Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Comparing Different Creative Process Measurement Techniques within a Self-regulated Learning Framework to Enhance the Sustainability of Arts Education Progress

Version 1 : Received: 26 April 2023 / Approved: 26 April 2023 / Online: 26 April 2023 (15:26:12 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Wang, C.; Zhang, X.; Pan, Y. Enhancing Sustainable Arts Education: Comparative Analysis of Creative Process Measurement Techniques. Sustainability 2023, 15, 9078. Wang, C.; Zhang, X.; Pan, Y. Enhancing Sustainable Arts Education: Comparative Analysis of Creative Process Measurement Techniques. Sustainability 2023, 15, 9078.

Abstract

Abstract: Self-regulated Learning has become one of educational psychology's most critical research areas. Contemporary research indicates that student creativity is crucial to the success of arts education. However, there is limited research on creativity in arts education in Self-regulated Learning. Therefore, this study aims to define the creativity characteristics that determine the quality of students’ work. This study implemented a creative competition in painting and composition for first-year undergraduates. It evaluated the characteristics of creativity during the three main phases of the task: planning, execution, and completion. We discovered through semi-open questionnaires (n=178),and using the content analysis method. According to the competition results, the students with the highest scores in Flow, Inspiration, and Idea Generation in the Performance phase had the best quality work. In the Forethought phase, Analogical Thinking and Idea Generation worked best for most students, while in the Performance phase, Flow Sense, Idea Generation, and Idea Manipulation worked best.Data on creativity characteristics at different work phases and final quality might adequately guide and organize educational procedures. These findings can serve as a theoretical foundation for quantifying the creativity phase in Self-regulated Learning and offer arts educators a reference for creativity instruction.

Keywords

creativity; three-phase SRL model; think-aloud; arts education; education quality; work quality.

Subject

Social Sciences, Education

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.