Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Analyzing the Time Spectrum of Supernova Neutrinos to Constrain Their Effective Mass or Lorentz Invariance Violation

These authors contributed equally to this work.
Version 1 : Received: 27 April 2023 / Approved: 28 April 2023 / Online: 28 April 2023 (04:31:14 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Moura, C.A.; Quintino, L.; Rossi-Torres, F. Analyzing the Time Spectrum of Supernova Neutrinos to Constrain Their Effective Mass or Lorentz Invariance Violation. Universe 2023, 9, 259. Moura, C.A.; Quintino, L.; Rossi-Torres, F. Analyzing the Time Spectrum of Supernova Neutrinos to Constrain Their Effective Mass or Lorentz Invariance Violation. Universe 2023, 9, 259.

Abstract

We analyze the expected arrival time spectrum of supernova neutrinos using simulated luminosity and computing the expected number of events in future detectors such as the DUNE Far Detector and Hyper-Kamiokande. We develop a general method using minimum square statistics that can compute the sensitivity to any variable affecting neutrino time of flight. We apply this method in two different situations: First, we compare the time spectrum changes due to different neutrino mass values to put limits in electron (anti)neutrino effective mass. Second, we constrain Lorentz Invariance Violation through the mass scale, MQG, at which it would occur. We consider two main neutrino detection techniques: 1. DUNE-like liquid argon TPC, for which the main detection channel is νe+40Ar→e−+40K*, related to the supernova neutronization burst, and 2. HyperK-like water Cherenkov detector, for which ν¯e+p→e++n is the main detection channel. We consider a fixed supernova distance of 10 kpc and two different masses of the progenitor star: (i) 15 M⊙ with neutrino emission time up to 0.3 s and (ii) 11.2 M⊙ with neutrino emission time up to 10 s. The best mass limits at 3σ are of O(1) eV. For νe, the best limit comes from a DUNE-like detector if the mass ordering happens to be inverted. For ν¯e, the best limit comes from a HyperK-like detector. The best limit for the Lorentz Invariance Violation mass scale at 3σ level, considering superluminal or subluminal effect, is MQG≳1013 GeV (MQG≳5×105 GeV) for linear (quadratic) energy dependence.

Keywords

neutrino; supernova; Lorentz Invariance violation; mass

Subject

Physical Sciences, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.