Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Evaluation of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Development of Flowchart for BI-RADS Classification of Breast Lesions

Version 1 : Received: 3 May 2023 / Approved: 5 May 2023 / Online: 5 May 2023 (03:26:25 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Klarić, K.; Šribar, A.; Budisavljević, A.; Labinac, L.; Valković Zujić, P. Evaluation of Contrast-enhanced Mammography and Development of Flowchart for BI-RADS Classification of Breast Lesions. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 1958. Klarić, K.; Šribar, A.; Budisavljević, A.; Labinac, L.; Valković Zujić, P. Evaluation of Contrast-enhanced Mammography and Development of Flowchart for BI-RADS Classification of Breast Lesions. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 1958.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and compare breast lesions on CEM and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using 5 features. We propose to create a flowchart for BI-RADS classification of breast lesions on CEM based on the Kaiser score (KS) flowchart for breast MRI. Included were 68 subjects (women and men; median age 61.4 ± 11.6 years) who were suspected of having a malignant process in the breast based on digital mammography (MG) findings. The patients underwent breast ultrasound (US), CEM, MRI, and biopsy of the suspicious lesion. There were 47 patients with malignant lesions confirmed by biopsy and 21 patients with benign lesions, for each of which a KS was calculated. In the patients with malignant lesions, the MRI-derived KS was 9 (IQR 8-9), its CEM equivalent was 9 (IQR 8-9), and BI-RADS was 5 (IQR 4-5). In patients with benign lesions, MRI-derived KS was 3 (IQR 2-3), its CEM equivalent was 3 (IQR 1.7-5), and BI-RADS was 3 (IQR 0-4). There was no significant difference between the ROC-AUC of CEM and MRI (P=0.749). In conclusion, there were no significant differences in KS results between CEM and breast MRI. The KS flowchart is useful for evaluating breast lesions on CEM.

Keywords

breast cancer; contrast-enhanced mammography; magnetic resonance imaging

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Oncology and Oncogenics

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.