Lopez Perez, N.; Reymond, P.; Cikirikcioglu, M.; van Steenberghe, M.; Sologashvili, T.; Murith, N.; Perneger, T.; Huber, C. Aortic Dilatation on the Edge of Dissection––Do We Operate Too Late? The Ratio between Ascending and Descending Aorta DiameteR (RADAR). J. Clin. Med.2023, 12, 4400.
Lopez Perez, N.; Reymond, P.; Cikirikcioglu, M.; van Steenberghe, M.; Sologashvili, T.; Murith, N.; Perneger, T.; Huber, C. Aortic Dilatation on the Edge of Dissection––Do We Operate Too Late? The Ratio between Ascending and Descending Aorta DiameteR (RADAR). J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 4400.
Lopez Perez, N.; Reymond, P.; Cikirikcioglu, M.; van Steenberghe, M.; Sologashvili, T.; Murith, N.; Perneger, T.; Huber, C. Aortic Dilatation on the Edge of Dissection––Do We Operate Too Late? The Ratio between Ascending and Descending Aorta DiameteR (RADAR). J. Clin. Med.2023, 12, 4400.
Lopez Perez, N.; Reymond, P.; Cikirikcioglu, M.; van Steenberghe, M.; Sologashvili, T.; Murith, N.; Perneger, T.; Huber, C. Aortic Dilatation on the Edge of Dissection––Do We Operate Too Late? The Ratio between Ascending and Descending Aorta DiameteR (RADAR). J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 4400.
Abstract
(1) Background: There is a need of a novel surrogate marker to ease decision making when facing ascending aortic dilatation. In this article we study the ratio between ascending and descending aorta diameters as a potential one; (2) Methods: Retrospective observational cohort study, including all the patients who have undergone surgery for aTAAD between January 2014 and September 2020 at our center. A total of 50 patients were included. Clinical and demographic data was collected. Anatomical measurements were made including orthogonal maximal diameters of the ascending and descending aorta, post-dissection whole circumference length (post-wCL), post-dissection true lumen circumference length (post-tCL), surface and sphericity index of the ascending and descending aorta. Pre-dissection ascending aorta diameter (pre-AAD) and pre-dissection descending aorta diameter (pre-DAD) were calculated as well as the ratio between them and compared with reference values; (3) Results: 96% of the patients pre-AAD was smaller than the recommended 55mm. The ratio between the descending and ascending aorta pre-dissection diameters was significantly smaller compared to the reference value (0.657±0.125 versus 0.745± 0.016 with a mean difference of -0.088 and a p<0.001); (4) Conclusions: The 55mm threshold for aorta maximal diameter is an insufficient criterion when assessing the risk of dissection. The ratio between DAD and AAD is a parameter worthy of analysis as a tool to stratify the risk of dissection.
Medicine and Pharmacology, Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.