Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Promoting self-management and independent living of elders with chronic diseases through technology: A study of self-reported needs, priorities, and preferences.

Version 1 : Received: 19 June 2023 / Approved: 20 June 2023 / Online: 20 June 2023 (14:25:24 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Kalaitzaki, A.; Rovithis, M.; Dimitropoulos, A.; Koukouli, S.; Linardakis, M.; Katsiri, E.; Rikos, N.; Vasilopoulos, G.; Tsolas, G.; Papachristou, A.; Dimitrantzou, A.; Katsiris, D.; Stavropoulou, A. Promoting Self-Management and Independent Living of Older Individuals with Chronic Diseases through Technology: A Study of Self-Reported Needs, Priorities, and Preferences. Medicina 2023, 59, 1493. Kalaitzaki, A.; Rovithis, M.; Dimitropoulos, A.; Koukouli, S.; Linardakis, M.; Katsiri, E.; Rikos, N.; Vasilopoulos, G.; Tsolas, G.; Papachristou, A.; Dimitrantzou, A.; Katsiris, D.; Stavropoulou, A. Promoting Self-Management and Independent Living of Older Individuals with Chronic Diseases through Technology: A Study of Self-Reported Needs, Priorities, and Preferences. Medicina 2023, 59, 1493.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Elders’ needs are rarely examined beforehand, and thus, although technology-based tools can enhance self-management, acceptability rates are still low. This study aimed to examine and compare self-reported needs, priorities, and preferences of elders with heart failure (HF), diabetes mellitus (DM), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) toward technology use to enhance self-management. Materials and Methods: A convenience sample of 473 participants over 60s (60.5% females), diagnosed with HF (N=156), DM (N=164), or COPD (N=153) was recruited. They were administered a questionnaire about the usefulness of technology in general and in specific areas of disease management. Results: Most participants (84.7%) admitted that technology is needed for better disease management. This was equally recognized across the three groups both for the overall and specific areas of disease management (in order of priority: ‘Information’, ‘Communication with Physicians & Caregivers’, and ‘Quality of Life & Wellbeing’). Sociodemographic differences were found. Cell phones and PCs were the devices of preference. The four common features prioritized by all three groups were related to ‘information about disease management’ (i.e., monitoring symptoms, reminders for medication intake, management and prevention of complications), whereas the fifth one was related to ‘communication with physicians and caregivers (i.e., in case of abnormal or critical signs). The top disease-specific feature was also monitoring systems (of respiratory rate or blood sugar or blood pressure, oxygen), whereas other disease-specific features followed (i.e., maintaining normal weight for HF patients, adjusting insulin dose for DM patients, and training on breathing exercises for COPD patients). Conclusions: Elders in these three samples seem receptive to technology in disease management. mHealth tools, incorporating both common and disease-specific features and addressing different chronic patients, and being personalized at the same time, could be cost-saving and useful adjuncts in routine clinical care to improve self-management.

Keywords

chronic non-communicable diseases; disease management; digital health technologies; technology-based applications; mHealth; mobile apps

Subject

Public Health and Healthcare, Other

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.