ToBRFV Mexican Strain: Seed Transmission Rate, Efficacy of Seed Disinfection Treatment, and Rapid Sensitive Detection in Seed Lots

1. Introduction

Tomato brown rugose fruit virus (ToBRFV) is a tobamovirus that forms rigid rod-shaped particles. Its genome comprises a positive single-stranded RNA (+ssRNA) genome that contains four open reading frames (ORFs). ORF1 and ORF2 encode the RNA-dependent-RNA polymerase (RdRp), while ORF3 encodes the movement protein (MP) and ORF4 for the capsid protein (CP) [2]. As its viral particles are very stable, it is easily mechanically transmitted. Therefore, cultivation activities are the primary way it spreads in greenhouses [3,4].

As ToBRFV quickly spreads through tomato and pepper-producing zones worldwide, the infected seed has been proposed as an essential source of this virus transmission. Most tobamoviruses are primarily found as contaminants in the coat of seeds. While viral particles are efficiently transmitted when they enter the embryo, those in the seed coat may not be infectious when they separate from the seedling. Although this causes a small transmission percentage, the process can occur as a primary field inoculation and quickly spread through contact [5]. Furthermore, viral particles can remain viable in clay soil and crop wastes for months or even years [6]. The mechanical transmission of ToBRFV from infected seeds to seedlings is very likely responsible for initiating a new infection [7].

Current disinfection methods used in commercial seed production involve chemical treatments with chlorhydric acid (1-9%), calcium hypochlorite (1-5%), sodium hypochlorite (1-3%) [8], tetramethyl thiuram disulfide (TMTD), and trisodium phosphate (10%) [9]. Nevertheless, the continually occurring epidemics show that the treatment of seeds is not having the desired impact, which may be due to the preservation of the virus in the internal tissues of the embryo [5]. In keeping with this, laboratory techniques for tobamoviruses detection in seeds include serological methods such as ELISA, which is a reliable and rapid technique [10,11]. However, it can give false positives and negatives. Molecular methods are also used, such as RT-PCR and qRT-PCR. These methods are more sensitive [12], but as they only detect a genome fragment, performing biological tests of infectivity in indicator plants is suggested as a confirmation [5].

In the case of ToBRFV, the International Seed Federation (ISF) recommends employing qRT-PCR to analyze subsamples of seeds without any disinfectant treatment, followed by bioassays to determine whether local lesions exist in tobacco plants [13]. For instance, the National Center of Phytosanitary Reference (SENASICA) established the following procedure in Mexico. First, seeds should be soaked in distilled water, shaken for 20 minutes, and then germinated to perform the total RNA extraction protocols [14].

Aware of the relevance of emergent diseases associated with potential seed dispersion of ToBRFV Mexican strains to agronomically important Solanaceae hosts, we focused on analyzing the virus seed transmission rate and the efficacy of different seed disinfection treatments. Additionally, we compared molecular biology techniques seeking rapid and sensitive virus detection in seed lots. We evaluated a combination of several total RNA extraction and RT-PCR protocols using a distinct combination of PCR primers reported in the literature. Moreover, we tested potential natural hosts to determine whether or not ToBRFV could infect cucurbits and additional hosts in selected Solanaceae species. Our results showed the specificity of the percentage of Nicotiana rustica seedlings and seeds infected. Herein we are contributing findings that could be useful for better understanding the biology underlying the ToBRFV Mexican strain, its natural hosts, and diagnostic methods with potential application in the routine detection of seeds lots and plants, reducing the risk of dispersion.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials Used as an Inoculum Source

In September 2020, tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L.) showing chlorosis, leaf narrowing, and mosaics (typical symptoms of ToBRFV infection) were collected from commercial greenhouses in Colima, Mexico. The inoculum source tested positive for ToBRFV by RT-PCR. A Nicotiana glutinosa plant was mechanically inoculated using this tissue, and local necrotic lesions were observed. One of these lesions was cut to inoculate a second N. glutinosa plant. This process was repeated twice. A local lesion of the fourth N. glutinosa plant was used to inoculate a tomato plant (var. saladette). Then, 30 days post-inoculation (dpi), the tomato plant was analyzed by RT-PCR for the presence of the virus. The inoculum source was increased by mechanical inoculation on tomato plants to perform the different host bioassays and seed transmission tests.

2.2. RNA Extraction and RT-PCR

Plant material from the inoculum source was divided into two groups for further processing. The first group was macerated in a phosphate buffer (0.1 M potassium phosphate at pH 7.0 + 0.1 M sodium sulfite + 1% of β-mercaptoethanol). This suspension was used to inoculate healthy tomato seedlings mechanically. Meanwhile, the second group was used to extract the total RNA to identify the associated agent by RT-PCR using the specific primers and conditions described by Rodríguez-Mendoza et al. (2018) [15]. The expected fragments were then sequenced.

2.3. Evaluation of Total RNA Extraction Methods

Pepper and tomato seeds were germinated in Petri dishes containing paper towels moistened with sterile distilled water. After 10 to 20 days, when the cotyledonary leaves emerged and expanded, 100 mg of complete seedlings (stem, leaves, and root) of each plant species were separately used to perform total RNA extraction. In addition, three seeds of most of the plant species were planted in 1L Styrofoam cups containing a peat-growing mix. Plants were maintained under greenhouse conditions. After 45 days, 100 mg of foliar tissue (pedicels, leaves, and shoots) was collected to perform total RNA extraction. A total of four RNA extraction methods were evaluated: PlantRNAeasy miniKit®, following the manufacturer's instructions; Trizol®, CTAB2 %, and CTAB2%-Trizol® following the protocol described by Jordon-Thaden et al. (2015) [16] (minor modifications, Appendix A). Plant tissue maceration was performed with liquid nitrogen in a sterile mortar. The amount and quality of the extracted RNA were quantified using a Nanodrop 2000®, and the absorbance measurements 260/280 and 260/230 were recorded.

2.4. Primer Evaluation and Sensitivity Limit

Three replicates of tomato, eggplant (Solanum melongena), and tomatillo (Physalis ixocarpa) seedlings were mechanically inoculated with the tomato inoculum. At 30 dpi, when plants showed chlorosis and mosaic symptoms, total RNA extraction was performed using the previously described CTAB-Trizol protocol. The quality and quantity of the extracted RNA were verified using a Nanodrop 2000®. The final concentration was adjusted to 300 ng/µL. Subsequently, serial dilutions of each total RNA sample were made and adjusted to 10, 1, 0.1, 0.01, 0.001, and 0.0001 ng/µL. Pairs of specific primers, described by Ling et al. (2019) [17] and Rodríguez-Mendoza et al. (2018) [15] and reported by Dovas et al. (2004) [1], were tested. The specifications described in the protocols reported for each primer pair were followed.

2.5. Seed Transmission Test

2.5.1. Acquisition of Seeds

Virus mechanical inoculation was carried out in thirty healthy tobacco plants (N. rustica) at two true leaves stage. Additionally, plants were mock-inoculated as controls. Plants were maintained under greenhouse-controlled conditions with a 12-hours light:12 hours dark cycle at temperatures ranging from 16°C to 24°C until fruiting. Seeds were collected from each plant when the capsules opened and stored at 4°C. ToBRFV infection in tobacco plants was confirmed by total RNA extraction and RT-PCR using the primers reported by Dovas et al. (2004) [1].

2.5.2. Germination Test

Stereoscopic microscopy was used to select vain seeds. Those were divided into three groups of 100 seeds from ToBRFV-infected plants and their respective mock-inoculated controls. Each group was placed into a petri dish containing paper moistened with sterile distilled water. Petri dishes were incubated at 23°C for 72 hours of light, followed by 18° to 24°C for one 12-hour light: 12-hour dark cycle. The sprouted seedlings were counted after 20 days. This procedure was repeated three times.

2.5.3. Estimation of Percentage of Infection in Seeds or Seedlings

The technique described by Albrechtsen (2006) [18] was employed to calculate the percentage (P) of infected seeds or seedlings. In brief, this technique uses the maximum likelihood estimation, in which a population (seeds or seedlings) is divided into subgroups (N) of a known amount (n). P= [1- (Y/N)^1/n]X 100, where Y is the number of negative subgroups. Then, the percentage of infection was calculated in N. rustica seedlings from seeds obtained from ToBRFV-infected plants.

2.5.4. Experimental Method to Determine the Percentage of Infected Seeds

In order to determine the percentage of infected seeds, fifteen subgroups of 250 seeds per Petri dish were placed under the previously described conditions. Then, seedlings were selected using stereoscopic microscopy when sprouted, and the seed coat was separated from the cotyledon. The seedlings were placed in previously sterilized paper envelopes and stored at -20°C. Subsets of 150 were obtained from each Petri dish for a total of 2,250 seedlings. The CTAB-Trizol protocol described by Jordon-Thaden et al. (2015) [16] was employed to obtain total RNA using each subset. The quality and amount of RNA extracted were verified and quantified using a Nanodrop 2000®. Total RNA was adjusted to 300 ng/µL, and 1 µL was employed for reverse transcription, followed by nested PCR using the primers and protocols described by Dovas et al. (2004) [1] (Figure 1). Electrophoresis with a 1.5% agarose gel was performed on the products obtained from the nested PCR. The expected size of the fragments was verified, and the fragments were purified with EXO-SAP according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The purified products were shipped to Macrogen, Korea, for sequencing. The second experiment used stereoscopic microscopy to select 15 subgroups of 150 N. rustica seeds from ToBRFV-positive plants. These were placed in Eppendorf tubes, and total RNA extraction, nested RT-PCR, and purification were performed with each subgroup, as described previously (Figure 1a). Both experiments included two subgroups of 150 seeds or seedlings from healthy N. rustica controls.

2.5.5. Infectivity Tests of Viral Particles in Seeds

Evaluation of infectivity was performed on fifteen subsets comprising 100 seeds treated with 3% sodium hypochlorite for three minutes with respective subsets of untreated seeds. Each group was macerated in liquid nitrogen. The maceration was divided equally into two Eppendorf tubes, one containing 500 µL of phosphate buffer at a pH of 7.0 and the other containing 600 µL of 2% CTAB buffer. Healthy N. rustica plants were mechanically inoculated using carborundum as an abrasive. The CTAB RNA total extraction, followed by nested RT-PCR, was performed on samples in the second tube (Figure 1b). The inoculated N. rustica plants were maintained in a greenhouse at 18°C to 23°C with a 12 hours light:12 hours dark cycle. Plants were visually observed daily to record the appearance of local or systemic symptoms. At 30 dpi, the apical leaves were selected from each plant to extract total RNA and to perform RT-PCR. We included two subgroups of 100 treated seeds, 100 untreated seeds, or 100 seedlings from healthy N. rustica.

2.6. Bioassays of Potential Hosts

To identify potential ToBRFV hosts, mechanical inoculations were performed on five biological replicates from each of the following species; a) Solanaceae family: tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), tomatillo (Physalis ixocarpa), tobacco (Nicotiana rustica), pepper (Capsicum annum), eggplant (Solanum melongena L.); b) Cucurbitaceae family; watermelon (Citrullus lanatus), cantaloupe (Cucumis melo L.), squash (Cucurbita pepo), and cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Additionally, three plants from each species were mock-inoculated as controls. The plants were maintained under greenhouse conditions and observed daily to record symptoms. After 30 dpi, plants were tested for virus presence using RT-PCR employing the primers described by Dovas et al. (2004) [1] and ELISA, with antibodies against TMV (Agdia®) that have cross-reactions. This experiment was performed thrice: first in October 2019, second in February 2020, and last in April 2020. During the first experiment, the average monthly temperature in the greenhouse ranged from 13°C to 23°C with a 12 hours light:12 hours dark cycle. During the second experiment, the temperature went from 11° to 26° with an 11 hours light:13 hours dark cycle. The temperature during the third experiment ranged from 14° to 29°C with a 13 hours light:11 hours dark cycle.

3. Results

3.1. Evaluation of Total RNA Extraction Methods

When comparing methods, a higher concentration of total RNA was obtained using tomato and pepper seedlings. Notably, the highest amount in nanograms per microliter was obtained with the CTAB-Trizol protocol, while the lowest concentration was obtained with the RNA isolation Kit (Figure 2).

3.2. Primer Evaluation and Sensitivity Limit

Our results show that using total RNA from tomato and tomatillo plants, the primers designed by Ling et al. (2019) [17] detected the virus up to 0.01ng/𝜇L. In contrast, for eggplant RNA samples, the detection limit was 1 ng/𝜇L. In comparison, the primers of Rodríguez-Mendoza et al. (2018) [15] showed a 0.1 ng/𝜇L detection limit in tomato and 0.01 ng/𝜇L in tomatillo. Notwithstanding either of the primers selection, 1 ng/𝜇L was the sensitivity limit for eggplant samples. Remarkably, the sensitivity limit was increased for tomato and tomatillo using the nested RT-PCR technique and the primers described by Dovas et al. (2004) [1]. Using this set of primers, we identified the virus detection limit as 0.0001 ng/𝜇L in tomato, 0.001 ng/𝜇L in tomatillo, and 1 ng/𝜇L in eggplant (Figure 3).

3.3. Seed Transmission

3.3.1. Collection of Seeds and Germination Test

After mechanical inoculation, seed pods from infected tobacco plants were collected for three to four months, collecting an adequate amount of seeds to perform the tests described in this section. As could be expected, the percent seed germination was higher in seeds obtained from control plants (82%) when compared to those infected with ToBRFV (57.7%) (Table 1).

3.3.2. Percentage of Infection in Seeds and Seedlings

ToBRFV was detected in subsample sizes of 150 and 100 seeds, which were found to have a percentage of infection (P) of 0.61% and 0.22%, respectively. Regarding seedlings, positive groups were detected only when analyzing 150 seedlings and not 100, and the percentage of infection (P) was 0.42% (Figure 4a). In addition, the virus was not detected within subgroups of 100 seeds treated with 3% sodium hypochlorite for three minutes.

3.3.3. Infectivity Tests of Viral Particles in Seeds

Regarding the infectivity tests of viral particles in N. rustica seeds, only three subgroups in tobacco leaves showed symptoms (Figure 4b). They were positive by nested RT-PCR (Figure 4b). This could indicate that positive results in seeds are from viable viral particles and can spread an infection. When analyzing subsamples of 100 seedlings and 100 seeds treated with 3% sodium hypochlorite, no positive groups were detected, nor were symptoms observed in inoculated nicotiana leaves.

3.4. Biological Assays to Test Potential Hosts

Symptoms of virus infection were absent for all the Cucurbitaceae tested species (watermelon, cantaloupe, squash, and cucumber). The absence of virus presence was confirmed by negative results obtained by performing both ELISA and nested RT-PCR techniques (Table 2). In the case of the Solanaceae species, tomato and tobacco-infected plants showed symptoms, and virus presence was confirmed as positive. Interestingly, our results showed that only a percentage of the inoculated tomatillo, pepper, and eggplant displayed symptoms (Figure 5); and were confirmed as infected (Table 2).

4. Discussion

Tobamoviruses can be transmitted by contaminated seeds that are untreated or insufficiently treated with disinfectants to the growing seedling. In this work, we first analyzed virus seed transmission rates and the efficacy of seed disinfection treatments in Nicotiana rustica using a ToBRFV Mexican isolate. Our results showed that the percentage of infection in seeds and seedlings was less than 1% (Figure 6.). Previous experiments demonstrated low seed-to-seedling transmission rates in tomato plants ranging from 0.08% to 1.8% [7,19]. Several disinfection treatments had been tested for ToBRFV removal efficiency from the contaminated seeds. It was found that disinfection treatments such as incubation in sodium hypochlorite solution at 2% for 30 min removed the contaminated ToBRFV virions from the seeds without affecting the germination rate of the treated seeds [7,20,21]. Our experiments identified that sodium hypochlorite solution at 3% was effective as a seed disinfection treatment. Moreover, our findings show that ToBRFV affects the germination of seeds in this host. Although the phenomenon involved is not well known, viruses can affect the physiological performance of the seed [22,23].

Additionally, we compared molecular biology techniques seeking rapid and sensitive virus detection in seed lots (Figure 6). The difference between using subsample sizes of 150 and 100 seeds resulted from an increased viral load when using more seeds, with more positive subgroups being detected. In keeping with this, the virus was not detected within subgroups of 100 seeds after 3% sodium hypochlorite treatment. These results support the proposal that a higher proportion of ToBRFV is found as a contaminant of the seed coat and occasionally of the endosperm [7]. In general, treating seeds with 1-3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) is effective against viruses [8], and it has been corroborated that 2.5% NaOCl for 15 minutes was able to inactivate ToBRFV without affecting seed germination [7]. Nevertheless, the ongoing tobamovirus epidemics demonstrate that treating seeds does not have the desired impact, suggesting that some percentage of the virus is present in the internal tissue of the seeds [5].

Notably, the percentage of a virus transmitted by the seed differs among viral species and variants of the same virus. This percentage can be modified by various factors, including mixed infections, the type of host and the stage of development during which the plant is infected, and the severity and environmental factors that affect both the host and the performance of the virus [24]. In addition, viral accumulation in the host and the transmission type (vectors, contact, seed) can modify the virus's transmission rate. A complex relationship has been observed between viral accumulation in the host and virulence and severity. In keeping with this, more significant viral accumulation cannot be guaranteed to lead to more symptoms [25].

In terms of the efficiency of the vertical transmission of parasites, this is highly dependent on the reproductive potential of the host since the parasite needs to reproduce to infect new individuals [26]. An attenuated virulence could favor the transmission of the virus through the seed. The efficiency of seed transmission has also been associated with greater mobility and multiplication of the virus in the inflorescence [27]. Vertical transmission could be favored by environmental conditions that contribute to reducing the virulence of the virus without controlling the multiplicative level within the plant (tolerance). For example, a higher light intensity favors the accumulation of some viruses in the inflorescence, increasing seed transmission while reducing the host plant's virulence [28].

Nevertheless, of the many factors that influence the percentage of seed transmission, it is known that even if a virus has a ratio as low as 0.001%, this can potentially start an epidemic [24]. In the case of ToBRFV, Davino et al. (2020) [7] found the seed transmission rate was 1.8% and 2.8% in cherry tomatoes.

Regarding the size of the sample and subsamples required to detect ToBRFV, the ISF (2019) [13] recommends analyzing a minimum of 3,000 seeds, which should be divided into subsamples of no more than 250. However, there needs to be more indication as to whether or not this sample size can represent larger seed lots and how they should be sampled. Panno et al. (2020) [4] analyzed 3,000 commercial tomato seeds by lot and divided them into subgroups of 300. This resulted in the detection of ToBRFV in 7% of the lots, and in those cases, all the subgroups were positive. Meanwhile, Fidan et al. (2020) [29] analyzed a lot of 3,000 tomato seeds from symptomatic plants that were artificially infected with ToBRFV, which they divided into 12 subsamples of 250 seeds. They detected the virus in at least one subsample. This work detected the virus in subsamples of 150 and 100 seeds. According to Dombrovsky and Smith (2017) [5], the threshold for detecting Tobamovirus in seeds is one infected out of 249, and 20 subsamples of 100 seeds are required to ensure a 95% likelihood of detecting the virus in minimal infestations of 0.15%.

In the present work, we have observed some advantages and disadvantages that need to be analyzed to determine whether ToBRFV can be detected directly from the seed or the seedling. Seed samples can be immediately investigated, and a more significant number of seeds can be used for each sample processed during extraction, thereby increasing the likelihood of detecting the virus if a few seeds are infected. Nevertheless, non-viable virions, such as contaminants, can be found in the seed, which increases the risk of false positives. In addition, because of the seed tissue's hardness and structural complexity, obtaining a high-quality RNA extraction is more complicated.

While using seedlings makes it possible to increase the replication of the virus and thereby increase the likelihood of detection, it has been found that seedlings remain asymptomatic (with low viral load) and do not express symptoms until handled in intensive production. Meanwhile, analyzing only seedlings without the seed coat eliminates the risk of false positives. The seedling tissue is easier to process, increasing the quality of the extracted RNA. Nonetheless, fewer can be processed since the plant material weighs more in seedlings. There needs to be more information about how many seedlings per subsample need to be processed to detect tobamoviruses.

There are diverse RNA extraction methods whose objective has been focused on obtaining suitable concentrations of the best possible quality since plant tissues may contain high levels of phenolic compounds, polysaccharides, pigments, and RNases [30]. The content of phenols in plants is highly variable and depends on the development stage of plants and the biotic and abiotic environmental factors to which they are exposed. In tomato leaves, the phenol content can decrease with age, but various compounds fluctuate throughout their development [31].

An excellent quality RNA extraction from woody tissues in plants is challenging because they have a high concentration of polysaccharides, polyphenols, and other secondary metabolites. Phenolic compounds bind to proteins and nucleic acids to form large molecular weight complex molecules. Polysaccharides tend to co-precipitate with RNA in the presence of alcohols, remaining as contaminants in the final extraction [32].

The quality and concentration of the RNA obtained during the extractions are critical for accuracy and confidence in plant molecular studies such as RT-PCR [33] and gene expression analysis [34]. However, in mass detection tests, the method's cost will also influence its choice; in this sense, techniques such as CTAB (hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide) and Trizol are cheaper than commercial kits. The CTAB and Trizol methods have also been widely used in various plant species and tissues, with favorable results [33], obtaining good quality and purity and being a fast and economical extraction method for detecting viruses [35]. The CTAB method allows rapid extraction of total RNA from recalcitrant tissue without using toxic chemicals [36]; however, DNA was also extracted by processing the extractions with Trizol afterward, and better quality total RNA extractions can be obtained.

Our results confirmed that the sensitivity limit of each pair of primers was different concerning the plant species. This is probably because the pathogen is expressed and concentrated differently between hosts. In eggplant, the sensitivity limit was the same regardless of the primers used. Regarding tomatillo, the primers of Ling and Rodríguez-Mendoza had the same limit, while for tomato Ling's primers were ten times more sensitive (Figure 3). The Ling primers are designed to amplify the coat protein region, while the Rodríguez-Mendoza primers detected an RdPR region. Magaña-Álvarez et al., (2021) [37] found that primers that amplify the ToBRFV coat protein region have a better performance for virus detection than primers that detect the RdRp region in tomato plants. Nested PCR is known to be more sensitive and reliable than conventional PCR [38]; although it requires more time and reagents to be carried out. As expected, the Dovas primers were 100 times more sensitive with tomato and ten times more sensitive with tomatillo.

The purpose of being able to detect ToBRFV in seeds is to offer producers quality seeds that do not contain more pathogens than the permitted threshold. But the tolerance limits of the virus in seeds depend on certification requirements, and the acceptable level of inoculation is highly debatable. In some cases, the certification of seeds is not affordable or is not available with the infrastructure in developing countries [18]. In the specific case of ToBRFV, given the low percentage of seed transmission that has been reported in tomatoes [7] and considering what we have found in this work (less than 1%), we believe that in addition to certifying seeds through diagnostic tests, it is crucial to verify that all the plants that serve as a source of germplasm are also certified.

Tobamoviruses affect a wide range of species belonging to the Solanaceae and Cucurbitaceae families [5]. In the case of ToBRFV, it has been reported as naturally restricted to tomato and pepper plants. However, it has been possible to experimentally infect multiple plant models, including Nicotiana tabacum, N. benthamiana, N. clevelandii, N. glutinosa, Solanum nigrum, Chenopodium murale, C. amaranticolor, C. quinoa, Petunia hybrid, N. glutinosa, N. occidentalis, N. rustica, and N. sylvestris [39,40]. Although, it has been reported infecting eggplant in Mexico (S. melongena) [40], recent reports indicated not being able to infect this species under controlled conditions, nor were they able to infect potato (S. tuberosum L.) [39].

We tested potential natural hosts in selected Cucurbitaceae and Solanaceae species. None of the Cucurbitaceae species was infected. Our results show that following recent reports, it was experimentally possible to infect N. rustica [40] with ToBRFV. Moreover, its frequent detection in tomato fields in various countries is consistent with 100% infectivity through the inoculation of this species. Interestingly, although natural ToBRFV infections have not been reported in tomatillo, we identified susceptible, infected plants upon experimental transmission. As tomatillo is a commercial crop in Mexico, this evidence highlights the potential risk posed to Mexican national production.

Regarding eggplant bioassays, only the second and third experiments resulted in systemic infection (20% and 100% of the inoculated plants, respectively). This could be related to the differences in temperature (from 23°C to 29°C) along with the photoperiod conditions. In keeping with this, Panno et al. (2019) [39] could not experimentally infect this vegetable species under controlled conditions with 14 hours of light at 20° to 28°C, while Fidan et al. (2020) [29] detected by RT-PCR to the ToBRFV in artificially inoculated eggplants. Still, all were asymptomatic, using the same temperature but a photoperiod of 16 h of light. Variations in temperature and the photoperiod can determine whether the virus successfully infects these plants and causes symptom appearance. For instance, in the case of pepper bioassays, we identified that the percentage of infectivity increased from 20 to 100% as the temperature increased.

Systemic infection is an outcome of multiple factors such as plant age, temperature, the replication and movement of the virus, and RNA silencing [42,43,44]. Regarding temperature, an ideal range has been found for the virus to become established and systemically replicated, which is specific for each viral species and its host. Generally, some viruses need a minimum temperature for systemic infection. A gradual increase in temperature up to a particular maximum will increase the speed of infection and the number of plants infected [45]. In addition, symptoms can be mitigated at high temperatures since the replication of the genomic RNA decreases, resulting in less viral replication and movement [46].

5. Conclusions

The ToBRFV Mexico strains did not infect cucurbit species in our study. However, they were capable of experimentally infecting tomatillo and eggplant. We found that the best protocol to detect the ToBRFV under these experimental conditions was CTAB-Trizol and the nested RT-PCR using the primers described by Dovas et al. (2004) [1]. The percentage of ToBRFV-infected N. rustica seeds was less than 1%. For the seedlings analysis, the subgroup's size required was found to be at least 150 for the virus to be detected by nested RT-PCR. We recognize that detecting a virus in seeds is very complex when the transmission percentage is low. The success of detecting the virus in seeds, therefore, depends not only on the percentage of virus transmission in a specific host, which is influenced by all the factors mentioned previously but also on the detection technique and the sample type (size of samples and subsamples). In addition, the ISF (2019) [13] protocol specifies that seeds that are analyzed for the detection of ToBRFV should not be treated with any disinfectants. Nevertheless, when seeds are imported or exported, seed companies generally submit them to chemical treatments to prevent phytosanitary problems with germination. For this reason, it is better to analyze recently emerged seedlings.