Submitted:
09 August 2023
Posted:
11 August 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- Finding the floristic composition of the vegetation, the biodiversity of the sphagnets and the classification of the species in a synthetic table of association by to their affinity to the coenotaxa, alliance, order and the class of vegetation to which they are subordinated;
- Statistical analysis of the abundance-dominance and constancy of species in the structure of the living soil cover;
- Ecological characterization of the cormoflora of the soil ecosystems in the light of the distribution of species by the type of bioform, phytogeographic element, by categories of the ecological indexes of edaphic moisture, air temperature and chemical reaction of the soil;
- Highlighting the dynamics, development trend of the phytocoenoses of the ecosystem at a certain stage of life;
- Economic and scientific capitalisation of the biotic and abiotic material elements of the ecosystem complex that characterizes the sphagnets;
- Establishing the sustainable management of the ecosystems (habitats) of the sphagnum and the related measures necessary to maintain the favourable conservation status of the rare, vulnerable, critically endangered, threatened, relict, endemic species they shelter.
2. Materials and Methods

3. Results
3.1. Floristic composition or the specific biodiversity
3.2. Ecological characterization of the flora and vegetation of sphagnum ecosystems
3.2.1. Composition by categories of bioforms
3.2.2. Composition by categories of phytogeographic elements (geoelements)
3.2.3. Composition by ecological categories with moisture, temperature and chemical reaction of the soil
3.2.4. Composition by karyotype genetic types
3.3. Vegetation dynamics of ecosystems
3.4. Economic and scientific relevance
3.5. Current state of play, potential threats, ecosystem management and the issue of biodiversity protection of representative raised bogs in the Western Carpathians
3.5.1. Călățele oligotrophic swamp
3.5.2. Molhașul cel Mare oligotrophic swamp from Izbuc - Padiș block mountains, Someșul Cald spring.
- Căpățânii oligotrophic swamps (Mocirle, Tăul Sărat/ Salty tarn)
- Vârful Băii peak’s peat land (Căpățânii tarn)
- -
- Exploitation of peat from high peats, although strictly regulated, is done only in isolated cases and after prior obtaining legal approvals, e.g. the degraded high peats from Călățele and Dorna (Someșul Rece river valley), Cluj county;
- -
- Logging, forest clearings around the wetland ecosystems can trigger imbalances and dysfunctions in the hydrological and microclimate regime in the raised bogs habitat;
- -
- Drainage of peat lands and the collection of the waters that feed them generate serious dysfunctions in the balance and self-regulation of the ecosystem, one of the basic requirements being the permanent presence of excess water;
- -
- Grazing and the transit of animals through wetlands produces soil subsidence and destruction of the peat moss layer (Sphagnum L. sp.) and triggers the modification of the floristic composition of the grassy layer, which ultimately leads to the disappearance of glacial relict, rare, endemic species, the loss of biodiversity and the degradation of the entire ecosystem;
- -
- Construction of roads with consolidated infrastructure leads to anthropization, destruction and pollution of the forest ecosystem, and to dysfunctions in the hydrological regime of the habitat.
- -
- Within the surveyed territory, 23 taxa were found (see Table 2 below) representing rare plants, glacial relicts, endemites in different stages of endangerment: vulnerable – VU (Pedicularis limnogena A. Kern, Rhynchospora alba (L.) Vahl., Scheuchzeria palustris L.), critically endangered – CR (Drosera intermedia Hayne), in critical risk - CR (Drosera intermedia Hayne), in low risk - LR (Pedicularis limnogena A. Kern), of least concern - LC (Carex limosa L., Lycopodium inundatum L., Eriophorum scheuchzeri Hoppe, Dactylorhiza cordigera (Fr.) Soó, Dactylorhiza maculata (L.) Soó, Gymnadenia conopsea (L.) R.Br. Dryopteris dilatata (Hoffm.) A.Gray), and near threatened – NT ((Carex magellanica ssp. irrigua Hiitonen, Drosera rotundifolia L., Empetrum nigrum L., Dryopteris cristata (L.) A.Gray, Menyanthes trifoliata L., Swertia punctata Baumg., Vaccinium microcarpum (Rupr.) Schmalh, Vaccinium oxycoccos L.) included on the red lists at national and European level [33, 34, 35, 38, 39, 40].
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
- Vegetation of the ecosystems of the surveyed peatland has a predominantly mesohygrophilic (40%) to hygrophilic (28%), microthermic (46%) to micromesothermic (24%), ionic amphitolerant (38%) to acidophilic (22%) character;
- Composition of phytocoenoses by ecological categories of bioforms is dominated by hemicryptophyte (66.1%) and bryophytes (10.7%) species, as main components of the herbaceous layer of peatland ecosystems;
- Composition of phytocoenoses by categories of phytogeographic elements (geo-elements) is dominated by circumpolar, circumpolar-boreal (32.2%), alpine-European, arctic-alpine (7.2%) plants which have overlapped in the long process of evolution and speciation with Eurasian (25%), European (16%), and Cosmopolitan (10.7%) plants. The share of Carpatho-Balkan, Alpine-Carpatho-Balkan, Carpatho-Balkan-Caucasian species in a percentage of 5.4% suggests the existence of floristic-phytohistorical links between the vegetation of the Western Carpathians and that of the Balkan Mountains, the European Alps and the Caucasus Mountains;
- Composition of peatland vegetation by karyotype genetic types is favourable to the development of polyploid species (62%) whose basic genotype, multiplied several times, provides their resilience to extreme living conditions (very high acidity of water and soil, low temperatures) of the habitat, a high interspecific competition capacity in the colonization of the land.
- With regard to the current state of the ecosystem, biodiversity conservation, potential threats and peatlands management, we pointed out some of the most frequent and harmful human interventions (e.g. exploitation of peat deposits, road construction, drainage of sediments and collection of water, grazing and the transit of animals through the habitat) that lead to the destabilization of the ecological balance and the degradation of the ecosystem.
- Peat deposit has a special economic value, being available for use in almost all fields: energy, construction, domestic, chemical, and pharmaceutical industries, medicine, agriculture, but it also has a paleontological & scientific value in the archiving of pollen grains and fossil relicts of ancient plants and animals.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
| Bio. | P.e. | M | T | R | 2n | Survey no. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | K | ADm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | Altitude (mamsl ) | 1602 | 1590 | 1579 | 1545 | 1325 | 1287 | 1170 | 1043 | 611 | 605 | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | - | Grassy layer coverage (%) | 60 | 90 | 80 | 70 | 70 | 90 | 80 | 100 | 100 | 90 | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | - | Exposure | S | - | - | E | - | - | N | SV | - | - | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | - | Slope(°) | 0-2 | - | - | 2-4 | - | - | 0-2 | 2-4 | - | - | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | - | Surface (m2) | 16 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 4 | 8 | 20 | 40 | ||
| H | Cp | 5 | 2 | 1 | P | As. Carex echinata | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | V | 50.5 |
| Brchs | Cp-Bo | - | - | - | - | As. Sphagnum recurvum | 3 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | + | . | . | IV | 33.05 |
| Caricion nigrae et Caricetalia nigrae | ||||||||||||||||||
| H | Cosm | 4.5 | 3 | 3 | P | Juncus effusus | + | . | . | + | . | + | + | 2 | . | + | III | 2 |
| H | Cp | 5 | 0 | 2 | P | Epilobium palustre | . | + | + | . | . | + | + | + | . | . | III | 0.25 |
| Brchs | Cosm | - | - | - | - | Sphagnum magellanicum | . | . | . | . | + | . | 1 | 5 | + | . | II | 9.35 |
| Brchs | Cp | - | - | - | - | Sphagnum angustifolium | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 5 | 5 | I | 17.5 |
| Brchs | Cosm | - | - | - | - | Sphagnum palustre | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | I | 0.05 |
| H(Hh) | Cp | 4 | 3 | 4 | D | Veronica scutellata | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | I | 0.05 |
| Scheuchzerio-Caricetea nigrae | ||||||||||||||||||
| H | Eua | 5 | 0 | 4.5 | P | Eriophorum latifolium | + | + | . | + | 1 | + | + | + | + | . | IV | 0.85 |
| H | Cp | 4.5 | 3 | 0 | P | Carex flava | + | + | + | + | . | . | + | + | 1 | + | IV | 0.85 |
| H | Carp-B | 5 | 2 | 2 | N | Pedicularis limnogena | + | + | + | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | II | 0.2 |
| Hh(H) | Cp | 5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | P | Carex lasiocarpa | . | . | . | . | + | . | + | . | . | . | I | 0.1 |
| H | Carp-B-Cauc | 5 | 1.5 | 0 | P | Swertia punctata | + | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | I | 0.1 |
| H | Arct-Alp | 4 | 2 | 2 | P | Juncus alpinoarticulatus | . | . | . | + | . | . | + | . | . | . | I | 0.1 |
| G | D | 4,5 | 2 | 2 | P | Dactylorhiza cordigera | . | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | I | 0.1 |
| Hh | Cp | 5 | 3 | 3 | P | Menyanthes trifoliata | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | I | 0.1 |
| H | Alp-E | 5 | 2 | 2 | N | Epilobium nutans | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | I | 0.05 |
| G | E | 4 | 2 | 2 | P | Dactylorhiza maculata ssp. maculata | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | I | 0.05 |
| H | Eua | 4.5 | 3 | 3 | P | Ranunculus flammula | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | I | 0.05 |
| Hh(H) | Cp | 5 | 2 | 0 | P | Carex rostrata | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | I | 0.05 |
| H | E | 4,5 | 2 | 4.5 | P | Carex lepidocarpa | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | I | 0.05 |
| Oxycocco-Sphagnetea | ||||||||||||||||||
| H | Cp | 5 | 2.5 | 1 | D | Drosera rotundifolia | . | . | + | + | . | . | . | + | + | + | III | 0.25 |
| H | Cp | 4.5 | 0 | 1.5 | D | Eriophorum vaginatum | 1 | . | + | . | . | + | . | + | . | . | II | 0.65 |
| Brchs | Cp | - | - | - | - | Sphagnum fuscum | 1 | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | I | 1 |
| Brchs | Cp-Bo | - | - | - | - | Polytrichum strictum | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | I | 0.05 |
| Vaccinio-Piceetea | ||||||||||||||||||
| G(H) | Cp | 3 | 2 | 2.5 | D | Moneses uniflora | + | . | + | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | II | 0.6 |
| H | End | 4 | 2 | 3 | D | Leucanthemum waldsteinii | . | . | . | . | + | . | + | . | . | . | I | 0.1 |
| H | Alp-E | 3.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | P | Homogyne alpina | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | I | 0.05 |
| Molinio-Arrhenatheretea | ||||||||||||||||||
| H | Cp | 5 | 2 | 0 | P | Caltha palustris ssp. laeta | . | 1 | + | + | + | + | + | + | . | . | IV | 0.8 |
| H(Hh) | Eua | 5 | 3 | 0 | P | Myosotis scorpioides | . | + | . | + | + | . | + | + | . | . | III | 0.25 |
| H | Cp | 5 | 3 | 0 | DP | Galium palustre | . | . | . | . | + | + | + | + | . | . | II | 0.2 |
| H | Cosm | 4 | 0 | 0 | DP | Deschampsia caespitosa | . | + | + | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | II | 0.15 |
| H | Eua | 2.5 | 0 | 0 | D | Leontodon hispidus | + | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | II | 0.15 |
| H | Cosm | 3 | 3 | 0 | P | Prunella vulgaris | + | . | . | + | . | + | . | . | . | . | II | 0.15 |
| G | E | 3.5 | 2 | 3 | P | Gymnadenia conopsea | . | + | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | I | 0.1 |
| H(G) | Eua | 4.5 | 0 | 4 | P | Agrostis gigantea ssp. gigantea | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | I | 0.1 |
| H | Eua | 0 | 0 | 0 | P | Anthoxantum odoratum | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | I | 0.05 |
| H | E | 3 | 2 | 0 | P | Alchemilla vulgaris | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | I | 0.05 |
| TH | Eua | 4.5 | 3 | 3 | D | Cirsium palustre | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | I | 0.05 |
| G | Cp | 5 | 2 | 0 | P | Equisetum palustre | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | I | 0.05 |
| Th | E | 3 | 3 | 0 | P | Euphrasia stricta | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | I | 0.05 |
| H | Cosm | 3,5 | 3 | 0 | D | Holcus lanatus | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | I | 0.05 |
| H | Eua | 4 | 0 | 0 | P | Ranunculus repens | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | I | 0.05 |
| H | Eua | 4 | 2,5 | 0 | D | Succisa pratensis | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | I | 0.05 |
| Nardo-Callunetea | ||||||||||||||||||
| H | Eua | 4 | 1 | 0 | P | Potentilla erecta | + | . | . | . | + | + | + | + | + | + | IV | 0.35 |
| H | E | 3.5 | 1.5 | 3 | DP | Crepis paludosa | . | + | + | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | II | 0.2 |
| H | E | 0 | 3 | 2 | P | Danthonia decumbens | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | I | 0.1 |
| H | Eua | 4.5 | 2 | 0 | DP | Filipendula ulmaria | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | . | . | I | 0.1 |
| H | E | 0 | 0 | 1.5 | D | Nardus stricta | . | . | . | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | I | 0.1 |
| H | Arct-Alp | 3.5 | 2 | 4 | P | Hieracium aurantiacum | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | I | 0.05 |
| H | Eua | 4 | 3 | 3 | D | Hypericum maculatum | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | I | 0.05 |
| Ch | Eua | 2 | 2 | 2 | P | Veronica officinalis | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | I | 0.05 |
| Querco-Fagetea | ||||||||||||||||||
| mPh | Eua | 4 | 3 | 3 | DP | Frangula alnus | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | I | 0.05 |
| Betulo-Adenostyletea | ||||||||||||||||||
| H | Alp-Carp-B | 3.5 | 2 | 3 | P | Senecio subalpinus | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | I | 0.05 |
| Montio-Cardaminetea | ||||||||||||||||||
| Hh | Cp | 6 | 3 | 4.5 | P | Glyceria plicata | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | I | 0.05 |
| Nanocyperetalia | ||||||||||||||||||
| H(Hh) | E | 4.5 | 2.5 | 0 | D | Juncus bulbosus | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | I | 0.05 |
References
- Pop, E. Peat bogs in the Romanian People’s Republic. Publishing House of the Academy of the Romanian People’s Republic, Bucharest, 1960.
- Pop, I., Cristea, V., Hodișan, I., Rațiu. O. Vegetation of the peat bogs from Blăjoaia and Dorna (upper course of the Someșului Rece valley, Cluj county). Contribuții Botanice magazine, Cluj-Napoca, 1986, pp. 123-129.
- Burescu, P., Togor, G. C. Phytocoenological studies on oligotrophy peat bog of Bihorului Mountains. Studia Universitatis ,,Vasile Goldiș,, Life Sciences Series, Issue 20, Arad, 2010; 2, 71-81.
- Pop, I.F, Burescu, L.I.N., Burescu-Morar, E.A., Vlad, I.A., 2023. Contributions to the phytocoenological study of oligo-mesotrophic peat bogs/marshy meadows in the Vlădeasa Mountains, Western Carpathians, Romania. Romanian Agricultural Research, 2023, NO.40/2023.
- Rațiu, O. Contributions to the knowledge of the vegetation in the Stâna de Vale basin, Contribuții Botanice Publishing House, Cluj-Napoca, 1965, pp. 151-175.
- Rațiu, O., Gergely I., Șuteu S., Marcu, A. Flora and phytosyntactic units from the Valea Iadului valley (Bihor County). Economic and scientific relevance. Ecological characterization II Contribuții Botanice, Cluj-Napoca, 1983; pp. 65-97.
- Pop, I., Hodișan I., Cristea, V. La vegetation de certaines tourbieres de la Valleé Izbuc (Depart. Cluj). (The vegetation of some peatlands of the Izbuc Valley (Cluj Dept.)). Contribuții Botanice magazine, Cluj-Napoca, 1987; pp. 111-120.
- Togor, G.C. Flora and vegetation in the northern Bihor Mountains. Doctoral thesis. University of Oradea, Romania, 2016.
- Cristea, M. Climatic risks in the Criș rivers basin, Abaddaba Publishing House, Oradea, 2004.
- Braun-Blanquet, J. Pflanzensoziologie (Plant sociology). Springer-Verlag, Wien-New York, 1964; 3, 12-24.
- Borza, A., Boșcaiu, N. An introduction to the study of the living soil cover. Publishing House of the Romanian Academy: Bucharest, 1965.
- Ivan, D., Doniță, N. Practical methods for ecologic and phytogeographically study of vegetation, University of Bucharest, 1975.
- Ivan, D., Spiridon, L. Phytocoenology and Vegetation of Romania. A practical courses guide. University of Bucharest, 1983.
- Ivan, D. Vegetation of Romania. Editura Tehnică Agricolă, Bucharest, 1992.
- Géhu, J.M. & Rivas-Martinez, S. Notions fondamentales de phytosociologie (Fundamentals of Phytosociology). In: Dierschke H., Syntaxonomy, Ber.Int.Symp.Int.Vereinigung Vegetationskunde. Cramer, Berlin, 1981; pp. 5-33.
- Tüxen, R. Das System der nordwestdeutschen Pflanzengesellschaften (The system of Northwest German plant communities), Mitt.D.Flour. Soz. Arbeitsgem.m.n., Germany, 1955 ; 5, 155-156.
- Soó, R. A maggyar flora és vegetácio rendszertani, növényföldrajzi kézikönyve (A systematic and phytogeographical manual of the Hungarian flora and vegetation). Acad. Kiado, I-VI, Budapest, 1964-1980.
- Oberdorfer, E. Süddeutche Pflanzengesellschaften (South German plant communities), III-Walder und Gebüsche. Gustav Fischer Verlag, J́ena, 1992.
- Pott, R. Die Pflanzengesellschaften Deutschlands (Plant communities of Germany), 2 Aufl, Welmer Verlug, Stuttgart, 1995.
- Borhidi, A. Critical revision of the Hungarian plants communities, Janus Pannonius Univerity Press, Pécs, 1996; pp. 43-94.
- Mucina, L. Conspectus of classes of European vegetation. Folia Geobot. Phytotax, Prahva, 1997; 32,117-172.
- Rodwell, J.S, Schamènée, J.H.J., Mucina, L., Pignatti, S., Dring, J́. & Moss, D. The diversity of European vegetation: An overview of phytosociological alliances and their relationships to EUNIS habitats. National Center for Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries, Wageningen, 2002.
- Sanda, V., Őllerer, K., Burescu, P. Phytocoenoses in Romania. Syntax, structure, dynamics and evolution. Ars Docendi Publishing House: University of Bucharest, Bucharest, 2008.
- Coldea, G., Oprea, A., Sârbu, I., Sârbu, C., Ștefan, N., The vegetable association of Romania. Cluj University, Press Publishing House: Cluj-Napoca, Cluj Napoca, 2012.
- Chifu, T., Irimia, I., Zamfirescu, O. Phytosociological diversity of Romania’s vegetation. Natural herbaceous vegetation. European Institute Publishing House: Iași, 2014.
- Raunkier, C. Plant life forms. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1937.
- Ellenberg, H., Weber, H.E., Dull, R., Wirth, V., Werner, W., Paulisen, D. Indicator values of plants in Central Europe. Scripta Geobot., 1992; 18, 7-97.
- Sanda, V., Biță, N.C., Barabaș, N. Flora of spontaneous and cultivated cormophytes in Romania. Ion Borcea Publishing House: Bacău, Bacău, 2003.
- Burescu, P., Toma, I. Handbook of practical botany York. Publishing House of the University of Oradea, Oradea, 2005.
- Ciocârlan, V. The illustrated flora of Romania. Pteridophyta and Spermatophyta. Ceres Publishing House: Bucharest, Bucharest, 2009.
- Meusel, H. & Jäger, E. J́. Comparative Chorology of Central European Flora, 3. ˶Gustav Fischer Verlag˝ Publishing House: J́ena, Jena, 1992.
- Doniță, N., Popescu, A., Paucă-Comănescu, M., Mihăilescu, S., Biriș, I.A. Habitats in Romania. Changes according to the amendments proposed by Romania and Bulgaria at Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC). Tehnică Silvică Publishing House, Bucharest, 2006.
- Sârbu, A., Sârbu I., Oprea, A., Negrean, G., Cristea, V., Coldea, G., Cristurean, I., Popescu, G., Oroian, S., …, Stan, I., Frink, J. Special areas for the protection and conservation of plants in Romania. Victor B Victor Publishing House, București, 2007.
- Dihoru, Gh., Negrean, G. Red list of vascular plants from Romania. Publishing House: Academy of the Romanian People’s Republic, Bucharest, 2009.
- Bilz, M., Kell, S.P., Maxted, N., Lansdown, R.V. European Red List of Vascular Plants, Publication Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2011.
- Oltean, M., Negrean, G., Popescu, A., Roman, N., Dihoru, G., Sanda, V., Mihăilescu, S. Red plant list of superior plants from Romania Stud. Sint. Doc. Ecol., Acad. Romn., București, 1994, 1, 1-52.
- Gafta, D., Mountford, J.O. (coord.), Alexiu, V., Anastasiu, P., Bărbos, M., Burescu, P., Coldea, Gh., Drăgulescu, C., Șuteu, A. Interpretation manual of NATURA2000 habitats in Romania, Risoprint Publishing House, Cluj-Napoca, 2008.
- Boșcaiu, N., Coldea, Gh., Horeanu, C. The Red list of extinct, endangered, vulnerable and rare vascular plants from Romania's flora, Ocrot. Nat. Med. Înconj., Bucharest; 1994; 1, 45-56.
- Dihoru, Gh., Dihoru, A. Rare, endangered and endemic plants from Romania's flora - Red List. Acta Bot. Horti Bucuresti (1993-1994), Bucharest, 1994; pp. 173-197.
- Oprea, A. Critical list of vascular plants from Romania, “Al. I. Cuza” University Press; Iași, 2005.







| Ecological indices | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | 2.5 | 3 | 3.5 | 4 | 4.5 | 5 | 6 | 0 | Total species | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | sp. no. | - | - | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 10 | 14 | 1 | 3 | 50 |
| % | - | - | 2 | 2 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 20 | 28 | 2 | 6 | 100 | |
| T | sp. no. | 1 | 2 | 18 | 5 | 15 | - | - | - | - | - | 9 | 50 |
| % | 2 | 4 | 36 | 10 | 30 | - | - | - | - | - | 18 | 100 | |
| R | sp. no. | 4 | 11 | 10 | 6 | - | - | 19 | 50 | ||||
| % | 8 | 22 | 20 | 12 | - | - | 38 | 100 | |||||
| No. | Species | Sites no. | Sozological categories of protection according to bibliographic sources | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [36] | [35] | [40] | [34] | |||
| 1 | Andromeda polifolia L. | 1 | R, RG | |||
| 2 | Carex limosa L. | 3 | R, RG | LC | NT | |
| 3 | Carex magellanica ssp. irrigua Hiitonen | 1 | R, RG | NT | ||
| 4 | Carex pauciflora Lightf | 3 | RG | |||
| 5 | Dactylorhiza cordigera (Fr.) Soó | 1 | R | LC | NT | |
| 6 | Dactylorhiza maculata (L.) Soó | 1 | R, NT | LC | ||
| 7 | Drosera intermedia Hayne | 1 | RG, CR | CR | CR | |
| 8 | Drosera rotundifolia L. | 4 | R, RG | NT | ||
| 9 | Dryopteris cristata (L.) A.Gray | 1 | R, RG | NT | ||
| 10 | Dryopteris dilatata (Hoffm.) A.Gray | 1 | LC | |||
| 11 | Empetrum nigrum L. | 3 | R, RG | NT | ||
| 12 | Epilobium nutans F.W. Schmidt | 1 | R | |||
| 13 | Eriophorum scheuchzeri Hoope | 2 | R | LC | NT | |
| 14 | Eriophorum vaginatum L. | 6 | RG | |||
| 15 | Gymnadenia conopsea (L.) R.Br. | 2 | R | LC | NT | |
| 16 | Lycopodium inundatum L. | 2 | R, RG | LC | NT | NT |
| 17 | Menyanthes trifoliata L. | 2 | R | NT | ||
| 18 | Pedicularis limnogena A.Kern. | 4 | VU | VU | LR | |
| 19 | Rhynchospora alba (L.) Vahl. | 1 | R, RG | VU | VU | |
| 20 | Scheuchzeria palustris L. | 3 | VU, RG | VU | ||
| 21 | Swertia punctata Baumg. | 1 | R, RG | NT | ||
| 22 | Vaccinium microcarpum (Rupr.) Schmalh | 2 | R | NT | ||
| 23 | Vaccinium oxycoccos L. | 2 | R | NT | ||
| Place | Ecological indices | Level of ecological indices and number of species/% | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5 | 2 | 2.5 | 3 | 3.5 | 4 | 4.5 | 5 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| Raised bogs of Vlădeasa Massif | M (Sp. No) (%) |
- | - | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 10 | 14 | 1 | 3 | ||
| - | - | 2 | 2 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 20 | 28 | 2 | 6 | ||||
| T (Sp. No.) (%) |
1 | 2 | 18 | 5 | 15 | - | - | - | - | - | 9 | |||
| 2 | 4 | 36 | 10 | 30 | - | - | - | - | - | 18 | ||||
| R (Sp. No). (%) |
4 | 11 | 10 | 6 | - | - | 19 | |||||||
| 8 | 22 | 20 | 12 | - | - | 38 | ||||||||
| Raised bogs of Padiș Plateau, Bihor Mountains [8] | M (Sp. No.) (%) |
- | - | - | - | 8 | 15 | 13 | - | 5 | ||||
| - | - | - | - | 20 | 36.59 | 31.71 | - | 12 | ||||||
| T (Sp. No.) (%) |
- | - | 23 | 10 | - | - | - | - | 8 | |||||
| - | - | 56 | 24 | - | - | - | - | 20 | ||||||
| R (Sp. No.) (%) |
9 | 14 | - | 8 | - | - | 10 | |||||||
| 21.95 | 34.15 | - | 19.51 | - | - | 24.39 | ||||||||
| Raised bogs of Blăjoaia, Gilău Mountains [2] | M (Sp. No.) (%) |
- | - | - | - | - | 1 | 3 | 5 | 14 | - | 4 | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | 3.7 | 11.1 | 18.5 | 51.8 | - | 14.8 | ||||
| T (Sp. No.) (%) |
- | - | 14 | 2 | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | 6 | |||
| - | - | 51.8 | 7.4 | 18.5 | - | - | - | - | - | 22.2 | ||||
| R (Sp. No.) (%) |
7 | 9 | 5 | 1 | - | - | 5 | |||||||
| 25.9 | 33.3 | 18.5 | 3.7 | - | - | 18.5 | ||||||||
| Place | Bioforms | H | Brchs | G | Hh | T | Ch | mPh | Total species | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TH | Th | |||||||||
| Raised bogs of Vlădeasa Massif | Sp. no. | 37 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 56 |
| Percentage (%) | 66.1 | 10.7 | 8.9 | 7.1 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | ||
| Raised bogs of Padiș Plateau, Bihor Mountains [8] | Sp. no. | 29 | 8 | 8 | - | - | - | 3 | 1 | 49 |
| Percentage (%) | 70.73 | 16.2 | 19.51 | - | - | - | 7.32 | 2.44 | ||
| Raised bog of Blăjoaia, Gilău Mountains [2] | Sp. no. | 12 | 5 | - | 2 | - | - | 8 | - | 27 |
| Percentage (%) | 55.5 | 18.5 | - | 7.4 | - | - | 37.0 | - | ||
| Place | Phytogeographic elements | Cp | Cp-Bo | Eua | E | Ec | Alp-E | Arct-Alp | Alp-Carp-B | Carp-B | Carp-B-Cauc | D | End | Cosm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raised bogs of Vlădeasa Massif | Species no. | 16 | 2 | 14 | 9 | - | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Percentage (%) | 28.6 | 3.6 | 25 | 16.1 | - | 3.6 | 3.6 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 10.7 | |
| Raised bogs of Padiș Plateau, Bihor Mountains [8] | Species no. | 14 | 5 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | - | 3 |
| Percentage (%) | 34.1 | 12.1 | 25.3 | 4.8 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | - | 2.4 | - | 7.3 | |
| Raised bogs of Blăjoaia, Gilău Mountains [2] | Species no. | 10 | 4 | 4 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 |
| Percentage (%) | 45.4 | 18.1 | 18.1 | 4.5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 13.6 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).