Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

The Width of f0(980) in Isospin-Violating Decays

Version 1 : Received: 14 May 2023 / Approved: 15 May 2023 / Online: 15 May 2023 (09:30:20 CEST)

How to cite: Liang, Y.; Yan, W.; Li, D. The Width of f0(980) in Isospin-Violating Decays. Preprints 2023, 2023051008. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202305.1008.v1 Liang, Y.; Yan, W.; Li, D. The Width of f0(980) in Isospin-Violating Decays. Preprints 2023, 2023051008. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202305.1008.v1

Abstract

The scalar meson f0(980) has been a long-standing puzzle in light hadron physics. The mass and width of the f0(980) in normal decay processes are estimated to be M=990±20 MeV/c2 and Γ=40−100 MeV, respectively. Theoretically, the internal structure of the f0(980) is proposed to be a conventional quark-antiquark meson, tetraquarks state, KK¯ molecule, or quark-antiquark gluon hybrid. So far, explanations about the nature of f0(980) have been controversial for a long time. Recently, anomalously narrow width f0(980) were observed by the BESIII experiment in five independent isospin-violating decay channels. Based on the experimental data, we performed a simultaneous fit to ππ invariant mass distributions, and the mass and width in isospin-violating decays are determined to be M=990.0±0.4 MeV/c2 and Γ=11.4±1.1 MeV, respectively. In addition, we use the parameterized Flatté formula to simultaneously fit the same ππ invariant mass distributions, the two coupling constants of gfππ and gfKK¯ are measured to be gfππ=0.46±0.03 and gfKK¯=1.24±0.32, respectively. According to the joint confidence regions of gfππ and gfKK¯, we conclude that the experimental data tend to support the KK¯ molecule model and the quark-antiquark (qq¯) model, but tend not to support the tetraquarks (q2q¯2) model and the quark-antiquark gluon (qq¯g) hybrid model.

Keywords

f0(980); isospin-violating; simultaneous fit; coupling constant

Subject

Physical Sciences, Particle and Field Physics

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.