Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Techno-economic Assessment of the Viability of Commercial Solar PV System in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria

Version 1 : Received: 25 August 2023 / Approved: 25 August 2023 / Online: 28 August 2023 (09:22:30 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Ijeoma, M.W.; Chen, H.; Carbajales-Dale, M.; Yakubu, R.O. Techno-Economic Assessment of the Viability of Commercial Solar PV System in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria. Energies 2023, 16, 6803. Ijeoma, M.W.; Chen, H.; Carbajales-Dale, M.; Yakubu, R.O. Techno-Economic Assessment of the Viability of Commercial Solar PV System in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria. Energies 2023, 16, 6803.

Abstract

Supermarkets in Port Harcourt (PH) city, Nigeria, predominantly rely on diesel electricity generation due to grid instability, leading to high cost of electricity prices. Although solar photovoltaic (PV) systems have been proposed as an alternative, these supermarkets have yet to adopt them, mainly due to high investment costs and a lack of awareness of the long-term financial and environmental benefits. This paper examines the technical and economic practicality of a PV system for these supermarkets using the PVsyst software and a spreadsheet model. Solar resources showed that PH has a daily average solar radiation and temperature of 4.21 kWh/m2/day and 25.73℃, respectively. Market Square, the supermarket with the highest peak power demand of 59.8 kW, and a 561 kWh/day load profile, was chosen as a case study. A proposed PV system with a power capacity of 232 kW, battery storage capacity of 34,021 Ah, a charge controller size of 100 A/560V, and an inverter with a power rating of 60V/75 kW has been designed to meet the load demand. The economic analysis showed a $266,936 life cycle cost, $0.12 per kWh levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), 4-year simple payback time, and a 20.5% internal rate of return (IRR). The PV system is feasible due to its positive net present value (NPV) of $165,322 and carbon savings of 582 tCO2/year.

Keywords

PV design; solar energy; feasibility analysis; life cycle cost; levelized cost of electricity; net present value; simple payback time; internal rate of return; economic assessment; environmental assessment.

Subject

Engineering, Energy and Fuel Technology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.