Submitted:
06 June 2023
Posted:
07 June 2023
Read the latest preprint version here
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Big Data in Thai Government
3. Big data in Thai government
4. Algorithm of machine leaning in this research.
4.1 Artificial neural network algorithm (ANN)
4.2. Decision tree algorithm
4.3. K-Nearest Neighbors
5. Algorithm of machine leaning in this research.
6. Conceptual framework
7. Research methodology
7.1. Application of machine learning
7.2. Verifying the Model
7.3. Hyperparameter optimization with random search
7.4. Data Collection
8. Result
8.1. General Information.
8.2. Machine learning model
8.3. Validating data with confusion matrix
8.4. After hhyperparameters tuning.
5. Discussion
9. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Srinavin, K.; Kusonkhum, W.; Chonpitakwong, B.; Chaitongrat, T.; Leungbootnak, N.; Charnwasununth, P. Readiness of Applying Big Data Technology for Construction Management in Thai Public Sector. J. Adv. Inf. Technol. 2021, 12, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilal, M.; Oyedele, L.O.; Qadir, J.; Munir, K.; Ajayi, S.O.; Akinade, O.O.; Alaka, H.; Pasha, M. Big Data in the Construction Industry: A Review of Present Status, Opportunities, and Future Trends. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2016, 30, 500–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaitongrat, T.; Leungbootnak, N.; Kusonkhum, W.; Deewong, W.; Liwthaisong, S.; Srinavin, K. Measurement Model of Good Governance in Government Procurement. IOP Conf. Series: Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 639, 012024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soni, S.; Pandey, M.K.; Agrawal, S. Conflicts and Disputes in Construction Projects: An Overview. Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl. 2017, 7, 40–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaffar, N.; Tharim, A.H.A.; Shuib, M.N. Factors of Conflict in Construction Industry: A Literature Review. Procedia Eng. 2011, 20, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rose, K. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)-Fifth Edition. Proj. Manag. J. 2013, 44, e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaitongrat, T. Causal relationship model of problems in public sector procurement. Int. J. GEOMATE : Geotech. Constr. Mater. Environ. 2021, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hurwitz, J.; and Kirsch, D.; Machine Learning for Dummies, IBM Limited Edition. 2018. p. 75.
- Bai, S.; Li, H.; Kong, R.; Han, S.; Li, H.; Qin, L. Data Mining Approach to Construction Productivity Prediction for Cutter Suction Dredgers. Autom. Constr. 2019, 105, 102833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naganathan, H.; Chong, W.C.; Chen, X.-W. Building Energy Modeling (BEM) Using Clustering Algorithms and Semi-Supervised Machine Learning Approaches. Autom. Constr. 2016, 72, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poh, C.Q.X.; Ubeynarayana, C.U.; Goh, Y.M. Safety Leading Indicators for Construction Sites: A Machine Learning Approach. Autom. Constr. 2018, 93, 375–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chonpitakwong, B.; Kusonkhum, W.; Chaitongrat, T.; Srinavin, K.; Charnwasununth, P. Hindrance of Applying Big Data Technology for Construction Management in Thai Government. J. Adv. Inf. Technol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jervis, B.M.; Levin, P.T. Construction Law, Principles and Practice; 1988.
- The Comptroller General’s Department. The Government Procurement and Supplies Management Act B.E. 2560. The Comptroller General’s Department. 2017.
- Deal, J.L. Information ShiftBig Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, And Think By Mayer-Schonberger Viktor Cukier Kenneth New York (NY) : Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2013, 242 Pp., $27.00. Health Aff. 2014, 33, 1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michael, K.; Miller, K. Big Data: New Opportunities and New Challenges [Guest Editors’ Introduction]. IEEE Comput. 2013, 46, 22–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Big Data Analytics; Springer Science+Business Media, 2018.
- Creely, E.; Henriksen, D.; Henderson, M. Artificial intelligence, creativity, and education: Critical questions for researchers and educators. In Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 2023; pp. 1309-1317.
- Anand, R.J.D., March. More Data Usually Beats Better Algorithms. 2008, 24.
- Eadie, R.; Browne, M.; Odeyinka, H.; McKeown, C.; McNiff, S.J.A.i.c. BIM implementation throughout the UK construction project lifecycle: An analysis. Autom. Constr. 2013, 36, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Insights, F.J.R.f.w.f.c.f. Betting on Big Data: How the right culture, strategy and investments can help you leapfrog the competition. 2015.
- Kaisler, S.; Armour, F.; Espinosa, J.A.; Money, W. Big data: Issues and challenges moving forward. In Proceedings of the 2013 46th Hawaii international conference on system sciences; 2013; pp. 995–1004. [Google Scholar]
- Wielki, J. Implementation of the big data concept in organizations-possibilities, impediments and challenges. In Proceedings of the 2013 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems; 2013; pp. 985–989. [Google Scholar]
- Osmani, M.; Glass, J.; Price, A. Architect and contractor attitudes to waste minimisation. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-waste and resource management, 2006; pp. 65-72.
- Wang, L.; Leite, F. Knowledge discovery of spatial conflict resolution philosophies in BIM-enabled MEP design coordination using data mining techniques: a proof-of-concept. In Computing in Civil Engineering (2013); 2013; pp. 419-426.
- Jiao, Y.; Zhang, S.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yang, B.; Wang, L. An augmented MapReduce framework for building information modeling applications. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 18th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD), 2014; pp. 283-288.
- Lin, J.R.; Hu, Z.Z.; Zhang, J.P.; Yu, F.Q.J.C.A.C.; Engineering, I. A natural-language-based approach to intelligent data retrieval and representation for cloud BIM. Comput. Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 2016, 31, 18–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dzuke, A.; Naude, M.J.J.J.o.T.; Management, S.C. Procurement challenges in the Zimbabwean public sector: A preliminary study. J. Transp. Supply Chain. Manag. 2015, 9, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hazra, J.; Mahadevan, B. A procurement model in an electronic market with coordination costs. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management; 2011; pp. 1364–1368. [Google Scholar]
- Mark McKevitt, D.; Davis, P.J.I.J.o.P.S.M. Supplier development and public procurement: allies, coaches and bedfellows. Int. J. Public Sect. Manag. 2014, 27, 550–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leungbootnak, N.; Chaithongrat, T.; Aksorn, P. An exploratory factor analysis of government construction procurement problems. In Proceedings of the MATEC Web of Conferences, 2018; p. 02057.
- Tanayut, C.; Narong, L.; Preenithi, A.; Patrick, M. Application of Confirmatory Factor Analysis in Government Construction Procurement Problems in Thailand. Int. Trans. J. Eng. Manag. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2017, 8, 22. [Google Scholar]
- Du, J.; Jiao, Y.-Y.; Jiao, R.J.; Kumar, A.; Ma, M. A case study of obsolete part procurement process reengineering. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management; 2007; pp. 1337–1341. [Google Scholar]
- Burke, R. Project management: planning and control techniques; John Wiley & Sons: 2013.
- Chitkara, K. Construction Project Management-Planning, Scheduling and Controlling, Tata McGraw Hills. 2011.
- Maemura, Y.; Kim, E.; Ozawa, K. Root causes of recurring contractual conflicts in international construction projects: Five case studies from Vietnam. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2018, 144, 05018008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diekmann, J.E.; Kruppenbacher, T.A. Claims analysis and computer reasoning. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 1984, 110, 391–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.P. US Army Corps Engineers construction contract claims guidance system. In Proceedings of the Utilization of Ocean Waves—Wave to Energy Conversion; 1989; pp. 203–209. [Google Scholar]
- Chau, K.-W. Prediction of construction litigation outcome–a case-based reasoning approach. In Proceedings of the Advances in Applied Artificial Intelligence: 19th International Conference on Industrial, Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems, IEA/AIE 2006, Annecy, France, June 27-30, 2006. Proceedings 19, 2006; pp. 548-553.
- Atuahene, B.T.; Kanjanabootra, S.; Gajendran, T. Transformative role of big data through enabling capability recognition in construction. Constr. Manag. Econ. 2023, 41, 208–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- James, G.; Witten, D.; Hastie, T.; Tibshirani, R. An introduction to statistical learning; Springer: 2013; Volume 112.
- Breiman, L. Random Forests--Random Features. - 1999.
- Zhang, Z. Introduction to machine learning: k-nearest neighbors. Ann. Transl. Med. 2016, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Canhoto, A.I.; Clear, F.J.B.H. Artificial intelligence and machine learning as business tools: A framework for diagnosing value destruction potential. Bus. Horiz. 2020, 63, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.H. KNN based knowledge-sharing model for severe change order disputes in construction. Autom. Constr. 2008, 17, 773–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, S.; Fang, J. Prediction of construction cost index based on multi variable grey neural network model. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Change Manag. 2018, 10, 209–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salama, D.M.; El-Gohary, N.M. Semantic text classification for supporting automated compliance checking in construction. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 2016, 30, 04014106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elfahham, Y. Estimation and prediction of construction cost index using neural networks, time series, and regression. Alex. Eng. J. 2019, 58, 499–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, P.T.; Nguyen, Q.L.H.T.T. Critical factors affecting construction price index: An integrated fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process. J. Asian Financ. Econ. Bus. 2020, 7, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, W.C.; Ke, S.W.; Tsai, C.F. Top 10 data mining techniques in business applications: a brief survey. Kybernetes 2017, 46, 1158–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, M.Y.; Peng, H.S.; Wu, Y.W.; Chen, T.L. Estimate at completion for construction projects using evolutionary support vector machine inference model. Autom. Constr. 2010, 19, 619–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cost, S.; Salzberg, S. A weighted nearest neighbor algorithm for learning with symbolic features. Mach. Learn. 1993, 10, 57–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roy, R.; Low, M.; Waller, J. Documentation, standardization and improvement of the construction process in house building. Constr. Manag. Econ. 2005, 23, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kusonkhum, W.; Srinavin, K.; Leungbootnak, N.; Aksorn, P.; Chaitongrat, T. Government construction project budget prediction using machine learning. J. Adv. Inf. Technol. 2022, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wistuba, M.; Schilling, N.; Schmidt-Thieme, L. Hyperparameter optimization machines. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA); 2016; pp. 41–50. [Google Scholar]
- Le, Q.V.; Ngiam, J.; Coates, A.; Lahiri, A.; Prochnow, B.; Ng, A.Y. On optimization methods for deep learning. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning, 2011; pp. 265-272.
- Wistuba, M.; Schilling, N.; Schmidt-Thieme, L. Learning hyperparameter optimization initializations. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE international conference on data science and advanced analytics (DSAA), 2015; pp. 1-10.
- Hazan, E.; Klivans, A.; Yuan, Y.J.a.p.a. Hyperparameter optimization: A spectral approach. 2017.
- Hernández-Torruco, J.; Canul-Reich, J.; Frausto-Solis, J.; Méndez-Castillo, J.J. Towards a predictive model for Guillain-Barré syndrome. In Proceedings of the 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC); 2015; pp. 7234–7237. [Google Scholar]
- Allen, K.; Berry, M.M.; Luehrs, F.U., Jr.; Perry, J.W.J.A.D. Machine literature searching VIII. Operational criteria for designing information retrieval systems. Am. Doc. 1955, 6, 93. [Google Scholar]
- Gondia, A.; Siam, A.; El-Dakhakhni, W.; Nassar, A.H. Machine learning algorithms for construction projects delay risk prediction. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2020, 146, 04019085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suntharanurak, S. Screening for bid rigging in rural road procurement of Thailand. Doctoral dissertation, National Institute of Development Administration, 2012.
- Samui, P.; Roy, S.S.; Balas, V.E. Handbook of neural computation; Academic Press: 2017.
- Lu, B.; Hardin, J. Constructing prediction intervals for random forests. Ph. D. thesis, Pomona College, 2017.
- Tang, L.; Zhao, Y.; Cabrera, J.; Ma, J.; Tsui, K. L. Forecasting short-term passenger flow: An empirical study on shenzhen metro. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2018, 20, 3613–3622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bergstra, J.; Bengio, Y. Random search for hyper-parameter optimization. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2012, 13. [Google Scholar]
- Bergstra, J.; Bardenet, R.; Bengio, Y.; Kégl, B. Algorithms for hyper-parameter optimization. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2011, 24. [Google Scholar]
- Bergstra, J.; Yamins, D.; Cox, D. Making a science of model search: Hyperparameter optimization in hundreds of dimensions for vision architectures. In Proceedings of the International conference on machine learning; 2013; pp. 115–123. [Google Scholar]
- Olson, D.L.; Delen, D. Advanced data mining techniques; Springer Science & Business Media: 2008.










| No. | Attributes | Factor |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Project owner epartments | 13 |
| 2 | Type of construciton project | 3 |
| 3 | Bidding method | 3 |
| 4 | Duration | 5 |
| 5 | Project level | 5 |
| 6 | Standard price over budget | 3 |
| 7 | Winning price over budget | 3 |
| Method of procurement | Detail |
|---|---|
| Bidding | Every firm was welcome to join and evaluate the initiatives. |
| Chosen | Only the qualifying firm could submit a proposal with specific project requirements. |
| Specific | The contractors might be chosen by the proprietors on their own. |
| Project level | Detail (Million USD) |
|---|---|
| L1 | < 140,000 |
| L2 | 140,001 - 280,000 |
| L3 | 280,001 - 1,400,000 |
| L4 | 1,400,001 - 7,000,000 |
| L5 | > 7,000,001 |
| Method of procurement | Price (USD) | % |
|---|---|---|
| University | 747,838,774 | 5.63 |
| School | 477,369,208 | 3.59 |
| Hospital | 332,634,917 | 2.50 |
| Irrigation | 680,402,982 | 5.12 |
| Public works and town and country planning | 29,724,273,461 | 6.14 |
| Highway | 2,761,913,958 | 20.78 |
| Rural road | 1,131,877,654 | 8.51 |
| Finance | 15,551,811 | 0.12 |
| Local of administration | 2,946,100,502 | 22.16 |
| Justice | 560,697,143 | 4.22 |
| Police | 290,890,893 | 2.19 |
| Soldier | 336,971,946 | 2.53 |
| Other | 2,195,136,360 | 5.63 |
| Sum | 13,294,211,568 | 100.0 |
| Algorithm | Accuracy |
|---|---|
| ANN | 77.60% |
| Decision tree | 77.30% |
| KNN | 75.00% |
| precision | recall | f1-score | support | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under | 0.83 | 0.41 | 0.55 | 18,704 |
| Balance | 0.77 | 0.96 | 0.85 | 37,954 |
| Over | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 47 |
| Accuracy | 0.78 | 56,705 | ||
| Macro avg | 0.53 | 0.46 | 0.47 | 56,705 |
| Weighted avg | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 56,705 |
| precision | recall | f1-score | support | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under | 0.81 | 0.41 | 0.54 | 18,595 |
| Balance | 0.77 | 0.95 | 0.85 | 38,060 |
| Over | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 50 |
| Accuracy | 0.77 | 56,705 | ||
| Macro avg | 0.53 | 0.45 | 0.46 | 56,705 |
| Weighted avg | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 56,705 |
| precision | recall | f1-score | support | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under | 0.66 | 0.50 | 0.57 | 18,564 |
| Balance | 0.78 | 0.87 | 0.82 | 38,088 |
| Over | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 53 |
| Accuracy | 0.75 | 56,705 | ||
| Macro avg | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 56,705 |
| Weighted avg | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 56,705 |
| Machine learning algorithm | |||
| Cases | ANN | Decision Tree | KNN |
| Under | 83% | 81% | 66% |
| Balance | 77% | 77% | 78% |
| Over | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Algorithm | Accuracy before hyperparameter | Accuracy after hyperparameter | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANN | 77.6% | 78.9% | |
| Decision tree | 77.3% | 78.8% | |
| KNN | 75.0% | 77.7% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).