Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Forecasting PM Levels Using Machine Learning Models in the Arctic: A Comparative Study

Version 1 : Received: 3 June 2023 / Approved: 5 June 2023 / Online: 5 June 2023 (05:04:24 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Fazzini, P.; Montuori, M.; Pasini, A.; Cuzzucoli, A.; Crotti, I.; Campana, E.F.; Petracchini, F.; Dobricic, S. Forecasting PM10 Levels Using Machine Learning Models in the Arctic: A Comparative Study. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 3348. Fazzini, P.; Montuori, M.; Pasini, A.; Cuzzucoli, A.; Crotti, I.; Campana, E.F.; Petracchini, F.; Dobricic, S. Forecasting PM10 Levels Using Machine Learning Models in the Arctic: A Comparative Study. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 3348.

Abstract

In this study, we present a statistical forecasting framework and assess its efficacy using a range of established machine learning algorithms for predicting Particulate Matter (PM) concentrations in the Arctic, specifically in Pallas (FI), Reykjavik (IS), and Tromso (NO). Our framework leverages historical ground measures and 24-hour predictions from 9 models provided by the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) to provide PM predictions for the following 24 hours. Furthermore, we compare the performance of various memory cells based on artificial neural networks (ANN), including recurrent neural networks (RNNs), gated recurrent units (GRUs), long short-term memory networks (LSTMs), echo state networks (ESNs), and windowed multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs), which are commonly employed in time series forecasting tasks. Irrespective of the chosen memory cell type, our results demonstrate that the proposed framework consistently outperforms the CAM models in terms of mean squared error (MSE), with average improvements ranging from 25% to 40%. Additionally, we investigate the impact of outliers on the overall model performance.

Keywords

deep learning; PM10; environmental forecasting; chaotic time series; Arctic

Subject

Environmental and Earth Sciences, Pollution

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.