Submitted:
23 August 2023
Posted:
24 August 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Antigen
2.2. Samples preparation
2.3. Immunoassays procedures
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
References
- Akita, E.M. & Nakai, S. 1993. Comparison of four purification methods for the production of immunoglobulins from eggs laid by hens immunized with an enterotoxigenic E. coli strain. J. Immunol. Methods. 160:207-214. [CrossRef]
- Amro et al. Production and purification f IgY antibodies from chicken egg yolk. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, 2018, v. 16, p 99-103. [CrossRef]
- Avery, G. Biotin interference in immunoassay: a review for the laboratory scientist. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry 2019, Vol. 56(4) 424–430 doi: 10.1177/0004563219842231 journals.sagepub.com/home/acb. [CrossRef]
- Awake P, Angadi K, Sen S, Bhadange P. Prozone phenomenon in secondary syphilis with HIV co-infection: Two cases. Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS. 2022 Jul-Dec; 43(2):183-185. [CrossRef]
- Balieiro, G.N. et al. Effects of IgY antibodies on Streptococcus equinus strain JB1 as an antibiotic alternative for improving feedlot performance, ruminal fermentation patterns, and ciliate protozoa counts. Proceedings, Western Section, American Society of Animal Science, vol 68, 2017, p,285-293. [CrossRef]
- Blanch, M. et al. Physiological changes in rumen fermentation during acidosis induction and its control using a multivalent polyclonal antibody preparation in heifers. Journal of Animal Science, v.87, p.1722-1730, 2009. [CrossRef]
- 7. Kabiri, P.; Weiskirchen, R.; Van Helden, J. The biotin interference within interference suppressed immunoassays. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis.2021, 35, e23940. [CrossRef]
- Kowalczyk, K., Daiss, J., Halpern, J. and Roth, T.F. (1985). Quantitation of maternal-fetal IgG transport in the chicken. Immunology. 54, 755-762.
- Larsson, A. and Sjoquist, J. (1990), Chicken IgY: Utilizing the evolutionary difference. Comp. Immune. Microbiology Infect. Dis. 13, 199-201. [CrossRef]
- Lee, W. et al. Insights into the chicken IgY with emphasis on the generation and applications of chicken recombinant monoclonal antibodies. Journal of Immunological Methods, 2017, v. 447, p. 71–85. [CrossRef]
- Li, X. et al. Chicken egg yolk antibodies (IgY) as non-antibiotic production enhancers for use in swine production: A review. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 2015, v. 6, n. 1, p. 1–10. [CrossRef]
- Lipman NS, Jackson LR, Trudel LJ, Weis-Garcia F. Monoclonal versus polyclonal antibodies: distinguishing characteristics, applications, and information resources. ILAR J. 2005;46(3):258-68. [CrossRef]
- Liu, D.; Gebreab, Y.B.; Hu, J.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, N.; Tong, H.; Chen, B.; Wang, X. Development and Evaluation of an Anti-Biotin Interference Method in BiotinStreptavidin Immunoassays. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 1729. [CrossRef]
- Liu, D.; Tong, H.; Chen, B.; Zhang, N.; Hu, J.; Wang, X.Q. Research Progress of Exogenous Biotin Interference on Chemiluminescence Immunoassay Based on Biotin-Avidin System. J. Mod. Lab. Med. 2021, 36, 161–164.
- Losch, U., Schranner, I., Wanke, R, and Jurgens, L. (1986). The chicken egg and antibody source. J. Vet. Med. B 33, 609-619. [CrossRef]
- Meslar, H. W., Camper, S. A. and White, H. B. III (1978) J. Biol. Chem. 253, 6979-6982. Pharmacotherapy, 2017, v. 95, p. 1734–1742.
- Mrosewski, I.; Urbank, M.; Stauch, T.; Switkowski, R. Interference from High-Dose Biotin Intake in Immunoassays for Potentially Time-Critical Analytes by Roche. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2020, 144, 1108–1117.
- Ostrowska, M.; Bartoszewicz, Z.; Bednarczuk, T.; Walczak, K.; Zgliczy ´nski, W.; Glinicki, P. The Effect of Biotin Interference on the Results of Blood Hormone Assays. Endokrynol. Pol. 2019, 70, 102–121.
- Pacheco, R.D.L. et al. Effects of feeding a multivalent polyclonal antibody preparation on feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, rumenitis, and blood gas profi le in Bos indicus biotype yearling bulls. Journal of Animal Science, v.90, p.1898- 1909, 2012. [CrossRef]
- Pennington JAT. Bowes and Church’s Food Values of Portions Commonly Used 14th Edition. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; Pennsylvania: 1989. [Google Scholar] (citado por Staggs, C.J. et al, 2004). J Food Compost Anal. 2004 Dec; 17(6): 767–776. [CrossRef]
- Rodrigues, E. et al. Performance, carcass characteristics and gain cost of feedlot cattle fed a high level of concentrate and different feed additives. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v.42, n.1, p.61-69, 2013. [CrossRef]
- Samarasinghe, S.; Meah, F.; Singh, V.; Basit, A.; Emanuele, N.; Emanuele, M.A.; Mazhari, A.; Holmes, E.W. Biotin Interference with Routine Clinical Immunoassays: Understand the Causes and Mitigate the Risks. Endocr. Pract. 2017, 23, 989–998. [CrossRef]





| Plate columns | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
| Assay controls | Serial dilution (biotin ng/mL) | |||||||||||
| no-antigen sample |
no-antigen no-sample |
Antigen no-sample |
5,250 | 2,620 | 1,310 | 650 | 320 | 160 | 80 | 40 | 20 | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).