Submitted:
06 June 2023
Posted:
07 June 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Experimental setting up
2.1. Wind tunnel and cable model

2.2. Wind flow profile
2.3. Experimental parameters
3. Excitation mechanism of wind induced circular cylinder vibration
3.1. Wake flow measurements
3.2. Excitation mechanism of DSG
3.2.1. Wavelet-analysis on vertical-wind fluctuation component (w-component)
3.2.2. Wavelet-analysis on along-wind fluctuation component (u-component)
3.3. Shedding correlation of wind flow in cable wake
4. Conclusions
- The study successfully reproduces both limited response and divergent galloping, which are characteristic responses of wind-induced vibration in dry conditions in circular cylinders.
- Comprehensive measurements of the wake flow around the cylinders have been conducted, capturing both the vertical and horizontal wind fluctuation components. Additionally, wavelet analysis and coherence analysis have been employed to elucidate the flow field characteristics in the vicinity of the cylinder wake.
- Under dry conditions, the formation of low-frequency dominant vortices and the suppression of Karman vortex shedding in the cylinder wake are closely associated with the process of wind-induced circular cylinder galloping.
- At high wind speeds, there is a significant increase in the shedding correlation of low-frequency vortices. Conversely, as wind speed increased, the shedding correlation of the Karman vortex was progressively attenuated.
- The low-frequency vortices exhibit high energy levels and demonstrate a strong temporal shedding correlation. Consequently, they have a significant excitation effect on the cylinder, contributing to its strong vibration response.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Vo, H.D.; Katsuchi, H.; Yamada, H.; Nishio, M. A wind tunnel study on control methods for cable dry-galloping. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 2015, 10, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vo-Duy, H.; Nguyen, C.H. Mitigating Large Vibrations of Stayed Cables in Wind and Rain Hazards. Shock. Vib. 2020, 2020, 5845712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- J.B. Jakobsen, et al., Wind-induced response and excitation, characteristic of an inclined cable model in the critical Reynolds number range. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 2012. 110: p. 100-112.
- Matsumoto, M.; Yagi, T.; Hatsuda, H.; Shima, T.; Tanaka, M.; Naito, H. Dry galloping characteristics and its mechanism of inclined/yawed cables. J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2010, 98, 317–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ni, Y.; Wang, X.; Chen, Z.; Ko, J. Field observations of rain-wind-induced cable vibration in cable-stayed Dongting Lake Bridge. J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2007, 95, 303–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zuo, D. and J.P. Jones, Interpretation of field observations of wind- and rain-wind-induced stay cable vibrations. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2010, 98(2): p. 73-87.
- Kumarasena, S. , et al., Wind Induced Vibration of Stay Cables, in Report No. FHWA-HRT-05-083, 2007, Federal Highway Administration: McLean, Virginia.
- Kusuhara, S. , Vibration and countermeasures for cable structure of Honshu-Shikoku bridges. The International Symposium on Flutter and its Application 2016, 2016. 1: p. CD Room.
- Saito, T., M. Matsumoto, and M. Kitazawa. Rain-wind Excitation of Cables on Cable-stayed Higashi-Kobe Bridge and Cable Vibration Control. in Proc. of Cable-stayed and Suspension Bridges. 1994.
- Honda, A. , et al. Wind tunnel test on rain-induced vibration of the stay cable. in Proceedings of International Symposium on Cable Dynamics. 1995. Lie`ge, Belgium.
- Miyata, T., H. Yamada, and T. Hojo. Aerodynamic response of PE stay cables with pattern-indented surface. In the International Conference on Cable-Stayed and Suspension Bridges (AFPC). 1994. Deauville, France.
- Cheng, S.; Larose, G.L.; Savage, M.G.; Tanaka, H.; Irwin, P.A. Experimental study on the wind-induced vibration of a dry inclined cable—Part I: Phenomena. J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2008, 96, 2231–2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- J.B. Jakobsen, et al., Wind-induced response and excitation, characteristic of an inclined cable model in the critical Reynolds number range. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 2012. 110: p. 100-112.
- Nikitas, N.; Macdonald, J. Aerodynamic forcing characteristics of dry cable galloping at critical Reynolds numbers. Eur. J. Mech. - B/Fluids 2015, 49, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kleissl, K.; Georgakis, C. Comparison of the aerodynamics of bridge cables with helical fillets and a pattern-indented surface. J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2012, 104-106, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Den Hartog, J.P. , Mechanical Vibrations, 4th ed. 1956: McGraw-Hill, New York.
- Macdonald, J.; Larose, G. A unified approach to aerodynamic damping and drag/lift instabilities, and its application to dry inclined cable galloping. J. Fluids Struct. 2006, 22, 229–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piccardo, G.; Zulli, D.; Luongo, A. Dry galloping in inclined cables: linear stability analysis. Procedia Eng. 2017, 199, 3164–3169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.; Sun, Y.; Jia, Y.; Ma, W.; Xiao, B. Study on the characteristics and mechanisms of the wind-induced vibration of micro-elliptical section stay cables. J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2020, 206, 104355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakamura, Y.; Hirata, K.; Urabe, T. Galloping of rectangular cylinders inthe presence of a splitter plate. J. Fluids Struct. 1991, 5, 521–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matsumoto, M. , et al. Aerodynamic Behavior of Inclined Circular Cylinders Cable Aerodynamics. International Colloquium on Bluff Bodies Aerodynamics and Applications, 1990.
- McTavish, S.; D’auteuil, A.; Raeesi, A. Effect of cable surface characteristics and flow turbulence on the aerodynamic behaviour of stay cables in dry conditions. J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2020, 207, 104414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barltrop, N.D.P.; Adams, A.J. Dynamics of Fixed Marine Structures, 3rd ed.; Butterworth Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 1991. [Google Scholar]
















| No. | Mean U (m/s) | Iu | Iw |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.71 | 0.59% | 0.60% |
| 2 | 9.20 | 0.59% | 0.62% |
| 3 | 11.68 | 0.56% | 0.59% |
| 4 | 14.15 | 0.60% | 0.61% |
| 5 | 19.06 | 0.48% | 0.62% |
| No. | U1 (m/s) At pitot tube |
U2 (m/s) At model position |
U1/U2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 1.024 |
| 2 | 0.54 | 0.49 | 1.095 |
| 3 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 1.114 |
| 4 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 1.081 |
| 5 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 1.099 |
| 6 | 0.96 | 0.87 | 1.109 |
| 7 | 1.16 | 1.03 | 1.123 |
| 8 | 1.38 | 1.26 | 1.093 |
| 9 | 1.72 | 1.62 | 1.059 |
| 10 | 3.04 | 2.89 | 1.051 |
| 11 | 4.21 | 3.99 | 1.055 |
| 12 | 5.41 | 5.13 | 1.055 |
| 13 | 6.60 | 6.32 | 1.045 |
| 14 | 7.82 | 7.73 | 1.012 |
| 15 | 9.06 | 8.66 | 1.046 |
| 16 | 10.25 | 9.97 | 1.028 |
| 17 | 11.51 | 11.20 | 1.028 |
| 18 | 12.73 | 12.50 | 1.018 |
| 19 | 13.95 | 13.20 | 1.057 |
| 20 | 15.18 | 15.10 | 1.005 |
| 21 | 16.42 | 16.30 | 1.007 |
| 22 | 17.62 | 17.10 | 1.030 |
| 23 | 18.79 | 18.40 | 1.021 |
| 24 | 20.07 | 19.50 | 1.029 |
| Parameters | Value |
|---|---|
| Stay cable diameter: D | 158mm |
| Model length | 1,500mm |
| Mass per unit | 14.00 - 16.00 kg/m |
| Frequency | 0.80 – 1.00 Hz |
| Logarithm decrement (δ) | 0. 5% - 1.6% |
| Reynolds number | ~ 2.1×105 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).