Submitted:
15 June 2023
Posted:
15 June 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- R1 What are the dimensions of Generation Z’s conference attendance motivations?
- R2 Are there differences in terms of respondents’ gender, level of education, employment status, and previous conference attendance concerning the dimensions of Generation Z's motivation for attending conferences?
2. Literature Review
3. Methodology
4. Results
4.1. Study Sample Characteristics
| z1 | % | |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Male | 79 | 38 |
| Female | 127 | 61 |
| Prefer not to say | 2 | 1 |
| Age | ||
| 19-21 | 41 | 19.7 |
| 22-24 | 106 | 51.0 |
| 25-27 | 61 | 29.3 |
| Current programme of study | ||
| Undergraduate | 86 | 41.3 |
| Postgraduate degree | 108 | 60 |
| Doctoral studies | 14 | 6.7 |
| Currently employed? | ||
| Yes | 67 | 32.2 |
| No | 141 | 67.8 |
| Attendance at a conference in the past five years | ||
| Yes | 151 | 72.6 |
| No | 57 | 27.4 |
4.2. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) - Generation Z Conference Attendance Motivations Scale
4.3. Confirmatory Factorial Analysis (CFA)
4.4. The Role of Socio-Demographic Variables
5. Discussion and Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Davidson, R. Business Events, 2nd ed.; Routledge: Oxon, United Kingdom, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- World Travel & Tourism Council (WTTC). Maximising Opportunities for Business Travel Growth [Report]. 2017. Available online: https://www.wttc.org/publications/2017/p4g-white-paper-maximising-opportunities-for-business-travel-growth/.
- Han, H.; Hwang, J. What Motivates Delegates’ Conservation Behaviors While Attending a Convention? J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2017, 34, 82–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavluković, V.; Davidson, R.; Chaperon, S.; Vujičić, M. China's Generation Z: Students' Motivations for Conference Attendance and Preferred Conference Design. Event Manag. 2022, 26, 847–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Damanik, J.; Priyambodo, T.K.; Wibowo, M.E.; Pitanatri, P.D.S.; Wachyuni, S.S. Travel behaviour differences among Indonesian youth in Generations Y and Z: pre-, during and post-travel. Consum. Behav. Tour. Hosp. 2023, 18, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nikolić, T.M.; Paunović, I.; Milovanović, M.; Lozović, N.; Đurović, M. Examining Generation Z’s Attitudes, Behavior and Awareness Regarding Eco-Products: A Bayesian Approach to Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Sustainability 2022, 14, 2727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stojsavljević, R.; Vujičić, M.D.; Stankov, U.; Stamenković, I.; Masliković, D.; Carmer, A.B.; Polić, D.; Mujkić, D.; Bajić, M. In Search for Meaning? Modelling Generation Z Spiritual Travel Motivation Scale—The Case of Serbia. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Government of the Republic of Serbia, Ministry of Trade, Tourism, and Telecommunications. Tourism Development Strategy of the Republic of Serbia 2016-2025. 2016. Available online: https://mtt.gov.rs/download/3/TOURISM%20DEVELOPMENT%20STRATEGY%20OF%20RS%202016- 2025.pdf.
- Huang, Y. L.; Lee, Y. H. Understanding Participator Patterns and Trends to Convention Destination. Int. J. Product. Manag. 2017, 7, 27–42. [Google Scholar]
- Jung, S.; Tanford, S. What contributes to convention attendee satisfaction and loyalty? A meta-analysis. J. Conv. Event Tour. 2017, 18, 118–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavlukovic, V.; Cimbaljevic, M. Factors affecting conference participation decision-making. J. Geogr. Inst. Jovan Cvijic, SASA 2020, 70, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oppermann, M.; Chon, K. Conference destination and brand images: A comparative analysis. Tour. Manag. 1997, 18, 443–451. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, H. Q.; Qu, H.; Tavitiyaman, P. Modeling the relationship between factors affecting conference participation decision-making and participation behavior. J. Conv. Event Tour. 2007, 8, 25–46. [Google Scholar]
- Yoo, J.J.-E.; Chon, K. Factors Affecting Convention Participation Decision-Making: Developing a Measurement Scale. J. Travel Res. 2008, 47, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mair, J.; Thompson, K. The UK association conference attendance decision-making process. Tour. Manag. 2009, 30, 400–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malekmohammadi, A.; Mohamed, B.; Ekiz, E. H. An Analysis of Conference Attendee Motivations: Case of International Conference Attendees in Singapore. J. Travel Res. 2011, 11, 50–64. [Google Scholar]
- Liang, H.C.K.; A Latip, H. Factors Affecting Attendees’ Decision-Making in Convention Tourism Industry. Adv. Sci. Lett. 2018, 24, 4414–4420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mair, J.; Lockstone-Binney, L.; Whitelaw, P.A. The motives and barriers of association conference attendance: Evidence from an Australasian tourism and hospitality academic conference. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2018, 34, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aktas, G.; Demirel, B. The genuine needs of conference attendees: an analysis by the modern quality function deployment. Int. J. Qual. Res. 2019, 13, 13–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stuart, C.M.; Tindle, K.C.; Phillips, L.L. Characteristics and Motivating Factors of Attendees of a Regional Student-Run Wilderness Medicine Conference. Wilderness Environ. Med. 2019, 30, 461–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scott, S.; Ogbeide, G.-C.; Fenich, G.G. Millennial Subgroups' Attendance and Participation in Events. Event Manag. 2020, 24, 361–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López-Bonilla, J.M.; Monroy-Rodríguez, S.; López-Bonilla, L.M.; Granados-Perea, C. Motivational factors to participate in conferences and gender differences. Tour. Hosp. Res. 2023, 23, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blunch, N. Introduction to Structural Equation Modelling Using SPSS and AMOS; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J. F.; Anderson, R. E.; Tatham, R. L.; Black, W. C. Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed. New Jersey, Prentice Hall, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, C.-C.; Wang, Y.-M.; Wu, T.-W.; Wang, P.-A. An Empirical Analysis of the Antecedents and Performance Consequences of Using the Moodle Platform. Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol. 2013, 3, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zait, A.; Bertea, P.E. Methods for Testing Discriminant Validity. Management & Marketing 2011, 9, 217–224. [Google Scholar]
- Vujičić, M.D.; Stamenković, I.; Stankov, U.; Kovačić, S.; Vasiljević. A.; Popov-Locke, J. What will prevail within citybreak travel, motivation or demotivation?: Case study of Novi Sad, Vojvodina, Serbia. Geogr. Pannonica 2020, 24, 42–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Label | Factor loading | Eigenvalue | Variance explained | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
F1 – Green and Digital Conference Experience Strong Internet/social media presence of conference Conference marketing and programme is available online rather than hardcopy Conference embraces ‘green’ practices Conference provides an environment for generating and sharing my ideas Well-known, reputable speakers Environmental impact of traveling to the conference |
0.749 0.641 0.610 0.566 0.546 0.507 |
7.029 | 18.997 | 0.744 |
|
F2 – Educational and professional opportunities Opportunity to learn and gain new knowledge Professional advancement/development New contacts with colleagues Interesting conference theme Interesting conference program New contacts with keynote speakers Self-achievement |
0.738 0.717 0.705 0.666 0.623 0.596 0.570 |
3.547 | 9.588 | 0.820 |
| F3 – Conference costs Transportation cost Accommodation cost Conference registration cost |
0.870 0.864 0.852 |
2.796 | 7.557 | 0.887 |
|
F4 – Destination and conference stimuli Attractive conference destination Scenery/sightseeing/shopping opportunities at the conference destination Weather at the conference destination Fun social events as part of conference |
0.749 0.724 0.676 0.572 |
2.165 | 5.852 | 0.740 |
|
F5 – Stimulating factors Previous experience of the conference Previous destination experiences Family support / family responsibilities Personal recommendation by a friend/colleague/family member Conference reputation |
0.745 0.716 0.683 0.576 0.563 |
1.880 | 5.080 | 0.756 |
|
F6 – Conference destination accessibility Easy to access to the conference destination Time required to travel to the conference destination Location close to home Safety and security at the conference destination |
0.725 0.722 0.520 0.502 |
1.518 | 4.104 | 0.589 |
| F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | 0.64 | |||||
| F2 | 0.51 | 0.74 | ||||
| F3 | 0.038 | 0.193 | 0.9 | |||
| F4 | 0.459 | 0.14 | 0.165 | 0.74 | ||
| F5 | 0.539 | 0.426 | 0.171 | 0.511 | 0.7 | |
| F6 | 0.408 | 0.445 | 0.456 | 0.499 | 0.54 | 0.64 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).