 62(1), 33-38.
- Dexter, R. J. , & Ocel, J. M. (2013). Manual for repair and retrofit of fatigue cracks in steel bridges (No. FHWA-IF-13-020). United States. Federal Highway Administration.
- Sveinsdóttir, S. L. (2012). Experimental research on strengthening of concrete beams by the use of epoxy adhesive and cement-based bonding material (Doctoral dissertation).
- Ghafoori, E. , & Motavalli, M. (2016). A retrofit theory to prevent fatigue crack initiation in aging riveted bridges using carbon fiber-reinforced polymer materials. Polymers, 8(8), 308.
- “Inernational, A. S. T. M. (2007). Standard test methods for flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics and electrical insulating materials. ASTM D790-07.
- “ASTM D7774-12, Standard Test Method for Flexural Fatigue Properties of Plastics,” D20.10.24, Ed. West Conshohocken, PA ASTM Int., 2013.
- Chandrathilaka, E. R. K. , Gamage, J. C. P. H., & Fawzia, S. (2019). Mechanical characterization of CFRP/steel bond cured and tested at elevated temperature. Composite Structures, 207, 471-477.
- Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Mechanical-properties-of-the-CFRP-sheet-MBrace-CF-130-based-on-the-fibre-properties_tbl2_43511771 (accessed on 27 September 2022).
- Available online: https://5.imimg.com/data5/SELLER/Doc/2021/7/FV/NX/RH/130557397/araldite-ft-420-ab-en.pdf (accessed on 27 September 2022).
- Matweb.com. 2022. MatWeb - The Online Materials Information Resource. Available online: https://www.matweb.com/search/datasheet.aspx?bassnum=MS0001&ckck=1 (accessed on 27 September 2022).
- Coffin Jr, L. F. (1954). A study of the effects of cyclic thermal stresses on a ductile metal. Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical engineers, 76(6), 931-949.
- Silva, M. A. L. , Dedigamuwa, K. V., & Gamage, J. C. P. H. (2021). Performance of severely damaged reinforced concrete flat slab-column connections strengthened with Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer. Composite Structures, 255, 112963.
- Systèmes, D. (2013). ABAQUS 6.13 analysis user’s guide. Dassault Systèmes.
- Kabir, M. H., Fawzia, S., Chan, T. H. T., Gamage, J. C., & Bai, J. B. (2016). Experimental and numerical investigation of the behaviour of CFRP strengthened CHS beams subjected to bending. Engineering Structures, 113, 160-173.

| Series Geometry Composite action Conditioning type Samples |
| S1 Steel plates with and without a CSH non strengthened Up to 10,000 cycles with step of 2000 cycle 24 |
| S2 Steel plates with and without a CSH strengthened 24 |
| S3 Steel plates with a CSH with varying diameter of the CSH strengthened / non-strengthened Non conditioned(control samples) 24 |
| S4 Steel plates with a CSH with varying diameter of the CSH strengthened /non-strengthened 10,000 cycles 36 |
| S5 Steel plates with a CSH with change in position。 non strengthened 10,000 cycles 15 |
| S6 Steel plates with a CSH with change in position strengthened 10,000 cycles 15 |
| S7 Steel plates with and without a CSH with varying CFRP bond length strengthened 10,000 cycles 24 |


















| Series Geometry Composite action Conditioning type Samples |
| S1 Steel plates with and without a CSH non strengthened Up to 10,000 cycles with step of 2000 cycle 24 |
| S2 Steel plates with and without a CSH strengthened 24 |
| S3 Steel plates with a CSH with varying diameter of the CSH strengthened / non-strengthened Non conditioned (control samples) 24 |
| S4 Steel plates with a CSH with varying diameter of the CSH strengthened /non-strengthened 10,000 cycles 36 |
| S5 Steel plates with a CSH with change in position non strengthened 10,000 cycles 15 |
| S6 Steel plates with a CSH with change in position strengthened 10,000 cycles 15 |
| S7 Steel plates with and without a CSH with varying CFRP bond length strengthened 10,000 cycles 24 |
| Material property Measured data Manufacturers provided data |
| Steel Epoxy adhesive CFRP Steel Epoxy adhesive CFRP |
| Average tensile strength (MPa) 583 25 1575 350 29 550 |
| Average elastic modulus (GPa) 200 0.579 175 200 1.85 240 |
| Category | Parameter | Range of Operation |
|---|---|---|
| Geometry | Diameter to width ratio (d/b) |
≤ 0.2 |
| Thickness to diameter ratio (t/b) |
≤ 0.5 |
|
| Diameter to crack length ratio (d/l) |
≥ 0.4 |
|
| Diameter to offset distance ratio (d/x) |
≤ 0.2 |
|
| Load | Ratio of diameter to stress ratio (d/R) |
≥ 80 |
| Diameter to frequency ratio (d/f) |
≥ 3 |
|
| Diameter to load ratio (d/F) |
≥ 3 |
|
| CFRP | Diameter to bond length ratio (d/L) |
≤ 0.1 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).







