Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Comparison of Aeroelastic Problems Calculation Methods Based on Numerical and Experimental Results

Version 1 : Received: 21 June 2023 / Approved: 21 June 2023 / Online: 25 June 2023 (04:35:14 CEST)

How to cite: Marano, A.D.; Guida, M.; Polito, T.; Marulo, F. Comparison of Aeroelastic Problems Calculation Methods Based on Numerical and Experimental Results. Preprints 2023, 2023061585. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202306.1585.v1 Marano, A.D.; Guida, M.; Polito, T.; Marulo, F. Comparison of Aeroelastic Problems Calculation Methods Based on Numerical and Experimental Results. Preprints 2023, 2023061585. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202306.1585.v1

Abstract

The current design process of a new aircraft includes several mod- eling and testing steps.The main purpose of the Ground Vibration Testing is to achieve experimental vibration data of the whole aircraft structure, in terms of frequencies, damping factors, and mode shapes to ensure that the aircraft will be free from any aeroelastic instability and safe to fly in the desired flight envelope. GVT results are also mainly used for validating and eventually im- proving FEM models of the aircraft examined. On the other hand, structural dynamic models are used to predict the flutter behavior and carefully plan the in-flight flutter tests, and lead to mitigation of the risks related to them. This paper aims to compare different aeroelastic methods outcomes achieved using two diverse commercial software: the widely used NASTRAN™ and the most recently developed Zonatech ZAERO. The flutter computation results are obtained by means of P-K, K, and G methods. The first case presented is the aeroelastic analysis of a forward-swept wing whereas the second case concerns the stabilator of a two-seater ultralight aircraft, for which an experimental campaign of vibrations test is also carried out. The structural mode shapes at each generated frequency mode are also visually presented.

Keywords

Aeroelasticity; Flutter; Divergence; NASTRAN; ZAERO; GVT

Subject

Engineering, Aerospace Engineering

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.