Submitted:
15 August 2023
Posted:
16 August 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. ”From Housewife to Strategic General Affairs” Project: A Model Project of the Cabinet Office in FY 2015 to Support Women Who Want to Reenter the Workforce in this Study
1.1.1. Outline of reemployment support project for women
1.1.2. Project Outcomes and Expected Ripple Effects

2. Theoretical Background
2.1. Potential Working Women
2.2. The Role of SROI
- Determination of scope and identification of stakeholders
- Mapping of results
- Proving results and valuing results
- Determination of impact
- Calculation of SROI
- Reporting, utilization and integrationThird item.
2.3. Advantages and Concerns of SROI
3. Research design
3.1. Trial Estimation of Social Value by Utilizing Potential Employed Women—Expansion to the Kyushu Version of the school project
3.2. Scope of effects of the Kyushu school project
3.3. Results of interviews with re-employed women and hiring companies
3.4. Estimation of the number of potential school students
3.5. Input capital school operating expenses
3.6. Number of start-up (growing)companies accepting women who have completed the course
4.1. Results of SROI estimation in Kyushu
5. Limitation of the study
6. Conclusion
Acknowledgement
References
- Schmid, G., and B. Gazier. (2002). The Dynamics of Full Employment: Social Integration through Transitional Labour Markets. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
- Gallie, D., S. Paugam, and S. Jacobs. (2003). Unemployment, Poverty and Social Isolation: Is There a Vicious Circle of Social Exclusion? European Societies 5 (1): 1–32. [CrossRef]
- Greenhaus, J. H., & G. N. Powell, (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. The Academy of Management Review, 31(1): 72-92. [CrossRef]
- Sieber, S.D.,(1974)Toward a theory of role accumulation. American Sociological Review, 39(4): 567-578. [CrossRef]
- van Steenbergen, E.F., Ellemers, N., and Mooijaart, A. (2007). How work and family can facilitate each other: Distinct types of work-family facilitation and outcomes for women and men. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12 (3): 279-300. [CrossRef]
- Wayne, J.H., Musisca, N., & Fleeson, W. (2004). Considering the role of personality in the work–family experience: Relationships of the big five to work–family conflict and facilitation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64 (1): 108-130. [CrossRef]
- Palkovitz, R. (1996). Parenting as a generator of adult development: Conceptual issues and implications. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13 (4): 571-592. [CrossRef]
- Galinsky, E. (1987). Six stages of parenthood. New York: Da Capo Lifelong Books.
- Stern, D. N., Bruschweiler-Stern, N. and Freeland, A. (1998). The Birth of a Mother. How the Motherhood Experiences Changes You Forever. New York: Basic Books.
- Emerson, J., J. Wachowicz, and S. Chun. (2000), Social Return On Investment: Exploring Aspects of Value Creation in the Nonprofit Sector. (REDF, San Francisco).
- Mertens, S., V. Xhauflair, and M. Marée. (2015). Questioning the Social Return on Investment (SROI). SOCENT Publication, Interuniversity Attraction Pole on Social Enterprise. http://iap-socent.be/publications/questioning-social-return-investment-sroi.
- Ryan, P., and I. Lyne. (2008). Social Enterprise and the Measurement of Social Value: Methodological Issues with the Calculation and Application of the Social Return on Investment. Education, Knowledge and Economy 2, (3): 223–37. [CrossRef]
- Rotheroe, N., and A., Richards. (2007). Social return on investment and social enterprise: Transparent accountability for sustainable development. Social Enterprise Journal, 3(1),:31-48. [CrossRef]
- Nicholls, J., E. Lawlor, E. Neitzer, and T. Goodspeed. (2012). A Guide to Social Return on Investment. www.thesroinetwork.org/publications/doc_details/241-a-guide-to-social-return-on-investment-2012.
- Cellini, S. R., and J. E. Kee. (2010). Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Benefit Analysis. In Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation, 493–530. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Hopkins, B. (2019). Social Return on Investment: An Important Consideration for State Vocational Rehabilitation Programs. Journal of Rehabilitation Administration 40(1): 11-16.
- Teresa S., Morera, C., Guzmánand Francisco J. Santos. (2022). Measuring the impact of sheltered workshops through the SROI: A case analysis in southern Spain. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 93(2): 381–415. [CrossRef]
- Jackson, A and R., McManus (2019). SROI in the art gallery; valuing social impact, CULTURAL TRENDS 28(2–3), 132–145. [CrossRef]
- Millar, M and K., Hall. (2012). SOCIAL RETURN ON INVESTMENT (SROI) AND PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT -The opportunities and barriers for social enterprises in health and social care. Public Management Review. 15(6): 923-941.
- Classens, M. (2015). What’s In It for the Volunteers? AN SROI APPROACH TO VOLUNTEERS’ RETURN ON INVESTMENT IN THE GOOD FOOD MARKETS. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 26(2): 145-56.
- Banke-Thomas, A, O., B, Madaj,. A, Charles., and N, Broek. (2015). Social Return on Investment (SROI) methodology to account for value for money of public health interventions: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 15 (1): 1-14.
- Arvidson, M., Lyon, F., McKay, S., & Moro, D. (2013). Valuing the social? The nature and controversies of measuring Social Return on Investment (SROI). Voluntary Sector Review, 4(1): 3-18. [CrossRef]
- Krlev, G., Münscher, R., and Mülbert, K. (2013). Social Return on Investment (SROI): State-of the-Art and Perspectives. CSI Report.
- Lawlor, E., Murray, R., Neitzert, E., & Sanfilippo, L. (2008). Investing for Social Value: Measuring social return on investment for the Adventure Capital Fund. New Economics Foundation.
- Pathak P., and Dattani, P. (2014). Social return on investment: three technical challenges. Social Enterprise Journal, 10(2): 91-104. [CrossRef]
- Jönsson, J. (2013). Social Return on Investment: rooms for improvement & research—A background study on SROI to identify research gaps. Forum for social innovation Sweden.
- Bull, M. (2007). Balance: The Development of a Social Enterprise Business Performance Tool. Social Enterprise Journal 3 (1): 49–66.
- Paton, R. (2003). Managing and Measuring Social Enterprises. London: Sage.
- Ridley-Duff, R., P. Seamour, and M. Bull. (2011). Measuring Social Outcomes and Impacts. In Understanding Social Enterprise: Theory and Practice, edited by R. Ridley-Duff and M. Bull, 230–256. London: Sage.

| Survey steps | Survey target | Survey item | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | Interviews with women who have re-employed after career training | Women who re-employed after career development (3 people) | Actual working style, amount of remuneration, usage fees for services such as childcare,$Impact on family, use of increased disposable income |
| (2) | Interview with hiring companies | Managers and personnel managers of companies that hired women who re-employed after career development (3 companies) | Work content and remuneration, work that became possible as a result of new hiring$Changes in business performance after being hired to the present, changes in the work environment and culture after being hired$Points to note when using restricted employees, etc. |
| (3) | Questionnaire to grasp the current situation of start-up support, partial hearing [Kyushu 7 prefectures] | Start-up support staff in each prefecture | Details of measures to support startups, rate of startups, human issues and needs of founders ascertained, possibility of expanding startups by potential working women |
| (4) | Questionnaire and interviews to understand the current status of women’s employment support [Kyushu 7 prefectures] | Person in charge of the labor administration section and gender equality section of each prefecture | Details of employment support measures for women, results and trends of employment support$Status of grasping the needs of potential working women who wish to work (actual numbers, overview of needs, issues)$The Possibility of Business Expansion by Potential Working Women |
| School Participants = re-employed | Company (i) | Company (ⅱ) | Company (ⅲ) | Average, etc. | ||
| Monthly disposable income (yen) | 60,000 | 80,000 | 100,000 | 80,000 | A-1 | |
| Increased willingness to work | 80% | 100% | 100% | 93% | A-2 | |
| Family household help | ・Husband has started to cooperate in household by hanging the laundry out to dry.・Children were able to stay at home for short periods after starting work | increase | A-3 | |||
| Family Communications | ・Course participant began to discuss their work with her spouse, enabling them to have conversations as equals.・Course participants started talking to their children about their work. | activation | A-4 | |||
| Amount of shopping and service consumption | ・Increase in eating out (1-2 times ⇒ 4 times/month)・Inviting children to entertainment venues (like Disneyland) for their daughters’ birthdays・Buying more gifts for friends.・Since re-entering the workforce, she spend 70,000-80,000/month on family travel and eating out.・Plans are in place to fund childcare costs in the immediate future. | increase | A-5 | |||
| Childcare (yen) | 0 | 9,500 | 3,000 | 4,167 | A-6 | |
| ・Started to use extended day care.・Use of extended care at kindergartens, and in-house childcare on days when extended care is not available. | increase | A-7 | ||||
| Company (i) | Company (ⅱ) | Company (ⅲ) | Average, etc. | |||
| Hiring companies | Reduced workload for general administration staff | 30% Reduction in workload⇒40% for new initiatives | Amount of workload related to general affairs 100% ⇒ 20%. | Contributed to a reduction in proposal writing work of 100% ⇒ 30% =Contributed to a 70% reduction in workload. | Median value, etc. | B-1 |
| Business reduction rate ⇒⇒ | 30% | 80% | 70% | 70% | B-2 | |
| Initial equipment costs = cost of on-boarding new staff (yen) | 0 | 110,000 | 115,000 | 75,000 | B-3 | |
| Other benefits (e.g., in-house childcare, mobile phone allowance, etc.) (yen) | 0 | 160,000 | 82,000 | 80,667≒80,000 | B-4 | |
| \prefecture | Fukuoka | Saga | Nagasaki | Kuma$moto | Oita | Miyazaki | Kago$shima | Total$Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A Number of non-working women for childcare reasons | 43,300 | 5,500 | 8,100 | 10,700 | 8,700 | 6,000 | 12,000 | 94,300 |
| B Number of outplacement women employment support program providers | 10,066 | 480 | 2,821 | 76 | 100 | 1,263 | 36 | 14,842 |
| C Estimated target (25-44 years old) Note 1 | 176,453.6 | 19,221.5 | 35,880.2 | 44,337.6 | 31,651.4 | 26,525.7 | 44,273.6 | 378,343.6 |
| D Percentage of providers (B/C) | 5.7% | 2.5% | 7.9% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 4.8% | 0.1% | 3.9% |
| Number of non-working women raising children that can be reached (A*D) | 2,470 | 137 | 637 | 18 | 27 | 286 | 10 | 3,586 |
| Number of school sessions required Note 2. | 82 | 4 | 21 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 119 |
| Investment(input) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.Mamawork Institute. | |||||
| labour cost | Total operating hours$(in hours) | Unit price$(Yen/hour) | Number of events/year | Subtotal$(Yen) | |
| office staff | 240 | 1,000 | 119 | 28,560,000 | |
| Research Staff | 150 | 2,000 | 119 | 35,700,000 | |
| direct project cost | Number of implementations$(times) | Unit price$(Yen/hour) | Subtotal$(Yen) | ||
| Lecturer fees | 14 | 20,000 | 119 | 33,320,000 | |
| childcare charge | 1 | 115,000 | 119 | 13,685,000 | |
| Flyer production and distribution costs | 1 | 155,000 | 119 | 18,445,000 | |
| Total input costs of the Mamawork Institute | 129,710,000 | ||||
| 2. Prefectures | |||||
| labour cost | Total operating hours$(in hours) | Unit price$(Yen/hour) | Number of events/year | Subtotal$(Yen) | |
| Cooperative implementation of leaflet distribution | 3 | 2,356 | 119 | 841,092 | |
| Cooperation with publication in e-newsletters | 1.0 | 2,356 | 119 | 280,364 | |
| Venue Adjustment Service | 0.5 | 2,356 | 119 | 140,182 | |
| direct project cost | Number of implementations$(times) | Unit price$(Yen/hour) | Subtotal$(Yen) | ||
| venue charge | 1 | 17,390 | 119 | 2,069,410 | |
| Prefecture input costs (total) | 3,331,048 | ||||
| Total input cost | 133,041,048 | ||||
| primary beneficiary | resulting effect | Calculation formula/basis | First year social value (yen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| school student | Increase in disposable income (salary income) | Hearing result average value 80,000 yen/month (=Table 2-A-1) x 12 months | 960,000 |
| Increased willingness to work through school attendance | 59,000 yen (alternative index) x 93%* (=Table 2-A-2) for a similar distance learning course | 55,067 | |
| Families of school students | Increased voluntary domestic help time for children and partners | 40,093 yen/month x 12 months using a housekeeping agency once a week x 2 hours. | 481,116 |
| Activation of communication with family members | Family counseling 10,000 yen/session is used once a month ×12 months estimated. | 120,000 | |
| start-up company | Reduction of the burden on general affairs staff in relation to workload | Calculate the acceptance rate of 4 hours of overtime work per day due to general affairs work for personnel earning 200,000/month as 70% of the median interview result (=Table 2-B-1) :$200,000/8 hours x 1.25 × 4 hours x 70% x 12 months | 1,050,000$ |
| Increased revenue due to hiring of school students and streamlining of general affairs operations. | The increas in revenue is assumed to be 1,000,000 yen/year, of which 15% is the effect of streamlining general affairs. | 150,000$ | |
| Increase in equipment costs required when hiring school students | Interview result average 75,000 yen/first year (=Table 2-B-2) | -75,000$ | |
| Increased cost burden of various allowances when hiring school students | Benefits such as cell phone expenses and in-house childcare, etc. $interview results average(=Table 2-B-3) | -80,000 | |
| National/local government | Increase in income tax revenue | Disposable income as a result of hearing is 80,000 yen/month. income rises 1.3% per year. | 0 |
| Increase in resident tax revenue | Disposable income as a result of hearing is 80,000 yen/month. If income increases by 1.3%/year, 5,915 yen will be generated after 3 years.。 | 0 | |
| Increase in corporate tax revenue | Calculated as revenue increase of 1 million yen x tax rate of 22% x contribution of general affairs personnel of 15%, assumed to increase by 0.5% from the second year onwards | 33,000 | |
| Commercial facilities in major cities in the prefecture | Increase in per capita purchases due to higher income of school students | Calculated as consumption increase of 10,000 yen/month x 70% x 12 months. | 84,000 |
| Nursery School/Kindergarten | Increase in childcare hours (childcare) | Calculated as the average usage amount for extended childcare based on interview results of 4,167 yen/month x 12 months (monthly amount = Table 2-A-6) | 50,004 |
| After-school childcare facility | Increase in childcare hours (school-age childcare) | Calculated as usage fee of 7,000 yen/month x 12 months | 84,000 |
| (Unit: Yen) | ||||
| 1st year | 2nd year | 3rd year | 4th year | |
| Annual value (yen) | 10,129,563,672 | 10,306,399,151 | 10,560,035,388 | 10,680,510,336 |
| Cumulative value (yen) | 10,129,563,672 | 20,435,962,823 | 30,995,998,211 | 41,676,508,547 |
| Invested capital (yen) | 133,041,048 | - | - | - |
| SROI value (yen) | 76.1 | 153.6 | 233.0 | 313.3 |
| 1.Effects on the school participant herself (assuming that the child in her care will be of primary school age from the third year of employment) | |||||||||||||||
| indicator | Value of change(Yen) | Discount rate(%) | Rate of increase/reduction per year | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | ||||||||
| Increase in disposable income (salary income) | 960,000 | 0% | 1.3% | 960,000 | 972,001 | 984,152 | 996,455 | ||||||||
| Increased willingness to work compared to before attending the school | 59,000 | 93% | 0% | 55,067 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| Per school student | 1,015,067 | 972,001 | 984,152 | 996,455 | |||||||||||
| 3,586 $prospective trainees | 3,640,029,067 | 3,485,595,931 | 3,529,169,860 | 3,573,288,514 | |||||||||||
| 2.Effects on households of school students | |||||||||||||||
| indicator | Value of change(Yen) | Discount rate(%) | Rate of increase/reduction per year | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | ||||||||
| Increased voluntary household help from children and partners | 481,116 | 0% | 0% | 481,116 | 481,116 | 481,116 | 481,116 | ||||||||
| Activating communication with families | 120,000 | 0% | 0% | 120,000 | 120,000 | 120,000 | 120,000 | ||||||||
| Per school student | 601,116 | 601,116 | 601,116 | 601,116 | |||||||||||
| 3,586 prospective trainees | 2,155,601,976 | 2,155,601,976 | 2,155,601,976 | 2,155,601,976 | |||||||||||
| 3. Effects on start-ups | |||||||||||||||
| indicator | Value of change(Yen) | Discount rate(%) | Rate of increase/reduction per year | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | ||||||||
| Reduced workload for general administration staff | 1,500,000 | 70% | 0% | 1,050,000 | 1,050,000 | 1,050,000 | 1,050,000 | ||||||||
| Increase in corporate profits | 1,000,000 | 15% | 0.5% | 150,000 | 157,500 | 165,375 | 173,644 | ||||||||
| Increased equipment costs | -75,000 | 0% | 0% | -75,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| Increased costs of various allowances | as shown on the right | 0% | 0% | -80,000 | -80,000 | -80,000 | -80,000 | ||||||||
| Per school student | 1,045,000 | 1,127,500 | 1,135,375 | 1,143,644 | |||||||||||
| 3,586 prospective trainees | 3,747,370,000 | 4,043,215,000 | 4,071,454,750 | 4,101,106,488 | |||||||||||
| 4. Effect on national and local governments | |||||||||||||||
| indicator | Value of change(Yen) | Discount rate(%) | Rate of increase/reduction per year | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | ||||||||
| Increased income tax revenue/per capita | as shown on the right | 0% | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| ResidentsTax revenue increase/per capita | as shown on the right | 0% | 0% | 0 | 0 | 5,915 | 7,146 | ||||||||
| Per school student | 0 | 0 | 5,915 | 7,146 | |||||||||||
| 3,586 prospective trainees | 0 | 0 | 21,211,986 | 25,623,851 | |||||||||||
| 5.Effect on national and local governments | |||||||||||||||
| indicator | Value of change(Yen) | Discount rate(%) | Rate of increase/reduction per year | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | ||||||||
| Increase in corporate tax revenue per start-up company | 220,000 | 15% | 0.5% | 33,000 | 34,650 | 36,383 | 38,202 | ||||||||
| Annual number of companies established/3213 | 106,024,286 | 111,325,500 | 116,891,775 | 122,736,364 | |||||||||||
| 6. Effects of activities envisaged to be brought to commercial premises and nursery schools, kindergartens and childcare centres in major cities. | |||||||||||||||
| indicator | Value of change(Yen) | Discount rate(%) | Rate of increase/reduction per year | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | ||||||||
| Increase in shopping per capita | 120,000 | 70% | 10% | 84,000 | 92,400 | 101,640 | 111,804 | ||||||||
| Increased hours of child care (nursery school) | 50,004 | 0% | 0% | 50,004 | 50,004 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| Increase in child care hours (school age children) | 84,000 | 0% | 0% | 0 | 0 | 84,000 | 84,000 | ||||||||
| Per school student | 134,004 | 142,404 | 185,640 | 195,804 | |||||||||||
| 3,586 prospective trainees | 480,538,344 | 510,660,744 | 665,705,040 | 702,153,144 | |||||||||||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).