Version 1
: Received: 14 August 2023 / Approved: 14 August 2023 / Online: 15 August 2023 (02:44:01 CEST)
How to cite:
Yehia, S.; Faihan, B.; M. A. Ibrahim, A. The Impact of Using Internal Reinforcement or/and External Strengthening around the Openings for Hybrid Steel-BFRP Reinforced Concrete Beams. Preprints2023, 2023081040. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202308.1040.v1
Yehia, S.; Faihan, B.; M. A. Ibrahim, A. The Impact of Using Internal Reinforcement or/and External Strengthening around the Openings for Hybrid Steel-BFRP Reinforced Concrete Beams. Preprints 2023, 2023081040. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202308.1040.v1
Yehia, S.; Faihan, B.; M. A. Ibrahim, A. The Impact of Using Internal Reinforcement or/and External Strengthening around the Openings for Hybrid Steel-BFRP Reinforced Concrete Beams. Preprints2023, 2023081040. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202308.1040.v1
APA Style
Yehia, S., Faihan, B., & M. A. Ibrahim, A. (2023). The Impact of Using Internal Reinforcement or/and External Strengthening around the Openings for Hybrid Steel-BFRP Reinforced Concrete Beams. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202308.1040.v1
Chicago/Turabian Style
Yehia, S., Bader Faihan and Arafa M. A. Ibrahim. 2023 "The Impact of Using Internal Reinforcement or/and External Strengthening around the Openings for Hybrid Steel-BFRP Reinforced Concrete Beams" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202308.1040.v1
Abstract
The opened beams always confused the designers due to the guidelines missing. In this research, six hybrid reinforced beams reinforced with mixed steel and basalt fiber reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars had constant cross-sections of 150mm x 300mm and a clear span of 1800mm. Generally, five beams have symmetrical rectangular openings with dimensions of 150mm x 250mm located at a distance of 250mm (equivalent to the beam effective depth) from the beam support in addition to a solid beam that is served as a control reference. The studied parameters included the effect of using internal reinforcement (steel or BFRP bars) provided along the opening or by incorporating an external BFRP sheet around the opening corners. Also, the conduction of double enhancement with internal steel reinforcement bars further external strengthening BFRP sheet was investigated. The relevant results showed that the opened beam without enhancement lost almost 74.66% of the maximum load compared with the solid beam. Placing internal steel or BFRP bars around the openings increased the maximum load by 62.07% and 59.68%, respectively in comparison to the non-enhanced opened beams. Using an external BFRP sheet to strengthen the opening corners of the beam enhanced the maximum load by 76.39% compared with the non-enhanced opened beam. Therefore, if the beam double enhancement with an external BFRP sheet and internal steel reinforcement around the openings, the maximum load increased by 137.40% compared with the non-enhanced opened beam. Ultimately to further analyze the experimental results and confirm their findings, the study was extended to include the numerical analysis using three dimensional finite element modeling and the results correlated very well with the experimental ones.
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
