Submitted:
18 May 2023
Posted:
18 May 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Related Work
2.1. Social Commerce
2.2. Personified Communication
3. Research Method
3.1. Hypothesis
3.2. Research Model
| Variable | Item | Questionnaire Question |
|---|---|---|
| Perceived Usefulness (PU) | PU1 | Reading the personified microblog of brand enterprises allows me to buy the products I like |
| PU2 | Reading the personified microblog of brand enterprises can enhance my understanding of products or services | |
| PU3 | Reading the personified microblog of brand enterprises has improved my shopping efficiency | |
| Perceived Interaction (PIU) (User-User) |
PIU1 | Through the personification of enterprise communication, the frequency of communication with other consumers has become more and more |
| PIU2 | Through the personification of corporate communication, I feel that I have strengthened the connection with other consumers | |
| PIU3 | As consumers, they often communicate with each other under the personified microblog of enterprises | |
| Perceived Interaction (PIC) (User-Company) |
PIC1 | When I post my microblog about brand enterprises in microblog, I will get personified response from brand enterprises |
| PIC2 | I often participate in related topics about a corporate brand in microblog | |
| PIC3 | Through the personified communication of enterprises, I feel able to establish contact with enterprises | |
| Attitude (AT) |
AT1 | I am delighted with the personified communication behavior of enterprises |
| AT2 | The personified communication of enterprises makes me have the impulse to buy goods | |
| AT3 | I think it's a good idea for companies to personify communication on social media | |
| Purchase Intention (PW) |
PW1 | It is helpful for me to make a purchase decision for this product |
| PW2 | The personification of enterprise communication has an impact on my purchase of this enterprise's products | |
| PW3 | In whether to buy this product, I will refer to the personified communication behavior of the enterprise | |
| PW4 | The personified communication behavior of the enterprise makes me more confident when I decide to buy the products of this brand | |
| Cognitive Need (CN) |
CN1 | The personified communication behavior of the enterprise makes me more confident when I decide to buy the products of this brand |
| CN2 | I have a strong interest in the goods I buy | |
| CN3 | I like to do things that require a lot of thinking |
4. Empirical Study and Results
4.1. Questionnaire Design
4.2. Data Collection
| Variable | Item | Factor loading | Cronbach's α | CR | AVE |
| Perceived Usefulness(PU) | PU1 | 0.84 | 0.879 | 0.881 | 0.712 |
| PU2 | 0.85 | ||||
| PU3 | 0.84 | ||||
| Perceived Interaction(PIU) (User-User) |
PIU1 | 0.75 | 0.862 | 0.864 | 0.681 |
| PIU2 | 0.88 | ||||
| PIU3 | 0.84 | ||||
| Perceived Interaction (PIC) (User-Company) |
PIC1 | 0.83 | 0.896 | 0.898 | 0.746 |
| PIC2 | 0.89 | ||||
| PIC3 | 0.87 | ||||
| Attitude (AT) |
AT1 | 0.75 | 0.813 | 0.807 | 0.583 |
| AT2 | 0.79 | ||||
| AT3 | 0.75 | ||||
| Purchase Intention (PW) |
PW1 | 0.74 | 0.852 | 0.858 | 0.603 |
| PW2 | 0.74 | ||||
| PW3 | 0.84 | ||||
| PW4 | 0.78 | ||||
| Cognitive Need (CN) |
CN1 | 0.84 | 0.842 | 0.852 | 0.592 |
| CN2 | 0.80 | ||||
| CN3 | 0.71 |
4.3. Model Validation
4.4. SEM Analysis
4.5. Mediating Effect Test
4.6. Moderated Mediation Analysis
5. Conclusions and Suggestions
5.1. Research Conclusions
5.2. Suggestions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hajli, N. Social Commerce and the Future of E-commerce. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2020, 108, 106133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hajli, N.; Sims, J. Social Commerce: The Transfer of Power from Sellers to Buyers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2015, 94 (Supplement C), 350–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, X.; Wang, X.; Hajli, N. Building E-Commerce Satisfaction and Boosting Sales: The Role of Social Commerce Trust and Its Antecedents. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2019, 23, 328–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bazi, S.; Haddad, H.; Al-Amad, A.; Rees, D.; Hajli, N. Investigating the Impact of Situational Influences and Social Support on Social Commerce during the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2022, 17, 104–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hajli, N. The Impact of Positive Valence and Negative Valence on Social Commerce Purchase Intention. Inf. Technol. People, 2020, 33, 774–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hammond, M. Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 2010, 53, 59–68. [Google Scholar]
- Chikandiwa, S.; Contogiannis, E.; Jembere, E. The Adoption of Social Media Marketing in South African Banks. European Business Review, 2013, 25, 365–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, W.; Yang, S.; Kim, H. Design of Sweepstakes-Based Social Media Marketing for Online Customer Engagement. Electronic Commerce Research. 2020, 20, 119–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kietzmann, J.; Hermkens, K.; Mccarthy, I. Social Media? Get Serious! Understanding the Functional Building Blocks of Social Media. Business Horizons, 2011, 54, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammadian, M.; Mohammadreza, M. Identify the Success Factors of Social Media. International Business & Management, 2012, 4, 23–25. [Google Scholar]
- Wawrowski, B.; Otola, I. Social Media Marketing in Creative Industries: How to Use Social Media Marketing to Promote Computer Games? information, 2020, 11, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hudson, S.; Huang, L.; Roth, M. The Influence of Social Media Interactions on Consumer–Brand Relationships: A Three-Country Study of Brand Perceptions and Marketing Behaviors. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2016, 33, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aaker, J. Dimensions of Brand Personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 1997, 34, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salminen, J.; Kaate, I.; Kamel, A.; Jung, S.; Jansen, B. How Does Personification Impact Ad Performance and Empathy? An Experiment with Online Advertising. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 2021, 37, 141–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nobile, T.; Kalbaska, N. An Exploration of Personalization in Digital Communication. Insights in Fashion. Proc. of the 22nd HCI International Conference (HCI), Copenhagen, Denmark, July 19-24, 2020, 456-473.
- Puzakova, M.; Kwak, H.; Rocereto, J. When Humanizing Brands Goes Wrong: the Detrimental Effect of Brand Anthropomorphization Amid Product Wrongdoings. Journal of Marketing, 2013, 77, 81–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar]
- Davis, F. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 1989, 13, 319–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cacioppo, J.; Petty, R. The Need for Cognition. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 2009, 42, 318–329. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, M.; Briñol, P.; Horcajo, J. The Effect of Need for Cognition on the Stability of Prejudiced Attitudes toward South American Immigrants. Psicothema, 2013, 25, 73–78. [Google Scholar]
- Kaur, H.; Paruthi, M.; Islam, J.; Hollebeek, L. The Role of Brand Community Identification and Reward on Consumer Brand Engagement and Brand Loyalty in Virtual Brand Communities. Telematics Informatics, 2020, 46, article 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Preece, J. Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and Measuring success. Behaviour & Information Technology, 2001, 20, 347–356. [Google Scholar]
- Li, S. Li, F. The Interaction Effects of Online Reviews and Free Samples on Consumers' Downloads: An Empirical Analysis. Information Processing & Management 2019, 56, 102071.
- Macinnis, D.; Moorman, C.; Jaworski, B. Enhancing and Measuring Consumers' Motivation, opportunity, and ability to process brand information from ads. Journal of Marketing, 1991, 55, 32–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeh, H.; Chang, T. Mining Customer Shopping Behavior: A Method Encoding Customer Purchase Decision Attitude. International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector. 2018, 10, 16–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayes, A.; Scharkow, M. The Relative Trustworthiness of Inferential Tests of the Indirect Effect in Statistical Mediation Analysis: Does Method Really Matter? Psychological Science, 2013, 24, 1918–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Milin, P.; Hadzic, O. Moderating and Mediating Variables in Psychological Research. International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science 2011, 849–852.
- Podsakoff, P.; Mackenzie, S.; Lee, J. Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88, 879–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aging, H. A Theory Based on Free Radical and Radiation Chemistry. Journal of Gerontol, 1956, 11, 298–300. [Google Scholar]
- Hajli, N. Social Commerce Constructs and Consumer's Intention to Buy. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2015, 35, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hajli, N.; Wang, Y.; Tajvidi, M.; Hajli, M. People, Technologies, and Organizations Interactions in a Social Commerce Era. IEEE Trans. Engineering Management, 2017, 64, 594–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tajvidi, M.; Wang, Y.; Hajli, N.; Love, P. Brand Value Co-Creation in Social Commerce: The Role of Interactivity, Social Support, and Relationship Quality. Comput. Hum. Behav.; 2021, 115, 105238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]


| PU | PIU | PIC | AT | PW | CN | |
| Perceived Usefulness (PU) |
0.843 | |||||
| Perceived Interaction (PIU) (User-User) |
0.161 | 0.825 | ||||
| Perceived Interaction (PIC) (User-Company) |
0.071 | 0.034 | 0.863 | |||
| Attitude (AT) |
0.191 | 0.245 | 0.226 | 0.763 | ||
| Purchase Intention (PW) |
0.231 | 0.256 | 0.198 | 0.278 | 0.769 | |
| Cognitive Need (CN) |
0.230 | 0.257 | 0.266 | 0.373 | 0.335 | 0.875 |
| Statistical test | χ2/df | SMRM | RMSEA | AGFI | NFI | RFI | CFI | IFI | PGFI | PNFI | PCFI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ideal Value | <2.00 | <0.08 | <0.05 | >0.80 | >0.90 | >0.90 | >0.90 | >0.90 | >0.50 | >0.50 | >0.50 |
| Acceptable Value | <3.00 | <0.1 | <0.08 | >0.70 | >0.80 | >0.80 | >0.80 | >0.80 | |||
| Our Value | 1.46 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.91 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.67 | 0.76 | 0.79 |
| Path | Effect | Bootstrapping(5000 samples) | Result | |||
| bias-corrected | percentile | |||||
| 95%CI | 95%CI | |||||
| lower | upper | lower | upper | |||
| PU→AT→PW | total | 0.170 | 0.452 | 0.170 | 0.450 | Exist |
| direct | 0.049 | 0.261 | 0.049 | 0.264 | Exist | |
| indirect | 0.019 | 0.318 | 0.010 | 0.311 | Exist | |
| PIU→AT→PW | total | 0.205 | 0.530 | 0.197 | 0.515 | Exist |
| direct | 0.014 | 0.250 | 0.001 | 0.237 | Exist | |
| indirect | 0.084 | 0.403 | 0.082 | 0.401 | Exist | |
| PIC→AT→PW | total | 0.194 | 0.494 | 0.197 | 0.496 | Exist |
| direct | 0.115 | 0.389 | 0.096 | 0.369 | Exist | |
| indirect | -0.059 | 0.268 | -0.044 | 0.285 | Not Exist | |
| Path | Conditional Indirect Effect | Moderated Mediating Effect | ||||||||
| Variable | Effect | Standard Error | Lower Bound | Upper Bound |
INDEX | Standard Error | Lower Bound | Upper Bound | ||
| PU→AT→PW | Low | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.003 | 0.150 | 0.064 | 0.03 | 0.024 | 0.127 | |
| High | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.045 | 0.218 | ||||||
| PIU→AT→PW | Low | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.022 | 0.150 | 0.013 | 0.04 | -0.069 | 0.011 | |
| High | 0.06 | 006 | 0.042 | 0.187 | ||||||
| PIC→AT→PW | Low | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.042 | 0.215 | 0.002 | 0.05 | -0.096 | 0.089 | |
| High | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.012 | 0.239 | ||||||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
