Submitted:
19 June 2023
Posted:
20 June 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Raw materials
2.2. Reagents
2.3. Extrusion process
- I – press-cakes extruded at moisture content of 30% and maximum temperature of 110°C
- II – press-cakes extruded at moisture content of 30% and maximum temperature of 120°C
- III – press-cakes extruded at moisture content of 60% and maximum temperature of 110°C
- IV – press-cakes extruded at moisture content of 60% and maximum temperature of 120°C
2.4. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis
2.5. Preparation of meat analogues
2.6. Determining the chemical composition of press-cakes and meat analogues
2.7. Determination of trypsin inhibitor activity
- D is the dilution factor
- At is the change in absorbance
- S is the weight of the sample
2.8. Analysis of functional properties of non-extruded press-cakes, extruded press-cakes, and meat analogues
2.8.1. Water holding capacity and oil holding capacity
2.8.2 Cooking loss
2.10. Texture and colour analysis of meat analogues
2.11. Sensory analysis of meat analogues
2.12. Statistical analysis
3. Results
3.1. Extrusion of press-cakes
3.2. Physical and technological characteristics of non-extruded and extruded press-cakes
3.2.1. Structure
3.2.2. Water-holding and Oil-holding capacity
3.3. Nutritional characteristics of non-extruded and extruded press-cakes
3.3.1. Nutritional composition of press cake samples
3.3.2. Trypsin inhibitor levels in press cake samples
3.3.3. Amino acid composition of press cake samples
3.4. Analysis of meat analogues produced from non-extruded and extruded press-cakes
3.4.1. Texture profile analysis of prepared meat analogues from treated and untreated press cake samples
- MA-C – control, without press-cakes.
- M – meat analogue
- MT – meat analogue with press cakes from tofu production
- MD – meat analogue with press cakes from soy drink production.
- I-IV – shows which extrusion regime was used for certain press cake that was used in meat analogue (as mentioned in methodology section 2.3)
- 3%, 6% - amount of extruded press cakes added to meat analogue.
3.4.2. Sensory analysis of prepared meat analogues from treated and untreated press cake samples
- MA-C – control, without press-cakes.
- M – meat analogue
- MT – meat analogue with press cakes from tofu production
- MD – meat analogue with press cakes from soy drink production.
- I-IV – shows which extrusion regime was used for certain press cake that was used in meat analogue (as mentioned in methodology section 2.3)
- 3%, 6% - amount of extruded press cakes added to meat analogue.
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Acknowledgments and Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Shakeel A, Saeed MS, Aslam HKW, Naheed N, Shoaib MH, Razal MS, Noor A Extraction of soya milk from different varieties 0 of soya beans and comparative study for better nutrition with buffalo milk. J Global Innov Agricult Soc Sci 2015, 3, 146–151. [CrossRef]
- P. Ancuta, A. Sonia Oil press-cakes and meals valorisation through circular economy approaches: A review. Applied Sciences 2020, 10, 7432. [CrossRef]
- K. Trakselyte-Rupsiene, G. Juodeikiene, G. Alzbergaite, D. Zadeike, E. Bartkiene, F. Ozogul, L. Rueller, J. Robert, J.M.F. Rocha Bio-refinery of plant drinks press cake permeate using ultrafiltration and lactobacillus fermentation into antimicrobials and its effect on the growth of wheatgrass in vivo. Food Biosci. 2022, 46, 101427.
- Vaitkeviciene, R.; Bendoraitiene, J.; Degutyte, R.; Svazas, M.; Zadeike, D. Optimization of the Sustainable Production of Resistant Starch in Rice Bran and Evaluation of Its Physicochemical and Technological Properties. Polymers 2022, 14, 3662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seyedmahmood Razavizadeh, Gitana Alenčikienė, Lina Vaiciulyte-Funk, Per Ertbjerg, Alvija Šalaševičienė, Utilization of fermented and enzymatically hydrolyzed soy press cake as ingredient for meat analogues. LWT 2022, 165, 113736. [CrossRef]
- Martin A, Naumann S, Osen R, Karbstein HP, Emin MA. Extrusion Processing of Rapeseed Press Cake-Starch Blends: Effect of Starch Type and Treatment Temperature on Protein, Fiber, and Starch Solubility. Foods. 2021, 10, 1160. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Schmid, E.- M., Farahnaky, A., Adhikari, B., & Torley, P. J. (). High moisture extrusion cooking of meat analogs: A review of mechanisms of protein texturization. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 2022, 1– 37. [CrossRef]
- Morrison, Oliver, “Why high moisture extrusion could solve alt meat’s nutritional as well as structural challenges.” Food Navigator. 2022. Available online: https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2022/03/24/Why-high-moisture-extrusion-could-solve-alt-meat-s-nutritional-as-well-as-structural-challenges.
- Jung-Soo Lee, Hyewon Oh, Inyoung Choi, Chan Suk Yoon, Jaejoon Han, Physico-chemical characteristics of rice protein-based novel textured vegetable proteins as meat analogues produced by low-moisture extrusion cooking technology, LWT 2022, 157, 113056.
- S.M. Beck, K. Knoerzer, M. Foerster, S. Mayo, C. Philipp, J. Arcot Low moisture extrusion of pea protein and pea fibre fortified rice starch blends Journal of Food Engineering. 2018, 231, 61–71.
- Miller, R.C. Low Moisture Extrusion: Effects of Cooking Moisture on Product Characteristics. Journal of Food Science 1985, 50, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aussanasuwannakul, A.; Teangpook, C.; Treesuwan, W.; Puntaburt, K.; Butsuwan, P. Effect of the Addition of Soybean Residue (Okara) on the Physicochemical, Tribological, Instrumental, and Sensory Texture Properties of Extruded Snacks. Foods 2022, 11, 2967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chiang, J.H., Loveday, S.M., Hardacre, A.K., Parker M.E. Effects of soy protein to wheat gluten ratio on the physicochemical properties of extruded meat analogues. Food Structure. 2019, 19, 100102. [CrossRef]
- Prinyawiwatkul, W., Beuchat, L.R., Phillips D. and Resurreccion V.A. Modeling the effects of peanut flour, feed moisture content, and extrusion temperature on physical properties of an extruded snack product. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 1995, 30, 37–44. [CrossRef]
- et al. Clifford Smith et al. The Determination of Trypsin Inhibitor Levels in Foodstuffs. Journal of the Science of Food Science and Agriculture [online]. 1980, 31, 341–350, [viewed on 7th January 2021]. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadh Kumar Pardeep et al. Fermentation approach on phenolic, antioxidants and functional properties of peanut press cake. Food Bioscience [online]. 2018, 22, 113–120, [viewed on 9th January 2021]. [CrossRef]
- Vidal, Natalia P., et al. "Enhancing the nutritional value of cold-pressed oilseed cakes through extrusion cooking." Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies. 2022, 77, 102956.
- Karunanithy C, Muthukumarappan K, Gibbons WR. Effect of extruder screw speed, temperature, and enzyme levels on sugar recovery from different biomasses. ISRN Biotechnol. 2012, 2013, 942810. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Köksel, H., Ryu, G.-., Başman, A., Demiralp, H., & Ng, P. K. W. Effects of extrusion variables on the properties of waxy hulless barley extrudates. Nahrung – Food 2004, 48, 19–24. [CrossRef]
- Yongfeng Ai, Karen A. Cichy, Janice B. Harte, James D. Kelly, Perry K.W. Ng, Effects of extrusion cooking on the chemical composition and functional properties of dry common bean powders. Food Chemistry 2016, 211, 538–545. [CrossRef]
- Wi, G.; Bae, J.; Kim, H.; Cho, Y.; Choi, M.-J. Evaluation of the Physicochemical and Structural Properties and the Sensory Characteristics of Meat Analogues Prepared with Various Non-Animal Based Liquid Additives. Foods 2020, 9, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bae, J., et al. Evaluation of the Physicochemical and Structural Properties and the Sensory Characteristics of Meat Analogues Prepared with Various Non-Animal Based Liquid Additives. Foods 2020, 9, 461–463 PMID 32276505. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zanette, B., et al. Comparison of physicochemical and functional properties of surimi and protein isolate obtained from mechanically deboned meat of chicken. International Food Research Journal [online]. 2015, 22 (4), 1374-1379. ISSN 2231 7546. Available online: http://www.ifrj.upm.edu.my/22%20(04)%202015/(9).pdf.
- K. Maurya and P. P. Said. Extrusion Processing on Physical and Chemical Properties of Protein Rich Products-An Overview. Journal of Bioresource Engineering and Technology. 2014, 1, 67–73. Available online: http://jakraya.com/journal/pdf/5-jbetArticle_2.pdf.
- Rajput, H., et al. Dietary fibre in foods: a review. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2012, 49, 255–266. [CrossRef]
- Khan, K., et al. Fortification of Spaghetti with Edible Legumes. I. Physicochemical, Antinutritional, Amino Acid, and Mineral Composition. Cereal Chemistry [online]. 1986, 63, 210–215, [viewed 3rd March 2021]. Available online: https://www.cerealsgrains.org/publications/cc/backissues/1986/Documents/chem63_210.pdf.
- Chandra, M. V., et al. Texture Profile Analysis and Functional Properties of Gelatin from the Skin of Three Species of Fresh Water Fish. International Journal of Food Properties [online]. 2015, 81, 572–584. [CrossRef]
- Bourne, M. C., et al. Parameters of Texture Profile Analysis. Food Science and Technology Research [online]. 2013, 19, 519–521. [CrossRef]
- Onega, E., et al. A comparison between two methods (Warner-Bratzler and Texture profile analysis) for testing either raw meat or cooked meat. Meat Science. 2005, 69, 527–536. [CrossRef]
- Aguilera, J.M. and Kosikowski, F.V. Ultrastructural changes occurring during thermoplastic extrusion of soybean grits. Journal of Food Science. 1976, 41, 1209–1213. [CrossRef]
- Simopoulos, A. P., et al. An Increase in the Omega-6/Omega-3 Fatty Acid Ratio Increases the Risk for Obesity. Nutrients. 2016, 8, 128–131. [CrossRef]
- Vaculova, K., et al. The effects of extrusion on the content and properties of dietary fibre components in various barley cultivars. Journal of Cereal Science [online]. 2016, 68, 132–139. [CrossRef]
- Liener, I. E. Implications of antinutritional components in soybean foods. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutrition [online]. 1994, 34, 31–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Albert, C., et al. Methods and procedures for reducing soy trypsin inhibitor activity by means of heat treatment combined with chemical methods. Scientific Journal of Sapientia University. 2018, 11, 58–80. [CrossRef]
- Wu, W., Hua, Y., Lin, Q., & Xiao, H. Effects of oxidative modification on thermal aggregation and gel properties of soy protein by peroxyl radicals. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 2011, 46, 1891–1897. [CrossRef]
- Hyun, Y. J., Mok, Y. S., & Jang, D. I. Transesterification of vegetable oils in pulsed-corona plasma discharge process. Journal of the Korean Applied Science and Technology 2012, 29, 81–87.
- Delwiche, J. The impact of perceptual interactions on perceived flavor. Food Quality and Preference. 2004, 15, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kinchila, A. J., et al. Role of Sensory Evaluation in Consumer Acceptance of Plant-Based Meat Analogs and Meat Extenders: A Scoping Review. Foods. 2020, 9, 1334. [CrossRef] [PubMed]







| Sample (press-cake) | Moisture (%) | Tmax* (°C) | Motor load (%) | Die pressure (bar) | Throughput (kg/h) | SME (Wh kg-1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soyt | 30 | 110 | 6.0 | 26 | 3.4 | 38.5 | |
| 30 | 120 | 6.3 | 25 | 3.1 | 44.0 | ||
| 60 | 110 | 4.0 | 6 | 8.5 | 10.2 | ||
| 60 | 120 | 4.0 | 7 | 7.5 | 11.6 | ||
| Soyd | 30 | 110 | 12.0 | 21 | 10.7 | 24.2 | |
| 30 | 120 | 12.0 | 19 | 12.7 | 20.4 | ||
| 60 | 110 | 4.7 | 6 | 13.1 | 7.7 | ||
| 60 | 120 | 5.0 | 6 | 14.1 | 7.7 |
| Samples | WHC, g/g | OHC, g/g |
|---|---|---|
| Soyt | 5,572 ± 0,47 | 1,989 ± 0,23 |
| Soyt I | 4.281 ± 0.19 | 1.989 ± 0.25 |
| Soyt II | 4.570 ± 0.15 | 2.418 ± 0.15 |
| Soyt III | 4.813 ± 0.10 | 2.623 ± 0.17 |
| Soyt IV | 5.448 ± 0.17 | 2.932 ± 0.10 |
| Soyd | 2,875 ± 0,17 | 1,585 ± 0,16 |
| Soyd I | 6.095 ± 0.04 | 2.032 ± 0.10 |
| Soyd II | 6.135 ± 0.17 | 2.480 ± 0.12 |
| Soyd III | 6.658 ± 0.12 | 2.648 ± 0.18 |
| Soyd IV | 6.877 ± 0.12 | 2.967 ± 0.11 |
| Fat | Saturated Fatty acid* | MUFA | PUFA | Nitrogen* | Protein | Ash | Sucrose | Glucose * | Fructose* | Total Sugar | Salt | Fibre | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soyt | 9.73 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 5.65 | 36.2 | 3.62 | 2.74 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.16 | <0.03 | 50.2 |
| Soyt I | 15.31 | 2.24 | 2.89 | 1.18 | 5.38 | 33.6 | 3.49 | 3.23 | 0.34 | 0.42 | 3.99 | <0.03 | 37.3 |
| Soyt II | 15.29 | 2.33 | 2.97 | 1.00 | 5.36 | 33.4 | 3.50 | 3.32 | 0.33 | 0.50 | 4.14 | <0.03 | 37.7 |
| Soyt III | 9.57 | 1.85 | 2.12 | 5.60 | 5.35 | 33.4 | 3.44 | 2.51 | 0.59 | 0.71 | 3.80 | <0.03 | 36 |
| Soyt IV | 10.71 | 1.96 | 3.01 | 5.73 | 5.40 | 33.6 | 3.39 | 0.58 | 0.45 | 1.09 | 1.61 | <0.03 | 39.9 |
| Soyd | 11.87 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 4.76 | 29.7 | 3.59 | 0.14 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.16 | N.D. | 51.2 |
| Soyd I | 16.84 | 2.85 | 4.17 | 9.82 | 5.36 | 33.5 | 4.13 | 1.50 | 0.26 | 0.36 | 1.86 | <0.03 | 38.7 |
| Soyd II | 16.03 | 2.49 | 3.89 | 9.66 | 5.41 | 33.8 | 4.16 | 1.43 | 0.28 | 0.35 | 2.06 | <0.03 | 37.3 |
| Soyd III | 14.40 | 2.26 | 3.50 | 8.64 | 5.42 | 33.8 | 4.18 | 0.64 | 0.46 | 0.55 | 1.19 | <0.03 | 40.5 |
| Soyd IV | 16.17 | 3.59 | 4.87 | 5.46 | 5.50 | 34.3 | 4.06 | 0.90 | 0.45 | 0.47 | 1.37 | <0.03 | 41.8 |
| Sample | TIA (mg/g dry matter) |
|---|---|
| Soyt | 0.83 ± 0.00 |
| Soyt I | 0.83 ± 0.01 |
| Soyt II | 1.07 ± 0.01 |
| Soyt III | 0.67 ± 0.01 |
| Soyt IV | 0.64 ± 0.01 |
| Soyd | 1.74 ± 0.13 |
| Soyd -I | 0.87 ± 0.00 |
| Soyd II | 1.36 ± 0.013 |
| Soyd III | 0.51 ± 0.01 |
| Soyd IV | 0.74 ± 0.01 |
| Samples | ||||||||||
| Amino Acid Content, g/100g | Soyt | Soyt I | Soyt II | Soyt III | Soyt IV | Soyd | Soyd I | Soyd II | Soyd III | Soyd IV |
| Aspartic Acid | 4.18 ± 0.03 | 3.48 ± 0.04 | 3.35 ± 0.03 | 2.04 ± 0.05 | 2.12 ± 0.03 | 3.10 ± 0.01 | 3.58 ± 0.02 | 3.10 ± 0.03 | 3.58 ± 0.09 | 3.10 ± 0.03 |
| Glutamic Acid* | 5.94 ± 0.05 | 4.86 ± 0.02 | 4.68 ± 0.04 | 2.81 ± 0.03 | 2.86 ± 0.06 | 4.60 ± 0.08 | 4.88 ± 0.09 | 4.60 ± 0.07 | 4.88 ± 0.04 | 4.60 ± 0.05 |
| Serine | 1.75 ± 0.02 | 1.29 ± 0.06 | 1.24 ± 0.09 | 0.72 ± 0.04 | 0.79 ± 0.02 | 1.39 ± 0.07 | 1.36 ± 0.08 | 1.39 ± 0.04 | 1.36 ± 0.03 | 1.39 ± 0.07 |
| Glycine | 1.21 ± 0.01 | 1.11 ± 0.03 | 1.03 ± 0.08 | 0.67 ± 0.04 | 0.70 ± 0.03 | 1.08 ± 0.07 | 1.15 ± 0.07 | 1.00 ± 0.068 | 1.15 ± 0.05 | 1.08 ± 0.09 |
| Histidine | 0.58 ± 0.08 | 0.82 ± 0.04 | 0.81 ± 0.04 | 0.53 ± 0.05 | 0.54 ± 0.04 | 0.66 ± 0.10 | 0.85 ± 0.03 | 0.66 ± 0.08 | 0.85 ± 0.04 | 0.66 ± 0.09 |
| Threonine | 1.65 ± 0.03 | 1.18 ± 0.06 | 1.16 ± 0.05 | 0.76 ± 0.07 | 0.76 ± 0.06 | 1.12 ± 0.13 | 1.24 ± 0.04 | 1.12 ± 0.03 | 1.24 ± 0.03 | 1.12 ± 0.03 |
| Alanine | 1.43 ± 0.04 | 1.17 ± 0.07 | 1.14 ± 0.06 | 0.70 ± 0.02 | 0.73 ± 0.09 | 1.15 ± 0.04 | 1.24 ± 0.04 | 1.15 ± 0.02 | 1.24 ± 0.04 | 1.15 ± 0.10 |
| Arginine | 2.44 ± 0.06 | 1.95 ± 0.07 | 1.91 ± 0.03 | 1.23 ± 0.05 | 1.26 ± 0.08 | 1.74 ± 0.04 | 1.99 ± 0.06 | 1.74 ± 0.05 | 1.99 ± 0.04 | 1.74 ± 0.01 |
| Proline | 3.61 ± 0.03 | 1.49 ± 0.03 | 1.73 ± 0.05 | 0.95 ± 0.03 | 0.80 ± 0.03 | 0.99 ± 0.03 | 2.01 ± 0.06 | 0.99 ± 0.09 | 2.01 ± 0.07 | 0.99 ± 0.02 |
| Cysteine | 0.92 ± 0.04 | 0.81 ± 0.05 | 0.84 ± 0.06 | 0.54 ± 0.05 | 0.58 ± 0.04 | 0.00 ± 0.02 | 0.84 ± 0.09 | 0 .00 ± 0.04 | 0.84 ± 0.09 | 0.00 ± 0.01 |
| Tyrosine | 1.15 ± 0.04 | 1.06 ± 0.02 | 1.05 ± 0.04 | 0.71 ± 0.04 | 0.74 ± 0.05 | 0.77 ± 0.06 | 1.09 ± 0.07 | 0.77 ± 0.05 | 1.09 ± 0.05 | 0.77 ± 0.10 |
| Valine | 1.31 ± 0.03 | 1.36 ± 0.04 | 1.42 ± 0.03 | 0.90 ± 0.01 | 1.13 ± 0.06 | 1.29 ± 0.03 | 1.52 ± 0.06 | 1.29 ± 0.02 | 1.52 ± 0.07 | 1.29 ± 0.05 |
| Methionine | 0.91 ± 0.11 | 0.58 ± 0.05 | 0.38 ± 0.05 | 0.36 ± 0.04 | 0.28 ± 0.01 | 0.25 ± 0.05 | 0.42 ± 0.03 | 0.25 ± 0.04 | 0.42 ± 0.09 | 0.25 ± 0.04 |
| Lysine* | 4.22 ± 0.03 | 2.23 ± 0.02 | 2.07 ± 0.07 | 1.42 ± 0.02 | 1.65 ± 0.07 | 1.26 ± 0.07 | 2.21 ± 0.02 | 1.26 ± 0.05 | 2.21 ± 0.09 | 1.26 ± 0.06 |
| Isoleucine* | 2.63 ± 0.06 | 2.00 ± 0.04 | 1.93 ± 0.06 | 1.16 ± 0.07 | 1.19 ± 0.04 | 2.11 ± 0.03 | 2.12 ± 0.04 | 2.11 ± 0.07 | 2.12 ± 0.10 | 2.11 ± 0.09 |
| Leucine | 1.62 ± 0.04 | 1.49 ± 0.05 | 1.48 ± 0.03 | 0.91 ± 0.08 | 0.93 ± 0.06 | 1.32 ± 0.05 | 1.42 ± 0.07 | 1.32 ± 0.04 | 1.42 ± 0.01 | 1.32 ± 0.06 |
| Phenylalanine | 1.80 ± 0.07 | 1.25 ± 0.02 | 1.24 ± 0.04 | 0.79 ± 0.09 | 0.81 ± 0.02 | 1.46 ± 0.08 | 1.31 ± 0.012 | 1.46 ± 0.01 | 1.31 ± 0.03 | 1.46 ± 0.04 |
| Tryptophan | 2.33 ± 0.01 | 2.19 ± 0.01 | 2.11 ± 0.06 | 1.17 ± 0.10 | 1.16 ± 0.04 | 1.76 ± 0.07 | 2.30 ± 0.08 | 1.76 ± 0.03 | 2.30 ± 0.08 | 1.76 ± 0.07 |
| Meat analogues | Hardness, N | Adhesiveness, J | Cohesiveness | Springiness, mm | Gumminess, N |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MA-C | 26.68 ± 0.06 | -0.002 ± 0.00 | 0.76 ± 0.02 | 3.05 ± 0.02 | 6.46 ± 0.01 |
| MT I, 3% | 15.17 ± 0.08 | -0.003 ± 0.00 | 0.77 ± 0.03 | 2.45 ± 0.20 | 2.81 ± 0.03 |
| MT I, 6% | 9.08 ± 0.14 | -0.001 ± 0.00 | 0.75 ± 0.01 | 1.99 ± 0.02 | 2.61 ± 0.03 |
| MT II, 3% | 30.93 ± 0.08 | -0.005 ± 0.00 | 0.74 ± 0.01 | 5.77 ± 0.05 | 2.66 ± 0.02 |
| MT II, 6% | 29.45 ± 0.20 | -0.019 ± 0.00 | 0.72 ± 0.02 | 2.34 ± 0.03 | 1.82 ± 0.03 |
| MT III, 3% | 21.82 ± 0.13 | -0.001 ± 0.00 | 0.77 ± 0.03 | 5.04 ± 0.02 | 2.50 ± 0.03 |
| MT III, 6% | 13.54 ± 0.21 | -0.003 ± 0.00 | 0.70 ± 0.02 | 2.25 ± 0.02 | 2.79 ± 0.02 |
| MT IV, 3% | 10.10 ± 0.21 | -0.004 ± 0.00 | 0.74 ± 0.02 | 1.54 ± 0.02 | 2.48 ± 0.02 |
| MT IV, 6% | 15.51 ± 0.25 | -0.002 ± 0.00 | 0.77 ± 0.01 | 2.56 ± 0.03 | 2.13 ± 0.01 |
| MD I, 3% | 10.05 ± 0.20 | -0.002 ± 0.00 | 0.74 ± 0.02 | 2.69 ± 0.02 | 1.78 ± 0.01 |
| MD I, 6% | 13.80 ± 0.11 | -0.002 ± 0.00 | 0.77 ± 0.02 | 2.85 ± 0.02 | 3.11 ± 0.02 |
| MD II, 3% | 12.85 ± 0.20 | -0.001 ± 0.00 | 0.75 ± 0.01 | 2.86 ± 0.02 | 2.88 ± 0.01 |
| MD II, 6% | 10.90 ± 0.13 | -0.006 ± 0.00 | 0.71 ± 0.02 | 2.40 ± 0.02 | 0.99 ± 0.01 |
| MD III, 3% | 17.69 ± 0.24 | -0.002± 0.00 | 0.73 ± 0.02 | 2.75 ± 0.02 | 3.63 ± 0.02 |
| MD III, 6% | 23.68 ± 0.27 | -0.002 ± 0.00 | 0.75 ± 0.02 | 2.48 ± 0.02 | 4.63 ± 0.01 |
| MD IV, 3% | 11.15 ± 0.23 | -0.003 ± 0.00 | 0.77 ± 0.02 | 2.55 ± 0.02 | 2.10 ± 0.02 |
| MD IV, 6% | 9.40 ± 0.11 | 0.000 ± 0.00 | 0.75 ± 0.02 | 2.76 ± 0.02 | 2.33 ± 0.02 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).