Preprint Article Version 2 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Sustainability in Project Management: PM² versus PRiSMTM

Version 1 : Received: 24 August 2023 / Approved: 25 August 2023 / Online: 25 August 2023 (07:28:59 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 22 October 2023 / Approved: 23 October 2023 / Online: 23 October 2023 (10:01:17 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Marques, P.; Sousa, P.; Tereso, A. Sustainability in Project Management: PM2 versus PRiSMTM. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15917. Marques, P.; Sousa, P.; Tereso, A. Sustainability in Project Management: PM2 versus PRiSMTM. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15917.

Abstract

This paper makes a theoretical contribution by exploring the integration of sustainability principles into project management. It compares two recent methodologies, PM² and PRiSMTM, and provides a practical contribution by advocating for the adoption of these sustainability-driven practices among practitioners. Sustainability remains relatively unknown in the realm of project management, and this research aims to bridge that gap. The study follows an interpretivist philosophy and employs a combination of interviews and archival data analysis. PM², created by the European Commission, provides a project management methodology free to organizations and includes best practices from other bodies of knowledge. However, it doesn't include sustainability, because it aims to be generic. PRiSMTM, based on the P5™, aims to make the project management process more sustainable. PRiSMTM has P5 Impact Analysis and Sustainability Management Plan as the main differentiating deliverables and is an extension of the Triple Bottom Line, also including product and process. The PM² Alliance CEO believes that PM² aims to be generic, so a focus on sustainability would remove the methodology's "elasticity". However, users wishing to use PM² and consider sustainability can include it in the additional objectives and use PRiSMTM differentiating deliverables.

Keywords

P5™; PM²; PRiSMTM; Project Management; Sustainability

Subject

Business, Economics and Management, Business and Management

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 23 October 2023
Commenter: Paulo Sousa
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: According to MPI reviewers suggestions and remarks, the authors made the following changes to the article:

- Manuscript title to better match the paper content;
- Abstract - some changes to better and faster understanding of paper content
- Strongness of the Theoretical background to better connection relationship with the results analysis
- Re-Structure of discussion section
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.