Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Nutritional Performance of Five Citrus Rootstocks under Different Fe Levels

Version 1 : Received: 28 July 2023 / Approved: 31 July 2023 / Online: 31 July 2023 (11:19:47 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Pestana, M.; García-Caparrós, P.; Saavedra, T.; Gama, F.; Abadía, J.; Varennes, A.D.; Correia, P.J. Nutritional Performance of Five Citrus Rootstocks under Different Fe Levels. Plants 2023, 12, 3252. Pestana, M.; García-Caparrós, P.; Saavedra, T.; Gama, F.; Abadía, J.; Varennes, A.D.; Correia, P.J. Nutritional Performance of Five Citrus Rootstocks under Different Fe Levels. Plants 2023, 12, 3252.

Abstract

Iron is an essential micronutrient for Citrus, playing an important role in photosynthesis and yield. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the tolerance to Fe deficiency of five Citrus rootstocks: sour orange (S), Carrizo citrange (C), Citrus macrophylla (M), Troyer citrange (T) and Volkamer lemon (V). Plants were grown for 5 weeks in nutrient solution that contained the following Fe concentrations (in µM): 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20. At the end of the experiment, biomass (dry weight), leaf area, total leaf chlorophyll (CHL) and the activity of root chelate activity (FCR) were registered. Additionally, the mineral composition of roots (R) and shoots (S) was evaluated. Principal Component Analysis was used to study the relationships between all parameters and, subsequently, the relations between rootstocks. In the first component, N-S, P-S, Ca-S, Cu-S, Zn-S, Mn-S and Zn-R and Mn-R concentrations were related to leaf CHL and FCR. Increases in leaf CHL, Mg-R, DW (shoots and roots) were inversely related to Cu-R, which was shown in the second component. The values obtained were consistent for V10, C15, and C20, but in contrast for S0 and S5. Overall, the Fe/Cu ratio was significantly related to CHL, which may be used to assist rootstock performance.

Keywords

Fe-chlorosis; ferric-chelate reductase; mineral composition

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Agricultural Science and Agronomy

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.