Submitted:
18 September 2023
Posted:
19 September 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Material and Methods
3. Results and Discussion
Characteristics of Mangrove Forests
4. Conclusions
References
- Alongi, D.M. Mangrove forests: Resilience, protection from tsunamis, and responses to global climate change. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 2008, 76, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alongi, D.M. Carbon cycling and storage in mangrove forests. Annual Review of Marine Science 2014, 6, 195–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Balke, T.; Bouma, T.J.; Horstman, E.M.; Webb, E.L.; Erftemeijer, P.L.; Herman, P.M. Windows of opportunity: Thresholds to mangrove seedling establishment on tidal flats. Marine Ecology Progress Series 2011, 440, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barbier, E.B. The protective service of mangrove ecosystems: A review of valuation methods. Marine pollution bulletin 2016, 109, 676–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Besset, M.; Gratiot, N.; Anthony, E.J.; Bouchette, F.; Goichot, M.; Marchesiello, P. Mangroves and shoreline erosion in the Mekong River delta, Viet Nam. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 2019, 226, 106263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, S.; Vincent, J.R.; Abdesselam, S. The economic value of mangroves for fisheries: A global synthesis. Marine Policy 2015, 47, 44–50. [Google Scholar]
- Duke, N.; Wilson, N.; Mackenzie, J.; Nguyen, H.H.; Puller, D. 2010 Assessment of Mangrove Forests, shoreline condition and feasibility for REDD in Kien Giang Province, Vietnam. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ)1-128.
- El-Nahry, A.H.; Doluschitz, R. Climate change and its impacts on the coastal zone of the Nile Delta, Egypt. Environmental earth sciences 2010, 59, 1497–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GIZ, 2008 Mangroves in Kien Giang Bioshere Reserve, Vietnam. Agriculture Publishing House.
- GIZ, 2012 Rehabilitation of coastal areas and mangroves with fences of Melaleuca poles. Practical experimence in Kien Giang. Agriculture publisher Houser.
- GIZ Kien Giang, 2012 Restore mangrove forests in coastal areas of Vietnam.
- Kathiresan, K.; Bingham, B.L. 2001 Biology of mangroves and mangrove ecosystems.
- Kien Giang Protection Forest Management Board, 2020 Mangrove situation report.
- Le, X.T.; Hoang, T.B.; Vo, Q.T.; Wright, D.P.; Tanim, A.H.; Duong, T.A. Evaluation of coastal protection strategies and proposing multiple lines of defense under climate change in the Mekong Delta for sustainable shoreline protection. Ocean & Coastal Management 2022, 228, 106301. [Google Scholar]
- Lovelock, C.E.; Cahoon, D.R.; Friess, D.A.; Guntenspergen, G.R.; Krauss, K.W.; Reef, R.; Rogers, K.; Saunders, M.L.; Sidik, F.; Swales, A. The vulnerability of Indo-Pacific mangrove forests to sea-level rise. Nature 2015, 526, 559–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sarker, S.; Masud-Ul-Alam, M.; Hossain, M.S.; Rahman Chowdhury, S.; Sharifuzzaman, S. A review of bioturbation and sediment organic geochemistry in mangroves. Geological Journal 2021, 56, 2439–2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schoonees, T.; Gijón Mancheño, A.; Scheres, B.; Bouma, T.; Silva, R.; Schlurmann, T.; Schüttrumpf, H. Hard structures for coastal protection, towards greener designs. Estuaries and Coasts 2019, 42, 1709–1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, D.T. Some types of marine position resources in Vietnam. Journal of Marine Science and Technology 2007, 7, 80–93. [Google Scholar]
- West Ca Mau Marine Protected Forest Management Board, 2020 Report on situation of mangroves in the West Sea 2020.
- Whitehead, S.; Caporn, S.; Press, M. Effects of elevated CO2, nitrogen and phosphorus on the growth and photosynthesis of two upland perennials: Calluna vulgaris and Pteridium aquilinum. New Phytologist 1997, 135, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| No. | Nam of place | Nc/100m2 | Hvn (m) | D1,3m (cm) | Dt (m) | St (m2)/ | St (m2)/cell | Rd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | Ha Tien | 72.4 | 4.01 | 4.88 | 1.76 | 2.54 | 176 | 148 |
| II | Kien Luong | 43.5 | 6.21 | 8.53 | 2.95 | 7.49 | 107.43 | 94.64 |
| Statistical characteristics of Ha Tien, Kien Luong area | Nmax = 105, Nmin = 16, N average = 51; Htmax = 8.77, Hvnmin = 3.67, Ht average = 5.63; D1,3max = 13.26, D1,3max = 4.17, D1.3 averagebq = 7.57; Dtmax = 4.62, Dtmin = 1.35, Dt average = 2.64 | |||||||
| Level N | Level H | Level D1,3 | Level Dc | Gt/tree | Level Gt/plot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 105.0 – 87.2 | 8.77- 7.75 | 13.26 – 11.442 | 4.620 – 3.966 | 16.76 – 13.694 | 241 – 206.2 |
| 87.2 - 69.4 | 7.75- 6.73 | 11.442 – 9.624 | 3.966 – 3.312 | 13.694-10.628 | 206.2 – 171.4 |
| 69.4 - 51.6 | 6.73 - 5.71 | 9.624 – 7.806 | 3.312 – 2.658 | 10.628-7.652 | 171.4 – 136.6 |
| 51.6 - 33.8 | 5.71 - 4.69 | 7.806 – 5.988 | 2.658 – 2.004 | 7.652-4.496 | 136.6 – 101.8 |
| 33.8 - 16.0 | 4.9 – 3.67 | 5.988 – 4.17 | 2.004 – 1.35 | 4.496-1.43 | 101.8 - 67 |
| No. | Name of place | Nc/100m2 | Ht (m) | D1,3m (cm) | Dc (m) | Sc/tree (m2) | Sc (m2)/plot | Rd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| III | Hon Dat | 37.04 | 7.12 | 9.51 | 3.59 | 10.70 | 326.62 | 32.63 |
| Typical statistical indicators in Hon Dat and Kien Luong area | Nmax = 93, Nmin = 11, Nbq = 37; Htmax = 9.04, Htmin = 5.54, Ht average = 7.12; D1.3max = 17.9, D1.3min = 5.76, D1.3 average = 9.51; Dcmax = 5.56, Dcmin = 1.63, Dc average = 3.59 | |||||||
| Level N | Level H | Level D1.3 | Level Dc | Gc/tree | Level Gc/ plot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 93-76.6 | 9.04-8.488 | 17.9-15.472 | 5.56-4.774 | 24.28-19.842 | 557-475 |
| 76.6-60.2 | 8.488-7.963 | 15.472-13.004 | 4.774-3.988 | 19.842-15.404 | 475-339 |
| 60.2-43.8 | 7.963-7.411 | 13.004-10.616 | 3.988-3.202 | 15.404-10.966 | 339-311 |
| 43.8-27.4 | 7.411-6.859 | 10.616-8.188 | 3.202-2.416 | 10.966-6.528 | 311-229 |
| 27.4-11 | 6.859-5.4 | 8.188-5.76 | 2.416-1.63 | 6.528-2.09 | 229-147 |
| No. | Name of place | Nc/100m2 | Ht | D1,3m | Dc | Sc/tree (m2) | Sc (m2)/plot | Rd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IV | An Bien | 25.81 | 8.83 | 10.45 | 2.90 | 7.04 | 175.81 | 36.54 |
| Statistical parameters of An Bien, Kien Luong area | Nmax = 46, Nmin = 12, N average= 26; Htmax = 13.35, Htmin = 4.8, Ht average = 8.83; D1.3max = 21.09, D1.3min = 4.93, D1.3 average = 10.46; Dcmax = 4.4, Dcmin = 1.78, Dc average = 2.90 | |||||||
| Level N | Level H | Level D1.3 | Level Dc | Gc/tree | Level Gc/plot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46-39.2 | 13.5-11.746 | 21.09-17.858 | 4.45-3.85 | 15.55-12.77 | 363-299.4 |
| 39.2-32.4 | 11.746-9.992 | 17.858-14.626 | 3.85-3.25 | 12.77-9.99 | 299.4-235.8 |
| 32.4-25.6 | 9.992-8.238 | 14.626-11.394 | 3.25-2.65 | 9.99-7.21 | 235.8-172.2 |
| 25.6-18.8 | 8.238-6.484 | 11.394-8.126 | 2.65-.,05 | 7.21-4.43 | 172.2-108.6 |
| 18.8-12 | 6.484-4.73 | 8.126-4.93 | 2.05-1.45 | 4.43-1.65 | 108.6-45 |
| No. | Name of place | Nc/100m2 | Ht | D1.3m | Dt | Sc/tree (m2) | Sc (m2)/plot | Rd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | An Minh | 24.07 | 5.70 | 9.86 | 2.56 | 5.50 | 112.93 | 33.1 |
| VI | U Minh Ca Mau | 31.67 | 4.40 | 8.22 | 1.88 | 2.77 | 88.33 | 36.67 |
| The typical statistical indicators of forests in An Minh Kien Giang, U Minh Ca Mau | Nmax= 41, Nmin= 11, Nbq= 25; Htmax= 7.64, Htmin= 4.06, Ht average = 5.47; D1.3max = 14.91, D1.3min = 5.73, D1.3 average = 9.57; Dcmax = 4.49, Dcmin = 1.65, Dc average = 2.43. | |||||||
| Level | Level H | Level D1.3 | Level Dc | Level Gc/tree | Level Gc/plot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41-35 | 7.64-6.924 | 14.91-13.047 | 4.49-3.922 | 15.83-13.902 | 222-190.8 |
| 35-29 | 6.924-6.208 | 13.047-11.238 | 3.922-3.354 | 13.902-10.354 | 190.8-159.6 |
| 29-23 | 6.208-5.492 | 11.238-9.402 | 3.354-2.786 | 10.354-7.616 | 159.6-128.4 |
| 23-17 | 5.492-4.776 | 9.402-7.566 | 2.786-2.218 | 7.616-4.78 | 128.-97.2 |
| 17-11 | 4.776-4.06 | 7.566-5.73 | 2.218-1.65 | 4.878-2.14 | 97.2-66 |
| Level N | Level H | Level D1.3 | Level Dc | Gc/tree | Level Gc/plot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 105 – 86.2 | 13.51-11.542 | 21.09-17.706 | 5,56-4,718 | 24,28-19,71 | 557-454,6 |
| 86.2 - 67.4 | 11.542-9.574 | 17.706-14.322 | 4,718-3,876 | 19,71-15,14 | 454,6-352,2 |
| 67.4 – 48.6 | 9.574-7.606 | 14.322-10.938 | 3,876-3,034 | 15,14-10,57 | 352,2-249,8 |
| 48.6 – 29.8 | 7.606-5.38 | 10.938-7.554 | 3,034-2,192 | 10,57-6 | 249,8-147,4 |
| 29.8-11 | 5.638-3.67 | 7.554-4.17 | 2,192-1,35 | 6-1,43 | 147,4-45 |
| R =18.8 Min=11 Max=105 N average= 34 |
R =1.968 min = 3.67 max = 13.5 H average= 6.98 |
R=3.384 Min=4.17 Max=21.09 D1,3 averagebq=9.38 |
R=0.842 Min = 1.35 Max = 5.56 Dt average= 2.94 |
R= 4.57 Min = 1.43 Max = 24.28 Gt average= 7.47 |
R= 102.4 Min = 45 Max =557 Gt average/plot= 193.48 |
| Level N | Level H | Level D1,3 | Level Dc | Gc/tree | Gc/plot | Rd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95.6 | 12.526 | 19.398 | 5.139 | 21.995 | 505.8 | 271.5 |
| 76.8 | 10.558 | 16.077 | 3.757 | 17.425 | 403.4 | 214.8 |
| 58 | 8.59 | 12.63 | 3.445 | 12.855 | 301 | 157.5 |
| 39.2 | 6.622 | 9.246 | 2.613 | 8.285 | 198.6 | 100.5 |
| 20.4 | 4.654 | 5.862 | 1.771 | 3.715 | 96.2 | 43.5 |
| Level N | Level H | Level D1.3 | Level Dc | Gc/tree | Level Gc/plot | Level Rd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.79 |
| 0.61 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.58 |
| 0.41 | 0.53 | 0.48 | 0.44 | 0.37 | 0.39 | 0.37 |
| 0.21 | 0.37 | 0.30 | 0.25 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.16 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).