Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Solid-State Fermentation as a Sustainable Tool for Extracting Phenolic Compounds from Cascalote Pods

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

27 July 2023

Posted:

27 July 2023

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Cascalote pods are an important source of phenolic compounds, mainly recovered using solvent extraction methods. As a sustainable alternative, this study aimed to evaluate solid-state fermentation (SSF) to enhance the extractability of total phenolic compounds (TPC) with antioxidant activity (AA) from cascalote pods. Aspergillus niger GH1 was selected based on the amount of TPC released and AA measured (ABTS, DPPH, FRAP) in a shorter time. Moreover, moisture, temperature, inoculum size, and mineral composition were evaluated. The largest amount of TPC released was 124.17 mg/gdm (g of dry material) after 12 h of culture, strongly and highly significantly correlated with the AA. Moisture and KH2PO4 concentration were the main influencing factors on TPC release. Treatment 6 [1x 107 spores/gdm, 30 °C, 60% moisture, mineral composition (g/L): KH2PO4, 1.52; NaNO3, 7.65; and MgSO4, 1.52] was selected due to the highest values of both TPC and AA. SSF-assisted extraction allowed increase 118 % and 93 % in TPC and AA values, respectively. Corilagin, lagerstannin, geraniin, and ellagic acid were the main phenolic compounds identified by RP-HPLC-ESI-MS in cascalote extracts. The results obtained demonstrate the feasibility of SSF-assisted extraction as a biotechnological alternative for the recovery of important bioactive molecules from this underutilized material.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Caesalpinia coriaria is a plant found in the Pacific coastal plains of Central America, commonly called “cascalote” or “divi-divi”, which is used to obtain firewood, charcoal, poles, and beams. This plant produces pods 3 to 7 cm long, with a green color when unripe and dark brown color when ripe. According to Palma García [1], one cascalote tree can produce up to 150 kg of pods, which indicates a large production.
These pods are commonly used in leather tanning and fodder and are traditionally used as a treatment for infectious skin problems [2]; however, most of the pods produced are underutilized and, consequently, not fully exploited. Also, economic activity derived from harvesting has declined. Cascalote pods are astringent due to their high content of phenolic compounds, important molecules with a great interest in health, mainly due to their biological activities, such as antimicrobial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory [3,4]. The main phenolic compounds reported in cascalote fractions with biological activity are gallic acid, ethyl gallate, stigmasterol, tannic acid, and corilagin [2,5].
Phenolic compounds are commonly recovered using solvents and several extraction techniques, such as maceration, microwave, and ultrasound, among others; however, their use involves expensive equipment, as well as environmental pollution and toxicological safety concerns regarding the use of solvents [6,7]. As a biotechnological alternative, the use of fermentative or enzymatic methods for assisted extraction of biomolecules from vegetal matrices has been reported, solid-state fermentation (SSF) included [8].
SSF does not require the use of solvents and promotes high yields and easy recovery of bioactive compounds. During the SSF process, polyphenols could be biosynthesized or biotransformed into simpler molecules using the activity of microbial enzymes [9,10], which degrade the wall cell components, increasing the extraction of free and bound polyphenols [11]. Recently, SSF has been successfully used to obtain bioactive compounds from rambutan peel [12], orange peel [13], pomegranate husk [14], and pineapple waste [15], among others; however, the use of SSF in cascalote pods as a substrate to obtain bioactive compounds has not been studied. Based on responsible production and consumption, this work aimed to develop an eco-friendly bioprocess, SSF, for the extraction, recovery, and identification of compounds with antioxidant capacity from cascalote pods.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Raw material

Cascalote pods were collected in San Miguel Totolapan, Guerrero, México (18.152094485006664, -100.36604425470092) and transported to the laboratory of Biotechnology & Bioengineering in Delicias, Chihuahua, Mexico. They were dehydrated (50 °C, 24 h), pulverized (PULVEX Mini 100, Mexico City) to a particle size of 1 mm, and stored in a hermetic black polyethylene bottle at room temperature (30 °C) until use.

2.2. Physicochemical characterization of cascalote pods

Protein, fat, carbohydrate, fiber, moisture, and ash content were determined according to the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (AOAC) procedures [16]. The critical humidity point (CHP) and water absorption capacity (WAC) were obtained according to Orzua, et al. [17]. The maximum material moisture was obtained using solids, moisture content, and WAC values [12].

2.3. Microorganisms

For this study, the strains Aspergillus niger GH1, Aspergillus awamori, and Aspergillus niger HT4 (belonging to the DIA-UAdeC collection) were used. The GH1 strain of A. niger was deposited in the Micoteca of the University of Minho with the number MUM:23.16. Fungal strains were cryopreserved at -55 °C in a skim milk/glycerol (9:1 v/v) solution. Fungal spores were activated on potato dextrose agar (PDA-Bioxon™) plates at 30 °C for 5 days. For the inoculum preparation, fungal spores were collected with a sterile solution of Tween-80 (0.01 % v/v) and counted in a Neubauer chamber.

2.4. Solid-state fermentation (SSF)

Cascalote pods mixed with vermiculite (50:50 w/w) were used as support and the sole carbon source for fungal growth. SSF was performed in column reactors (31.5 x 180 mm) packed aseptically with a homogeneous mixture containing 6 g of fermentable mass with initial moisture of 50% (3 g of support impregnated with 3 mL of Czapeck-Dox saline solution, previously inoculated with 1 x 106 spores/g of support). A saline solution was prepared to contain (g/L): KCl (1.51), MgSO4 (1.52), NaNO3 (7.65) and K2HPO4 (3.04). SSF was monitored at 30 °C for 72 h, withdrawing samples every 12 h to determine the maximum phenolic content time. To obtain the fermented extracts, 12 mL of 50% ethanol was added to each reactor. Samples were shaken in a vortex and filtered through cotton and filter paper (0.45 μm) before being placed into 2 mL vials and stored at -18 °C until analysis.

2.5. Evaluation of the SSF factors for the total polyphenol extraction

Once the fungal strain was selected, the maximum phenolic content time and antioxidant activity were selected as well. Other SSFs were conducted in parallel to identify the effects of inoculum, temperature, moisture, and the concentrations of KCl, MgSO4, NaNO3, and K2HPO4, according to Table 1. The extracts were obtained after 12 h of SSF with A. niger GH1 and used to determine the TPC and the activity in antioxidant assays.

2.6. Analytical analysis

2.6.1. Determination of polyphenol content

The hydrolysable polyphenols (HP) assay was carried out according to Wong-Paz et al. [18]. In a 96-well microplate, 20 μL of the sample, 20 μL of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (2 N), 20 μL of 20% sodium carbonate solution, and 125 μL of distilled water were mixed. After 5 min of incubation, the absorbance was measured at 790 nm in a microplate reader (Multiskan GO, Thermo Scientific). The results were expressed as mg of gallic acid equivalents/g of dry matter (mgGAE/gdm), using a calibration curve (0–1 mg/mL).
The condensed polyphenols (CP) were determined using ferric reagent and HCl-butanol (1:9 v/v) [12]. The sample (250 μL) was mixed with 1,500 μL of HCl-butanol, and 50 μL of ferric reagent in 20% HCl was added. The mixture was sealed hermetically and boiled for 40 min. Finally, the samples were cooled and 200 μL were placed in a 96-well microplate, and the absorbance was recorded at 460 nm using a microplate reader (Multiskan GO, Thermo Scientific). The results were expressed as mg of catechin equivalents/g of dry matter (mgCE/gdm), using a calibration curve (0–1 mg/mL). The TPC was determined by adding the values of hydrolysable and condensed polyphenols and expressed as mg/g of dry matter (mg/gdm).

2.6.2. Antioxidant activity

The antioxidant activity of the extracts was evaluated based on DPPH, ABTS, and FRAP assays. For the DPPH assay, 60 µM DPPH [2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydracyl (Sigma-Aldrich®, México)] stock solution (2.365 mg dissolved in 100 mL absolute ethanol) was prepared. The sample (7 μL) and DPPH stock solution (193 μL) were placed in a 96-well microplate, mixed, and kept in darkness for 30 min at room temperature [19]. A microplate reader (Multiskan GO, Thermo Scientific) was used to measure the absorbance at 517 nm.
The ABTS decolorization assay was carried out using the protocol adapted to a microplate [20,21]. The ABTS●+ was prepared by mixing 7 mM ABTS [2,2-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonate)] (Sigma-Aldrich®, México) solution (0.3602 g in 100 mL distilled water) with 2 mM potassium persulfate (2.45 µM, 0.0662 g in 100 mL distilled water). The mixture was kept in darkness for 12–16 h at room temperature. After that, the absorbance of ABTS●+ was adjusted to 0.70 at 734 nm. The sample (10 μL) and ABTS●+ (190 μL) were mixed, and after one minute, the absorbance was measured using a microplate reader (Multiskan GO, Thermo Scientific). The results for DPPH and ABTS assays were expressed as mg of Trolox equivalents/g of dry matter (mgTE/gdm), using a calibration curve with 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox; 0–1 mg/mL).
The FRAP (ferric reducing antioxidant power) assay was carried out according to Pulido, et al. [22], adapted to a 96-well microplate. The FRAP reagent [0.3 M acetate buffer (pH 3.6), 10 mM 2,4,6-tri(2-pyridyl)-s-triazine (TTPZ; Sigma-Aldrich®, México) solution in 10 mM HCl, and 20 mM FeCl3.6H2O; 10:1:1 v/v] was prepared daily and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. For the reaction, 6 µL of sample, 18 µL of distilled water, and 180 µL of FRAP reagent were mixed. The resulting solution was incubated at 37 °C for 60 min, and the absorbance was measured using a microplate reader (Multiskan GO, Thermo Scientific) at 595 nm. The results obtained were expressed as mg of Fe+2 equivalents/g of dry matter (mgFe+2/gdm), using a calibration curve with Fe2SO4 (Sigma-Aldrich®, México) in 80% methanol (0–1 mg/mL).

2.6.3. Identification of phenolic compounds

The phenolic profile of fermented extract was obtained by reverse phase-high performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization/mass spectrometry (RP-HPLC/ESI/MS) according to Buenrostro-Figueroa, Nevárez-Moorillón, Chávez-González, Sepúlveda, Ascacio-Valdés, Aguilar, Pedroza-Islas, Huerta-Ochoa and Arely Prado-Barragán [14], using a Varian HPLC system including an autosampler (Varian ProStar 410, USA), a PDA detector (Varian ProStar 330, USA), and a ternary pump (Varian ProStar 230I, USA). The separation was carried out at 30 °C in a Denali C18 column (150 mm × 2.1 mm, 3µm, Grace, USA) in samples of 5 µL. The mobile phase (wash phase) was methanol, and the eluents were formic acid (0.2 %, v/v) and acetonitrile (solvent A and B, respectively). A mass spectrometer (Varian 500-MS IT Mass Spectrometer, USA) equipped with an electrospray ionization source, operated in negative mode [M-H]-1, was used for LC-ESI-MS analysis. Data were collected and processed using MS Workstation software (V 6.9). Samples were firstly analyzed in full scan mode acquired in the m/z range of 50–2000.

2.7. Experimental design

To select the best strain and time for the largest TPC content and AA, a completely randomized design with factorial arrangement was established. The factors evaluated were fungal strain (A. niger GH1, A. awamori, and A. niger HT4) and culture time (0, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 h) in triplicate (N = 63). After that, a 2k Box, Hunter, and Hunter (BHH) design was set up to identify the factors with a significant effect on TPC extraction and AA. For this purpose, six factors (inoculum size, temperature, moisture, MgSO4, NaNO3, and K2HPO4), at two levels each, were used to construct a condensed matrix with eight treatments (Table 1). All treatments were performed in triplicate and expressed as a mean (n = 3) ± standard deviation. Data were submitted to Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey´s test using Statistica 7.0 software (Stat Soft, Tulsa, OK, USA). A p-value ≤0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference. Correlations between phenolic compounds content (HP, CP, and TPC) and the activity in antioxidant assays (ABTS, DPPH, and FRAP) were determined using Pearson´s correlation coefficient (r).

3. Results

3.1. Physicochemical characterization of cascalote pods

The chemical composition of cascalote pods (Table 2) was determined to evaluate their nutritional feasibility to be used as a substrate for fungal growth in a SSF process. The main components in cascalote pods were carbohydrates and fiber, whereas proteins constitute both elemental carbon and nitrogen sources for fungal growth and enzyme production [15]. The physicochemical values for water absorption capacity (WAC), critical humidity point (CHP), and maximum moisture of the substrate (see Table 2) indicate the potential of any material to be used as substrate in a SSF process.

3.2. Kinetics of TPC extraction and AA using Aspergillus strains

The TPC release and AA assays (DPPH, ABTS, and FRAP), related to fermentation time, are shown in Figure 1. All of the evaluated strains could use cascalote pods as a substrate-support for their growth. TPC release was fast at the beginning, reaching a maximal value after 12 h of fermentation for all of the strains. At 12 h, the amount of TPC released was 70.22, 102.21, and 117.69 mgGAE/gdm for A. niger HT4, A. awamori, and A. niger GH1, respectively. After that time, TPC started to decrease, attaining a concentration of 55 mgGAE/gdm for all of the strains. Similar patterns were observed in the AA assays, DPPH (Figure 1b), ABTS (Figure 1c), and FRAP (Figure 1d), which achieved the largest numbers at 12 h for all of the strains. Based on the obtained results, A. niger and 12 h of fermentation time were selected for further studies.
Data from the extraction kinetics were used to estimate the relation between the phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of fermented extracts from cascalote pods through the Pearson correlation coefficient. As shown in Table 3, the phenolic compounds content (HP, CP, and TPC) was strongly positively and highly significantly correlated with activity in antioxidant assays (ABTS, DPPH, and FRAP).

3.3. Significant factors for TPC release by SSF

Experimental design is a useful tool to define the conditions for performing a minimal number of experiments. The BHH design was performed to identify the main factors that influence TPC release from cascalote pods by SSF. For that, an 8-treatment experimental matrix was constructed to evaluate three process parameters (inoculum size, temperature, and moisture) and three media components (KH2PO4, NaNO3, and MgSO4) on the content of hydrolyzed, condensed, and total polyphenols, as well as the antioxidant activity against DPPH and ABTS radicals in cascalote pods fermented with A. niger GH1 (Table 1). Maximal values were obtained in treatment 6, without significant differences with treatment 7, which were 0.98-, 0.79-, and 1.1-fold higher than those obtained in treatment 2 for TPC, ABTS, and DPPH values, respectively.
To evaluate the influence of these factors, absolute values of standardized effects were estimated, and their behaviors are shown in Figure 2. Moisture was the most influential (p ≤ 0.05) with a positive effect, indicating that as the factor level increased, the expected response also increased (Figure 2a). In contrast, TPC release was negatively affected by KH2PO4, MgSO4, and KCl concentrations (Figure 2b, 2c, and 2d), revealing that an increase in these factors harms the TPC release. Temperature and NaNO3 showed no significant effect (p ≤ 0.05). Therefore, any level evaluated for these factors could be used. Media components that show a negative (KH2PO4, MgSO4, and KCl concentration) or non-significant (temperature and NaNO3) effect are recommended to use in low levels (see Table 1). Therefore, treatment 6 was selected due to the highest values of TPC release and higher activity in antioxidant assays (DPPH, ABTS, and FRAP).

3.4. Effect of SSF on chemical composition, tannin content, and antioxidant activity

Chemical composition, tannin content, and antioxidant activity of treatment 6 were determined, and compared to control, no fermentation was conducted (Table 4). Significant changes were observed for all of the parameters (p≤0.05), including an increase in moisture, fat, protein, and ash content. Reduction in fiber and carbohydrate contents by the effect of SSF was observed. Concerning tannin content, SSF by A. niger GH1 increased the content of hydrolyzed, condensed, and total polyphenols, reaching values 66%, 337%, and 118% higher than the control (without fermentation), respectively. The activity of fermented extracts in the DPPH, ABTS, and FRAP assays was improved by 66.76%, 93%, and 55.67%, respectively, compared to the control.

3.5. Identification of phenolic compounds by RP-HPLC-ESI-MS

The extracts obtained at 0 and 12 h of SSF under treatment 6 conditions (see Table 1) were characterized by RP-HPLC-ESI-MS. A total of nine phenolic compounds were detected (Table 5), mainly belonging to the family of hydroxybenzoic acids and ellagitannins; however, two of them were unidentified according to the existing database, but according to the phenolic compounds profile and the weight of unidentified compounds, they are closely related to other ellagitannins. These compounds will be further elucidated using other procedures (i.e., Nuclear Magnetic Resonance).

4. Discussion

The culture media represents a mixture of nutrients that, in adequate concentrations and under optimal physical conditions, allows microbial growth and metabolic processes to occur [14]. The obtained results (Table 2) are in the range of values reported in the literature for moisture (3%), protein (3.85%–5.34%), ash (1.87%–2.58%), fat (0.19%–3.35%), and carbohydrates (71.62%–88.82%) contents [1,23].
In the SSF process, WAC, CHP, and maximum moisture are important parameters to evaluate the vegetal material’s suitability as a solid support for fungal growth and metabolite production. WAC indicates the amount of water that can be absorbed by the substrate, related to the hydroxyl groups present on it, which allows additional water interactions by hydrogen bonding [12,24]. Thus, a high WAC value is convenient for the SSF process because moisture content can be modified, allowing microbial growth. Cascalote pods presented a WAC value of 2.97 g gel/gdw, which is in the range reported (2.16 to 3.4 g gel/gdw) for agro-industrial byproducts considered as suitable supports for SSF like grape waste [25], corn cobs [26], candelilla stalks [26], rambutan peels [12], and fig byproducts [27]. The CHP represents the water linked to the support, which cannot be used for the biological functions of the microorganism. The microbial growth is promoted at low CHP values, since high values affect it for the high proportion of water linked to the substrate, and therefore, free water content is low [15]. The CHP of cascalote pods was 3.75%, lower than those reported for fig byproducts (4.63%), sugarcane bagasse (9.46%), pomegranate peel (10.13%), coconut husk (16%), corn cobs (27%), grape waste (53.33%), pineapple waste (55.6%), and mango seeds (56.5%), which are materials successfully used as substrate-supports in SSF [11,14,15,25,26,27]. Additionally, cascalote pods could be used as substrate in SSF process at high moisture levels due to the maximum moisture obtained (79.33%); however, it is recommended to work at below 70% moisture to avoid oxygen transfer limitations, particle agglomeration, and bacterial growth [12,28]. Based on their physicochemical characterization, cascalote pods are suitable to be used as a substrate-support for SSF.
Filamentous fungi are the most used microorganism in SSF, and they have great potential to release bioactive compounds from vegetal matrices [8]. During SSF, fungi produce several enzymes that degrade the cell wall components, resulting in an enhanced phenolic compounds extraction [15]. A niger GH1 has been previously reported as a potential fungus for degrading lignocellulosic materials and releasing phenolic compounds [11,12,14]. In this study, the use of A. niger GH1 increased the TPC releasement 1.67-fold and the AA 2.17-fold compared to the other Aspergillus strains evaluated.
The Pearson correlation coefficient is a number between –1 and 1 that measures the strength and direction of the relationship between two variables. When one variable changes, the other variable changes as well but in the opposite or the same direction. The TPC releasement was strongly, positively, and highly correlated to AA (0.95; p˂0.01), confirming that the increase in AA values is due to the increase in TPC release during the SSF process. This correlation is in accordance with the previous studies reported by Paz-Arteaga et al. [15], Jericó-Santos et al. [29], and Buenrostro-Figueroa et al. [14] in SSF of pineapple, tamarind, and pomegranate byproducts, which reported correlation values between TPC and DPPH from 0.63, 072, and 0.86, respectively. Increments in TPC released are associated with fungal enzymes produced during the microbial growth phase. These enzymes (xylanases, pectinases, proteases, and glucosidase, among others) are responsible for the oxidative degradation of lignin and the breakdown of the links between cell wall matrix and phenolic compounds, which results in their release [15,30].
Exploring the effects of nutritional and physical parameters in SSF promotes an increased TPC releasement. Moisture plays an important role in fungal growth. SSF requires a close control of water content; depending on the microbial strain used, a specific moisture content is needed to ensure growth and metabolite production [31]. In this study, TPC releasement was favored at high levels of moisture (60%), similar to the results obtained by Buenrostro-Figueroa et al. [27] in SSF of fig byproducts with A. niger GH1.
Magnesium is necessary for fungal nutrition, and it has an important role in hyphae development. An optimal concentration of this mineral improves the sporulation rate, promoting an efficient enzyme synthesis, and consequently, fungal biomass proliferation and phenolic compounds releasement [14,32]. Using A. niger GH1 and pomegranate husk to obtain ellagic acid and total phenolic compounds by SSF, Sepulveda et al. [32] and Buenrostro-Figueroa et al. [14] found that increments in MgSO4 levels improved the releasement of ellagic acid and total phenolic compounds, respectively. Furthermore, those authors reported that the best phenolic compounds releasement was attained at high levels of KH2PO4 and KCl. In the present study, the same KH2PO4, KCl, and MgSO4 levels were used; however, a contrary effect was observed. This may be due to the substrate-support (cascalote pods) itself containing sufficient amounts of minerals (Mg, P, and K) needed for both microbial growth and TPC releasement. The addition of higher amounts of minerals could affect the enzyme production [33]. The cell wall of A. niger contains carbohydrates, proteins, ash, and lipids [34]. Increases in protein and lipid content are related to the fungal biomass present in fermented cascalote pods. During fungal growth, the available nutrients are used to synthesize lipids as mycelium components. Reduction in carbohydrate and fiber contents are associated with fungal growth, since these components are used by the fungi as a carbon source for its development and production of cell wall-degrading enzymes [15,30].
SSF substantially improved the amount of phenolic compounds released from cascalote pods, as well as the antioxidant activity. This is explained by the fact that several enzymes with important hydrolytic activities participate in SSF, inducing the releasement of phenolic compounds from polymeric matrices [15,35].
Based on the above results, an SSF was successfully conducted by A. niger GH1 from cascalote pods, with 12 h as the best time for TPC releasement. This is the first report conducted for cascalote pods under the conditions described. Using extraction by maceration with methanol, Sánchez et al. [36] reported values of 21.71 mg/gmd of condensed tannins and 32.06 mg/gdm of total tannins. Rojas-Morales et al. [37] reported values for condensed and total tannins of 13 and 34 mg/gdm, respectively. A total condensed tannins content of 7.72 mg/gdm was reported by Pineda-Peña et al. [38]. The values for condensed and total polyphenols released from cascalote pods in the present work are 120%–521% and 265%–288% higher than the values previously reported [36,37,38].
In addition, cascalote pods exhibited strong antioxidant activity by reducing agents for ferric ions and scavenging free radicals, and SSF provided an increase of up to 93% in the AA of the extract (498.46 mgTE/gdm) compared to the value before SSF (258.18 mgTE/gdm), according to the ABTS assay. Ethanolic extract from cascalote was evaluated against DPPH and ABTS antioxidant assays [39]. At 500 mg/L, the inhibition rate was higher than 90% in both cases. Based on the strongly positive and highly significant correlation between phenolic compounds content and activity in antioxidant assays (DPPH, ABTS, and FRAP), the increase in AA is attributed to the amount and type of phenolic compounds released by the SSF. These results show the feasibility of SSF to obtain TPC with AA from vegetal matrices in comparison to chemical processes.
The RP-HPLC-ESI-MS of cascalote extracts showed that the main compounds were 5-O-galloylquinic acid, ellagic acid derivatives, corilagin, gallagyl-hexoside, lagerstannin B derivative, geraniin, and ellagic acid. There have been no reports indicating the identification of phenolic compounds obtained from cascalote pods by SSF; however, some of these compounds have been previously reported from hydroalcoholic extracts of C. coriaria [38,40]. In addition, other compounds, such as ethyl gallate, methyl gallate, gallic acid, tetragalloylglucose, pentagalloulglucose, valoneic acid dilactone, digalloylshikimic acid, and other phenolic compounds derivatives, have been cited [2,4,41].
From the nine compounds detected, seven of them increased in concentration at 12 h of SSF (in terms of units of absorbance), highlighting 5-o-galloyquinic acid, corilagin, geraniin, and ellagic acid with values 12.19-, 2.34-, 5.11-, and 7.72-fold higher than those obtained at 0 h of SSF. Lagerstannin B derivative was only found at 12 h of SSF, while gallagyl-hexoside was only detected at 0 h. The differences between the phenolic profile and absorbance values might be due to the phenolic compounds being in free or conjugated form (esterified). Therefore, during SSF these bonds are broken by the action of microbial enzymes, facilitating the partial or complete release of the phenolic compounds, improving their solubility or producing new molecules [15].
Identified polyphenol molecules in cascalote pods have different biological activities, such as antioxidant effects, hepatoprotective effects [39], anthelmintic effects [37,42], arginase inhibitory activity [43], antimicrobial activity [4,41,44], and gastroprotective effects [38]. These benefits provide a wide range of possible applications in the food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industries.
Accurate data related to cascalote production was not found; however, a yield of 150 kg of pods per tree has been reported [1]. Using the described bioprocess here, up to 18.6 kg of TPC per tree of cascalote pods could be obtained (124 kg of TPC/ton). Considering the commercial prices of corilagin, geraniin, and ellagic acid (885 USD/10 mg, 877 USD/10 mg, and 420 USD/50 mg, respectively; Sigma-Aldrich®), the SSF extraction process represents a profitable and sustainable alternative to obtain valuable compounds with industrial applications. These results confirm that SSF permits the recovery of larger amounts of high-value molecules in a shorter time process. Focusing on the highly desired circular economy model, an alternative to the diversification of cascalote pods is reported.

5. Conclusions

A. niger GH1 utilized cascalote pods as a carbon source and released phenolic compounds with antioxidant activity. The factors that most influenced the TPC releasement were moisture and KH2PO4 concentration. The higher TPC releasement and antioxidant activity were obtained at the following SSF conditions: A. niger GH1 (1x107 sp/gdm) at 12 h of culture, 30 °C, 60% moisture, and a concentration of mineral salts in the medium (g/L) of: KH2PO4: 1.52, NaNO3: 7.65, MgSO4•7H2O: 1.52, and KCl: 1.52. Corilagin, lagerstannin, geraniin, and ellagic acid were the main phenolic compounds identified by RP-HPLC-ESI-MS in cascalote extracts. The development of a bioprocess like the SSF-assisted extraction conducted in this study allowed the significant increase of TPC releasement, exhibiting high AA, offering an alternative use for this underutilized material, cascalote pods.

Author Contributions

Francisco López-Cárdenas: performed lab research, methodology, and formal analysis. Emilio Ochoa Reyes: validation, formal analysis and investigation. R. Baeza-Jiménez: visualization, supervision, review & editing. Julio C. Tafolla-Arellano: conceptualization, resources, visualization, supervision, writing, review & editing. Juan A. Ascacio-Valdés: RP-HPLC-ESI-MS, investigation, review & editing. J.J. Buenrostro-Figueroa: conceptualization, software, formal analysis, resources, supervision, project administration, writing-original draft, writing-review & editing, funding acquisition.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available upon request.

Acknowledgments

To Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo (CIAD), Departamento de Investigación en Alimentos (DIA-UAdeC) and Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro (UAAAN).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Palma García, J.M. Caesalpinia coriaria (Jacq.) Wild. In Recursos arboreos y arbustivos tropicales, Palma García, J.M., González-Reveles, C., Eds.; Universidad de Colima: México, 2018; pp. 30–34, http://ww.ucol.mx/content/publicacionesenlinea/adjuntos/Recursos-arboreos-y-arbustivostropicales_462.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sánchez-Carranza, J.N.; Alvarez, L.; Marquina-Bahena, S.; Salas-Vidal, E.; Cuevas, V.; Jiménez, E.W.; Veloz G, R.A.; Carraz, M.; González-Maya, L. Phenolic Compounds Isolated from Caesalpinia coriaria Induce S and G2/M Phase Cell Cycle Arrest Differentially and Trigger Cell Death by Interfering with Microtubule Dynamics in Cancer Cell Lines. Molecules 2017, 22, 666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jeeva, K.; Thiyagarajan, M.; Elangovan, V.; Geetha, N.; Venkatachalam, P. Caesalpinia coriaria leaf extracts mediated biosynthesis of metallic silver nanoparticles and their antibacterial activity against clinically isolated pathogens. Industrial Crops and Products 2014, 52, 714–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Olmedo-Juárez, A.; Briones-Robles, T.I.; Zaragoza-Bastida, A.; Zamilpa, A.; Ojeda-Ramírez, D.; Mendoza de Gives, P.; Olivares-Pérez, J.; Rivero-Perez, N. Antibacterial activity of compounds isolated from Caesalpinia coriaria (Jacq) Willd against important bacteria in public health. Microbial Pathogenesis 2019, 136, 103660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Li, X.; Deng, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Huang, W.; Chen, L.; Tong, Q.; Ming, Y. Corilagin, a promising medicinal herbal agent. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 2018, 99, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Makris, D.P.; Boskou, G.; Andrikopoulos, N.K. Recovery of antioxidant phenolics from white vinification solid by-products employing water/ethanol mixtures. Bioresource Technology 2007, 98, 2963–2967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Alara, O.R.; Abdurahman, N.H.; Ukaegbu, C.I. Extraction of phenolic compounds: A review. Current Research in Food Science 2021, 4, 200–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cano y Postigo, L.O.; Jacobo-Velázquez, D.A.; Guajardo-Flores, D.; Garcia Amezquita, L.E.; García-Cayuela, T. Solid-state fermentation for enhancing the nutraceutical content of agrifood by-products: Recent advances and its industrial feasibility. Food Bioscience 2021, 41, 100926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Huynh, N.T.; Van Camp, J.; Smagghe, G.; Raes, K. Improved Release and Metabolism of Flavonoids by Steered Fermentation Processes: A Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2014, 15, 19369–19388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Martins, S.; Mussatto, S.I.; Martínez-Avila, G.; Montañez-Saenz, J.; Aguilar, C.N.; Teixeira, J.A. Bioactive phenolic compounds: Production and extraction by solid-state fermentation. A review. Biotechnology Advances 2011, 29, 365–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Torres-León, C.; Ramírez-Guzmán, N.; Ascacio-Valdés, J.; Serna-Cock, L.; dos Santos Correia, M.T.; Contreras-Esquivel, J.C.; Aguilar, C.N. Solid-state fermentation with Aspergillus niger to enhance the phenolic contents and antioxidative activity of Mexican mango seed: A promising source of natural antioxidants. LWT 2019, 112, 108236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cerda-Cejudo, N.D.; Buenrostro-Figueroa, J.J.; Sepúlveda, L.; Torres-Leon, C.; Chávez-González, M.L.; Ascacio-Valdés, J.A.; Aguilar, C.N. Recovery of ellagic acid from mexican rambutan peel by solid-state fermentation-assisted extraction. Food and Bioproducts Processing 2022, 134, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xue, P.; Liao, W.; Chen, Y.; Xie, J.; Chang, X.; Peng, G.; Huang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Sun, N.; Yu, Q. Release characteristic and mechanism of bound polyphenols from insoluble dietary fiber of navel orange peel via mixed solid-state fermentation with Trichoderma reesei and Aspergillus niger. LWT 2022, 161, 113387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Buenrostro-Figueroa, J.J.; Nevárez-Moorillón, G.V.; Chávez-González, M.L.; Sepúlveda, L.; Ascacio-Valdés, J.A.; Aguilar, C.N.; Pedroza-Islas, R.; Huerta-Ochoa, S.; Arely Prado-Barragán, L. Improved Extraction of High Value-Added Polyphenols from Pomegranate Peel by Solid-State Fermentation. Fermentation 2023, 9, 530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Paz-Arteaga, S.L.; Ascacio-Valdés, J.A.; Aguilar, C.N.; Cadena-Chamorro, E.; Serna-Cock, L.; Aguilar-González, M.A.; Ramírez-Guzmán, N.; Torres-León, C. Bioprocessing of pineapple waste for sustainable production of bioactive compounds using solid-state fermentation. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 2023, 85, 103313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. AOAC, I.; Latimer, G.W. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC, 19th ed ed.; AOAC International: Gaithersburg, Md, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  17. Orzua, M.C.; Mussatto, S.I.; Contreras-Esquivel, J.C.; Rodriguez, R.; de la Garza, H.; Teixeira, J.A.; Aguilar, C.N. Exploitation of agro industrial wastes as immobilization carrier for solid-state fermentation. Industrial Crops and Products 2009, 30, 24–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wong-Paz, J.E.; Muñiz-Márquez, D.B.; Aguilar-Zárate, P.; Rodríguez-Herrera, R.; Aguilar, C.N. Microplate Quantification of Total Phenolic Content from Plant Extracts Obtained by Conventional and Ultrasound Methods. Phytochemical Analysis 2014, 25, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Meléndez, N.P.; Nevárez-Moorillón, V.; Rodriguez-Herrera, R.; Espinoza, J.C.; Aguilar, C.N. A microassay for quantification of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydracyl (DPPH) free radical scavening. African Journal of Biochemical Research 2014, 8, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Re, R.; Pellegrini, N.; Proteggente, A.; Pannala, A.; Yang, M.; Rice-Evans, C. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 1999, 26, 1231–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rojo-Gutiérrez, E.; Carrasco-Molinar, O.; Tirado-Gallegos, J.M.; Levario-Gómez, A.; Chávez-González, M.L.; Baeza-Jiménez, R.; Buenrostro-Figueroa, J.J. Evaluation of green extraction processes, lipid composition and antioxidant activity of pomegranate seed oil. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization 2021, 15, 2098–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pulido, R.; Bravo, L.; Saura-Calixto, F. Antioxidant activity of dietary polyphenols as determined by a modified ferric reducing/antioxidant power assay. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2000, 48, 3396–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mora-Santacruz, A.; Roman-Miranda, M.L.; González-Cueva, G.; Barrientos-Ramírez, L. Chemical composition of cascalote Caesalpinia coriaria (Jacq.) Willd. and diversity of uses in the rural areas of dry tropics. Revista de Investigación y Desarrollo 2018, 4, 24–28, https://www.ecorfan.org/spain/researchjournals/Investigacion_y_Desarrollo/vol4num12/Revista_de_Investigacion_y_Desarrollo_V4_N12_4.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  24. Martins, Z.E.; Pinho, O.; Ferreira, I.; Jekle, M.; Becker, T. Development of fibre-enriched wheat breads: impact of recovered agroindustrial by-products on physicochemical properties of dough and bread characteristics. European Food Research and Technology 2017, 243, 1973–1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Martínez-Ávila, G.C.; Aguilera-Carbó, A.F.; Rodríguez-Herrera, R.; Aguilar, C.N. Fungal enhancement of the antioxidant properties of grape waste. Annals of Microbiology 2012, 62, 923–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Buenrostro-Figueroa, J.; Ascacio-Valdés, A.; Sepúlveda, L.; De La Cruz, R.; Prado-Barragán, A.; Aguilar-González, M.A.; Rodríguez, R.; Aguilar, C.N. Potential use of different agroindustrial by-products as supports for fungal ellagitannase production under solid-state fermentation. Food and Bioproducts Processing 2014, 92, 376–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Buenrostro-Figueroa, J.J.; Velázquez, M.; Flores-Ortega, O.; Ascacio-Valdés, J.A.; Huerta-Ochoa, S.; Aguilar, C.N.; Prado-Barragán, L.A. Solid state fermentation of fig (Ficus carica L.) by-products using fungi to obtain phenolic compounds with antioxidant activity and qualitative evaluation of phenolics obtained. Process Biochemistry 2017, 62, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gowthaman, M.K.; Krishna, C.; Moo-Young, M. Fungal solid state fermentation — an overview. In Applied Mycology and Biotechnology, Khachatourians, G.G., Arora, D.K., Eds.; Elsevier: 2001; Volume 1, pp. 305-352. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1874533401800149.
  29. Jericó Santos, T.R.; Santos Vasconcelos, A.G.; Lins de Aquino Santana, L.C.; Gualberto, N.C.; Buarque Feitosa, P.R.; Pires de Siqueira, A.C. Solid-state fermentation as a tool to enhance the polyphenolic compound contents of acidic Tamarindus indica by-products. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 2020, 30, 101851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. da Costa Maia, I.; Thomaz dos Santos D'Almeida, C.; Guimarães Freire, D.M.; d'Avila Costa Cavalcanti, E.; Cameron, L.C.; Furtado Dias, J.; Simões Larraz Ferreira, M. Effect of solid-state fermentation over the release of phenolic compounds from brewer's spent grain revealed by UPLC-MSE. LWT 2020, 133, 110136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Krishna, C. Solid-State Fermentation Systems—An Overview. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 2005, 25, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sepúlveda, L.; Aguilera-Carbó, A.; Ascacio-Valdés, J.A.; Rodríguez-Herrera, R.; Martínez-Hernández, J.L.; Aguilar, C.N. Optimization of ellagic acid accumulation by Aspergillus niger GH1 in solid state culture using pomegranate shell powder as a support. Process Biochemistry 2012, 47, 2199–2203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sirisansaneeyakul, S.; Jitbanjongkit, S.; Prasomsart, N.; Luangpituksa, P. Production of β-Fructofuranosidase from Aspergillus niger ATCC 20611. Agricultural and Natural Resources 2000, 34, 378–386. [Google Scholar]
  34. Garcia-Rubio, R.; de Oliveira, H.C.; Rivera, J.; Trevijano-Contador, N. The Fungal Cell Wall: Candida, Cryptococcus, and Aspergillus Species. Frontiers in Microbiology 2020, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Espitia-Hernández, P.; Ruelas-Chacón, X.; Chávez-González, M.L.; Ascacio-Valdés, J.A.; Flores-Naveda, A.; Sepúlveda-Torre, L. Solid-State Fermentation of Sorghum by Aspergillus oryzae and Aspergillus niger: Effects on Tannin Content, Phenolic Profile, and Antioxidant Activity. Foods 2022, 11, 3121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sánchez, N.; Mendoza, G.D.; Martínez, J.A.; Hernández, P.A.; Camacho Diaz, L.M.; Lee-Rangel, H.A.; Vazquez, A.; Flores Ramirez, R. Effect of Caesalpinia coriaria Fruits and Soybean Oil on Finishing Lamb Performance and Meat Characteristics. BioMed Research International 2018, I, 9486258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rojas-Morales, D.; Cubides-Cárdenas, J.; Montenegro, A.C.; Martínez, C.A.; Ortíz-Cuadros, R.; Rios-de Álvarez, L. Anthelmintic effect of four extracts obtained from Caesalpinia coriaria foliage against the eggs and larvae of Haemonchus contortus. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2021, 30, e002521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pineda-Peña, E.A.; Capistran-Amezcua, D.; Reyes-Ramírez, A.; Xolalpa-Molina, S.; Chávez-Piña, A.E.; Figueroa, M.; Navarrete, A. Gastroprotective effect methanol extract of Caesalpinia coriaria pods against indomethacin- and ethanol-induced gastric lesions in Wistar rats. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2023, 305, 116057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pájaro González, Y.; Méndez Cuadro, D.; Fernández Daza, E.; Franco Ospina, L.A.; Redondo Bermúdez, C.; Díaz Castillo, F. Inhibitory activity of the protein carbonylation and hepatoprotective effect of the ethanol-soluble extract of Caesalpinia coriaria Jacq. Oriental Pharmacy and Experimental Medicine 2016, 16, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. García-Hernández, C.; Rojo-Rubio, R.; Olmedo-Juárez, A.; Zamilpa, A.; Mendoza de Gives, P.; Antonio-Romo, I.A.; Aguilar-Marcelino, L.; Arece-García, J.; Tapia-Maruri, D.; González-Cortazar, M. Galloyl derivatives from Caesalpinia coriaria exhibit in vitro ovicidal activity against cattle gastrointestinal parasitic nematodes. Experimental Parasitology 2019, 200, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rangel-López, L.; Rivero-Perez, N.; Valladares-Carranza, B.; Olmedo-Juárez, A.; Delgadillo-Ruiz, L.; Vega-Sánchez, V.; Hori-Oshima, S.; Nassan, M.A.; Batiha, G.E.; Zaragoza-Bastida, A. Antibacterial Potential of Caesalpinia coriaria (Jacq) Willd Fruit against Aeromonas spp. of Aquaculture Importance. Animals 2022, 12, 511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. García-Hernández, C.; Rojo-Rubio, R.; Gives, P.M.-d.; González-Cortazar, M.; Zamilpa, A.; Mondragón-Ancelmo, J.; Villa-Mancera, A.; Olivares-Pérez, J.; Tapia-Maruri, D.; Olmedo-Juárez, A. In vitro and in vivo anthelmintic properties of Caesalpinia coriaria fruits against Haemonchus contortus. Experimental Parasitology 2022, 242, 108401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wulansari, A.; Elya, B.; Noviani, A. Arginase Inhibitory and Antioxidant Activities of Caesalpinia coriaria (Jacq.) Willd. Bark Extract. Pharmacognosy Journal 2018, 10, 1174–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pitre-Ruiz, L.; Galván-Ayala, D.; Castro-Uriana, O.; Ávila Mendez, K.J.; Lopez-Pazos, S.A. In vitro antimicrobial activity of Caesalpinia coriaria (Jacq.) Willd extracts on Streptococcus pyogenes and Candida albicans. Vitae 2021, 28, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Kinetics of: a) total polyphenol content, b) antioxidant activity by DPPH assay, c) antioxidant activity by ABTS assay, and d) antioxidant activity by FRAP assay, for fermented extracts from cascalote pods by Aspergillus strains.
Figure 1. Kinetics of: a) total polyphenol content, b) antioxidant activity by DPPH assay, c) antioxidant activity by ABTS assay, and d) antioxidant activity by FRAP assay, for fermented extracts from cascalote pods by Aspergillus strains.
Preprints 80694 g001
Figure 2. Effect of significant factors for TPC release by SSF with A. niger GH1.
Figure 2. Effect of significant factors for TPC release by SSF with A. niger GH1.
Preprints 80694 g002
Table 1. A Box, Hunter, and Hunter condensed matrix was used to determine the influence of independent factors (A, B, C, D, E, F, and G) on TPC and AA (ABTS, DPPH, FRAP) of extracts obtained by SSF with A. niger GH1 from cascalote pods.
Table 1. A Box, Hunter, and Hunter condensed matrix was used to determine the influence of independent factors (A, B, C, D, E, F, and G) on TPC and AA (ABTS, DPPH, FRAP) of extracts obtained by SSF with A. niger GH1 from cascalote pods.
Preprints 80694 i001
*Different lowercase letters indicate no significant differences among treatments (Tukey’s test; p≤0.05).
Table 2. Physicochemical characterization of cascalote pods.
Table 2. Physicochemical characterization of cascalote pods.
Parameter Content
Moisture (g/100 gdb) 3.36 ± 0.15
Fat (g/100 gdb) 0.65 ± 0.09
Fiber (g/100 gdb) 6.54 ± 0.25
Protein (g/100 gdb) 3.44 ± 0.13
Ash (g/100 gdb) 2.13 ± 0.21
Carbohydrates (g/100 gdb) 87.24 ± 0.96
Water absorption capacity (g of gel/gdw) 2.97 ± 0.07
Critical humidity point (%) 3.75 ± 0.29
Maximum moisture of cascalote pods (%) 79.33 ± 2.08
gdb: gram of dry basis; gdw: gram of dry weight.
Table 3. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between phenolic compounds (HP, CP, and TPC) and activity in antioxidant assays (ABTS, DPPH and FRAP).
Table 3. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between phenolic compounds (HP, CP, and TPC) and activity in antioxidant assays (ABTS, DPPH and FRAP).
Variables HP CP TPC ABTS DPPH FRAP
HP 1 0.94* 0.98* 0.94* 0.94* 0.82*
CP 1 0.98* 0.93* 0.94* 0.84*
TPC 1 0.95* 0.95* 0.85*
ABTS 1 0.95* 0.87*
DPPH 1 0.95*
FRAP 1
*Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level.
Table 4. Effect of SSF of cascalote pods using A. niger GH1 on chemical composition, tannin content, and antioxidant activity.
Table 4. Effect of SSF of cascalote pods using A. niger GH1 on chemical composition, tannin content, and antioxidant activity.
Parameter/Treatment Control (0 h) Treatment 6 (12 h)*
Moisture (g/100 gdb) 4.90 ± 0.04b 5.40 ± 0.20a
Fat (g/100 gdb) 0.23 ± 0.05b 0.34 ± 0.10a
Fiber (g/100 gdb) 5.54 ± 0.23a 1.77 ± 0.12b
Protein (g/100 gdb) 3.24 ± 0.15b 3.59 ± 0.10a
Ash (g/100 gdb) 52.88 ± 0.95b 59.28 ± 0.93a
Carbohydrates (g/100 gdb) 38.11 ± 1.95a 35.02 ± 1.76b
Hydrolyzed polyphenols (mgGAE/gdm) 45.76b 76.22a
Condensed polyphenols (mgCE/gdm) 10.97b 47.95a
Total polyphenol content (mg/gdm) 56.73b 124.17a
Antioxidant activity:
DPPH (mgTE/gdm) 266.63b 444.64a
ABTS (mgTE/gdm) 258.18b 498.46a
FRAP (mgFe+2/gdm) 354.03b 551.13a
*Different letters indicated no significant differences between treatments (Tukey α=0.05).
Table 5. Phenolic compounds profile from cascalote pods fermented by A. niger GH1 and identified using the RP-HPLC-ESI-MS technique.
Table 5. Phenolic compounds profile from cascalote pods fermented by A. niger GH1 and identified using the RP-HPLC-ESI-MS technique.
# RT [M-H]- Bioactive compound Molecular formula Family 0 h 12 h SSF
UA UA
1 10.41 342.5 5-O-Galloylquinic acid C14H16O10 Hydroxybenzoic acids 0.026 0.343
2 15.02 798.4 Ellagic acid derivate Hydroxybenzoic acids 0.136 1.539
3 17.64 494.7 Unidentified 0.373 2.479
4 18.51 1118.1 Unidentified 0.384 2.451
5 20.51 632.6 Corilagin C27H22O18 Ellagitannins 0.747 2.501
6 24.18 782.4 Gallagyl-hexoside C34H22O22 Ellagitannins 0.338 ND
7 24.62 968.1 Lagerstannin B derivate Ellagitannins ND 2.458
8 25.79 952.2 Geraniin C41H28O27 Ellagitannins 0.377 2.307
9 28.84 300.6 Ellagic acid C14H6O8 Hydroxybenzoic acid dimers 0.247 2.155
RT = retention time; UA = unit of absorbance; ND = not detected.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated