Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli Isolated From Children Under 5 Years With and Without Diarrhoea in Two Hospitals in Dschang, Cameroon

Submitted:

25 April 2023

Posted:

02 May 2023

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) mediating resistance in Enterobacterales is a global public health issue, especially in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) such as Cameroon. ESBL-producing Enterobacterales reduce therapeutic options and lead to the use of last resort drugs such as carbapenems even in vulnerable populations like children under five years. This study aims at determining the phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-Ec) isolated from children under five years with and without diarrhoea in two health care facilities in Dschang. A cross-sectional study was conducted from 3 February to 19 May 2022 in two hospitals in the city of Dschang, Cameroon. Stool collected were cultured on Eosine Methylen Blue (EMB) medium. Enterosystem 18 R kit was used for bacterial identification. Evaluation of the resistance patterns and detection of ESBL production were performed with, the Kirby Bauer disk diffusion method and CHROMagar® ESBL medium, respectively. The genomic DNA of ESBL-Ec was extracted using the boiling method and subjected to conventional and multiplex PCRs for detection of blaSHV, blaCTX-M and blaTEM genes. Data were entered into ExcelTM 2016. Epi info and R software were used for statistical analyses with a p-value <0.05 considered statistically significant. Out of the 125 children enrolled, 67.2% (84/125) were colonized by E. coli. Among these, 57.14% (48/84) were colonized by ESBL-Ec. ESBL- Ec isolates showed high levels of resistance to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (96.22%), cefotaxime (75.47%), ceftriaxone (73.58%), ofloxacin (67.92%), levofloxacin (56.6%) and ciprofloxacin (54.71%). Children aged between 1-3 years (47.62%, p=0.09) and those who had taken an antibiotic one week prior to collection (70.83%, p=0.04) had a higher prevalence of ESBL-Ec with statistical significance. The majority of ESBL-Ec isolates (52.83%; 28/53) were co-producers of blaCTX-M and blaTEM. Infection prevention and control measures coupled with antimicrobial stewardship strategies need to be strengthened to reduce emergence and dissemination of ESBL-Ec among this vulnerable population.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Diarrhoeal diseases are one of ten leading causes of death among children under five years, particularly in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) where inadequate water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) prevails (1-3). Foodborne diseases caused 600 million illnesses and 420,000 deaths globally in 2010 (4). Enterotoxigenic and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli were the leading bacteria involved in the largest number of cases and deaths, respectively (5, 6).
The emergence and escalation of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) is a major public health concern worldwide. ESBL-E including ESBL-producing E. coli (ESBL-Ec) exhibit resistance to third generation cephalosporins and also usually to several other antibiotic families such as aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones leading to the use of last resort drugs (2, 7, 8). ESBL-Ec has been incriminated in both nosocomial and community-acquired infections (5). Numerous studies focusing on faecal carriage revealed a high prevalence of ESBL-Ec in Nepal (74%) (8), Egypt (71%) (9) and Morocco (58%) (10) in community settings; while, lower rates were observed in hospitals in Gabon (12%) and Ethiopia (17%) (11, 12). A study performed in Cameroon reported a 54% prevalence of ESBL-E faecal carriage in participants including outpatients, inpatients and hospital workers (13).
However, there is limited comprehensive data on ESBL-Ec colonizing or causing diarrhoeal diseases in children under five in Cameroon. This study aimed at determining the prevalence, risk factors, phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of ESBL-Ec isolated from faecal samples of children with or without diarrhoea in two hospitals of Dschang, Cameroon.

2. Materials and Methods

1. Study population

Children under five years old with and without diarrhoea, attending the pediatric departments of two major hospitals, encoded for ethical consideration as H1 and H2, in the Western region of Cameroon were considered; during a four-month period (the 03rd February 2022 to 19th May 2022). H1 is a district hospital which receives an average of 300 children per year with about 20 cases of gastroenteritis per month. It is equipped with a biomedical analysis laboratory divided into three buildings and the hospital has 200 beds and provides care for more than 1,000 patients per year. The H2 which is a confessional hospital, receives an average of 30 children per month with about 5 children suffering from gastroenteritis. The hospital has 100 beds and provides care for more than 700 patients per year.
Recruitment and sample collection
The parent or legal guardian of any child that met the inclusion provided written informed consent and answered a questionnaire about the socio-demographics and clinical information of participants. Stool samples were collected in a sterile container after informed consent. Stool samples were cultured onto EMB agar and, incubated for 18-24 h at 37 °C in presence of oxygen. The growing colonies on EMB agar were analysed using biochemical tests through Enterosystem 18R as per the manufacturer instructions.

2. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and Screening Confirmation for ESBL

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method (14). A panel of nine antibiotics were tested including amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (30μg), ceftriaxone (30μg), cefotaxime (30μg), chloramphenicol (30μg), ciprofloxacin (30μg), levofloxacin (5μg), ofloxacin (5μg), tobramycin (10μg) and gentamicin (10μg). The different diameters of the inhibition zones were measured and interpreted as susceptible (S), intermediate (I) or resistant (R) according to the criteria defined by CA-SFM 2021 (14) (p. 38–47). In addition, two screening methods were used for ESBL detection namely the champagne cork or funnel shaped synergies using double discs (clavulanic acid and cefotaxime) and chromogenic media CHROMagar™ ESBL. E. coli ATCC 35218, K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603 and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were used as quality control strains for the antimicrobial susceptibility testing and ESBL screening.

3. Genomic DNA Extraction

The genomic DNA of ESBL-Ec was extracted using a modified boiling method as described previously (15). Briefly, one pure ESBL-Ec colony was suspended into 400 µL of Tris-EDTA (10mMTris, 0.1mMEDTA) and then vortexed for five seconds. The suspension was then incubated for 25 min at 95°C in a dry bath digital (MIULab DKT200-1, Lasec International Ltd., Johannesburg, South Africa). After incubation, the suspension was centrifuged for 5 min at 9500 rpm. The supernatant containing DNA (300µl) was subsequently transferred to a new Eppendorf tube and stored at –40°C for future analysis.

4. Conventional singleplex-Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

Amplification of blaSHV gene was performed by conventional PCR using a thermal cycler BIO-RAD T100 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Marnes-la-Coquette, France). The reaction took place in a 10 µL reaction mixture consisting of 5 µL of Dream Taq Green Polymerase Master Mix 2x (ThermoFisher Scientific™, Vilnius, Lithuana), 2.8 µL of nuclease-free water, 0.1 µL of each forward and reverse primer [10 µM] and 2 µL of DNA. The amplification steps were as follows: initial denaturation (95°C for 3 min), 30 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 4 s, annealing at 46.9°C for 45 s, elongation at 72°C for 60 s, and final elongation at 72°C for 5 min as previously described (16).

5. Conventional Multiplex-Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

The detection of blaCTX-M and blaTEM genes among ESBL-Ec isolates was performed by multiplex PCR method using a thermal cycler BIO-RAD T100 (Laboratoires Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France). The reaction was done in a 10 µL reaction mixture consisting of 5 µL of Dream Taq Green Polymerase Master Mix 2x (ThermoFisher Scientific™, Vilnius, Lithuana); 2.6 µL of nuclease-free water, 0.1 µL of each forward (CTX-Mu-F and TEM-F) and reverse (CTX-Mu-R and TEM-R) primers [50 µM] and 2 µL of DNA. Amplification steps were as follows: initial denaturation (95°C for 3 min), 30 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 4 s annealing at 46.9°C for 45s, elongation at 72°C for 60 s and final elongation at 72°C for 5 min. The annealing temperatures and primer sequences of primers are shown in Table 1.

6. Agarose electrophoresis gel and visualization

PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis analysis performed on an agarose gel of 1.5% (w/v) that was run at 90 V for 45 min along with a 100 bp molecular ladder (New England Biolabs, MA, USA). After electrophoresis, the gel was stained in an ethidium bromide solution (0.5 µg/mL) for 15 min and briefly unstained with water. PCR products were then visualized under UV light using a gel documentation system G-BOX Chemi-XL (Syngene, Cambridge, UK). E. coli ATCC 35218 (blaTEM), K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603 (blaSHV) and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 (blaCTX-M + blaTEM) were used as internal positive controls.
Ethical considerations of this research was approved by the Regional Ethics Committee for Research in Human Health, West, Cameroon (N° 2022/11/105/CE/CRERSH-OU/VP). Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the legal guardian/nearest relative of the participants.

7. Data management and analysis

Data analysis was performed using R software (version 4.1.0) and RStudio (version 2021.09.0). Proportions were compared using the Fischer exact test, chi square test and two-sample T-test as appropriate. A participant was considered positive to ESBL-Ec when at least one ESBL colony was detected. A participant was considered multidrug resistant when an E. coli isolate showed resistance to at least three antibiotics of three or more family of antibiotics with or without the presence of an ESBL phenotype. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Population characteristics

A total of 132 children were enrolled in the study and among these, 125 provided samples. Of the 125 children who provided sample, 85 were from H1 and 40 from H2. Seventy children (38 girls and 32 boys) reported having diarrhoea and 55 children (24 girls and 31 boys) had at least one other clinical sign than diarrhoea. The majority of children were aged between 1-3 years (42.4%, 53/125) and lived in an urban area (56.80%, 71/125; Table 2).

3.1.1. Pathogen recovery

Among the 125 children sampled, 67.2% (84/125) were colonized by E. coli. The prevalence of E. coli per hospitals, was higher in H1 (57.14%, 48/84) than in H2 (42.86%, 36/84) with high statistical significance (p=0.00005). Children without diarrhoea were more colonized by E. coli than those with diarrhoea with statistical significance (53.57% vs 46.43%, p=0.001). The overall prevalence of E. coli among children having diarrhoea associated with other clinical signs was 52% (65/125) while the prevalence of children having other clinical signs than diarrhoea was 44% (55/125) (p=0.006). Hand washing (p=0.25) was associated with E. coli colonization although without statistical significance. The socio-demographic characteristics associated with E. coli colonization are reported in Table 2.

3.1.2. Prevalence of ESBL-E. coli

Among the 84 children positive to E. coli, 57.14% (48/84) were colonized by ESBL-Ec. The prevalence of ESBL-Ec per hospitals, was higher in H1 than that of H2 although without statistical significance (60.42% vs 39.58%, p=0.24). Female were more positive than male with statistical significance (56.26 vs 43.75, p=0.02). The prevalence of ESBL-Ec among children with diarrhoea was lower than that of those without diarrhoea (41.67% vs 58.33%, p=0.16). A 70.83% prevalence of ESBL-Ec was observed among children having received an antibiotic with statistical significance (p=0.01). The socio-demographic characteristics associated with ESBL-Ec colonization are reported in Table 3.

3.2. Antibiotic resistance profile of ESBL- E. coli

Among the 84 children positive to E. coli, 6 were colonized by two isolates leading to a total of 90 E. coli isolates. Table 4 presents the resistance profile of ESBL-Ec and non ESBL- Ec to a panel of nine antibiotics. The majority of isolates were resistant to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (96.22%), followed by cefotaxime (75.47%), ceftriaxone (73.58%), ofloxacin (67.92%), levofloxacin (56.6%) and ciprofloxacin (54.71%). Tobramycin (35.84%), gentamicin (32%) and chloramphenicol (30.18%) displayed the lowest resistance although it was still above 30%.
Figure 1 presents the resistance profile of ESBL-E. coli per hospital to a panel of nine antibiotics. It appears that the majority of isolates from H1 were resistant to amoxicillin + clavulanic acid (60.38%), cefotaxime (49.06%), ceftriaxone (47.17%) and ofloxacin (45.28%). Likewise, in H2, the antibiotics that were mainly resistant were amoxicillin + clavulanic acid (35.87%), cefotaxime (27%) and ceftriaxone (27%) although with lower rates.

3.1.3. Multi-drug resistance and resistance patterns of ESBL-E. coli isolated from stool samples

A total of 24 different resistance patterns were observed among the ESBL-Ec isolates (Table 5). Our of the 53 ESBL-Ec isolates, 47.17% (n=25/53) isolates were concomitantly multi-drug resistant (MDR, resistance to at least one antibiotic of three or more families of antibiotics) and ESBL producers.

3.3. Genotypic resistance profiles

Figure 2 represents the detection of the different ß-lactamase genes (blaCTX-M, blaSHV, and blaTEM) after amplification and visualisation. Altogether, 52.83% (28/53) of ESBL-Ec isolates were co-producers of blaCTX-M and blaTEM, while 11.32% (6/53) harboured all three resistance genes (Figure 3).
ESBL-E. coli isolates carrying two resistance genes were more common in non-diarrhoeal stool samples (35%). The percent number of resistance genes detected in E. coli isolates from children with and without diarrhoea are reported in Figure 4.

4. Discussion

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence, risk factors, phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of ESBL-Ec isolated from children under five years with and without diarrhoea in two hospitals in the Western region of Cameroon.
Our study revealed a high prevalence of E. coli (72%) among children under five. This prevalence is consistent that study of Tola et al (2021), who reported an 84.4% prevalence of E. coli faecal carriage among children under five years in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (12). Of the 90 E. coli isolates detected in our study, 57.14% were ESBL producers. This is higher than that reported by Saka et al (2020) in a study conducted in the Kano area of Nigeria were 17.83 % of ESBL-Ec were detected in stools of female patients under five years of age (18). Our result is similar to a study conducted in Iran by Haghighatpanah et al (2016), where a prevalence 51.9% of ESBL-Ec was reported in clinical samples in the north of the country (19). These discrepancies may be explained by the regional geographic differences in the availability and consumption of antibiotics, in the implementation of programs conducted for surveillance, control measures and appropriate use of antibiotics.
Therapeutic options for the infections caused by the ESBL producers are becoming increasingly limited and; if available, expensive for patients living in LMICs. It was found that over 70% of all ESBL-Ec were resistant to third generation cephalosporins (cefotaxime and ceftriaxone). These results agree with previous studies in Burkina Faso (60%) (2) and in Nepal (100%) among patients attending Bir hospital (8). Furthermore, it was observed that resistance to fluoroquinolones in ESBL-Ec was high especially for ciprofloxacin with 54.71%. This is higher than that was previously reported in Yaoundé (2020) from in- and out-patients at three referral hospitals, where 36.6% of Enterobacterales were resistant to ciprofloxacin (20). In contrast, out finding agrees with a previous study conducted in Gabon (52,8%) where the risks factors for ESBL-Ec carriage were age under five years of age, hospitalization for above five days and a hospital stay during the past year (21). Numerous reports have already shown that in LMICs, community and hospitalized patients receive antibiotic treatment without antibiotic susceptibility testing, which contribute to the selective pressure on the microbiome (22). It is thus indispensable to implement antimicrobial stewardship and surveillance programs to curb the dissemination of antimicrobial resistance in Cameroon.
BlaCTX-M in combination with blaTEM was found in 52.83% of ESBL-E. coli, which is higher than that was detected in Iran among diarrheal children aged 0–60 months (42.1%) in 2014 (5). These results disagree with previous studies conducted in many countries including Egypt (89.04%) (23), United States (70%) (24), Nigeria (47%) (25) and Burkina Faso (7.14%) (2), where the blaCTX-M was the most represented ß-lactamase genes. Isolates with multiplex bla gene combinations and in particular those carrying blaCTX-M +blaTEM and blaCTX-M +blaTEM+blaSHV were resistant to a greater number of antibiotics from β-lactams and non ß-lactam antibiotics (>55% resistance). These results could be explained by the fact that ß-lactam genes can be carried by multi-drug resistant plasmids as described by Tawfick et al (2022) (6). The high level of MDR isolates observed could also be due to the excessive or inappropriate use of drugs in Dschang, where antibiotics are easily accessible over the counter without a prescription, the absence of legislation and limited infection prevention control measures favours the emergence of resistance.
Risk factors such as antibiotic use one prior sampling, age and gender, were common factors associated with ESBL-Ec infections in this study. Continuous and consistent adoption of hygienic practices and mass education through all available public and social media as well as regular hand washing are also important in the control of resistant infectious diseases especially in children under five (26). Strengthening epidemiological surveillance is also essential for better management of infections including diarrheal diseases among children.
Notwithstanding, the present study has some limitations. First, the limited sample size precludes any robust conclusion on the real burden of ESBL-Ec in children under five in the Western region of Cameroon. Second, the role of E. coli as causative agent of gastroenteritis among children could not be ascertained since its pathogenicity was not investigated. Third, children could not be followed up to assess the outcome of the disease. Finally, the selected healthcare structures were not of similar type (confessional vs public), hence the comparative results may not reflect the reality. Despite these limitations, the study adds significant data on the burden and molecular characteristics of ESBL-Ec circulating in a vulnerable population and a neglected region of the Cameroon.

5. Conclusions

The high prevalence of ESBL-Ec observed in children under five years in this study revealed the need to implement a real time surveillance of this important pathogen across vulnerable populations. Our study further pointed out some potential sources of transmission of these resistant bacteria among children under five years and highlighted the necessity for stringent infection prevention control measures to curb the dissemination of ESBL-Ec. Finally, it shows that it is imperative to implement antimicrobial stewardship guidelines in community as well as in hospital settings to contain antimicrobial resistance and mitigate its public health impact on children morbidity and mortality.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Raspail Carrel Founou, Donatien Gatsing, Lethicia Danaëlle Mafo Kamga; Formal analysis: Lethicia Danaëlle Mafo Kamga, Jessica Ravanola Zemtsa, Luria Leslie Founou; Funding acquisition: Raspail Carrel Founou; Luria Leslie Founou; Investigation : Lethicia Danaëlle Mafo Kamga ; Methodology: Lethicia Danaëlle Mafo Kamga, Jessica Ravanola Zemtsa, Brice Davy Dimani, Patrice, Landry Koudoum, Aurelia Djeumako Mbossi; Project administration : Luria Founou, Raspail Carrel Founou, Donatien Gatsing; Supervision : Raspail Carrel Founou, Diomede Noukeu, Flaurant Tchouangueu Thibau, Luria Leslie Founou, Noubom Michel, Donatien Gatsing; Writing – original draft: Lethicia Danaëlle Mafo Kamga; Writing – review & editing: Raspail Carrel Founou, Diomede Noukeu, Flaurant Tchouangueu Thibau, Luria Leslie Founou, Noubom Michel, Donatien Gatsing.

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data sets used during the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We would also like to thank all the parents who gave their consent for their children to participate in this study, as well as the staff of the various health facilities who helped with the recruitment of the study subjects.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bonkoungou, I.J.; Haukka, K.; Österblad, M.; Hakanen, A.J.; Traoré, A.S.; Barro, N.; et al. Bacterial and viral etiology of childhood diarrhea in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. BMC Pediatr. 2013, 13, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dembele, R.; Konate, A.; Traore, O.; Kabore, W.A.D.; Soulama, I.; Kagambega, A.; et al. Extended spectrum beta-lactamase and fluoroquinolone resistance genes among Escherichia coli and Salmonella isolates from children with diarrhea, Burkina Faso. BMC Pediatr. 2020, 20, 459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. WHO. The Top 10 Causes of Death. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2020. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death.
  4. Devleesschauwer, B.; Haagsma, A.; Mangen, J.; Lake, J.; Havelaar, H. The Global Burden of Foodborne Disease. Chapter 7; 2018; pp. 107–122. [Google Scholar]
  5. Khoshvaght, H.; Haghi, F.; Zeighami, H. Extended spectrum betalactamase producing Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli from young children in Iran. GHFBB. 2014, 7, 131–136. [Google Scholar]
  6. Tawfick, M.M.; Elshamy, A.A.; Mohamed, K.T.; El Menofy, N.G. Gut Commensal Escherichia coli, a High-Risk Reservoir of Transferable Plasmid-Mediated Antimicrobial Resistance Traits. Infect Drug Resist. 2022, 15, 1077–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Rehman, M.A.; Yin, X.; Lepp, D.; Laing, C.; Ziebell, K.; Talbot, G.; et al. Genomic Analysis of Third Generation Cephalosporin Resistant Escherichia coli from Dairy Cow Manure. Vet Sci. 2017, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Koirala, S.; Khadka, S.; Sapkota, S.; Sharma, S.; Khanal, S.; Thapa, A.; et al. Prevalence of CTX-M β-Lactamases Producing Multidrug Resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae among Patients Attending Bir Hospital, Nepal. BioMed Res Inter. 2021, 2021, 9958294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abdallah, H.M.; Alnaiemi, N.; Reuland, E.A.; Wintermans, B.B.; Koek, A.; Abdelwahab, A.M.; et al. Fecal carriage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase- and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Egyptian patients with community-onset gastrointestinal complaints: a hospital -based cross-sectional study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017, 6, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Arhoune, B.; Oumokhtar, B.; Hmami, F.; Barguigua, A.; Timinouni, M.; El Fakir, S.; et al. Rectal carriage of extended-spectrum β-lactamase- and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae among hospitalised neonates in a neonatal intensive care unit in Fez, Morocco. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2017, 8, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dikoumba, A.C.; Onanga, R.; Boundenga, L.; Bignoumba, M.; Ngoungou, E.B.; Godreuil, S. Prevalence and Characterization of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae in Major Hospitals in Gabon. Microbial Drug Resist. 2021, 27, 1525–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tola, M.A.; Abera, N.A.; Gebeyehu, Y.M.; Dinku, S.F.; Tullu, K.D. High prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae fecal carriage among children under five years in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. PloSone. 2021, 16, e0258117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Magoué, C.L.; Melin, P.; Gangoué-Piéboji, J.; Okomo Assoumou, M.C.; Boreux, R.; De Mol, P. Prevalence and spread of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Ngaoundere, Cameroon. CMI. 2013, 19, E416–E20. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Société Française de Microbiologie, C.E. Société Française de Microbiologie Ed: Paris, France, 2021; pp. 1–188.
  15. Zemtsa, R.J.; Noubom, M.; Founou, L.L.; Dimani, B.D.; Koudoum, P.L.; Mbossi, A.D.; et al. Multidrug-Resistant and Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL) - Producing Enterobacterales Isolated from Carriage Samples among HIV Infected Women in Yaoundé, Cameroon. Pathogens. 2022, 11, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Strauß, L.M.; Dahms, C.; Becker, K.; Kramer, A.; Kaase, M.; Mellmann, A. Development and evaluation of a novel universal β-lactamase gene subtyping assay for blaSHV, blaTEM and blaCTX-M using clinical and livestock-associated E. coli. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014, 70, 710–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Batchelor, M.; Hopkins, K.; Threlfall, E.; Clifton-Hadley, F.; Stallwood, A.; Davies, R.; et al. blaCTX-M genes in clinical Salmonella isolates recovered from humans in England and Wales from 1992 to 2003. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 1319–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Saka, H.K.; García-Soto, S.; Dabo, N.T.; Lopez-Chavarrias, V.; Muhammad, B.; Ugarte-Ruiz, M.; et al. Molecular detection of extended spectrum β-lactamase genes in Escherichia coli clinical isolates from diarrhoeic children in Kano, Nigeria. PloS one. 2020, 15, e0243130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Haghighatpanah, M.; Mozaffari Nejad, A.S.; Mojtahedi, A.; Amirmozafari, N.; Zeighami, H. Detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and plasmid-borne blaCTX-M and blaTEM genes among clinical strains of Escherichia coli isolated from patients in the north of Iran. J Glob antimicrob Resist. 2016, 7, 110–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mbamyah, E.E.L.; Toukam, M.; Assoumou, M.-C.O.; Smith, A.M.; Nkenfou, C.; Gonsu, H.K.; et al. Genotypic Diversity and Characterization of Quinolone Resistant Determinants from Enterobacteriaceae in Yaounde, Cameroon. OJMM. 2020, 10, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schaumburg, F.; Alabi, A.; Kokou, C.; Grobusch, M.P.; Köck, R.; Kaba, H.; et al. High burden of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Gabon. JAC. 2013, 68, 2140–2143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wencewicz, T.A. Crossroads of Antibiotic Resistance and Biosynthesis. J Molecular Biol. 2019, 431, 3370–3399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Abdallah, H.M.; Alnaiemi, N.; Reuland, E.A.; Wintermans, B.B.; Koek, A.; Abdelwahab, A.M.; et al. Fecal carriage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase- and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Egyptian patients with community-onset gastrointestinal complaints: a hospital -based cross-sectional study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017, 6, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Castanheira, M.; Simner, P.J.; Bradford, P.A. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases: an update on their characteristics, epidemiology and detection. JAC-Antimicrob Resist. 2021, 3, dlab092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Shitta, G.; Makanjuola, O.; Adefioye, O.; Olowe, O.A. Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase, blaTEM,blaSHV and blaCTX-M, Resistance Genes in Community and Healthcare Associated Gram Negative Bacteria from Osun State, Nigeria. Infect Disord Drug Targets. 2021, 21, 595–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Oli, A.N.; Akabueze, V.B.; Ezeudu, C.E.; Eleje, G.U.; Ejiofor, O.S.; Ezebialu, I.U.; et al. Bacteriology and Antibiogram of Urinary Tract Infection Among Female Patients in a Tertiary Health Facility in South Eastern Nigeria. J Open Microbiol. 2017, 11, 292–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Distribution of antibiotic resistance of ESBL-E. coli per Hospital. AMC: Amoxicillin/Clavulanic Acid, CTX: Cefotaxime, CTR: Ceftriaxone, CHL: Chloramphenicol, OFL: Ofloxacin, CIP: Ciprofloxacin, LEV: Levofloxacin, GEN: Gentamicin, TOB: Tobramycin.
Figure 1. Distribution of antibiotic resistance of ESBL-E. coli per Hospital. AMC: Amoxicillin/Clavulanic Acid, CTX: Cefotaxime, CTR: Ceftriaxone, CHL: Chloramphenicol, OFL: Ofloxacin, CIP: Ciprofloxacin, LEV: Levofloxacin, GEN: Gentamicin, TOB: Tobramycin.
Preprints 71841 g001
Figure 2. Agarose gel electrophoresis of amplified bla genes (blaCTX-M, blaSHV, and blaTEM) from seven (07) ESBL-E. coli isolated from stool among children five years. L: 100bp molecular weight marker, CP1: Positive control blaCTX-M, CP2: Positive control blaTEM (E. coli ATCC 35218), CP3: Positive control blaSHV (K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603), CP4: Positive control blaCTX-M and blaTEM (P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853), CN: Negative control (sterile water).
Figure 2. Agarose gel electrophoresis of amplified bla genes (blaCTX-M, blaSHV, and blaTEM) from seven (07) ESBL-E. coli isolated from stool among children five years. L: 100bp molecular weight marker, CP1: Positive control blaCTX-M, CP2: Positive control blaTEM (E. coli ATCC 35218), CP3: Positive control blaSHV (K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603), CP4: Positive control blaCTX-M and blaTEM (P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853), CN: Negative control (sterile water).
Preprints 71841 g002
Figure 3. Distribution of ESBL genes in ESBL-E. coli isolates.
Figure 3. Distribution of ESBL genes in ESBL-E. coli isolates.
Preprints 71841 g003
Figure 4. Association of blaCTX-M, blaTEM and blaSHV in faecal samples from children with and without diarrhoea.
Figure 4. Association of blaCTX-M, blaTEM and blaSHV in faecal samples from children with and without diarrhoea.
Preprints 71841 g004
Table 1. Characteristics of PCR primers.
Table 1. Characteristics of PCR primers.
Targeted gene Primer Name Sequence (5’-3’) Amplicon Size (bp) Annealing
Temperatures
References
TEM TEM-F
TEM-R
CATTTCCGTGTCGCCCTTATTC
CCAATGCTTAATCAGTGAGGC
846 pb 46.9°C (16) (p. 712)
CTX-M CTX-MU F
CTX-MU R
CGATGTGCAGTACCAGTAA
TTAGTGACCAGAATCAGCGG
585 pb 46.9°C (17) (p. 1319)
SHV SHV-F
SHV-R
AGCCGCTTGAGCAAATTAAAC
GTTGCCAGTGCTCGATCAGC
786 pb 46.9°C (16) (p. 29)
Table 2. Sociodemographic characteristics and clinical symptoms of study participants associated with E. coli status.
Table 2. Sociodemographic characteristics and clinical symptoms of study participants associated with E. coli status.
Variables Total n (%) Positive E. coli
n (%)
Negative
E. coli
n (%)
p-value
Overall 125 (100) 84(67.2) 41 (32.8)
Gender Male 63 (50.4) 45 (57.53) 18 (43.9) 0.15
Female 62 (49.6) 39 (46.43) 23 (56.1)
Age ˂ 1 year 50 (40) 28 (33.33) 22 (53.66) 0.09
1 – 3 years 53 (42.4) 40 (47.62) 13 (31.71)
3 -5 years 22 (17.6) 16 (19.05) 6 (14.63)
Residence Rural area 54 (43.20) 36 (42.86) 18 (43.9) 0.45
Urban area 71 (56.80) 48 (57.14) 23 (56.1)
Child's education level Kindergarten 18 (13.6) 13 (15.48) 5 (12.2)
0.77
Pre-nursery 6 (4.8) 3 (3.57) 3 (7.32)
Nursery 18 (14.4) 13 (15.48) 5 (9.76)
Primary 7 (5.6) 5 (5.95) 2 (4.88)
Not applicable* 77 (61.6) 50 (59.52) 27 (65.85)
Monthly income of parents (XAF) ˂ 38500 69 (55.2) 42 (50) 27 (65.85) 0.38
38500-100.000 31 ((24.8) 23 (27.38) 8 (19.51)
100.000- 250.000 19 (15.2) 14 (16.67) 5 (12.2)
˃250.000 6 (4.8) 5 (5.95) 1 (2.44)
Marital status of parents Single 30 (24) 19 (22.62) 11 (26.83)
0.3
Married 95 (76) 65 (77.38) 30 (73.17)
Hospital H1 85 (68) 48 (57.14) 37 (90.24)
0.00005
H2 40 (32) 36 (42.86) 4 (9.76)
Food consumptionhabits
Yogourt Yes 83 (66.4) 56 (66.67) 27 (65.85)
0.46
No 42 (33.6) 28 (33.33) 14 (34.15)
Eggs Yes 93 (74.4) 65 (77.38) 28 (68.29)
0.14
No 32 (25.6) 19 (22.62) 13 (31.71)
Porridge Yes 89 (71.2) 57 (67.86) 32 (78.05)
0.12
No 36 (28.8) 27 (32.14) 9 (21.95)
Natural Fruit Juice Yes 100 (80) 66 (78.57) 34 (82.93)
0.29
No 25 (20) 18 (21.43) 7 (17.07)
Artificial juice Yes 59 (47.2) 41 (48.81) 18 (43.9)
0.3
No 66 (52.8) 43 (51.19) 23 (56.1)
Breast milk Yes 53 (42.4) 34 (40.48) 19 (46.34)
0.26
No 72 (57.6) 50 (59.52) 22 (54.66)
Artificial milk Yes 79 (63.2) 55 (65.48) 24 (58.54)
0.22
No 46 (36.8) 29 (34.52) 17 (41.46)
Hygienic measures
Disposable nappies Yes 86 (68.8) 56 (66.67) 30 (73.17) 0.23
No 39 (31.2) 28 (33.33) 11 (26.83)
Hand washing of parents Yes 93 (74.4) 64 (76.19) 29 (70.73) 0.25
No 32 (25.6) 20 (23.81) 12 (29.27)
Type of consumed water Mineral 70 (56) 45 (53.57) 25 (60.98) 0.25
Tap 15 (12) 11 (13.1) 4 (9.76)
Drilling 28 (22.4) 21 (25) 7 (17.07)
Source 12 (9.6) 7 (8.33) 5 (12.2)
Cut finger nail (parents) Yes 93 (74.4) 63 (75) 30 (73.17) 0.41
No 32 (25.6) 21 (25) 11 (26.83)
Clinical status
Diarrhoea Yes 70 (56) 39 (46.43) 31 (75.61)
0.001
No 55 (44) 45 (53.57) 10 (24.39)
Symptoms Diarrhoea with others 65 (52) 36 (42.86) 29 (70.73)
0.006
Only diarrhoea 5 (4) 3 (3.57) 2 (4.88)
Other clinical signs without diarrhoea
55 (44)

45 (53.57)

10 (24.39)
Antibiotic Yes 76 (60.8) 51 (60.71) 25 (60.98)
0.49
No 49 (39.2) 33 (39.29) 16 (39.02)
* Not applicable represents out-of-school children.
Table 3. Sociodemographic characteristics and clinical symptoms of study participants associated with ESBL-E. coli status.
Table 3. Sociodemographic characteristics and clinical symptoms of study participants associated with ESBL-E. coli status.
Variables Total n (%) ESBL-Ec positive
n (%)
EBSL-Ec negative
n (%)
p-value
Overall 84 (100) 48 (57.14) 36 (42.85) 0.00
Gender Male 45 (53.57) 21 (43.75) 24 (66.67) 0.02
Female 39 (46.43) 27 (56.25) 12 (33.33)
Age ˂ 1 year 28 (33.33) 14 (29.17) 14 (38.89) 0.63
1 – 3 years 40 (47.62) 24 (50) 16 (44.44)
3 -5 years 16 (19.05) 10 (20.83) 6 (16.67)
Residence Rural area 36 (42.85) 22 (45.83) 14 (38.89) 0.26
Urban area 48 (57.14) 26 (54.17) 22 (61.11)
Child's education level Kindergarten 13 (15.48) 7 (15.4) 6 (16.67) 0.98
Pre-nursery 3 (3.57) 3 (3.57) 1 (2.78)
Nursery 13 (15.48) 13 (15.48) 5 (13.89)
Primary 5 (5.95) 5 (5.95) 2 (5.56)
Not applicable* 50 (59.52) 50 (59.52) 22 (61.11)
Monthly income of parents (XAF) ˂ 38500 42 (50) 19 (39.58) 23 (63.89) 0.10
38500-100.000 23 (27.38) 17 (35.42) 6 (16.67)
100.000- 250.000 14 (16.67) 8 (16.67) 6 (16.67)
˃250.000 5 (5.95) 4 (8.33) 1 (2.78)
Marital status of parents Single 19 (22.62) 9 (18.75) 10 (27.78)
0.17
Married 65 (77.38) 39 (81.25) 26 (72.22)
Hospital H1 48 (57.14) 29 (60.42) 19 (52.78)
0.24
H2 36 (42.86) 19 (39.58) 17 (47.22)
Food consumption habits
Yogourt Yes 56 (66.67) 32 (66.67) 24 (66.67)
0.49
No 28 (33.33) 16 (33.33) 12 (33.33)
Porridge Yes 57 (67.86) 34 (70.83) 23 (63.89)
0.25
No 27 (32.14) 14 (29.17) 13 (36.11)
Eggs Yes 65 (77.38) 38 (79.17) 27 (75)
0.32
No 19 (22.62) 10 (20.83) 9 (25)
Natural Fruit Juice Yes 66 (78.57) 39 (81.25) 27 (75)
0.25
No 18 (21.53) 9 (9.75) 9 (25)
Artificial juice Yes 41 (48.81) 22 (45.83) 19 (52.78)
0.26
No 43 (51.19) 26 (54.17) 17 (47.22)
Breast milk Yes 34 (40.48) 21 (56.25) 13 (36.11)
0.24
No 50 (59.52) 27 (43.75) 23 (63.89)
Artificial milk Yes 55 (65.48) 29 (60.42) 26 (72.22)
0.13
No 29 (34.52) 19 (39.58) 10 (27.78)
Hygienic measures
Disposable nappies Yes 56 (66.67) 35 (72.92) 21 (58.33) 0.08
No 28 (33.33) 13 (27.08) 15 (41.67)
Hand washing Yes 64 (76.19) 35 (72.92) 29 (80.56) 0.21
No 20 (23.81) 13 (27.08) 7 (19.44)
Type of consumed water Mineral 39 (46.43) 21 (43.75) 18 (50) 0.72
Tap 11 (13.10) 7 (14.58) 4 (11.11)
Drilling 27 (32.14) 15 (31.25) 12 (33.33)
Source 7 (8.33) 5 (10.42) 2 (5.56)
Clinical status
Diarrhoea Yes 39 (46.43) 20 (41.67) 19 (52.78)
0.16
No 45 (53.57) 28 (58.33) 17 (47.22)
Symptoms Diarrhoea with others 36 (42.86) 18 (37.5) 18 (50)
0.51
Only diarrhoea 3 (3.57) 2 (4.17) 1 (2.78)
Other clinical signs without diarrhoea 45 (53.57) 28 (58.33) 17 (47.22)
Antibiotic Yes 51 (60.71) 34 (70.83) 17 (47.22)
0.01
No 33 (39.29) 14 (29.17) 19 (52.78)
*Not applicable represents out-of-school children.
Table 4. Distribution of antibiotic resistance among all ESBL-E. coli and non-ESBL-Ec isolated from stools.
Table 4. Distribution of antibiotic resistance among all ESBL-E. coli and non-ESBL-Ec isolated from stools.

Antimicrobial Agents

Overall
N=90, n(%)
Resistance, n (%)
ESBL-Ec
(n=53)
Non-ESBL-Ec
(n=37)
Amoxicillin/Clavulanic Acid 87 (96.66) 51 (96.22) 36 (97.29)
Cefotaxime 47 (52.22) 40 (75.47) 7 (18.91)
Ceftriaxone 47 (52.22) 39 (73.58) 8 (21.62)
Chloramphenicol 30 (34.48) 16 (30.18) 14 (37.83)
Ofloxacin 53 (58.88) 36 (67.92) 17 (45.94)
Ciprofloxacin 36 (40) 29 (54.71) 7 (18.91)
Levofloxacin 40 (44.44) 30 (56.6) 10 (33.33)
Gentamicin 27 (30) 17 (32.07) 10 (33.33)
Tobramycin 34 (37.77) 19 (35.84) 15 (40.54)
Table 5. Resistance patterns of ESBL-E. coli resistant to three or more antibiotics.
Table 5. Resistance patterns of ESBL-E. coli resistant to three or more antibiotics.
Resistance patterns Number of Antibiotics Number of family
of Antibiotics
Number of
Isolates (%)
AMC-CHL-OFL 3

3
1 (4.16)
AMC-OFL-CIP-GEN-TOB 5 1 (4.16)
AMC-CTX-CTR-CHL-OFL-LEV 6
2 (8.33)
AMC-CTX-CTR-OFL-GEN-TOB 1 (4.16)
AMC-CTX-CTR-OFL-CIP-LEV-GEN
7
1 (4.16)
AMC-CTX-CTR-CHL-CIP-OFL-LEV 2 (8.33)
AMC-CTX-CTR-OFL-CIP-LEV-TOB 3 (12.5)
AMC-CTX-CTR-OFL-CIP-LEV-GEN-TOB 8 4 (16.66)
AMC-CHL-OFL-GEN 4
4
1 (4.16)
AMC-CTX-CHL-CIP-OFL-LEV-TOB 7 2 (8.33)
AMC-CTX-CTR-CHL-OFL-GEN-TOB 1 (4.16)
AMC-CTX-CTR-CHL-OFL-LEV-GEN->TOB
8
1 (4.16)
AMC-CTX-CTR-CHL-OFL-CIP-LEV-TOB 2 (8.33)
AMC-CTX-CTR-CHL-OFL-CIP-LEV-GEN 1 (4.16)
AMC-CTX-CTR-CHL-OFL-CIP-LEV-GEN-TOB 9 2 (8.33)
TOTAL 25 (100)
AMC: Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, CTX: Cefotaxime, CTR: Ceftriaxone, TOB: Tobramycin, GEN: Gentamicin, CHL: Chloramphenicol, LEV: Levofloxacin, OFL: Ofloxacin; CIP: Ciprofloxacin.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated