Submitted:
14 September 2023
Posted:
18 September 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Theoretical framework
2.1. Digital Transformation
2.2. External Stakeholders in HEIs
2.3. Relevant factors facilitating the Digital Transformation (DT) of HEIs from the perspective of external stakeholders.
3. Methodology
4. Results
4.1. Improving the learning process
4.2. Lifelong learning
4.3. Employability
4.4. Collaboration with external suppliers.
5. Discussion and Conclusions
| Proposals | Key factors | Results |
|---|---|---|
|
Technology: Learning Management Systems (LMS) Methodologies (flipped classroom). |
Improve the learning process. It facilitates the learning process. |
|
Technology (blog, social networks, and audiovisual platforms). Methodology. |
It enables lifelong learning. Better sense of belonging |
|
Technology (Intranet for bid management). Advisers for relations withemployers. |
Student and alumni recruitment is accelerated. Improve employability and reputation. |
|
Technology. Administrative processes |
It facilitates the creation and development of new technologies. It facilitates management and relationships. |
6. Limitations of the research.
7. Future lines of research.
Abbreviations
| ICT | Information and Communications Technologies. |
| DT | Digital Transformation |
| He is | Higher Education Institutions. |
| ODS | Sustainable development goals |
| WoS | Science Web |
References
- Castells, M. (2011). The rise of the network society (Vol. 12). John wiley & sons. [CrossRef]
- Abad-Segura, E. , González-Zamar, M. D., Infante-Moro, J. C., & Ruipérez García, G. (2020). Sustainable management of digital transformation in higher education: Global research trends. Sustainability, 12(5), 2107. [CrossRef]
- Sotnikov, A. , & Katasonova, G. (2018. The higher Education System In "digital Economy". Information Innovative Technologies, (1), 106-111.
- Sánchez Hernández, M. P. (2018). Déficit vocacional en la era digital. Tendencias Sociales. Revista De Sociología, (1), 197–224. [CrossRef]
- Trantopoulos, K. , &. e. a. (2017). "External knowledge and information technology: Implications for process innovation performance.". MIS quarterly 41.1: 287-300. [CrossRef]
- Piccini, E. , Hanelt, A., Gregory, R., & Kolbe, L. (2015). Transforming industrial business: the impact of digital transformation on automotive organizations.
- Manyika, J. , Chui, M., Miremadi, M., Bughin, J., George, K., Willmott, P., & Dewhurst, M. (2017). A future that works: AI, automation, employment, and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute Research, Tech. Rep, 60, 1-135.
- Cardenas-Navia, I. , & Fitzgerald, B. (2019). The digital dilemma: Winning and losing strategies in the digital talent race.. Industry and Higher Education, 33(3),, 214-217. [CrossRef]
- López, A. (2019). Transformación digital e innovación global en la Universidad 4.0. Economistas, 165, 113-122.
- Watermeyer, R. , Crick, T., Knight, C., & Goodall, J. (2021). COVID-19 and digital disruption in UK universities: Afflictions and affordances of emergency online migration. Higher Education, 81(3), 623-641.
- Fortunato, M. , Alter, T., Clever, M., & MacGregor, C. (2019). Higher educational engagement in economic development in collaboration with corporate powerhouses. Business and corporation engagement with higher education: Models, theories and best practices. [CrossRef]
- López, S. , & Almagro, A. (2002). Economía de la educación: capital humano y rendimiento educativo. Análisis económico 17 (36), 79-106. [CrossRef]
- Mahlow, C. , & Hediger, A. (2019). Digital Transformation in Higher Education. Buzzword or opportunity? E-learn, 13. [CrossRef]
- Almaraz, F. Almaraz, F., Machado, A. M., Esteban, C. L. (2017). Analysis of the digital transformation of Higher Education Institutions. A theoretical framework. EDMETIC 6(1), 181-202.
- Matt, C. , Hess, T., & Belian, A. (2015). Digital Transformation Strategies. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 57(5), 339-343. [CrossRef]
- Schmidt, R. , Mohring, M., Reichstein, R., Zimmerman, A., & Luceri, S. (November de 2015). Benefits of enterprise architecture management–insights from European experts. In IFIP Working Conference on The Practice of Enterprise Modeling (pp. In IFIP Working Conference on The Practice of Enterprise Modeling (págs. (pp. 223-236). Springer, Cham. [CrossRef]
- Perides, M. , Vasconcellos, E., & Vasconcellos, L. (2020). Change Management In Digital Transformation Projects: Case Study In A Financial Organization. Revista de Gestão e Projetos, 11(1),, 54.
- Geryk, M. (2017). Universities of the future: Universities in transition under the influence of stakeholders’ changing requirements.. Springer, Cham. In International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, (págs. (pp. 116-124)). [CrossRef]
- Burrows, J. (1999). Going beyond labels: A framework for profiling institutional stakeholders. Contemporary Education, 70(4), 5.
- Beach, S. (april de 2009). Who or what decides how stakeholders are optimally engaged by governance networks delivering public outcomes? In: 13th International Research Society for Public. (Fredericksberg, Ed.) Copenhagen Business School, 6-8. [CrossRef]
- Dewar, J. (2017), «University 4.0: Redefining the Role of Universities in the Modern Era», Higher Education Review, agosto, https://www.thehighereducationreview.com/magazine/university-40-redefining-the-role-of-universities-in-themodern-era-SUPG758722027.html.
- Karaboga, T. , GüROL, y., Binici, C., & Sarp, P. (2021). Sustainable Digital Talent Ecosystem in the New Era: Impacts on Businesses, Governments and Universities. Istanbul Business Research, 49(2),, 360-379. [CrossRef]
- García-Peñalvo, F. J. , Corell, A., Abella-García, V., & Grande, M. (2020). Online assessment in higher education in the time of COVID-19. Education in the Knowledge Society, 21. doi.org/10.14201/eks. 2301. [Google Scholar]
- Collings, D. , & Mellahi, K. (2009). Strategic talent management: A review and research agenda. Human Management Rewie, 19(4), 304-313. [CrossRef]
- Bond, M. , Marín, V. I., Dolch, C., Bedenlier, S., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2018). Digital transformation in German higher education: student and teacher perceptions and usage of digital media. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1-20. 10.1186/s41239-018-0130-1.
- Himmetoglu, B. , Aydug, D., Bayrak, C. (2020). Education 4.0: Defining the teacher, the student, and the scholl manager aspects of the revolution. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(Special issue-IODL), 12-28. [CrossRef]
- Akgündüz, D. , Aydeniz, M., Çakmakçı, G., Çavaş,, B., Öner, T., & Özdemir,, S. (2015). STEM eğitimi Türkiye raporu. İstanbul: Scala Basım. [CrossRef]
- Yin, R. (1998). The abridged version of case study research. In Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods;Bickman, L.T., Debra, J.R., Eds. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA,, pp. 229–259.
- Larriaga, O. , & Rodriguez, J. (2010). El estudio de casos como metodología de investigación científica en dirección y economía de la empresa. Una aplicación a la internacionalización.. Investigaciones europeas de dirección y economía de la empresa, Investigaciones europeas de dirección y economía de la empresa, 16(3), 31-52. [CrossRef]
- Perry, C. (1998). Processes of a case de study methodology for postgraduate research in marketing”, European Journal of Marketing. European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 32 No. 9, pp 785-802. [CrossRef]
- Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Revised and expanded from “Case Study Research in Education”. Jossey-Bass Publishers: San Francisco, CA, USA.
- Bustos Díaz, J. , Mellen Vinagre, T., & Nicolas-Sans, R. (2021). University Teaching Planning in Times of COVID-19: Analysis of the Catalan Context and Proposal for a Future Model from ESIC Business and Marketing School Experience. Sustainability, 13(11). [CrossRef]
- Billis, S. , & Anid, N. (2017). N. To Flip or Not to Flip.Active and Collaborative Learning. Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2017. canada.
- 7 Things You Should Know about Flipped Classrooms. (10 de September de 2017). Recuperado el 10 de September 2017 de 2017, de Educause Learning Initiative. 2012.: https://bit.ly/1RwE3mn.
- Mingorance, A. , Trujillo, J., Cáceres, P., & Torres, C. (2017). Improvement of academic performance through the flipped classroom methodology centered in the active learning of the university student of education sciences. Journal of Sport and Healt.
- Mingorance Estrada, A. Mingorance Estrada, A., Granda Vera, J., Rojas Ruiz, G., Alemany Arrebola, I. (2019). Flipped classroom to improve university student centered learning and academic performance. Social Sciences, 8(11),, 315.
- Ostojić, M. , & Leko Šimić, M. (2021). Students’ Perceptions of Public vs. Private Higher Education Institution Brand Value in Croatia. Sustainability, 13(17), 9767. [CrossRef]
- Correia, PMAR, Mendes, I., & Pereira, S. (2019) Enhancing Factors of the Attractiveness of Higher Education Institutions; a case study of Portuguese public universities. Synesis). 11 (2),pp148-176.
- Cueva Gaibor, D. (2020). Digital Transformation in Today´s University. Revista Conrado 16(77), 483-489.
- Baños Martínez, V. (2021). Blended learning en tiempos de pandemia ¿experiencia de éxito en educación superior? Revista INFAD de Psicología. Revista Internacional de Psicología Educativa y del Desarrollo.
- Jackson, N. (2019). Managing for competency with innovation change in higher education: Examining the pitfalls and pivots of digital transformation. Business Horizons, 62(6), 761-772. [CrossRef]
- Stoeker, R. (1991): “Evaluating and rethinking the case study”, The Sociological Review, vol.39, nº 1, págs. 88-112.
- Bonache, J. (1999): “El estudio de casos como estrategia de construcción teórica: características, críticas y defensas”, Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, nº 3, págs. 123-140.
- Chetty, S. (1996): “The case study method for research in small and medium sized firms”, International Small Business Journal, vol. 15, nº 1, págs. 73-85.
- Yin, R. (1994). Discovering the future of the case study. Method in evaluation reseach. [CrossRef]
- Tay, H. , & Low, S. (2017). "Digitalization of learning resources in a HEI – a lean management perspective. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, vol. 66 No. 5, págs. 680-694. [CrossRef]

| Category of matches | Constituent groups |
| The governing bodies | State and federal governments; Board of Directors;neutral organisations; religious organisations |
| Administration | Rector, Management Team |
| Employees | Faculty; administrative staff, support staff |
| Clientele | Students; parents; spouses; service sector partners, employers; companies receiving trainees; companies employing students. |
| Suppliers | Secondary education providers, secondary school students; other HEIs; HEI service companies. |
| Competitors | Direct: Public and private post-secondary education providers.Potential: Distance education providers; Inauguration.Substitutes: employer-sponsored training programmes. |
| Donors | Individuals (including managers, friends, parents, students, employees, companies, research centres, foundations). |
| Communities | Neighbours; school systems; social services.Chambers of Commerce; special interest groups. |
| Regulatory bodiesgovernmental | Ministry of Education, neutral organisations; state and local financial aid agencies; research councils; local research grants; tax authorities; social security; patent office. |
| Regulatory bodiesnon-governmental | Foundations; accredited institutional and non-programming entities; professional associations; sponsors; ecclesiastics |
| Financial intermediaries | Banks; fund managers; analysts. |
| Joint venture partners | Alliances and consortia; corporate co-sponsors of education and research services. |
|
Technology | Canvas | |
| Methodology | Transformative learning | ||
| External Stakeholders |
|
Technology | Audiovisual platform Social mediaBlogs |
| Methodology | |||
|
Technology | ||
| Council | |||
|
Technology | ||
| Processes |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).