Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Research on Durability and Prestress Loss of Lightweight Aggregate Concrete Prestressed Box Girders

Version 1 : Received: 1 September 2023 / Approved: 1 September 2023 / Online: 4 September 2023 (03:59:13 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Chen, H.-J.; Kuo, C.-C.; Tang, C.-W. Evaluation of the Superiority of Lightweight-Aggregate-Concrete Prestressed Box Girders in Terms of Durability and Prestress Loss. Materials 2023, 16, 6360. Chen, H.-J.; Kuo, C.-C.; Tang, C.-W. Evaluation of the Superiority of Lightweight-Aggregate-Concrete Prestressed Box Girders in Terms of Durability and Prestress Loss. Materials 2023, 16, 6360.

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the differences in durability and prestress loss between normal-weight concrete (NC) and lightweight aggregate concrete (LWC) prestressed box girders, which were constructed at the same time in the same area, so as to verify the superiority of using synthetic lightweight aggregate (LWA) made from reservoir sediments in prestressed bridges. For the NCs and LWCs used in prestressed box girders, the basic mechanical properties were tested on the one hand, and the durability properties were tested on the other hand. Then, through the prestress monitoring system, the prestress loss of the two groups of the prestressed box girders was tracked. The results of the durability test confirmed that LWC can inhibit the penetration of air, water, and chloride ions by strengthening the interfacial transition zone between the aggregate and the cement paste, thereby improving its durability. Moreover, the magnetic flux prestress loss of the NC prestressed box girder reached 8.1%. In contrast, the magnetic flux prestress losses on both sides of the LWC prestressed box girder were 4.6% and 4.9%, respectively. This verified that, under the same environmental conditions, the use of LWC produced less of a prestress loss than the use of NC.

Keywords

lightweight aggregate concrete; durability; prestress loss; prestressed box girder; creep; shrinkage; chloride ion

Subject

Engineering, Civil Engineering

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.