Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Effects of variated final temperature and workpiece thickness for hot rolling of aluminum alloy EN AW-8011

Version 1 : Received: 20 June 2023 / Approved: 20 June 2023 / Online: 20 June 2023 (07:08:30 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Kraner, J.; Cvahte, P.; Šuštarič, P.; Šuštar, T.; Donik, Č.; Paulin, I.; Kim, S.K.; Kim, K.I. Effects of Variated Final Temperature and Workpiece Thickness for Hot Rolling of Aluminum Alloy EN AW-8011. Metals 2023, 13, 1301. Kraner, J.; Cvahte, P.; Šuštarič, P.; Šuštar, T.; Donik, Č.; Paulin, I.; Kim, S.K.; Kim, K.I. Effects of Variated Final Temperature and Workpiece Thickness for Hot Rolling of Aluminum Alloy EN AW-8011. Metals 2023, 13, 1301.

Abstract

The hot rolling in the process chain of the aluminium rolled products present the critical element of material quality and influence on productivity. The desire to increase the letter demand modifications of hot rolling, consequential changes of microstructure, crystallographic texture, mechanical and formability properties must be knowledge and consistently considered in planning the rolling process and rolled product. Achieving lower thicknesses of the hot-rolled band would enable fewer passes with cold rolling; consequently, hot rolling with the same number of passes will complete with lower temperatures. Microstructural and texture characterization with the optical microscope and scanning electron microscope for the hot-rolled band 3.25 mm the smaller grains appeared in the center of the cross-section, unlike for the hot-rolled band 6 mm, the smaller grains were detected on the upper and bottom position of the cross-section. Furthermore, the comparison shows also that the hot-rolled band 6 mm has 64 % of random texture components and 83 % of recrystallized grains, and the proportional adjustment for the hot-rolled band 3.25 mm has the 42 % of random texture components and 55 % of recrystallized grains. For the mechanical testing results, the elongation values in rolling and transverse directions significantly differ just in the case of a hot rolled band of 3.25 mm. Consequently, the earing results are more than 1.5 % higher for the hot-rolled band, 3.25 mm, than the hot-rolled band, 6 mm.

Keywords

aluminium alloy, hot rolling, simulations, metallography, mechanical properties

Subject

Engineering, Metallurgy and Metallurgical Engineering

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.