Article
Version 3
Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Maximal Bell Violations with Independent Classical Observables
Version 1
: Received: 8 August 2023 / Approved: 9 August 2023 / Online: 9 August 2023 (10:54:11 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 11 October 2023 / Approved: 11 October 2023 / Online: 13 October 2023 (12:42:51 CEST)
Version 3 : Received: 10 January 2024 / Approved: 10 January 2024 / Online: 10 January 2024 (14:42:26 CET)
Version 2 : Received: 11 October 2023 / Approved: 11 October 2023 / Online: 13 October 2023 (12:42:51 CEST)
Version 3 : Received: 10 January 2024 / Approved: 10 January 2024 / Online: 10 January 2024 (14:42:26 CET)
How to cite: Mardari, G. Maximal Bell Violations with Independent Classical Observables. Preprints 2023, 2023080773. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202308.0773.v3 Mardari, G. Maximal Bell Violations with Independent Classical Observables. Preprints 2023, 2023080773. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202308.0773.v3
Abstract
Sequential properties can violate Bell-type inequalities without direct influence on each other, but only if detected in pairs. This is demonstrated below with theoretical arguments, and with a straightforward toy model. Rotating arrows can have transient qualities that produce maximal Bell violations with predetermined values. Any non-signaling phenomenon (classical, or non-classical) can also be interpreted as local.
Keywords
quantum entanglement; EPR paradox; Bell’s theorem; realism; locality; contextuality; sequential properties; simultaneous properties.
Subject
Physical Sciences, Quantum Science and Technology
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comments (1)
We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.
Leave a public commentSend a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Commenter: Ghenadie Mardari
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author