Submitted:
05 July 2023
Posted:
05 July 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Manual Annotations
Network Architecture
Performance Metrics and Segmentation Assessment
Results
Conclusion and discussion
Conclusion
Discussion
Author Contributions
Data Availability
References
- Zang, J., et al., The treatment of neurotrophic foot and ankle deformity of spinal bifida: 248 cases in single center. Journal of Neurorestoratology, 2019. 7(3): p. 153-160.
- Carroll, L.A., S. Paulseth, and R.L. Martin, Forefoot Injuries in Athletes: Integration of the Movement System. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 2022. 17(1): p. 81.
- Rozis, M., et al., Results and outcomes of combined cross screw and ilizarov external fixator frame in ankle fusion. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 2020. 59(2): p. 337-342.
- Knupp, M. , Diffuse Ankle Osteoarthritis, in Foot and Ankle Disorders. 2022, Springer. p. 723-742.
- Kadakia, R.J. , et al., 3D printed total talus replacement for avascular necrosis of the talus. Foot & Ankle International, 2020. 41(12): p. 1529-1536.
- Scott, D.J., et al., Early outcomes of 3D printed total talus arthroplasty. Foot & Ankle Specialist, 2020. 13(5): p. 372-377.
- West, T.A. and S.M. Rush, Total talus replacement: case series and literature review. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 2021. 60(1): p. 187-193.
- Strand, G., C. Juels, and J. Nowak, Custom total talus replacement as a salvage option for failed total ankle arthroplasty: A prospective report of two cases. Foot & Ankle Surgery: Techniques, Reports & Cases, 2022. 2(1): p. 100113.
- Lullini, G., et al., Custom-Made Total Talonavicular Replacement in a Professional Rock Climber: Functional Evaluation With Gait Analysis and 3-Dimensional Medical Imaging in Weightbearing at 5 Years’ Follow-Up. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 2020. 59(5): p. 1118-1127.
- Grau, D., et al., A 3D-Printed Model of a Titanium Custom-Made Talus for the Treatment of a Chronic Infection of the Ankle. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 2022. 61(1): p. 212-217.
- Wang, G., et al., Automatic Detection of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus via Deep Learning. Frontiers in Physics, 2022: p. 113.
- Engström Messén, M. and E. Moser, Pre-planning of Individualized Ankle Implants Based on Computed Tomography-Automated Segmentation and Optimization of Acquisition Parameters. 2021.
- Liu, X., et al., A review of deep-learning-based medical image segmentation methods. Sustainability, 2021. 13(3): p. 1224.
- Shadid, W.G. and A. Willis, Bone fragment segmentation from 3D CT imagery. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 2018. 66: p. 14-27.
- Ang, I.C., et al., An algorithm for automated separation of trabecular bone from variably thick cortices in high-resolution computed tomography data. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2019. 67(3): p. 924-930.
- Ma, J., et al. A novel bayesian model incorporating deep neural network and statistical shape model for pancreas segmentation. in International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. 2018. Springer.
- Rahmaniar, W. and W.-J. Wang, Real-time automated segmentation and classification of calcaneal fractures in CT images. Applied Sciences, 2019. 9(15): p. 3011.
- Boutillon, A., et al., Multi-Task, Multi-Domain Deep Segmentation with Shared Representations and Contrastive Regularization for Sparse Pediatric Datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.10310, 2021.
- Courtis, P., et al. ACCURACY EVALUATION OF AN X-RAY-BASED 2D/3D KNEE SEGMENTATION SYSTEM. in Orthopaedic Proceedings. 2017. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
- Isensee, F., et al. nnU-Net for brain tumor segmentation. in International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop. 2020. Springer.
- Fick, T., et al., Fully automatic brain tumor segmentation for 3D evaluation in augmented reality. 2021. 51(2): p. E14.


| Network Architecture | Dice Score | HD95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
| 3D full resolution U-Net | 0.982 | 0.002 | 0.562 | 0.059 | |
| 3D U-Net cascade | 3D low resolution U-Net | 0.975 | 0.002 | 0.611 | 0.047 |
| 3D full resolution U-Net | 0.983 | 0.002 | 0.566 | 0.062 | |
| Network Architecture | Inference time per image in s | |
|---|---|---|
| 3D full resolution U-Net | 162.49 | |
| 3D U-Net cascade | 3D low-resolution U-Net | 15.24 |
| 3D full resolution U-Net | 217.5 | |
| manual segmentation | 2100–2700 | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).