Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Attachment and Coping in the Second Pandemic Year: the Impact on Loneliness and Emotional Distress

Version 1 : Received: 2 August 2023 / Approved: 3 August 2023 / Online: 4 August 2023 (03:17:18 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Hopulele-Petri, A.; Fadgyas-Stănculete, M.; Manea, M. Attachment and Coping in the Second Pandemic Year: The Impact on Loneliness and Emotional Distress. COVID 2023, 3, 1322-1335. Hopulele-Petri, A.; Fadgyas-Stănculete, M.; Manea, M. Attachment and Coping in the Second Pandemic Year: The Impact on Loneliness and Emotional Distress. COVID 2023, 3, 1322-1335.

Abstract

Pandemic restrictions and reduced social opportunities led to increased loneliness throughout affected countries. Considering that stressful situations activate the attachment system and engage various coping strategies, the present study explored the role of attachment dimensions and coping styles in perceived social isolation and the subsequent effect on emotional distress. Data was collected using an online survey between the third and fourth waves in Romania during the second year of the pandemic. Correlational analyses presented significant relationships between all variables measured. Regression analysis showed that attachment insecurity could predict up to half of the variance in loneliness and one-third of emotional distress. Coping styles that predicted both loneliness and emotional distress were problem-focused and socially supported coping, though the effect was minimal. Emotion-focused coping presented a protective role against loneliness. Finally, moderation analysis revealed how loneliness fully mediated the relationship between insecure attachment styles and emotional distress. Further implications for research on loneliness, and pandemic resilience are discussed.

Keywords

loneliness; covid-19; attachment; coping, mental health

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental Health

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.